Guest post by Philip Grant in a personal capacity
The Morland Gardens site, from Google streetview.
On 17 May, Martin kindly published an open email I had sent to Alan Lunt, Strategic Director, Regeneration and Environment, setting out why Brent should not go ahead with the award of a contract for its proposed development at Morland Gardens in Stonebridge. Despite my advice, the Strategic Director made his Key Decision to award the contract (to Hill Partnerships Ltd, for a total sum of £37,933,491) on 20 May 2022.
The main reason why this c.£38 million contract would be a big financial risk for the Council to enter into is that they don’t have the legal right to build over an area of land at the eastern end of the development site. This is currently public highway and the Harlesden City Challenge Community Garden.
Although they could have dealt with the stopping-up of the highway at any time after planning consent was given for the development in October 2020, the Council only gave notice of the proposed Stopping-up Order in April this year. The period for objections to the proposed order ran out on 26 May, and I explained the reasons for my own objection (there have been others) in a guest blog on 28 April. It may take many months before this matter is resolved, and there is no certainty that an order will be approved.
Luckily, it appears that some Brent councillors are “Wembley Matters” readers! I’ve been sent a copy of an email received by the three Lib Dem members and two Conservative councillors, from a senior Governance Officer at Brent Council. This is the main part of that email:
‘Hi Councillors Lorber, Georgiou, Matin, Maurice & Hirani
I [am] emailing with an update on the call-in request you’ve submitted regarding the decision taken by the Strategic Director, Regeneration & Environment to award a design and build contract for Morland Gardens.
Following my email yesterday I can now confirm that we’ve received the required number of requests for the call-in to be submitted. As required under the call-in protocol, the reasons and outline of alternative action being sought under the call-in have been considered by the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Director of Legal, HR, Audit & Investigations and Head of Strategy & Partnerships, and as a result have been confirmed as meeting the requirements within the protocol and therefore accepted (on the basis of the attached form) to proceed for consideration as a call-in by the Resources & Public Realm Scrutiny Committee.
Having consulted with the Chair of the Resources & Public Realm Scrutiny Committee, I’m able to confirm that the scrutiny meeting to consider this call-in has been scheduled for 6:30pm on Thursday 9th June 22 with the meeting to take place in person in the Conference Hall, Brent Civic Centre. As usual the meeting will also be lived streamed for members of the public to follow online.’
I will ask Martin to include a copy of the ‘attached form’ at the end of this blog, so that readers who are interested can see what is involved in requesting a call-in.
Morland Gardens site plan, from the call-in form
I think it is encouraging that councillors in the two opposition parties, including several who were newly elected on 5 May, are willing to work together to ensure that potentially questionable decisions are given close scrutiny. I understand that Councillor Paul Lorber is taking the lead on this call-in.
Call-in by itself will not mean any change in this Key Decision, but it will give Scrutiny Committee members the chance to consider reasons for and against the decision, and to question the Lead Member and Council Officers responsible for it. At the end of the meeting on 9 June, they will either decide to refer the matter back to the decision maker, with recommendations, or that they do not object to the decision, so that it can go ahead.
It will be interesting to see how the new Chair of this Scrutiny Committee, and the majority Labour councillors, deal with the call-in. You can watch the meeting yourself, either in person or online, to see how our “new” Council operates in practice. Hopefully, this important piece of scrutiny will be dealt with on its merits, and not on party political lines!
Philip Grant
So Towerblock Tatler and Alan Lunt have cocked it up yet again.
ReplyDeleteThere have certainly been many mistakes made by Brent Council with this redevelopment project, going as far back as January 2019.
ReplyDeleteHopefully, their failure to consider the consequences of the Stopping-up Order (that architects warned them would be needed) may prove to be one mistake too far, and they will finally accept the need to rethink their plans.
If they don't backdown they will both forever be known as Boris.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous (6 June at 16:08),
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure how Boris is relevant to this "call-in" (although personally I hope he will be on his way out by the time Thursday's Scrutiny Committee meeting takes place).
It is a chance to see "Democracy in Brent" in action, and at least two members of the public have requested to speak.
Details of the meeting, on Thursday 9 June at 6.30pm, and how you can watch it either in person or online are on the Council's website at:
https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=551&MId=7148&Ver=4