The Brent Unison representative wrote to Christine Gilbert, Brent Council Acting Chief Executive, regarding the treatment of Rosemary Clarke saying “I am deeply concerned regarding the way Rosemary Clarke is being
treated, the lack of adherence to procedures and the breach of
confidentiality.”
She called Clarke's treatment by Cara Davani, Head of Human Resources, 'unprecedented and unnecessary'.
Clarke recently won her case with a judment that she has suffered racial discrmination, victimisation and constructive dismissal.
I understand that today another ex-employee of Brent Council has had a positive outcome at the Watford Employment Tribunal. Marion Hofmann's cause was championed by Francis Henry LINK who resigned as chair of Brent Sustainability Forum over Hofmann's treatment. Hofmann is white.
He wrote:
This is beginning to look like a pattern, rather than a one-off, which is what of course many people commenting on Wembley Matters have claimed.
'Unprecedented' may not be quite correct as Cara Davani had a run-in with Unisonn when she was at Tower Hamlets Council. This is what Personnel Today wrote in May 2006 LINK
Following the Brent TUC motion reported below and the success (and courage) of Rosemary Clarke and Marion Hoffman it is time for the many anonymous contributers of comments on this blog to come forward and put their cases to their union. That is what unions are for after all. Comments may let off steam, but they do not effect the change that is needed at Brent Council or win compensation for those experiencing injustice.
Action through the unions can do that. While complaints remain anonymous they can be ignored by both union officials, who want to avoid confrontation with management, and Brent Council itself. They can legitimately claim that they cannot follow up such complaints as they do not know the person complaining and no documented evidence, or less legitimately, that all the comments on Wembley Matters could have been made by just a handful of people.
I am aware that because of the alleged bullying and victimisation, people have been reluctant to come forward. In the new atmosphere generated by the Employment Tribunal judgments, and by Brent TUC's demand for an independent investigation, people should have the confidence to make a stand.
Together we stand - divided we fall.
Don't let the bullies win.
She called Clarke's treatment by Cara Davani, Head of Human Resources, 'unprecedented and unnecessary'.
Clarke recently won her case with a judment that she has suffered racial discrmination, victimisation and constructive dismissal.
I understand that today another ex-employee of Brent Council has had a positive outcome at the Watford Employment Tribunal. Marion Hofmann's cause was championed by Francis Henry LINK who resigned as chair of Brent Sustainability Forum over Hofmann's treatment. Hofmann is white.
He wrote:
I and others are appalled how Brent Council and your senior officers have treated one of our colleagues who has contributed so much to public engagement and the promotion of environmental issues.
It would seem that as an organisation Brent Council and some of your officers in Environmental Services will do everything possible to get rid of good and trusted officers who understand how to work with local people and who are truly committed to the cause.
I am so disgusted by the conduct of Brent Council and the conduct of your senior officers that I am resigning as Chair of Brent Sustainability Forum and ceasing my involvement with anything involving your Council.
You and the whole Council should be ashamed in the way you treat your valued members of staff who have the trust and respect of the local community.I do not know the details of the Judgment but will publish as soon as I do.
This is beginning to look like a pattern, rather than a one-off, which is what of course many people commenting on Wembley Matters have claimed.
'Unprecedented' may not be quite correct as Cara Davani had a run-in with Unisonn when she was at Tower Hamlets Council. This is what Personnel Today wrote in May 2006 LINK
The HR director at Tower Hamlets has fired a parting shot at one of the east London council’s trade unions after leaving for a new job.
Cara Davani, who left last week after three years in the role, accused Unison – which represents more than 2,200 staff at the authority -of being obstructive and afraid of change.
“I’ve watched [union reps] say no to something before they even know what I’m proposing,” she said. “I find that very hard to deal with.
Relationships have been mixed and there have been changes and restructuring they’ve found difficult to stomach.”
Davani said the council had “excellent” relations with the GMB, its other trade union, but that Unison was more “militant”.Either Brent Council did not check on Carani's background and were therefore negligent, or did and were quite happy with her approach. Both options are worrying.
Earlier this month, Unison members went on strike over changes to the council’s sickness absence procedures.
The union accused management of “bullying” staff by introducing a call centre that sick staff must notify when they are absent. But Davani said the union only objected after a decision was made to outsource the role to specialist firm FirstAssist.
John McLoughlin, Unison branch chairman, hit back, claiming it had been “very difficult” working with Davani. “The corporate management team have their own agenda to see change through rather than any genuine consultation,” he said.
Following the Brent TUC motion reported below and the success (and courage) of Rosemary Clarke and Marion Hoffman it is time for the many anonymous contributers of comments on this blog to come forward and put their cases to their union. That is what unions are for after all. Comments may let off steam, but they do not effect the change that is needed at Brent Council or win compensation for those experiencing injustice.
Action through the unions can do that. While complaints remain anonymous they can be ignored by both union officials, who want to avoid confrontation with management, and Brent Council itself. They can legitimately claim that they cannot follow up such complaints as they do not know the person complaining and no documented evidence, or less legitimately, that all the comments on Wembley Matters could have been made by just a handful of people.
I am aware that because of the alleged bullying and victimisation, people have been reluctant to come forward. In the new atmosphere generated by the Employment Tribunal judgments, and by Brent TUC's demand for an independent investigation, people should have the confidence to make a stand.
Together we stand - divided we fall.
Don't let the bullies win.
