Tuesday, 1 July 2025

Lana Del Rey Concerts: Wembley Parking restrictions and road closures Thursday 3rd July and Friday 4th July

 From Brent Council

 

Wembley Stadium will be hosting Lana Del Rey UK and Ireland Tour 2025 on Thursday 3 July and Friday 4 July.


Please read below to see how this might affect you.


Timings


- Lana Del Rey UK and Ireland Tour 2025 on Thursday 3 July and  Friday 4 July, doors will open at 5.00pm and road closures will be in place from 3.15pm on both days.


We expect the area around Wembley Stadium to be very busy before and after this event so please avoid the area if you can, unless you have a ticket for the event.


Event day parking


Event day parking restrictions will be in place from 8am to midnight on main roads and from 10am to midnight on residential roads on Thursday 3 July and Friday 4 July.



Saturday, 28 June 2025

Tenants seek further information on Brent Council's follow-up to council housing management failures


 

Wembley Matters has recently pubished guests posts by Brent Council tenants of the St Raphael's and South Kilburn Estates  LINK as well as the findings of the Regulator of Social Housing on brent Council's serious failings in housing management.

Asif Zamir of St Raphael's wrote to Spencer Randolph, Brent Director of Housing about the issues. His reply is below along with Asif's response.

 

Dear Asif Zamir,

 

Thank you for taking the time to write on behalf of the residents of St Raphael’s Estate and sharing your concerns regarding the condition and safety of your homes on the estate. I want to begin by acknowledging the distress that the recent findings from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) judgment, have understandably caused. Please know that we take these matters extremely seriously, and yours and all of our tenants safety and well-being remain our highest priority.

 

When we identified inconsistencies in our safety data earlier this year, we acted swiftly and responsibly by referring ourselves to the RSH. This was not a decision taken lightly, but we believed it was the right and transparent course of action to begin addressing the issues at hand with the seriousness they deserve.

 

Since then, we have taken a number of urgent steps. We appointed an external health and safety consultancy with experience in supporting organisations in similar situations. They have engaged directly with the RSH and are supporting us in making rapid and lasting improvements. Their work includes helping us to verify and update our compliance data and to ensure all necessary safety checks are clearly recorded and acted upon.

 

We have also commissioned an audit of our systems and data, due to conclude in mid-July. This review will identify the root causes of the failings and inform a detailed recovery plan, underpinned by clear timelines and actions to ensure accountability.

 

In the meantime, we are reviewing all compliance data and building safety actions using a risk-based approach, prioritising high-risk issues. To help us move at pace, we are increasing capacity in our teams, including recruiting additional officers and contractors dedicated to this work.

 

We are also taking visible action across the Borough and on St. Raphael’s Estate. Over the coming weeks, residents will see more surveyors and contractors on estates as we carry out:

 

A new round of Stock Condition Surveys to update our understanding of the condition of every home

Fire Risk Assessments for all blocks of flats on estates

Pre and post-inspections to make sure building safety actions are completed to a high standard

We will communicate clearly and in advance about any visits to our tenants homes or buildings, and we are committed to improving how we engage with you going forward.

 

Finally, I want to reiterate that Brent Council is fully committed to learning from these failings and to restoring your confidence in the safety and quality of your homes. We know that words alone are not enough, you deserve to see real, sustained improvements, and we are determined to deliver them.

 

Thank you again for sharing your concerns.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Spencer Randolph

Director – Housing Services

 

 

 

Dear Spencer Randolph,

 

Thank you for your prompt response to my letter and for acknowledging the concerns of St. Raphael's Estate residents following the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) findings. We appreciate your transparency in referring Brent Council to the RSH, and we understand that steps are being taken to address the issues.

 

While we acknowledge the measures you've outlined, including the appointment of an external consultancy, the audit of systems, and increased capacity within your teams, the residents of St. Raphael's Estate require reassurance and immediate, tangible results to ensure their safety.

 

The recent fire on St. Raphael's Estate in May, which tragically led to the tragic loss of life of our neighbours, has significantly heightened anxieties among residents. This incident demands an urgent and thorough investigation into why the building experienced accelerated combustion and further to this why the fire was not contained and spread to the ajoining property.  We need clear answers regarding potential concerns with insulation, cladding, or the overall build quality of the affected building and others on the estate. Furthermore, we are deeply concerned about a potential correlation between this tragic incident and the previously identified lack of safety data from Brent Council.

