Monday 25 April 2022

Wealdstone Brook campaigners call on Barry Gardiner MP to pressure agencies for urgent action to solve the pollution problem

 

Alicia Close on April 1st 2022

With frustration mounting over the lack of action by the appropriate agencies over toxic sewage contamination in the Wealdstone Brook a call has been made to Brent North MP  Barry Gardiner for support.


Dear Mr Gardiner,

We support all parks groups in Brent as part of the London and National Friends of Parks organisations.  We are supported by Mayoral funded Parks for London who advise and train London Councils and parks departments.  

We have joined the Brent and Harrow Rivers Alliance which was formed out of Harrow Parks biodiversity management groups and Brent Friends of Wealdstone Brook and Friends of Woodcock Park. 

We all call upon you to support the need for action from the Environment Agency, Thames Water and Brent Council to rectify this consistent river pollution issue that is in its 10th week and getting worse due to lack of causation tracking in a logical manner, based upon previous incidents at this time of the year (last year).   The Thames Water officer in charge is new and has been finding some difficulty in coordinating action, unlike previous years. There seemed to be a lack of staff, willingness to fund solutions and the result is more funds are now needed to reach a solution that returns the Brook to at least what is was 11 weeks ago.
 
Yours sincerely,
 
Brent Parks Forum 
 

Saturday 23 April 2022

How many people know about the big (very tall) changes ahead for this corner of Tokyngton ward? WEM Tower residents in revolt

 

Wembley Point redeveloped into small apartments

Let's face it, you can't really miss Wembley Point on the North Circular Road - in fact it is right in your face. For years disused and under-used it has been converted into c400 small housing units.

It was sold to the Canda Israel Group for £43 in 2018 on behalf of off-shore clients of Bravo Investment Homes. Crucially the sale included overage, a payment to be made to the original land owner in the event that a valuable planning permission is granted. The payment will usually be a percentage of the difference between the market value of the land with the benefit of planning permission and without it.

Canada Israel, controlled by Barak Rosen and Assaf Tuchmeir (their private company, not to be confused with public company Israel Canada) has done its first deal in the UK. The company has purchased an office tower in the north-west London suburb of Wembley which it intends to convert to a residential tower at a total investment of £100 million. Canada Israel is paying £45 million for the property, and plans to build under an existing permit ("Permitted Development Rights") 440 small apartments (averaging 40 square meters) for an additional £55 million. Canada Israel plans to sell the apartments - studio and two-room apartments, for which there is high demand - for an average of about £300,000, and expects total sales proceeds of £130-150 million.
The existing office tower, with 20,000 square meters of built space, was bought as part of a 2.5 acre site for which Canada Israel plans to obtain residential planning rights to build 30,000 square meters. The property is adjacent to the Stonebridge Park Underground station, about twenty minutes journey time from central London, and is within walking distance of Wembley Stadium. LINK

Crucially the sale included overage, a payment to be made to the original land owner in the event that an additional  valuable planning permission is granted. for the site. The payment will usually be a percentage of the difference between the market value of the land with the benefit of planning permission and without it.

That additional planning permission is now being sought from Brent Council and would result in this transformation of the site: 

Impression of 'Stonebridge Place'

You will note that Wembley Point itself would be over-shadowed by an even taller block (32 storeys). The River Brent flows in front of it (now largely covered by a concrete platform) and the greenery to the left of the picture is the Wembley Brook which joins the River Brent somewhere beneath the concrete. The surburban housing and shops on the Harrow Road near the junction with the North Circular would also be over-shadowed.

Europe Real Estate LINK reported in March:

Canada Israel and Avanton have submitted a planning application to the London Borough of Brent for the regeneration of the 2.5-acre (1.26 hectare) Wembley Point site on Harrow Road to create a residential-led development known as Stonebridge Place with a GDV value of up to €297.6m (£250m) providing 515 new homes of mixed tenure, 1,200ft² of commercial space, new boxing gym with public café, landscaped gardens, pedestrian boulevards and new water features.

