These are the provisions in the Coronavirus Bill that the Government are proposing. They are wide-ranging, some sensible and others which contain risks.
The UK government’s coronavirus action plan, published on 3 March, set out measures to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak that are reasonable, proportionate and based on the latest scientific evidence. Specifically, it detailed:
It also envisaged that changes to legislation might be necessary in order to give public bodies across the UK the tools and powers they need to carry out an effective response to this emergency. This paper sets out, subject to final approvals, the elements of the bill and the reasons why they are needed.
The development of an effective response to the epidemic requires a number of actions. Some of these involve the use of tools and powers that are set out in statute. The governments of the UK therefore resolved to review and where necessary amend the legislation, to ensure that the UK’s response is consistent and effective.
Some of the proposed changes therefore deal with easing the burden on frontline NHS and adult social care staff, some help staff by enabling them to work without financial penalty, and some support people and communities in taking care of themselves, their families and loved ones, and their wider community.
The legislation will be time-limited – for 2 years – and not all of these measures will come into force immediately. The bill allows the 4 UK governments to switch on these new powers when they are needed, and, crucially, to switch them off again once they are no longer necessary, based on the advice of Chief Medical Officers of the 4 nations.
The measures in the coronavirus bill are temporary, proportionate to the threat we face, will only be used when strictly necessary and be in place for as long as required to respond to the situation.
We have worked closely with the devolved administrations to develop an effective package of measures to support frontline staff and individuals involved in this vital national response.
In addition to this, there will be increased numbers of people becoming ill with COVID-19 and some of these people will require medical treatment or need to be admitted to hospital. These additional patient volumes will place pressure on our NHS. To ensure the best possible level of care is provided to those most in need, we may need to take measures to increase the available health and social care workforce and reduce the number of admin tasks they have to perform so they have more time to spend with patients.
To support this, the bill seeks to:
To support this the bill seeks to:
These powers would only be used if demand pressures and workforce illness during the pandemic meant that local authorities were at imminent risk of failing to fulfil their duties and only last the duration of the emergency. It would ensure that local authorities will continue to be able to deliver the best possible care services during the peak and to protect the lives of the most vulnerable members of society.
This will happen only where necessary, to help minimise disruption to everyday life and progression of children and young people to further and higher education or employment. The measures would only be put in place for the period of time required to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
To support this, the bill seeks to:
The bill intends to make changes to:
For example, local authorities may choose to direct local actors such as funeral directors, mortuaries owners, crematoriums owners and others, to streamline the death management process. This may include an increase in the operating times of crematoriums, directing companies to use their vehicles to move bodies, or directing others not directly involved in the funeral sector, to provide necessary support.
Only in the most extreme situations where there is a risk to public health would the powers of direction be used and only be used when scientific evidence and operational advice suggests that it is necessary. Activating the powers will ensure the local death management system continues to work effectively to protect public health and the dignity of the deceased. Personal choice will be respected as far as possible, especially in regard to how we handle loved ones after they have passed.
We want to ensure the Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) provisions support people in complying with this request and that they have retrospective effect from 13 March 2020. By ensuring that people receive SSP from the first day that they are off work, we will ensure that those who are unwell or have been instructed to self-isolate can do so without the fear of losing pay. This will be an important measure in the event of a severe outbreak. By refunding small businesses, we hope to alleviate the significant financial burden on employers through increased SSP costs.
The bill is therefore seeking to:
The UK government’s coronavirus action plan, published on 3 March, set out measures to respond to the COVID-19 outbreak that are reasonable, proportionate and based on the latest scientific evidence. Specifically, it detailed:
- what we know about the virus and the disease it causes
- how we have planned for an infectious disease outbreak
- what we are planning to do next, depending on the course the coronavirus outbreak takes
- the role the public can play in supporting this response, now and in the future
It also envisaged that changes to legislation might be necessary in order to give public bodies across the UK the tools and powers they need to carry out an effective response to this emergency. This paper sets out, subject to final approvals, the elements of the bill and the reasons why they are needed.
The development of an effective response to the epidemic requires a number of actions. Some of these involve the use of tools and powers that are set out in statute. The governments of the UK therefore resolved to review and where necessary amend the legislation, to ensure that the UK’s response is consistent and effective.
Some of the proposed changes therefore deal with easing the burden on frontline NHS and adult social care staff, some help staff by enabling them to work without financial penalty, and some support people and communities in taking care of themselves, their families and loved ones, and their wider community.
The legislation will be time-limited – for 2 years – and not all of these measures will come into force immediately. The bill allows the 4 UK governments to switch on these new powers when they are needed, and, crucially, to switch them off again once they are no longer necessary, based on the advice of Chief Medical Officers of the 4 nations.
The measures in the coronavirus bill are temporary, proportionate to the threat we face, will only be used when strictly necessary and be in place for as long as required to respond to the situation.
We have worked closely with the devolved administrations to develop an effective package of measures to support frontline staff and individuals involved in this vital national response.
Contents of the bill
The bill enables action in 5 key areas:- 
    increasing the available health and social care workforce – for 
example, by removing barriers to allow recently retired NHS staff and 
social workers to return to work (and in Scotland, in addition to 
retired people, allowing those who are on a career break or are social 
worker students to become temporary social workers)
 