 

While the planned surveys and risk assessments are a welcome step, residents need to see these actions translated into fast results. The fear of another incident is very real, and waiting for audits to conclude in mid-July and for the implementation of recovery plans does not alleviate the immediate anxieties.

 

We urge Brent Council to:

 

Prioritise the investigation into the St. Raphael's Estate fire, providing residents with immediate updates on preliminary findings regarding the cause of accelerated combustion and any links to building materials or construction.

 

Share a clear and accelerated timeline for addressing the most critical safety issues identified by the RSH and through your ongoing reviews, particularly those related to fire safety.

 

Demonstrate visible and proactive measures on the estate now, beyond just surveys, to address any immediate high-risk concerns.

 

Establish a direct and ongoing communication channel with residents to provide transparent updates on progress and address specific concerns arising from the fire and the RSH findings.

 

We understand that systemic changes take time, but the safety and peace of mind of St. Raphael's Estate as well as residents from wider Brent cannot wait. We look forward to seeing swift and decisive action that translates your commitment into demonstrable improvements in the safety and quality of our homes.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Asif Zamir

 


 An old map of the original estate

 

Meanwhile Pete Firmin, a tenant on the South Kilburn Estate,  has submitted a Freedom of Information request on the remit and makeup of the housing Advisory Board. LINK

  

Dear Brent Borough Council,
 

I understand a Housing Advisory Board has been set up. Can you please tell me:

1) Its remit.
2) Its composition - who is on the board and their qualification for doing so.
3) If there are residents on this board, how they were recruited and what qualifications they were required to have to be on the board.
4) All correspondence relating both to the establishment of this board and the recruitment of its members.

The curtain comes down for the very last time at the Wembley Majestic Cinema - the final part of the local history series


This the last of the local history series on the Wembley Majestic by Tony Royden and Philip Grant. I would like to thank them for the guest  articles that are clearly the result of a great deal of research and preserve another piece of Wembley history.

 

1.The Majestic Cinema from Park Lane, early 1950s, with a carnival procession passing by.

 

We hope you’ve enjoyed the two previous instalments of our story, taking us up to the cinema’s opening night on 11 January 1929. If you missed them, “click” on these “links” for Part 1 and Part 2

 

After all the hype and publicity behind Wembley’s new ‘super cinema’, the Majestic finally opened its doors to the public on Saturday 12 January 1929 and the audience were treated to a one-day special programme: On the bill were variety acts and two black-and-white, silent movies, with the headline feature film, “Across the Atlantic”, starring Monty Blue and Edna Murphy - a 1928 US, hour-long, romantic drama. With its first takings at the box office, the Majestic was now up and running as a business.

 

2.The Majestic’s advertisement from the “Wembley News”, 25 January 1929.
(Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

From that day, the Majestic adopted a regular pattern of screening two films a week: Monday to Wednesday (the first film) and Thursday to Saturday (the second film), with Sunday being a day of rest, until the law was changed in 1932. Often billed alongside the movies would be live variety acts, performed on the Majestic’s stage and music played on the cinema’s Kinestra organ (sometimes to accompany silent movies and other times solo pieces would be performed in the interludes).

 

3.The Majestic’s projection room and its equipment.
(“Kinematograph Weekly”, 17 January 1929 – image courtesy of the British Library)

 

An article published in the “Kinematograph Weekly”, 17 January 1929, stated: 'The Majestic embodies every principle of the best West End practice and there can be few similar halls which will bear comparison with the building, especially as regards the equipment of the projection box, which should serve as an example of modern installation of this nature.' The projection room was indeed something to be proud of, but no sooner had the Majestic opened, a major transition in cinematic history was taking place.

 

In October 1927 the very first “part-talkie” movie “The Jazz Singer” premiered in America – and it was an instant hit. The film screened at London’s Piccadilly Theatre in September 1928 and in the same month, British Talking Pictures Ltd (a newly formed company), had acquired a former British Empire Exhibition building at Wembley Park, to open a film studio – later claiming it to be the first fully equipped talking-picture studio in Europe. A new era of ‘talking movies’ had arrived and although the Majestic had top class film projectors, it would soon have to change and move with the times – an added expense they didn’t see coming.

