The Harrow Road frontage
The community library space
The attractive cluster of buildings - including artists' studios
The Veterans' Club
Nepalese Community Centre
The Children's Centre
When the planning application for the building of four 3 storey houses in Barham Park was approved there were warnings about setting a precedent that could be a threat to other parks and gave rise to a 1,000 plus petition calling on Brent Council to protect our parks. The news that the Barham Park Trustees were seeking to revise the covenant preventing building on the park reinforced fears and these seem to be borne out by a new threat.
Brent Council (not the Cabinet members under the leadership of Muhammed Butt but who call tell the difference?) have commissioned a feasibility study to refurbish the site to allow commercial development in order to maximise income by charging market rents.
In the process it would the whole feel and purpose of the buildings which once housed the Brent Council Parks Department and a Brent Council public library, closed by a previous Labour administration. The volunteer community library set up by a 'Save Our Libraries' campaign group, and offering many more community activities than just a library, would not be able to afford a commercial rent and its future would be threatened if the plans went ahead. A similar fate would await the other community groups that use the various buildings.
The brief is set out below with a key factor highlighted.
The key items considered within this report are:
-
Location of additional parking (including EV charging)
-
Partial demolition & rebuild of certain elements of the building (eg. the flat-roofed areas towards the rear) have insufficient potential to add value to the project as a whole and has been excluded from the project scope.
-
No full demolition & rebuild - design to relate to & incorporate existing building.
-
Not to consider existing tenancies and to consider the building as vacant.
-
Tracking and tracing of all underground drainage / pipe routes.
-
Topography survey and levelling to ensure sufficient drainage.
-
Structural constraints of the Barham Park Trust building
-
EPC C to be targeted.
-
Trees located within a conservation area that are not protected require written notice to the local planning authority.
Gotham City, but where is Batman?
ReplyDeleteSurely you're thinking of Buttman?
ReplyDeleteLabour Councillors closed Barham Park Library over 10 years ago.
ReplyDeleteWe will NOT allow them to close Barham Community Library that local volunteers have worked for over 10 years to create and develop as an active hub for our local Community.
THE FIGHT TO SAVE OUR COMMUNITY FACILITIES IS ON!
The attack is not just on us - Barham Veterans Club and the Gurkhas are under threat too - as are all the other local Community Groups which use our space at affordable rates:
Muslim Prayer Group attend by over 60 every week
Tamil School Classes
Our Knitting & Crochet Sewcial Group
The Dementia group attended by 40 people every week
Our Yoga, Pilates and Exercise Dance Groups
Our Book Club
Our Art Club
Our Rhyme & Story telling under 5s group
Our Chess Club
and all the other local organisations & groups who use our space for their social meetings and activities.
If the Council gets away with building their Hotel & Supermarket in Barham Park then it will open the door to building on other Brent Parks too.
Over 1000 local people signed the Petition to Protect Barham Park from over development recently. Are you listening Brent Council?
Come and support us by attending the Barham Park Trust Meeting at the Civic Centre on Tuesday 5 September at 10a.m. (bus No.92 stop outside and other buses nearby) and help us send a message to the Leadership of Brent Council that our Parks are our enjoyment and our recreations and NOT for Rbnb or a "Boutique" Hotel, Shops and Supermarkets that local people have not asked for and do not need.
Thank You for your support.
To quote from another report on the Barham Park Trust Committee agenda for 5 September:
ReplyDelete'Barham Park was given by George Titus Barham on trust to the Council in 1938. The terms of the trust are “to preserve the same for the recreation of the public".'
What have commercial office space, Airbnb, supermarkets or food courts got to do with 'the recreation of the public'?
How will the trust, a charity, raise the finance for this proposed £3-4m redevelopment (which would be a complete breach of the Local Green Space policies in the Sudbury Town Neighbourhood Plan anyway!)?
They may get some money from selling off the restrictive covenant on 776/778 Harrow Road to George Irvin, but that has already been partly used with the £25k fee to the architects for this pipedream scheme, which will need the commitment of tens of thousands more to other consultants before it could even get off the ground.
I could go on, but to put it bluntly, this whole idea is madness.
No wonder Butt's brother moved away from bring a Sudbury Councillor if he knew they were planning this? If you can't stand the heat...
