Wembley just wild about Harry! Road closures & bus diversions for 12 Harry Styles concerts - 8 on weekdays

 

There will be 12 Harry Styles concert dates at Wembley Stadium  over the rest of this month starting on Friday June 12th and through to July 4th, 

Eight of these dates are on weekdays with road closures starting at 1pm with associated bus diversions. This will impact school children travelling home from school, particularly those using the 206 bus route which will be not run south between Wembley Park and Brent Park. This also affects workers travelling to Brent Park and the industrial estates south of the stadium, including the Amazon warehouse and the Tesco and Ikea stores.

Brent Council approved the increased number of concerts at Wembley Stadium in January 2025 with 8 more major concerts a year. A major event is defined as an attendance of more that 60,000. Decision notice:

The number of major events held at the stadium in any one calendar year shall be restricted to no more than 54 (to exclude European Cup and World Cup events where England/UK is the host nation). This shall be described as the cap. Within the event cap, the number of major events involving UK based domestic association football teams shall be restricted to no more than 25. LINK

A Wembley Hill resident contacted Wembley Matters:

Does this mean that on all these days road closures and bus diversions will be active from 1pm?  Doors open 5pm. Not only that I have appointment at my doctors at Wembley Park Humphry Repton Lane which is also closed on event days, my appointment is for 4.00 p.m.on Friday.

 

Does this mean all locals using bus services 206,92,182 and 83 are again inconvenienced with either no service or diversions.

 

 

Employment & Benefits Support, Chalkhill Community Centre 17th June 3-6pm

 

Welford Centre, 113 Chalkhill Road, Wembley, HA9 9FX 

Wembley Park tube and 182, 206, 223, 245 (Forty Lane) 297 buses.

BREAKING: Woodfield dispute escalates as academy chief issues 47 staff with 30 day fire and rehire notice

 

The Chief Executive Officer of the Compass Learning Trust that runs two special schools in Brent, Woodfield School and The Village School, has issued 47 Woodfield staff with a 30 day consultation notice after which fire and rehire would be implemented:

Staff now have two options available:  

Option 1 – Accept the Variation of Contract

Staff may choose to sign a variation to their contract based on the final offer outlined above by no later than 8th July 2026. Individual variation letters will be issued during the coming week.

Option 2 – Decline the Variation of Contract

 

Staff who choose not to sign the variation will be invited to dismissal and re-engagement meetings.

Fire and rehire is due to be outlawed in January 2027  so the Trust is moving quickly. The letter from the CEO outlines the Trust's claim that its faces a dire financial situation. This of course raises the issue of how it got into this situation. The NEU were never given these deficit details. There is no mention of the £3.8m held in reserves:     

The purpose of the [proposed] restructure was to address the school’s ongoing and unsustainable financial position and to ensure its long-term viability. Woodfield School reported a deficit of £76,469 at the end of the 2023/24 financial year, which increased significantly to a net deficit of £372,422 in 2024/25. Current projections indicate that, without intervention, the deficit will increase by a further £517,790 over the next three years, resulting in a cumulative five-year projected deficit of £966,681. These figures exclude agency staffing costs, where current annual expenditure exceeds £600,000. The Trust is taking steps to bring expenditure under control.

Brent NEU has previously raised concerns over poor financial management at the school and high executive salaries. LINK The CEO addresses this:

In addition to the school-level savings identified through the restructure process, the Trust has also reviewed its central costs following discussions with the NEU regarding the level of top slice charged to schools and the cost of leadership at Trust level. As a result, the Trust has reduced the top slice by £400 per pupil. To support this reduction, following the departure of the previous CEO in April 2026, both the CEO and CFO (Chief Finance Officer)  roles have been reduced to 0.6 FTE.

The management's initial proposal was to reduce the hours of support staff by 3-1/2 hours per week equating to a loss of £200 a month. Workers rejected the offer below as derisory. It reduced the reduction in hours by one hour.

An increase in contracted hours from the proposed 32.5 hours to 33.5 hours per week.

A free school lunch for affected staff, provided by the school kitchen.

A 1.30pm finish at the end of each term for all staff.

A half-day for affected staff on the October Performance Management INSET day.

30 minutes of overtime for affected staff for the completion of Behaviour Reports.

Pay protection until 28 February 2027

The NEU will continue striking and has called for massive support for its picket lines on Thursday and Friday of this week.  The strike by mainly female mainly ethnic minority low paid workers recalls the struggle of Jayaben Desai and her fellow Grunwick strikers and today's school workers are equally determined.

The NEU Regional London Office will be receiving advice from senior lawyers, probably by Friday this week and meanwhile the NEU London senior officer are stressing to members that they should not sign under any circumstances- as negotiations are meant to be still ongoing, and the strike is also ongoing. The NEU will be in a stronger position legally if members do not sign and continue the campaign. Members are advised to continue the strike action to demonstrates that the workers are still in hope of an improved offer.