 

4.One of W.E. Greenwood’s interior designs, in the Majestic Cinema’s auditorium, colourised.
(From the “Wembley News” supplement, 18 January 1929)

 

Other changes were also on the horizon: By the end of 1929, Wembley’s Majestic Cinema had changed ownership from the original company of local businessmen, led by R.H. Powis (a County Councillor and public works contractor), to the ‘Majestic Theatres Corporation Ltd’, headed and chaired by W.E. Greenwood – the highly acclaimed atmospheric interior designer of Wembley’s Majestic cinema. The new company seemed to have legs and in December 1929, “The Bioscope” reported that a second “Majestic” cinema had opened in Staines and that there would be a third “Majestic” opening in High Wycombe (both with interior décor designed by Mr Greenwood) to add to the Wembley “Majestic” which the new company now owned.

 

How did the two rival cinemas in Wembley respond to competition from the new Majestic ‘super cinema’? The change in the style of the Majestic’s weekly programme advertisements in 1933 was a sign that something was going on!

 

5.Majestic Cinema programme adverts from the “Wembley News”, April and December 1933.
(Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

The Elite Cinema (with 1500 seats) located in Raglan Gardens (now Empire Way), closed in March 1930 and, after internal reconstruction, reopened in May 1930 as the Capitol Cinema, increasing its capacity to 1637 seats. It was refurbished again in 1933 and it was around this time that the Capitol and the Majestic decided the best way forward for both businesses to prosper would be to operate under one umbrella. It turned out that they were now both ultimately owned by County Cinemas Ltd (though operated through a local subsidiary company). The ownership change was publicly confirmed from July 1934, when their weekly programmes were displayed in joint advertisements.

 

6.Majestic and Capitol Cinema programme advert from the “Wembley News”, 5 July 1934.
(Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

The Majestic’s other, and nearest, rival (as you can tell from the aerial photograph below) was the smaller, privately-owned, Wembley Hall Cinema – located at the corner of the High Road and Cecil Avenue. It was 1935 before its proprietor, Miss Nora Thomson, decided to rebuild and modernise her cinema, increasing the seating capacity from 560 to 1050. This may have been in response to competition from the Majestic, or even from the rapidly-growing Odeon chain that had opened cinemas in Kingsbury and Kenton in 1934, and had plans to open another cinema even closer, in Allandale Avenue, Sudbury, in 1935. But with the film industry growing at an exponential rate, and on the cusp of what was considered to be the ‘Golden Age of Cinema’ (with people flocking to see their favourite movie stars and latest film releases), Miss Thomson’s decision to expand may have simply been to reap the rewards of that.

 

7.Aerial photograph showing part of Wembley High Road in 1938, with arrows showing the two cinemas.
(Britain from Above, image EPW056263 – courtesy of Historic England)

 

The outbreak of the Second World War in September 1939 may have had a profound impact on County Cinemas Ltd as (in the same month) it was sold to Oscar Deutsch’s Odeon Cinema chain. The Majestic managed to keep its name, and both its cinema and ballroom played their part in helping to keep up the morale of local civilians during the dark wartime years.  But more changes were afoot, when the Rank Organisation bought control of Odeon Cinemas following Deutsch’s death in 1941. As for the Capitol Cinema in Empire Way, that too played its part in the war effort when, in 1943, it was requisitioned to use as a shelter for people displaced from their bomb-damaged homes – it was never to reopen as a cinema again.

 

8.Two adverts for events at the Majestic in May 1943. (Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

From the end of the war through to the mid-1950s, the film industry experienced a period of prosperity, marked by a series of box office hits shown at the Majestic from Paramount Pictures, whose Academy Award winning films included "Sunset Boulevard", "The Greatest Show on Earth", "Shane" and Cecil B. DeMille's "The Ten Commandments".