ReplyDeleteThis plan for Barham Park has obviously been in the cooking pot for a few years. Hence Butts have secured their positions.
DeleteAnother case of Butts Brent, they need to be held accountable. Leave the parks alone, if its income they need, build an air bnb, cafe, restaurant near the stadium or civic centre, lots of footfall and ir will fit in with the big mess they have made there.
ReplyDeleteBIG WARNING STAY AWAY FROM THE PARKS THE COMMUNITY WILL UNITE
£4 million to carry out these works ruining the nature of the existing buildings and leaving the community without vital meeting spaces while the works are carried out - how exactly would this end up being a profitable decision?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous
ReplyDeleteIt’s the beginning of further similar sell offs in our surrounding, I can see this coming next…….This Labour council’s behaviour is our own fault for trusting them back into power again and again! As a regular Labour supporter I am questioning others to STOP voting for them ever again. They have created tower blocks all around us in Wembley/Alperton wards. I cannot trust this Labour council and few of their executive officers.
Also no doubt £4 million costs would end up being £8 million!!!
ReplyDeleteNeedless to say they have NOT bothered to speak to any of the tenants or brief the local Councillors.
ReplyDeleteWhile the Consultants Report refers to a Library - the actual drawings used to highlight the Silver option being recommended for approval have wiped the Community Library from the face of the earth. Our main Library would become a Cafe and the Children Library space (also used by our Arts Group and to give advice to carers of Dementia sufferers) would become a shop.
As Philip Grant says - it is madness - which has already cost £25,000 of public money and will cost very much more if the Barham Park Trustees do not come to their senses.
ReplyDeleteThe 776 Harrow Road site is surely a better suited site for community cafe, lavatory facilities, etc...............
.
Why are they holding the Barham Park Trust Commitee meeting at the Civic Centre - why not hold it at Barham Park Community Library? Why is it being held at 10.00am in the morning when most people are at work?
ReplyDeleteSo much for engaging with the local community!
Vote for anyone except Labour at the next local elections!
ReplyDeleteYou should always vote in local elections based on local issues NOT national issues.
Sadly the Butts community members who are in the majority in Brent Will continue voting for them out of sone kind of misguided loyalty
DeleteJust to clarify the boarded up windows are like that because some guy was smashing them a couple of weeks ago - they are not boarded up because the building is derelict.
ReplyDeleteUnder the 'brilliant' Silver option proposal recommended by officers ALL the Community organisations would be kicked out to provide a completely vacant site. The Park car park will also be out of action. The Report does not say for how long but a minimum of 2 years - and with Brent Council's track record much longer.
ReplyDeleteThe Barham Community Library space will be turned into a Cafe (with no alternative library space identified!.
BUT hang on have the Council not been touting a Cafe for years? Did they have any success?
Well here is an extract from a Brent Council Officers Report from 2015 in relation to Unit 1 when it was empty and before it was let to Tamu Samaj UK group.
"Unit 1-The Card Room
(i) In 2012 a Barham Park Users Consultation was undertaken which identified that there was a demand for a café within the Barham Park. Following that Report the Trust decided that officers should pursue options for a café within the site as part of the previous marketing campaign. It was considered that Unit 1 might be suitable for such a use,
but it did not attract a bid in isolation of the bids for the other Units."
Unit 1 was eventually let at a rent well below the market rent.
The whole aim of the £25,000 Consultants Report is to achieve market rents for the buildings in Barham Park. They do not say what the rents would be of course.
Does anyone in their right mind thinks that a Cafe is a viable business option in this location if a true market rent is charged?
Officers wasted their time in 2012, they wasted their time in 2015 and now they are going to be asked to waste more time in 2023.
In the meantime local groups providing a service for local people are threatened with eviction by Labour Councillors - in the name of "progress"!
Independent Trustees with good legal qualifications and knowledge should be appointed. To current trustees should removed to avoid conflicts of interests to put it mildly. As they cannot be trusted.
ReplyDeleteFollowing the Barham Park Trust’s meeting this morning we were made aware that Brent manages the costs of the park’s maintenance etc as the trust was not left any money.
ReplyDeleteAre Brent charging the Trust to maintain the grounds, buildings etc..?
When the Brent’s Parks Service were occupying the building for their office staff were Brent paying rent at market rent to the Trust?
Would be interesting to know if this arrangement has worked according to the legal and moral code.