The Stonebridge Place proposals will deliver significant public realm improvements including a civic square, green pedestrian boulevard, children’s play spaces and resident’s gardens at ground and podium levels. The proposed new homes will be an addition to the already completed WEM Tower London, with its 439 new homes and fantastic amenities. Of the 515 new homes, 341 will be for market sale, with 35% allocated for affordable housing comprised of 57 shared ownership and 117 affordable rent homes.

Located to the south of Wembley Park and National Stadium, adjacent to Stonebridge Park Station (Bakerloo Underground Line), the new Stonebridge Place project will provide three striking new buildings. The first building is a 32 storey focal triangular tower with glass and green terracotta façade providing 266 one, two and three-bedroom market sale apartments over a new double-height residential lobby, complete with flexible commercial space.

The second stepped building, rising from 10 to 20 storeys, will have a glass and beige brick façade with balconies providing 249 mixed-tenure homes and flexible commercial space, with a large podium garden at the first-floor level. The partners will be building Stonebridge Boxing Club, an important local sports-led charity, a new facility. This will be located in the third new building on site which will be three storeys high providing a new boxing gym and public café with glass and bronzed-black terracotta façade.

The project’s significant public realm improvements include a new civic square, for food markets, a new Wembley outdoor Film Festival and Art & Antiques Market. Running through the site will be Stonebridge Place, a new green pedestrianised route linking the various buildings and landscaped areas.

Gil Selzer, Managing Director of Canada Israel UK said: “This proposed residential-led development at Wembley Point is a major urban regeneration project that will create a new destination for South Wembley. Stonebridge Place marks the next step in Canada Israel’s international expansion plans and building a strong real estate presence in the London property market.”

Omer Weinberger, CEO of Avanton commented: “Avanton are delighted to be partnering with international property company Canada Israel on this major urban regeneration scheme in Wembley which will provide market sale, BTR (Build to Rent) and social housing provision.”


Current residents of Wembley Point  (now marketed as WEM Tower) are not happy - in fact they feel misled and cheated by Canada Israel:

These are extracts from a typical comment on the Brent Planning website:

I am a new resident/tenant in the WEM Tower building and I am one of the many first ever tenants to reside in the WEM Tower building.
 

The owners and management of the premises did not and still do not disclose to potential new tenants/residents in the WEM Tower building about the proposed planning works that have been applied for permission to the Brent council during the viewings or at any point in time throughout the process of signing a contract or rental tenancy agreement with them!

This information is purposefully kept discreet and un-disclosed to all of new tenants/residents in the WEM Tower building! This is a very intentional act and behaviour of the management company and the owners and landlords of the flats in the WEM Tower building.

The entire grounds surrounding the outdoor premises of the WEM Tower building being the car park area will be subject to construction/maintenance/building work on the premises surrounding the WEM Tower building in which our flats are located/situated where we have been locked into 6-18 months rental tenancy agreement contacts!

If the planning for this project is authorised for a go ahead .. it will be extremely hazardous and injurious to our health and safety as residents residing in the WEM Tower building because we will all be surrounded by the on going construction all around the WEM Tower building premises! This is clearly unhealthy for us residents!

It is completely unfair for the management/landlords to expect us to live on a construction site! Either they decide to terminate our rental tenancy agreements of permission is granted to them for this project! Because the management/owners/landlords of the flats in WEM Tower building have not and did not disclose this information about the further construction on the premises, it was information that was kept discreet, un-disclosed concealed and withheld from us new tenants/residents currently residing within the flats in the WEM Tower building!

Please Brent Council, I am writing this appeal/objection on behalf of all several other current new residents/tenants in this building who are unhappy and dissatisfied for this project to go ahead or be given permission to go ahead!

We would like to suggest that if permission is given for this project than construction can only begin if all of us residents are evacuated from this WEM Tower building and released from our long term rental tenancy agreements! As our health and safety is at risk of construction is deemed to occur in the foreseeable future and if permission is given for this project.

Please Brent Council take this objection and appeal in serious consideration from all of us current new tenants/residents.