 

9.Wembley High Road in the early 1950s, with the Majestic Cinema on the right. (Colourised photograph)

 

In January 1956, after it was decided that the Majestic needed a more modern feel, applications were submitted for new signage for the front of the building: The café was to become the “STARS espresso bar and restaurant”, and a large vertical illuminated “ODEON” sign was to be placed above the entrance door. The Majestic’s name was formally changed to the Odeon in March 1956 (although local residents still referred to it as The Majestic!). 

 

Meanwhile, the Wembley Hall Cinema, which had operated independently for 25 years under the ownership of Miss Nora Thomson, came to an end when Miss Thomson retired and sold her cinema in February 1956. The cinema closed for two weeks for rebranding and reopened on 25 March under the new name of “Gaumont”. This should have rung alarm bells, as both the Odeon and Gaumont cinema chains were owned by the Rank Organisation.

 

At that time, the Majestic’s future may have still looked bright, especially when more illuminated signs appeared on the front of the building in 1957, advertising the “Victor Silvester Dance Studio” – this would have been a huge draw. The famous Wembley-born ballroom dancer and band leader ran a chain of schools teaching ballroom dancing, and one of these opened in the Majestic’s ballroom. 

 

10.The Odeon (former Majestic) Wembley, with signs for the Victor Silverster dance studio, around 1960.
(Brent Archives – Wembley History Society Collection – colourised version)

 

However, television had arrived and its popularity was rapidly growing. By 1960, box office takings were on the decline and ‘The Golden Age of Cinema’ was coming to an end. During this period, Wembley had three cinemas, all in close proximity to each other – the Majestic, the Gaumont and the Regal/ABC (which had opened on Ealing Road, 8 February 1937). The market share wasn’t enough to go around and so something had to give.  

 

The Rank Organisation had probably been considering getting rid of one of their two Wembley High Road cinemas for some time (especially as they had already closed their Odeon cinema on Allandale Avenue, Sudbury, in October 1956). When a potential buyer came knocking with an offer for the much larger of the two cinemas, located in a more desirable position for shopping, the writing was on the wall for the Majestic.    

 

On Thursday, May 25 1961, Wembley residents awoke to read a front-page headline in the “Wembley Observer” that must have shaken them to the core. It read: “Former Majestic closes on Saturday. WEMBLEY LOSES ITS ODEON CINEMA.” Inside, instead of the usual programme advertisement, was an announcement from the cinema itself stating: ’The management regret that this Theatre will be closed as from Sunday, May 28th’.

 

11.The front-page story in the “Wembley Observer”, 25 May 1961.
(Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

12.The Odeon programme advert from the “Wembley Observer”, 25 May 1961.
(Brent Archives – local newspaper microfilms)

 

If the news wasn’t shocking enough, it was also announced that the dance studio and restaurant had been told they must close on the same day. The Observer further reported that the Rank Organisation had, that week, submitted an outline planning application to build a supermarket on the cinema’s site. It was the end of an era – Wembley’s beloved Majestic/Odeon was to be no more. Its wonderful stage curtain had fallen for the last time. 

 

13.The Majestic Cinema’s safety curtain - colourised.
(From the “Wembley News” supplement, 18 January 1929)

 

Out of the two cinemas on Wembley High Road, it was the Gaumont that went on to fight another day. When the Majestic closed, the Rank Organisation simultaneously rebranded the Gaumont to their more popularly known Odeon name, and there it continued as the Wembley Odeon until it closed in January 1975. (The building was used again from 1976 to 1981, as the Liberty Cinema, showing Bollywood films, before it was finally demolished.)

 

14.The former Wembley Hall Cinema, as the Gaumont (1956) and Wembley Odeon (1962).
(Images from the internet)

 

Only a third of a century after it was built, Wembley’s Majestic Cinema was demolished. The building which replaced it opened as a C&A Modes clothing shop in 1962. More recently, readers may also remember this as a Wilkinson’s “Wilko” store, but that too has gone. 

 

15.The 1960s building on the former Majestic Cinema site, from Park Lane, June 2025.

 

Sadly, the Majestic Cinema and its name have long disappeared from our High Road, but we hope that this short series of articles has helped you to visualise the grandeur of Wembley’s own “super cinema” and in some way, helped to preserve its memory. R.H. Powis, whose dream it was for local men to build the Majestic for the enjoyment of local people, is also long gone. But in his capacity as a public works contractor, his name has not entirely disappeared from our local streets – if you keep your eyes peeled, you may just see it as you stroll through the area!