- 
    easing the burden on frontline staff – by reducing the number of 
administrative tasks they have to perform, enabling local authorities to
 prioritise care for people with the most pressing needs, allowing key 
workers to perform more tasks remotely and with less paperwork, and 
taking the power to suspend individual port operations
 
- 
    containing and slowing the virus – by reducing unnecessary social
 contacts, for example through powers over events and gatherings, and 
strengthening the quarantine powers of police and immigration officers
 
- 
    managing the deceased with respect and dignity – by enabling the 
death management system to deal with increased demand for its services
 
- 
    supporting people – by allowing them to claim Statutory Sick Pay 
from day one, and by supporting the food industry to maintain supplies
 
Increasing the available health and social care workforce
Although we are implementing measures to save lives through delaying and flattening the peak of the epidemic, it is clear that the next few months will present a significant level of challenge for the NHS and anyone working in caring professions. As in all sectors, there will be pressures from increased staff absence, if staff are unwell or self-isolating with their households.In addition to this, there will be increased numbers of people becoming ill with COVID-19 and some of these people will require medical treatment or need to be admitted to hospital. These additional patient volumes will place pressure on our NHS. To ensure the best possible level of care is provided to those most in need, we may need to take measures to increase the available health and social care workforce and reduce the number of admin tasks they have to perform so they have more time to spend with patients.
To support this, the bill seeks to:
- 
    enable regulators to emergency register suitable people as 
regulated healthcare professionals, such as nurses, midwives or 
paramedics. This might include (but will not be limited to) recently 
retired professionals and students who are near the end of their 
training. Registered staff can then be used appropriately, with 
decisions made on a local basis, to increase the available health and 
social care workforce and enable essential health and care services to 
function during the height of the epidemic
 
- 
    enable regulators to temporarily add social workers to their 
registers who may have recently left the profession. This will ensure 
vital continuity of care for vulnerable children and adults
 
- 
    enable employees and workers to take Emergency Volunteer Leave in
 blocks of 2, 3 or 4 weeks’ statutory unpaid leave and establish a 
UK-wide compensation fund to compensate for loss of earnings and 
expenses incurred at a flat rate for those who volunteer through an 
appropriate authority. This will ensure that volunteers do not suffer 
financial disadvantage as a result of performing a public good. 
Volunteers play a critical role in the delivery of health and social 
care services and are particularly important in caring for the most 
vulnerable in our society, such as the elderly, those with multiple 
long-term conditions or those suffering from mental ill-health
 
- 
    provide indemnity for clinical negligence liabilities arising 
from NHS activities carried out for the purposes of dealing with, or 
because of, the coronavirus outbreak, where there is no existing 
indemnity arrangement in place. This will ensure that those providing 
healthcare service activity across the UK are legally protected for the 
work they are required to undertake as part of the COVID-19 response. 
This is in line with and will complement existing arrangements
 
