Guest post by Cllr Suzanne Gallagher
This week, Brent Council’s new four-year corporate strategy, Believe in Brent (2026–2030), came before the Cabinet on Monday (9 November), ahead of going to Full Council next week for final sign-off.
At the heart of the new plan is Priority 1: "A Borough to Be Proud Of," which promises to make Brent the best place to live, work, and build a future, underpinned by safe, welcoming, and vibrant neighbourhoods. Turn to page 37 of the Cabinet agenda pack, under the heading Healthy, active communities, and the written commitments are impossible to fault:
● "Every resident can enjoy parks, playgrounds and leisure facilities close to home that are safe, welcoming and vibrant spaces to play, exercise and spend time outdoors."
● "Everyone can access affordable opportunities to be active, regardless of their age, background or income."
● "Work with communities where health outcomes are poorer... to reduce health inequalities and make it easier to get the right support early."
● "Work with partners to encourage more residents to be active, improve their health and wellbeing and live independent lives."
● "Improve access to affordable physical activity opportunities, particularly for children and young people."
On paper, it reads like a blueprint for thriving youth and community provision. Yet the lived reality for hundreds of Brent residents right now could not be more different.
The Community Fightback at Willesden Sports Centre
At the exact moment Cabinet members were taking turns praising their new strategy on Monday morning, local families, athletes, and coaches were desperate to stop Brent Council from ripping out the indoor athletics track at Willesden Sports Centre.
The very same day, the Council had planned to begin works to uplift one of only five indoor athletics tracks of its kind in the whole of London to replace it with a commercial gym extension.
This decision poses an existential threat to the winter provision of Track Academy, an extraordinary Brent charity founded in 2007 by former international triple jumper Connie Henry MBE that uses the indoor track three times a week to support hundreds of young people aged 5 to 23.
For around 500 young people every week in the colder and wetter months, that indoor track is far more than a running lane. As coaches, parents, and young runners told Clkr Mary Mitchell, Cllr Amandine Alexandre and me when we visited the centre on Saturday, athletics is the hook that brings hard-to-reach young people through the door. Once inside, they receive mentorship, educational support, and a safe, screen-free sanctuary during dark winter nights that keeps teenagers off their phones, supports injury rehabilitation, and boosts their mental health. Older residents, women, and adults with learning disabilities also rely on the space to stay active side by side.
What Cabinet Members Said on Monday vs. The Lived Reality in Willesden
Listening back to what Cabinet members actually said when presenting Believe in Brent on Monday makes the decision to close Willesden’s indoor track look even more irrational and contradictory.
During the discussion, Deputy Leader Cllr Gwen Grahl praised the plan by saying:
"It's so resident focused. We're trying to and endeavouring to deliver on what not only the residents have communicated to us, but also making sure that everything is with them in mind... This is a document that really showcases how each and every member of our borough can thrive through intentional investment, through the intentionality of the policies and the work that is going on behind the scenes."
If the Council’s "behind the scenes" work is truly so resident-focused, why were Track Academy, Queens Park Harriers, parents, and young athletes completely sidelined without proper consultation before the decision to scrap their indoor track was taken? In fact, an Equality Impact Assessment was only carried out after the community demanded one, and even the Council has had to admit that the proposed replacement hall is not a like-for-like facility.
Even more striking were the remarks from Cllr Liz Dixon, Cabinet Member for Public Health and Community Safety, the very portfolio overseeing the Willesden Sports Centre redesign. Speaking on the new Council Plan on Monday, Cllr Dixon told the chamber:
"The truth is when you travel sometimes from the north to the south of the borough, the diversity or the differences are very stark and there are major inequalities. I think everything we're doing as a council to address that, so that we are more inclusive, is really helpful. Everything in here and the way that we're dealing with public health and community safety, it's ticking all the boxes. Everything we're doing is around the health and the well-being of residents, which is critical as the years go ahead."
How can closing Willesden’s indoor track possibly be described as "ticking all the boxes" on public health and inclusion? Willesden sits in the south of the borough where health inequalities are acute, and the Council’s own Equality Impact Assessment explicitly admits that closing the indoor track will have an adverse impact on girls, disabled young people, ethnically diverse communities, and low-income families. Pursuing a commercially driven gym expansion at the direct expense of those groups does not reduce inequalities, it deepens them.
Meanwhile, Cllr Matt Kelcher rightly highlighted the link between environment, physical health, and mental wellbeing, noting that "happiness as a central focus is something I'm really pleased about," while Cabinet colleagues spoke at length about "taking action to tackle health inequalities" and working to "improve every child in Brent's start in life."