There are three pages of comments, mainly from WEM Tower residents and just one supporting the planning application:

I do not object to the proposal to continue to develop the Wembley Point site. The developer's plans to fully develop the land have been clear since they purchased the land. I trust that my rights as a tenant will not be infringed upon. To date, I have received prompt and helpful replies to all my emails to the Property Managers at Home-Made (who are responsible for WEM Tower), and I have no reason to believe at this time that Home-Made and/or Canada-Israel will act in a manner which is inappropriate to tenants. If the nature of this relationship changes, I have the right to complain to Home-Made and Canada-Israel as appropriate and/or report any unlawful or unethical practices to the Property Ombudsman or other relevant regulatory body. However, I have no reason at this time to expect to complain either to Home-Made and/or Canada-Israel, nor to the Property Ombudsman or relevant regulatory body.


My understanding of the proposal is such that I believe that no significant alteration will be made to the fabric of the building in which I live, that building being WEM Tower. My understanding is that the only building works which will happen at WEM Tower itself are those which are necessary for maintenance purposes (e.g. such works as would be expected by a landlord so as to fulfil their duties to tenant(s)). Therefore, I do not believe that the development of the disused car park will affect my safety or compromise my right to quiet enjoyment of the property I rent. Construction work is subject to time restrictions so as to avoid excessive discomfort to those nearby, and acoustic insulation boards can be used to minimise noise during the works. I reserve the right to complain to Home-Made (the Property Manager) and/or Canada-Israel (the Landlord) if my quiet enjoyment of the property or any other contractual or legal right is compromised for whatever reason and I am further empowered to complain to the Property Ombudsman or other relevant regulatory body if my initial complaint is handled inappropriately.


As far as I am aware, tenants have not been advised that the carpark which is currently present at the site is available for long-term use. Neither the WEM Tower website nor the WEM Tower resident app advertise parking. Indeed, the resident app stipulates that cars cannot park on the site other than for checking-in purposes and for deliveries. In my experience, both the Developer and Property Manager have been fair and flexible regarding the use of the car park, as I was allowed to park for free whilst I sold my car. Cars are inappropriate for London; I have replaced my car with a small electric moped, and I also own a bicycle, and it is my understanding that these greener modes of transportation are unaffected by the absence of car parking. I firmly believe that the Wembley Point development should be car-free, with the exemption of blue badge holders. I am a car enthusiast, but I am sentient to the negative environmental impact of car use in London and beyond and the issue of congestion, which cannot be resolved through the acquisition of an electric car (as cars are larger vehicles). It is my opinion that residents at this development should be encouraged to use (preferably electric) mopeds/motorcycles, as well as bicycles, when they are not using public transport. This would further reduce the potentially negative impact of increased population to other residents in the area and would encourage residents to make environmentally-conscious decisions. Those who need cars should hire them occasionally, and I understand that Zipcar will soon be available direct from this development. This meets my needs perfectly, and likely the needs of most or all other residents. There are a small number of cars currently parked at the development, but I have only seen one of these move and that was only on one single occasion. I am not omniscient, but my perspective is that current residents do not desperately need access to personal cars.


I believe the development of this land will have a positive impact on the area. Firstly, the property I rent at present is very well-presented; it is nicely equipped and thoughtfully designed. I have lived in both social and private rental properties my entire life, and my flat at WEM Tower is definitively the nicest, most well-equipped property I have ever occupied. The property is furnished to a higher standard than I have come to expect from a private landlord, and certainly to higher standard than any property I have ever rented or viewed, not only in London but nationwide. It is a shame that the approach taken by this developer is not used more widely, particularly by Local Authorities which ought to work more effectively to tackle the nationwide housing crisis, and should build genuinely comfortable homes for all. I grew up on a council estate, and I only wish that it had been half as nice as WEM Tower, as our standard of living would have been so much higher than it was. If WEM Tower is anything to go by, I firmly believe that the developer should be encouraged to improve run-down, disused, or poorly-developed land in Brent and beyond. They are succeeding here at Wembley Point, and I am in favour of good quality housing for all. Perhaps Brent Council could buy a few properties from the developer when they are completed?