 

16.An “R.H. Powis – Wembley” manhole cover. (This one is in Slough Lane, Kingsbury)


Tony Royden and Philip Grant.


Thursday, 26 June 2025

International Reggae Day in Harlesden Tuesday July 1st starting at 4pm

 


Road closures from 2pm and post event bus diversions for LINKIN PARK Wembley Stadium event Saturday


 

From Brazil's diverse society to Brent's - Magnificent Quilt Exhibition at Wembley Library

 

When you enter Brent Civic Centre from its new main entrance on Olympic Way (next to Sainsbury's) you are hit by a riot of colour. This is the quilt exhibition that is the result of a lottery funded heritage project by the Brazilian Community and Cultural Support Centre in London.

They explain:

The Weaving our History in a quilt project offered cultural heritage education through a native art form that involved 56 children and young people and 15 parents of Brazilian descent living in London in a creative collaboration that will develop a History Quilt in the tradition of "Embroiderers". The final quilt was exhibited  days at  places of cultural importance for the Brazilian community residing in London

 

Over 20 sessions, specialized educators taught the history and weaving techniques to mothers and children in regular meetings at the Clube dos Brasileirinhos. They learned the history and heritage of embroidery and the tradition of “Embroiderers” from a place called: “Vale do Jequitinhonha”, which is located in "Minas Gerais"   in the Southeast region of Brazil. The families  created an embroidery exhibition, the Colcha da História, which summarized the history of Brazilian embroidery in a work of art.

 

In the process, the children learned  the basics of weaving, embroidery, finishing and the "painting" designs made by the weavers. During the workshops, the instructors trained the participants in weaving techniques and in the culture of the weavers of Vale do Jequitinhonha. This is a way of weaving and a culture that is established from the confluence of three different peoples: the Portuguese, the Africans and the indigenous people. The sessions were  led by Liliane Benevenuto Lemos, artisan and researcher in textile art, education and Brazilian culture. From learning the art of weaving, participants also learned about the history of weavers, meanings of traditional designs, quilombola way of life, work songs, verses, cirandas, weaving gestures and rhythms that are part of the local culture in Brazil .


During this immersive learning experience, participants created the quilt artwork that was structured in a three-part timeline that references significant periods in Brazil's recent history; indigenous, Portuguese and African legacy and European immigration. They collected information and designs that were manually incorporated as visual embroidered motifs and symbols from each period. The main message we want children and young people to take home is the unity achieved through diversity, which is a unique and significant gift that Brazil offers the world. The educational narrative will make reference to different ethnicities, food, music, customs, spirituality and dance. At the same time, it will deepen the tradition of “embroiderers” and equip participants with practical skills that keep this cultural heritage alive in the Brazilian diaspora. This Project  sewed the History of Brazil and the tradition of embroidery into a quilt.

 




Further information HERE

 


Wednesday, 25 June 2025

Road closures and bus diversions from 1.30pm tomorrow (THURSDAY) for Guns n' Roses at Wembley Stadium

 School children and workers will be affected by tomorrow's early road closures as they try to get home.

A young fan today - Thursday  (I told him about some of the comments below) -  his dad got him interested.


 



 

Tuesday, 24 June 2025

Bring back a Housing Committee so we have effective oversight and scrutiny!

 

 

There was something rather familiar about the issues discussed at the Audit and Standards Advisory Sub-Committee and the solutions put  forward. The Sub-committee were discussing the actions being undertaken following the Council reporting itself to the Regulator of Social Housing,

In March 2016 Brent Housing Partnership  was put into Special Measures after performance failings. BHP was an arms length adjunct of Brent Council.  Some of the Council's concerns were included in a report to Cabinet in June 2016:


Eventually Brent Council decided to bring housing management back in-house and BHP was dissolved in October 2017:


 

Tenants were promised:

  • More investment in up-to-date technology, such as a new smartphone app for simple transactions
  • More joined up approach between housing and other council services, to provide a better customer experience for tenants and leaseholders
  • A more responsive and flexible repairs service
  • More and better targeted investment in estates, blocks, and houses
  • Review of service standards, to ensure we are delivering what residents want 

 

Better engagement of residents in decision-making about their homes and estates.