- 
    suspend the rule that currently prevents some NHS staff who 
return to work after retirement from working more than 16 hours per 
week, along with rules on abatements and drawn-down of NHS pensions that
 apply to certain retirees who return to work. This will allow skilled 
and experienced staff who have recently retired from the NHS to return 
to work, and also allow retired staff who have already returned to work 
to increase their commitments if required, without having their pension 
benefits suspended
 
Easing the burden on frontline staff, both within the NHS and beyond
In the NHS and in other sectors who undertake activities that are vital to keeping the country running safely and securely, we may also face particular increased pressures as a result of staff absence or increased work volumes. This could include those caring for children or in education, protecting our borders, detaining and treating people under the Mental Health Act, supporting local authorities and ensuring national security. By reducing the number of admin tasks they have to perform, allowing key workers to perform more tasks remotely and with less paperwork, we will enable these crucial services to continue to operate effectively during periods of reduced staffing.To support this the bill seeks to:
- 
    enable existing mental health legislation powers to detain and 
treat patients who need urgent treatment for a mental health disorder 
and are a risk to themselves or others, to be implemented using just one
 doctor’s opinion (rather than the current 2). This will ensure that 
those who were a risk to themselves or others would still get the 
treatment they need, when fewer doctors are available to undertake this 
function
 
- 
    temporarily allow extension or removal of time limits in mental 
health legislation to allow for greater flexibility where services are 
less able to respond. These temporary changes would be brought in only 
in the instance that staff numbers were severely adversely affected 
during the pandemic period and provide some flexibility to help support 
the continued safe running of services under the Mental Health Act
 
- 
    allow NHS providers to delay undertaking the assessment process 
for NHS continuing healthcare for individuals being discharged from 
hospital until after the emergency period has ended
 
- 
    make changes to the Care Act 2014 in England and the Social 
Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 to enable local authorities to 
prioritise the services they offer in order to ensure the most urgent 
and serious care needs are met, even if this means not meeting 
everyone’s assessed needs in full or delaying some assessments. During a
 pandemic, a lot of people who work in health and social care could be 
off sick or may need to care for loved ones. This could mean that local 
authorities, which are responsible for social care, may not be able to 
do all the things they are usually required to do
 
These powers would only be used if demand pressures and workforce illness during the pandemic meant that local authorities were at imminent risk of failing to fulfil their duties and only last the duration of the emergency. It would ensure that local authorities will continue to be able to deliver the best possible care services during the peak and to protect the lives of the most vulnerable members of society.
- 
    temporarily relax local authorities’ duties in relation to their 
duties to conduct a needs assessment and prepare an adult carer support 
plan/young care statement under the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968, the
 Children (Scotland) Act 1995, the Social Care (Self-directed Support) 
(Scotland) Act 2013 and the Carers (Scotland) Act 2016 to enable them to
 prioritise people with the greatest needs
 
- 
    provide powers to require educational institutions or childcare 
providers to stay open or relax some requirements around education 
legislation in order to help these institutions run effectively during 
the event of an emergency. This could include reducing teacher ratios, 
adapting school meal standards and relaxing provisions for those with 
special educational needs. This will ensure that children, young people 
and those who work with them remain safe, while minimising disruption to
 everyday life and progression to further and higher education or 
employment by ensuring schools have the flexibility and support they 
need to respond pragmatically to the changing situation
 
- 
    enable the Home Secretary to request that port and airport 
operators temporarily close and suspend operations if Border Force staff
 shortages result in a real and significant threat to the UK’s border 
security. This is to ensure the UK can maintain adequate border security
 throughout the pandemic and protect the public from the threat of 
criminality or importation of prohibited items that could result from an
 inadequately controlled border. This would only be used in extremis, 
where necessary and proportionate, and any direction will be kept to the
 minimum period necessary to maintain the security of the UK border
 