Even if people did sign, this would not need doing until July anyway as there is a consultation period first, giving time for a proper legal response to the letters.

 

The picket line is from 7.30am outside the school:

Woodfield School, Glenwood Avenue, Kingsbury, London, NW9 7LY

 

 

 

London Assembly report on heat networks where some suffer from inescapable bad deals

 Heating networks are becoming more common in Brent with concerns over reliability and accounts of excessive bills.  This London Assembly report is timely and should be considered by the new administration in Brent:      

Britain’s energy regulator, Ofgem, must urgently consider implementing price protections for heat network customers, with continued energy price increases due to the conflict in the Middle East

Ofgem was appointed as the regulator for heat networks in January 2026.

The London Assembly Environment Committee has today published its report - Zoning: The Heat Networks Puzzle – calling for stronger price protections for Londoners on heat networks.

The Committee investigation found that due to planning rules in new developments, a significant number of Londoners on heat networks in these new builds are in social housing.

Heating homes currently accounts for around 18 per cent of the UK’s climate emissions.

London Plan policy has promoted heat networks, which feature significantly in the Mayor’s strategy for achieving net zero emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030. The Mayor’s preferred ‘pathway’ is based on 460,000 heat network connections by 2030,  and so the Committee looked in detail at how to get things right.

The Committee heard that heat network customers have often struggled to understand what they are paying for, how prices are calculated, and whether charges are fair.

The Committee is now calling for:

·       The Greater London Authority (GLA) to take the lead in ensuring price protection for Londoners and establish a set of Fair Pricing Principles for all heat networks in London.

·       Where existing under-performing legacy heat networks in social housing are being upgraded, there should be price protection for leaseholders in terms of capital costs.

·       The GLA should work with Ofgem and the Department of Energy Security & Net Zero (DESNZ) to develop a best practice guide, similar to an EPC rating that gives a short, clear introduction to heat networks, their efficiency levels, and explains heat network charges.

Leonie Cooper AM, Chair of the London Assembly Environment Committee while the investigation took place said:

We are deeply concerned that some Londoners have experienced considerable harms as a result of higher heating prices.

For too many in London, their experience of heat networks has not been satisfactory. They are getting a bad deal, and one from which they cannot escape.

For some, this is a very steep personal price to pay for a lower carbon heating network.

Tackling climate change is something we support, but we must ensure customers are protected from volatile price increases, particularly with the ongoing crisis in the Middle East.

Councillors' concern at over-development in Wembley Park that prioritises private profit over community

 

The proposed new building close to Wembley Stadium station

Guest post by the Green Party councillors for Wembley Park, Cllr Iman Ahmadi Moghaddam and Cllr Najib Warsame.

 As Councillors representing Wembley Park, we are seriously concerned about the proposed construction of a new 8 to 25-storey care home/ co-living space and the wider impact it will have on residents and the local area most affected by this proposal.

What Wembley Park is truly lacking is accessible, usable community space that enriches the lives of the people who have made this area their home, especially young people and children, who are increasingly being offered less and less as development continues. Over recent years, communal and recreational spaces have steadily disappeared, replaced by private developments that do little to support the existing community. This lack of investment in meaningful community infrastructure has contributed to growing anti-social behaviour, disproportionately involving and impacting young people.

We are deeply concerned about the strain this development will place on local infrastructure and public services, which have consistently failed to keep pace with Wembley Park’s rapidly growing population. Only recently has a new GP surgery been built, and it is already approaching capacity. There remains a severe shortage of accessible community facilities and public spaces, particularly on this side of the estate.

The environmental impact of the proposal cannot be ignored. Residents are increasingly being forced to live in a concrete-jungle designed to maximise private profit while the wellbeing of the community and local environment is treated as secondary. We need more greenery and open spaces and the construction of yet another building does not help.

Traffic and infrastructure concerns in Wembley Park have not been adequately addressed. There is severe congestion around that end of Empire Way, particularly on event days, where residents regularly struggle to access their homes. The parking provision proposed for the care home appears insufficient for staff, visitors and residents with disabilities. Restricting access to personal transport in this way risks limiting independence and accessibility whilst placing additional pressure on surrounding roads and infrastructure.

We are equally concerned about the quality and condition of many existing developments in Wembley Park. Residents continue to raise serious issues relating to mould, poor maintenance, broken doors, insufficient security measures, and unclear emergency access protocols in buildings that are only a few years old. These concerns raise important questions about whether the current private-public development model is genuinely delivering safe, liveable, and affordable homes for residents.

The proposed building will significantly reduce access to natural light for surrounding homes and residential buildings. Reduced daylight sunlight negatively affects wellbeing while also increasing household energy usage and costs during an ongoing cost of living crisis. There are also serious concerns specific to the proposed care home itself. From the applicant’s own report, we understand that 32% of care home rooms will fail to meet recommended daylight standards and 54% will fail to achieve recommended sunlight levels. Access to natural light in communal areas is also inadequate. This raises significant concerns about the quality of life being proposed for elderly residents who deserve safe, dignified and healthy living conditions.