The Wembley Towers development proposal will create jobs in the construction and hospitality sectors, both of which were hit hard by the pandemic. The staff working at WEM Tower, from the cleaners to the concierge, baristas to security guards, are fantastic. It is great to see jobs being created in Brent, and staff seem likely to be able to move onto other roles in their sector should they wish, as they are all excellent at what they do. The development, when complete, will also improve the lives of residents in the Wembley Towers; residents will be able to use both Brent River Park and the landscaped gardens at Wembley Towers, plus the health and well-being facilities which are intended.

I do not believe that the development of the carpark will infringe on my contractual and legal rights as a tenant of WEM Tower, and I understand what actions are necessary on my part should any of my rights be infringed upon for whatever reason. I plan to remain a long-term tenant of the development subject to my needs and I am enthused by the prospect of increased choice to properties on the development, and may indeed wish to migrate to another tower should it better suit my needs. I believe, based on the fairness and transparency exhibited to date, that the Landlord would consider a rent cap (that is, no increase to rent beyond the existing contractual period for the duration of another contract) should this prove appropriate and/or relevant to tenants who live onsite during the building works.

It is nice to see developers creating jobs without building on Green Belt land.

As I talk to people in Wembley it is remarkable how many do not know about planned developments - until work starts... I wonder if the WEM Tower and Monks Park residents know about the other pending tower in their corner of Tokyngton ward.

 Argenta House (opposite Stonebridge Park Station next to current bus stop)

This is a 24 storey tower that will replace the 2 storey Argenta House. The Wembley Brook runs close to the current building. The plans were approved by a much substituted Planning Committee back in October 2019. It was reduced from 28 storeys to 24. LINK

You can see Wembley Point behind the current building in this photograph but will need to imagine the 32 storey and the stepped 20 storey  buildings either side of WEM Tower as well as the impact of the 24 storey Argenta House on the light of all three. The artist's impression of a stand-alone Argenta House is more than a little misleading.

 

Argenta House on Argenta Way, opposite Stonebridge Park Station where the new block will be built. Wembley Point in the background.

This is not all of course. On the opposite side of the road we have the Unisys buildings which along with the Bridge Park Centre and some smaller sites is the site of a controversial major development by Brent Council with General Mediterranean Holding. Details have been held up by protected legal action as the community tried to secure its ownership of Bridge Park (use this blog's search facility for details).

 

The Unisys buildings

The  intial plans were for 800 residential units of a site said to be worth c£500m and GMH said one of the Unisys blocks could be refurbished as a hotel. In the light of the Stonebridge Place development and Brent's policy in favour of tall buildings and 'intensification corridors' this is likely to be revised by the developer.

Indeed a note on the Local Plan Tall Buildings Policy  (June 2021) goes further and includes Conduit Way on the opposite side of the road to the Unisys site LINK:

For Stonebridge Park an additional area adjacent to the site allocation BSSA7 Bridge Park and Unisys Building has been identified. This incorporates the Conduit Way estate. This extension is justified on the basis that the existing estate is of low density, lower quality homes which has the potential to be intensified to a higher density reflective of its higher public transport accessibility. This is particularly so along and in the areas adjacent to the Brentfield frontage. This will complement the taller buildings proposed on the Unisys and Bridge Park site and reinforce the gateway role from the North Circular of those entering the borough from further afield.


 

 

Friday 22 April 2022

Desperately seeking information from Brent Council on the results of the Estate Controlled Parking Zones consultations

 

At the last Cabinet of this administration a policy was adopted on how the Council would interact with residents. Full policy document HERE.

I was particularly interested on the section on enquiries as this is an area which I and other contributors to this blog have found frustrating and often feel we are being deliberately frustrated in gaining information which is in the public interest.

This is what the document  pledges:

  • We will resolve as many enquires as possible at the first point of contact
     
  •  Do what we say, on time and keep you informed so you don’t have to chase us
     
  • Make sure our staff have the skills, behaviours and tools to deliver the service you need
     
  • Work together with other services across the council to meet your needs and make it easier for you to get the help you need

 

I have been trying to find out the results of the very large consultation that was carried out in October 2021 by an external provider into the proposal to introduce Controlled Parking Zones on Brent's Council Estates. The proposal was controversial as it included a £50 annual fee, reduction in parking, and an initial ban on visitor parking. LINK

 

The Council provided a Q &A:

 

What percentage of residents will have to vote for the consultation to be valid?