- 
    expand availability of video and audio link in court proceedings.
 This would include magistrates’ court hearings taking place by phone or
 by video, should an individual appeal restriction of movement due to 
quarantine measures. This will ensure that an appeal takes place but 
will not require a person to break quarantine in order to attend in 
person.  It will also enable the expansion of the availability of video 
and audio link in various criminal proceedings, including full video and
 audio hearings in certain circumstances, and public participation in 
relation to these and other court and tribunal proceedings conducted by 
audio and video. The measures will enable a wider range of proceedings 
to be carried out by video, so that courts can continue to function and 
remain open to the public, without the need for participants to attend 
in person. This will give judges more options for avoiding adjournments 
and keeping business moving through the courts to help reduce delays in 
the administration of justice and alleviate the impact on families, 
victims, witnesses and defendants
 
- 
    ensure that the Treasury can transact its business at all times, 
by making it possible for a single commissioner or a single Treasury 
minister to sign instruments and act on behalf of the commissioners, 
during a COVID-19 emergency period. Under current rules, where any 
instrument or act is required to be signed by the Commissioners of Her 
Majesty’s Treasury, it must be signed by 2 or more of the commissioners.
 This change will ensure that the Treasury can transact its business at 
all times during a COVID-19 emergency period, should commissioners be 
unable to fulfil their duty
 
- 
    allow temporary judicial commissioners (JCs) to be appointed at 
the request of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, in the event that 
there are insufficient JCs available to operate the system under the 
Investigatory Powers Act 2016. This is the one of the critical pieces of
 domestic legislation for national security. It creates the statutory 
basis for the use of the investigatory powers by the intelligence and 
law enforcement agencies, using warrants issued under the act. These 
warrants provide the agencies with the capability they need to protect 
national security and investigate and prevent serious crime.
 
 The Home Secretary, again at the request of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, will also be allowed to vary the time allowed for urgent warrants to be reviewed by a JC and how long they can last before they need to be reviewed. The maximum time allowed for a review will be increased to a maximum of 12 days (up from the current 3 days). Maintaining national security capabilities at a time of potential widespread upheaval is critical and it is necessary to ensure that the powers to vary specific aspects of the regime are available to the government should they be deemed necessary, for example if there are fewer JCs available than usual.
 
Delaying and slowing the virus
The government’s objective is to delay and flatten the peak of the epidemic by bringing forward the right measures at the right time, so that we minimise suffering and save lives. To slow the virus, we will need people to reduce unnecessary social contacts, which, for periods of time, may mean preventing gatherings of people, postponing electoral events over the course of the year or closing schools, further or high education premises or childcare providers. This will help mitigate the risk to public health arising from such mass gatherings.This will happen only where necessary, to help minimise disruption to everyday life and progression of children and young people to further and higher education or employment. The measures would only be put in place for the period of time required to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
To support this, the bill seeks to:
- 
    enable the government to restrict or prohibit events and 
gatherings during the pandemic in any place, vehicle, train, vessel or 
aircraft, any movable structure and any offshore installation and, where
 necessary, to close premises
 
- 
    provide a temporary power to close educational establishments or childcare providers
 
- 
    postpone the local, mayoral and Police and Crime Commissioner 
elections that were due to take place in England in May this year until 
May 2021. Provision will also be made to postpone other electoral events
 over the course of the year (such as by-elections)
 
- 
    enable the departments of health in Northern Ireland and Scotland
 to make regulations for additional measures to be introduced to help 
them delay or prevent further transmission of COVID-19. Equivalent 
powers already exist in England and Wales and these provisions would 
bring them in line with the rest of the UK
 
- 
    remove a restriction in how Scottish territorial Health Boards 
can deliver vaccination programmes so a wider range of healthcare 
professionals in Scotland would be able to administer a vaccine.
 
Managing the deceased with respect and dignity
The steps the government is taking to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic will save lives. However, sadly, as has already been seen, people will lose loved ones as a result of this disease. We want to ensure the deceased are treated with the utmost respect and dignity and that the current procedures in relation to death and still-birth registration and management are modified to enable this and to protect public health. This will take account of the fact that families who have lost a loved one may be self-isolating, and that there may be reduced capacity to register and manage deaths as a result of pandemic-related sickness absence.The bill intends to make changes to:
- 
    mean a coroner is only to be notified where a doctor believes 
there is no medical practitioner who may sign the death certificate, or 
that they are not available within a reasonable time of the death
 
