Nearly Christmas and we now know that Brent Council will lose more funding next year. Muhammed Butt, leader of the council has issued more lamentations and condemnations but we need more than that. There is still no word on whether his council will devise a needs based budget to rally a community campaign against the cuts, how the council will consult residents on the budget, and at what point they will refuse to make a budget that they know will bring more deprivation to the people of Brent.
From Cllr James Denselow's blog:
From Cllr James Denselow's blog:
Councils in England will have their spending power cut by 1.7% next year, the local government secretary, Eric Pickles, has announced.As the year ends insiders tell me that Butt's position as leader is far from secure with critics both in the Executive itself and in the wider group of Labour councillors, with former leader Ann John returning to a more active role.
The shadow communities and local government secretary, Hilary Benn, said: “It is clear that he is living in a world of his own, because he simply does not understand the impact that his decisions on funding are having on the services and local people who use and rely upon them.”
Cllr. Muhammed Butt, the Leader of Brent Council said “this looks like another disastrous settlement for local authorities. I spent the weekend helping out at the Brent food bank – helping people who literally can’t afford to eat. Make no mistake, Eric Pickles announcement today will mean they have to help thousands more people in Brent alone in 2013. It is a direct attack on the poorest residents of our community, and it is shameful.”
This time round, there are few town hall revolutionaries. The Trots are largely absent. Instead, there are sensible Labour councillors working hard to protect their communities.
ReplyDeletehttp://labourlist.org/2012/12/if-eric-pickles-wants-a-revolution-we-should-give-him-one/
So called 'sensible opposition' seems to consist of wailing 'boo hoo the Tories made us do it'. Really sensible opposition would consist of mobilising communities against the cuts and gaining their support for non implementation.
ReplyDelete