How far those promises have been kept can be judged by the contributions to this blog by tenants on the St Raphael's and South Kilburn estates as well as the findings of the Housing Regulator.

Audit set out to ask frank and honest questions. It emerged that when Spencer Randolph became director of Housing Services some 11 months ago, he discovered the failings in the council housing service and saw no option but to report them to the Regulator.  During the meeting he remarked that he had previously held private landlords to account via the licensing scheme, and now in his role as a 'landlord' in change of Brent council housing, he had to hold the council to account. He had previously been unaware of the gravity of the situation.

Rather than going over old ground (presumably including who was to blame for the failures) he wanted to move on, and the Council will begin again to carry out assessments on all 33 of their high-rise blocks and pick up the required actions now. 

He said that the reason the fire risk assessments were not done properly was in the way they had been recorded - issues, actions taken and closed down (completed). The new system introduced two years ago should indicate when information is missing but had only been in active use since he came in 11 months ago and wanted up to date and robust information.

Cllr Malloy asked if staff had been recording that they had taken an action when they hadn't. Randolph said they didn’t know yet, that would come as a consequence of the audit that was being undertaken.

Cllr Long recognised that he had inherited the problem and asked it the issue was lack of tenant engagement and scrutiny. Randolph said it was probably lack of oversight of data management from a management perspective and inadequate training of staff. An engagement team had been brought in in March 2025 and were doing lots of engagement. In fact, the Regulator had complimented the authority on the engagement approach they were now taking.

 The audit currently taking place would take 6-8 weeks including report writing and he expected it would take a year to 18 months to achieve a C2 or C1 compliance rating.

He listed the 'Big Eight' that were being audited: fire safety, asbestos management, electricity and gas safety, water, lifts, damp, mould, smoke and Co2 detectors.  There would be a 'deep dive' into these compliance issues.

Cllr Kabir said that housing was the most important part of the council's work. Years ago, there had been a Housing Committee and personally, she though it should be brought back. Housing needs far more scrutiny and overview than it has now, given that it is of huge importance to the council. 

The councillor asked about the additional resources needed to address the issues, how much money would it cost, and where would the money come from?

Spencer Randolph said that the Regulator would want a plan in place to achieve compliance within the next 2 to 3 years. Many compliance posts had not been filled so he was recruiting to those. A new Strategic Compliance Manager had been recruited as well as an interim head of service. He would be bringing in additional posts in the Compliance Team over and above current structures. 

Cllr Smith asked about the 12,500 fire safety actions that had not been carried out, what proportion of the total were they? She agreed with Cllr Kabir over the need for a Housing Committee and asked about contractor management - Wates was often frequently the offender in complaints.  Randolph said that there were c36,000 repairs per year and wates would be named as it was the only contractor. There would now be two contractors in future with more robust management. Some of the 12,500 actions could date as much as 3 years.

Many London boroughs were in a similar position to Brent due to lack of investment in stock, ageing housing, and frozen rents. The London outlier was Newham with a C4 judgment.

 Cllr Malloy asked about the money needed for all the above and whether it would have to be funded from the Housing Revenue Account (HRA),

It is worth recording Randolph's reply for future reference:

Our business as a landlord is based upon our rents and how much it costs to run our business. So, we will need to make sure we are very stringent on where we can make savings elsewhere, better contract management, making sure we are maximising our rental income, maximising the payments we're getting from leaseholders and works we're carrying out there. These are all changes we’ve got in our Business Plan. 

Responding to Cllr Patel he said:

We can't kick this can down the road. If money needs to be spent to make people's houses safe, we can't keep putting it off and putting it off. If the root causality [of the failure] is that we find it was put off because we didn't want to spend the money, then that's not a good position to be in. 

I think that with proven financial management and a realistic timetable then things can be budgeted for within our existing HRA budget.

Spencer Randolph did not think that the Regulator's judgement would impct on the councils housing projects but another member of the corporate team said it was still a risk.