There is no specific percentage for the consultation to be valid but a 20% response rate is viewed as the norm. As we did with the pilot, if estates have a very low turnout, we will repeat the consultation with increased door knocking. 

 

What will happen if there is a low turnout but a clear majority?

We will review each the results of each estate on an individual basis, and if they have a very low turnout, we will repeat the consultation with increased door knocking. If there is a low turnout, but a clear majority and support from other consultees, e.g. emergency services, then we will proceed with implementation.

  

Since the consultation there have been rumours about plans that were going to be implemented or dropped on different estates but I have been unable to find a definitive report on the results of the consultation and the decisons made as a result.

 

I asked about the results of the c onsultation at the last Kingsbury Connects and my request for information was backed by Cllr Shafique Choudhary. Officers promised to get back to but I heard no more.

 

Thus the email trail begins:

 

Request for information on Estate controlled parking zones

 

5th April 2022

 

I was promised this information by Brent officers at the last Kingsbury Brent Connects.  I am receiving queries from residents about the outcomes of the various ballots.

Could you supply a spreadsheet for each Brent estate where proposals were made including:

The number of residents affected
The number of returns
The number for the suggested scheme
The number against the suggested scheme
The Council’s decision.

Thank you very much.

Martin Francis
Editor
Wembley Matters


5th April 2022

 

Request for information on Estate controlled parking zones

 

Dear Martin,

Thank you for your email.

I am looking into your request and will respond as soon as I can.


Kind Regards, 


Programme Manager (Tenancy & Neighbourhoods)


7th April 2022

 

Dear Martin,

This is just to advice that your request has been forwarded to our freedom of Information team for registering and processing.


Kind Regards, 


Programme Manager (Tenancy & Neighbourhoods)
[My note - an unexplained arbitrary decision to turn the request into an FoI]
 

7th April 2022

 

Thank you, but rather a long process.  I would have thought that the information was to hand as each consultation needed a report and conclusion.

Nevertheless please register it as a Freedom of Information request and provide a reference.

Many thanks,

Martin Francis

 

[Note: Converting into an FoI kicks the request into the long grass and may mean the information is not provided until after the borough elections on May 5th. ]

 

11th April 2022

 

RE: Estate controlled parking zones - From Martin Francis

Thank you for contacting the council on 05/04/2022.

Your case will be assigned to an officer and you should receive their details soon.

 

Please use this reference number IRC-15942-L7D9J9 when contacting us about this case.

Please note that we may require further information in order for us to proceed, in which case we will contact you. 

If you would like further information on how your case will be dealt with, please visit our website: 
https://www.brent.gov.uk/your-council/
 
 

11th April 2022

 

 IRC-15942-L7D9J9 Estate Controlled Parking Zones

 

Thank you for your response.   You do not include the details of the wording of the FoI which was actually submitted as a simple information request to the relevant department and Brent Council decided to turn it into an FOI request. The information on the results of the surveys is already held by the Council - (see image attached) Clearly this is an image of a spreadsheet so please accept this as the FoI Request:

 

1. Please provide copy of the spreadsheet  giving the results of the Estate Controlled Parking Zones in Excel format.

 

2. Please confirm in a list the housing estate names of those schemes which are going ahead.

 

3. Supply the results for Saltcroft Close/Summers Close (Barnhill ward)*

 

Martin Francis

 

[Note: I have had no response to this email so have written again today]

 

*missing from the list below

 

 April 22nd 2022

 

 IRC-15942-L7D9J9 Estate Controlled Parking Zones

 

 

I understand that the Council now undertakes to answer queries within 10 days. My initial request was made at Kingsbury Connects and then  by email to the council on April 5th.



I have had no response to my email of April 11th. Please confirm that the wording has been accepted as the FoI and expedite.

Thank you,

Martin Francis

 
 
As mentioned above I have found an image of the spreadsheet from another source which appears to tabulate the results of the consultations and gives a RAG (Red, Amber, Green) which may mean Red - rejected, Amber - further consultation, Green - to be implemented, but this will need to be confirmed by the Council. 
 