Closing the debate, the Leader of the Council Councillor Butt emphasised the importance of supporting young people and protecting community assets:
"Everyone wants to feel safe in their locality, in their home, in their area. And also have places and spaces which are thriving... We need to make sure we are creating places and spaces where people want to remain in Brent."
I could not agree more. Track Academy is a prime example of a thriving space that gives young people in Brent hope, ambition, discipline, and mentorship. You do not create "places and spaces where people want to remain in Brent" by tearing out a rare London-wide youth asset that already works.
A Week for Reflection Before Full Council
Nobody disputes that Willesden Sports Centre needs investment and modernisation. But rather than destroying a unique indoor track, the Council should be going back to the drawing board, working with Track Academy, Queens Park Harriers, and neighbouring boroughs like Camden and Westminster to promote and enhance this facility.
Over 1,100 people have already signed Track Academy’s petition calling on Brent Council to halt the closure.
Between now and next week’s Full Council meeting, where Believe in Brent will be put to a vote, I hope Cabinet members take the time to reflect carefully on the words they spoke on Monday morning. If they truly believe that everything they do is about "the health and well-being of residents," tackling "stark inequalities," and protecting "places and spaces which are thriving," then they must match their words with their deeds, and save the indoor athletics track at Willesden Sports Centre
Sign Track Academy’s petition and write to your councillor here: https://trackacademy.co.uk/protect-brent-athletics
6 comments:
Brents plans and strategies tend to the generic which is good only for the Brent conservation area life rafts.
The rest of Brent meanwhile sinks into escalating anti-socialism, anti-resilience and welfare infrastructure removal towards neighbourhoods no more. Population growth areas are colonies of exclusion Matt.
Lets hope that Suzanne is involved in the £1 billion public contract negotiation with Ballymore for South Kilburn, the next 10 tower years plus.
National government clearly does not Believe in Brent or it would direct connect South Brent (entire borough boundary) into Central London's £ billions of high quality public good investments. When will this North Korea- South Korea idiot game of bad decision making end?
Put South Kilburn's massive population growth zoned in the new London Plan. Active travel bridges connect Ballymore Kensal Canalside direct to Brent Kensal. Fund an 800m urban cable car south from Harlesden Old Town direct into the economic, heath and social major opportunities land south.
Removing provision like here at Willesden here reflects the lack of belief in Brent car-free tower hundreds being successful or being an equal in quality to car-free tower hundreds Hammersmith and Fulham or car-free tower hundreds Ealing. A rationing of goods, a disconnect, an ongoing inequality by austere design.
Nice one Suzanne, well presented. Brent Labour are a useless bunch of ne'er-do-wells. The sooner the other three parties depose them, the better for Brent.
Thanks very much for your comment and for raising these points about connectivity and investment in South Brent. You highlight a real frustration, major regeneration and high-density housing cannot succeed without genuine investment in active travel, public transport links, and local infrastructure so that areas like Willesden, Harlesden, and South Kilburn aren't left disconnected from opportunities across the borough boundary.
Unfortunately, I have no involvement in any discussions or decisions regarding the future of Ballymore in South Kilburn, I only found out they were appointed through the cabinet papers, like everybody else.
Because Brent Labour was forbidden by their NEC from any engagement with Brent Greens, we were never given the opportunity to explore a progressive alliance or coalition. Had that been on the table, I would have strongly advocated for it within our group and the local party so that a Green voice could have been in the room pushing for better infrastructure and a fairer deal for Kilburn and South Brent. Sadly, that wasn't an option open to us.
Thanks for the kind words. The reality in the council chamber is that the three opposition parties aren't acting as a single bloc, in practice, the Conservatives are propping up Cllr Butt and Brent Labour through a de facto confidence-and-supply arrangement.
Without an overall majority, Brent Labour are running a minority administration that doesn't reflect how Brent actually voted. They are only able to cling to power because the Tories abstain on critical votes rather than holding them to account. Residents deserve far better than a Labour administration kept afloat by Conservative abstentions.
It is really scary now that even the new by local people elected Green councillors for South Kilburn (one time Carlton ward) are excluded from the Brent-Ballymore New Deal for South Kilburn in what is now regeneration process year 25. A local Labour councillor sat on the local residents elected community-led NDC Board 2001-2008, how did democratic inclusion fail so badly?
From 2001-2008 community-led, since 2010 morphed into developer brownfield impunity-led with endless disturbances to local community health, wellbeing and life. A HARDSHIP of poorest quality towers/ wellbeing cuts surrounded by conservation area LIFE RAFTS of amplified public services.
The old antisemitism weapon put to dubious use by Labour. What about anti-tenantism, new feudalism and the exclusionary misery of brownfield contamination (since 2010) planning designation of council estate living (just about) communities in Brent?
Post a Comment