- 
    introduce powers to enable the provisions under the Burial and 
Cremation (Scotland) Act 2016 relating to the collection of ashes to be 
suspended and replaced with a duty to retain until the suspension is 
lifted, except where family wishes are known. Also, suspend an offence 
in section 49 of the 2016 Act, allowing any relative of the deceased to 
complete the cremation application form, regardless of the required 
hierarchy set out by section 65 of the 2016 Act
 
- 
    expand the list of people who can register a death to include funeral directors acting on behalf of the family
 
- 
    enable electronic transmission of documents that currently have 
to be physically presented in order to certify the registration of a 
death
 
- 
    remove the need for a second confirmatory medical certificate in order for a cremation to take place
 
- 
    remove the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 requirement that any 
inquest into a COVID-19 death must be held with a jury. Other notifiable
 diseases will still require an inquest with a jury
 
- 
    suspend the referral of certificates to the Death Certification 
Review Service (DCRS) for review in Scotland under the Certification of 
Death (Scotland) Act 2011. The timing of the suspension to be at the 
discretion of Scottish ministers
 
For example, local authorities may choose to direct local actors such as funeral directors, mortuaries owners, crematoriums owners and others, to streamline the death management process. This may include an increase in the operating times of crematoriums, directing companies to use their vehicles to move bodies, or directing others not directly involved in the funeral sector, to provide necessary support.
Only in the most extreme situations where there is a risk to public health would the powers of direction be used and only be used when scientific evidence and operational advice suggests that it is necessary. Activating the powers will ensure the local death management system continues to work effectively to protect public health and the dignity of the deceased. Personal choice will be respected as far as possible, especially in regard to how we handle loved ones after they have passed.
Protecting and supporting people
We are asking people to stay at home if they have a high temperature or a new and continuous cough, or if anyone in their household has one of those 2 symptoms. In the event of a wider outbreak of COVID-19, the number of people that would be off work would increase significantly. This would include those that were displaying-virus like symptoms and those who were self-isolating as a precautionary measure.We want to ensure the Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) provisions support people in complying with this request and that they have retrospective effect from 13 March 2020. By ensuring that people receive SSP from the first day that they are off work, we will ensure that those who are unwell or have been instructed to self-isolate can do so without the fear of losing pay. This will be an important measure in the event of a severe outbreak. By refunding small businesses, we hope to alleviate the significant financial burden on employers through increased SSP costs.
The bill is therefore seeking to:
- 
    give the government the power to temporarily suspend the rule 
that means SSP is not paid for the first 3 days of work that you miss 
because of sickness. These days are known as waiting days. Lifting this 
rule will enable us to respond quickly to an outbreak
 
- 
    enable employers with fewer than 250 employees to reclaim SSP 
paid for sickness absences relating to coronavirus during the period of 
the outbreak. This is because the government wants to ensure that 
businesses are supported to deal with the temporary economic impacts of 
an outbreak of coronavirus
 
- 
    require industry to provide information about food supplies, in 
the event that an industry partner does not co-operate with our current 
voluntary information-sharing arrangements during a period of potential 
disruption
 
Hi, Martin
ReplyDeleteThose of us who are at least familiar with the concept of 'statutory instrument' as it has applied to 'welfare reform' -- me at least -- have been cynical about Coronavirus stuff in terms of what it might lead to in terms of, say, worsening the disconnect between benefit claimants and 'key decision makers'.
So I just conducted an Internet search using keywords
"statutory instrument" "universal credit"
One of my resultant finds bears today's date, 19 March 2020, and reads:
Welfare rights
HMCTS [Her Majesty's Courts & Tribunal Service] issues new guidance on how it will use telephone and video technology during Coronavirus outbreak.
In deciding how hearings are to be conducted, judges should consider any issues using technology will present for participants.
Source: https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/welfare-rights
Related to this as part of right wing government agendas, there is Terra firma benefits services closures leave the economically vulnerable more firmly in the lurch and the legendary Stanley Milgram's experiment.
In conclusion, I'd say that COVID-19 legislation is a lever to weaken claimant rights still further. Or is that a prejudice based on my previous negative experiences and too much reading of https://reform.uk/sectors/digital-public-services
?