 Overall it shows 16 Green, 13 Amber and 63 Red.
 
A working spreadsheet would enable residents to establish quickly whether the 20% response rate norm has been established on their particular estate. Some of the green ratings appear to be questionable given the low rate of response.
 
In writing this I am not taking a position on the proposed schemes but on the right of residents to be kept informed and further on the right of the public to know whether public money has been spent on a deficient consultation.
 
Depending on software you may be able to enlarge the image below by clicking on it or saving it. 
 


 
 

Wednesday 20 April 2022

Lidding Road Garage development approved despite many doubts over Thames Water assurances about sewage and flooding in the area

 Brent Planning Committee tonight approved the planning application for the Lidding Road Garages site in Kenton by four votes in favour, 3 abstentions and one against.

Cllrs Butt, Kennelly and Johnson abstained because they were not convinced by assurances from Thames Water over the flooding and sewage sitution which has been going on for some time and worsened considerably over the weekend. Thames Water attributed the problems to 'misconnections' when foul water is wrongly connected and flows into Wealdstone Brook. 

Cllr Michael Maurice who voted against said he had no confidence at all in Thames Water's ability to deal with this situation and said he needed assurances that there was no risk to the propsoed development and to neighbouring properties. 

Evidence was given by John Poole demonstrating that there had been surface water flooding despite Thames Water claiming that there had been no incidents.

Agents for the developer said they has satisfied Thames Water with their plans for sustainable drainage. They insisted that their plans would not worsen the current situation and perhaps make it better.

 

 

This is John Poole's  excellent illustrated presentation:

This is a map produced by Thames Water showing the known misconnections – the red dots and lots of them – of foul surface water and foul sewage water in the Brent and Harrow Kenton areas. 

 

 

This is a map produced by the Environment Agency showing who they believe are the riparian owners with regards to the Wealdstone Brook in the Kenton area of Brent. Note that Brent Council is assumed to be the riparian owner of large sections of the Wealdstone Brook and its banks – this includes council owned land as well as council owned properties.

 

 

Last week the Wealdstone Brook was at its worst ever. Human excrement was seen floating in the shallow waters of the brook through Woodcock Park. The smell from the brook was vile. The water was more than polluted – it was toxic. In 50 years living in Brent close to the brook I have never known it as bad.

 

This isn’t an issue of house values but it is an issue of health values

 

The drainage map shows the foul surface and foul sewage pipes that run across the proposed development at the end of Lidding Road. The red dot on plot is the manhole cover which overflowed on October 5th last year. 

 


 


Brent Council has produced a number of climate emergency documents. I have produced copies of two of them for you.  One covers biodiversity and the other is about tackling the climate emergency. Both make it a central point that we need to protect and improve our remaining green spaces by making them greener.

 


 


 

We in Kenton are working with the council to green up our area  and make a big contribution to brent council’s target of being carbon neutral by 2030.

 

Both proposed planning applications run counter to these green policies of Brent Council. I therefore urge you to request from Oliver Myers, the Brent Council sustainability officer, a report on the impact of both proposed developments before you make a final decision. This would also coincide with the final report of the London Flood Review which is looking into the causes of the serious flooding events which hit London on the 12th and 25th July 2021. The final report is due out this summer.

 

I have highlighted the problems of the serious pollution of the Wealdstone Brook which is close to the proposed Lidding Road development. until an independent water analysis shows that the water quality in the brook is a least close to safe, then any and all proposed housing developments should be suspended pending works by Thames Water and the Environment Agency to improve the situation.

 

I understand that Brent planners have to take the word of Thames Water with regards to drainage systems in the area and that they are safe for further connections. I have to say that the experiences of local residents and the words from various engineers from Thames Water and Lanes for Drains that this is not the case.

 

I urge you to delay a decision on the proposed planning applications until the London Flood Review has completed its work and published its findings and that you have received a report from your sustainability officer.

 

We don’t need chemical warfare in the Kenton area of Brent – we already have it on a daily basis from the highly toxic and polluted water in the Wealdstone Brook. There are trace levels of oxygen in the water – then there are trace levels of oxygen on Mars.