Sunday, 14 February 2016

Details of new uplifted Brent councillor allowances for 2016-17

Perhaps it is not a great  public relations strategy to be discussing a 1% increase in councillor allowances at the same Full Council Meeting which will be agreeing a budget that cuts services, but that is what will happen on February 22nd LINK

Apart from the uplift there are other changes due to the proposed revised Scrutiny arrangements (see below). It is also proposed that councillors will be able to claim travelling and subsistence allowances for conferences they attend outside of the borough. This will be set at the same level as council officers.

In a move that might not sweeten relationships between the two Conservative Groups on the Council it is proposed to remove the  deputy leader allowance for the Conservative Group (led by Cllr John Warren) from Cllr Carol Shaw. Instead £9,000 will go to the leader of the Brent Conservative Group, Cllr Suresh Kansagra.

The report reminds councillors of the principle behind the allowance scheme:
 Members are reminded that the 2014 Report advocates the setting of allowances at a level that enables people to undertake the role of councillor while not acting as an incentive to do so. It is equally important, as acknowledged, that there should not be a financial disincentive. It is also worth mentioning that in 2014 Members allowances were set at a reduced, or much reduced, level than the amount recommended by the independent panel. The difficulty in increasing allowances for Members given the current financial austerity, was recognised by the independent panel
These are the proposed new allowances for 2016-17:

BASIC, SPECIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CO-OPTED MEMBER ALLOWANCES WITH EFFECT FROM 1 APRIL 2016

Basic Allowance

Payable to all councillors = £10,100


Special Responsibility Allowances
(No more than one allowance per member)  This is in addition to the Basic Allowance.
1. Leader of the Council = £39,354

2. Deputy Leader of the Council = £28,681

3. Other Cabinet Members (x6) = £18,898

4. Chair of the Scrutiny Committee = £14,140 (under current scrutiny arrangements until 18 May 2016)

5. Vice-Chair of the Scrutiny Committee = £5,050 (under current scrutiny arrangements until 18 May 2016)

6. Chair of the Community and Well-being Scrutiny Committee (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £14,140

7. Chair of the Resources and Public Realm Scrutiny Committee (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £14,140
8. Vice-Chair of the Community and Well-being Scrutiny Committee (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £5,050

9. Vice-Chair of the Resources and Public Realm Community and Well- being Scrutiny Committee (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £5,050

10. Members of the Scrutiny Committee (x6) (under current scrutiny arrangements until 18 May 2016) = £3,202

11. Members of the Scrutiny Committees (x12) (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £3,202

12. Chair of the Planning Committee = £14,140
13. Members of the Planning Committee (x6) = £3,234

14. Chair of the Standards Committee = £2,155

15. Co-Chair of the Youth Parliament = £2,155

16. Chair of the Pension Fund Sub-Committee = £2,155

17. Chairs of the Service User Consultative Forums (x5) = £2,155

18. Chairs of the Brent Connects Area Consultative Forums (x5) = £4,873

19. Members of the Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Committee (x15) = £2,155
20. Member of the Adoption and Permanency Panel = £3,234

21. Member of the Fostering Panel = £3,234

22. Leader of the Principal Opposition Group* = £12,913
23. Other Group Leader(s) = £9,000

24. Group Whip for the majority group with over 50% of councillors = £5,583

25. Deputy Whips for the majority group (x2) = £2,155

26. Mayor = £9,090

27. Deputy Mayor = £7,070 

*For the purposes of this Scheme this is the second largest group of the Council. If there are two or more opposition groups of the same size, it is such group as the Council shall decide.

Co-opted Member Allowances

1. Chair of the Audit Committee (non-voting) = £423

2. Independent member(s) of the Standards Committee (non-voting) = £423

3. Education voting co-opted members of the Scrutiny Committee (x4) (under current scrutiny arrangements until 18 May 2016) = £224

4. Education voting co-opted members of the Community and Well-being Scrutiny Committee (x4) (under new scrutiny arrangements from 19 May 2016) = £224

The introduction of two Scrutiny Committees is the main source of the increase in spending on allowances.  The overall budget cannot be predicted because it is not possible to forecast claims under the new conference expenses system and because only one special allowance can be paid even if a councillor takes on several roles.  The allocation of these roles will not be known until after the AGM.

The allocation of roles has been controversial in the past with accusations of unfairness to councillors with an independent mindset and favouritism towards the compliant. The increase in the number of potential roles may satisfy more of the 56 strong Labour Group.

With the leadership of the Labour Group (and therefore the Council)  to be decided at the AGM in May things could become quite interesting.


4 comments:

  1. Shaw will go ballistic.

    I don't get the claiming expenses bit. It was always allowable to claim travelling and subsistence for journeys outside the borough, as long as you had the consent of the Mayor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They partially justified last year's 25% rise in allowances by abolishing the expenses system. Now they're reintroducing expenses. Nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And those who will benefit will be the Leader and Cabinet who are he ones who tend to go to external events. And the Mayor and deputy, of coures.

      Delete
  3. How much extra will the new allowances cost?

    The report going to Full Council on the proposed councillor allowances for 2016/17 says, in the section on "Financial Implications", that these are set out in the separate report before Council on the proposed Scrutiny changes.

    However, the report on the Scrutiny Structure, under "Financial Implications", says that 'these are dealt with in the body of the report'. The only details in the body of the report at para. 3.21 in the "Cost Implications" section, says that
    'the total potential costs are £40,614 higher than the current scrutiny structure', which appears to refer only to the extra costs for the proposed new Scrutiny Committees.

    So what is the total cost of the proposed uplifted allowances, and why is this being hidden from councillors and Council Tax Payers?

    Philip Grant.

    ReplyDelete