All of these concerns reflect a wider pattern of over-development in Wembley Park where expansion and private profit are too often prioritised over residents’ wellbeing, community infrastructure, environmental quality, and long-term liveability. Residents deserve to be properly heard before further irreversible decisions continue to reshape the area.

The Neighbourhood Consultation expires on Wednesday June 10th - COMMENT HERE

The application itself expires on July 17th. Comments sent to Brent Planning (Case reference 26/0967) by email should be taken into account ahead of the Planning Committee where the application is heard,

Ipsos Poll: 10 years on from the Brexit vote, a majority of Britons would vote to apply to rejoin the EU

Flashback to Wembley Matters June 25th 2016

From Ipso Mori UK Ltd   10 years on from the Brexit vote, a majority of Britons would vote to apply to rejoin the EU  New polling by Ipsos given exclusively to Bloomberg News reveals that 58% of likely voters in a hypothetical future referendum would back rejoining the bloc, with almost half (49%) of the public supporting a new referendum after the next General Election London, UK The full findings on the survey of Britons will be discussed by an expert panel hosted at King’s College of London on Monday 15th of June. Registration details for the event can be found here. The panel will discuss a range of topics, including changing public views on whether it was right to hold the 2016 referendum, the trade-offs at stake in future UK-EU relations, and whether closer links with the bloc would be a vote winner or vote loser for the Labour government – all of which is analysed in additional forthcoming research by Ipsos, the Policy Institute at King’s College London, and UK in a Changing Europe. Ahead of the tenth anniversary of the 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union, new polling provided exclusively to Bloomberg News by Ipsos reveals a significant shift in public sentiment 10 years on. Key findings include: Majority support for rejoining: Among all Britons, 52% think the UK should apply to join the European Union, while exactly a third (33%) think the UK should stay out. The remainder say they don’t know or would not vote in a future referendum. Among likely voters in a future referendum, 58% would vote to rejoin and 37% would vote to stay out. This amounts to a 61% / 39% split once don’t knows are removed. Q. If a new referendum was held on whether the UK should apply to join the European Union or to stay out of the European Union, how would you vote?   All Britons Likely voters Likely voters (don’t knows excluded)  The UK should apply to rejoin the EU 52% 58% 61% The UK should stay out of the EU 33% 37% 39% Don’t know 9% 4% - Would not vote 4% - - Prefer not to day 1% - - Further analysis among all Britons: Overwhelming backing from Labour voters: Support for rejoining is particularly concentrated among current Labour voters, with 84% stating that Britain should apply to join the EU. But rejoining remains a divisive issue: Whereas 68% of those aged 18-34 and 58% of those aged 35-54 back rejoining, 50% of those aged 55+ want to stay out (37% of that group want to rejoin).  Similarly, whilst 84% of Labour voters, 80% of Lib Dems and 86% of Greens would vote to rejoin, 56% of Conservative voters and 7 in 10 Reform voters (71%) would vote to stay out. Appetite for a new referendum: Almost half of Britons support holding a referendum on whether or not the UK should join the European Union. 48% support a referendum taking place before the next General Election (compared to 29% who oppose it), while 49% support a referendum taking place after the next General Election (compared to 26% who oppose it). Keiran Pedley, Director of Politics at Ipsos, said: “As we approach the ten-year milestone of the Brexit vote, this exclusive data shows a clear shift in the public mood which will be unpacked at our event on June 15th. “A majority of the British public, indicate that if asked, the UK should apply to rejoin the European Union. This includes a clear majority of Labour voters. “With almost half of Britons open to another referendum, it is clear that the debate over our relationship with Europe is far from settled in the minds of the electorate. “With that said, we should be aware that a future referendum might play out differently in practice. Immigration remains a key issue for the British public, one which would likely feature in any campaign. And as our upcoming research will show, when the public are presented with various trade offs involved concerning the UK-EU relationship, a more complex picture emerges"   Technical Note: Ipsos interviewed a representative probability sample of 1,137 British adults aged 18+, via the Ipsos UK Knowledge Panel as part of our regular Ipsos Political Monitor series. Data was collected between the 14th – 20th May 2026 Data are weighted to match the profile of the population. All polls are subject to a wide range of potential sources of error. This research was conducted in partnership with King's College London and UK in a Changing Europe.

Defending Kilburn High Road: Billionaire-Backed Media Slurs Won’t Hide the Real Pressures Destroying Our High Streets

 

Fresh Poms, 227 Kilburn High Road

       

Guest post from the five newly elected Green Party councillors for the Kilburn wards on both sides of the Kilburn High Road: Cllr Ash Atkinson, Cllr Andr Lopez Turner, (Kilburn ward Camden)  Cllr Suzanne Gallagher, Cllr Paul Ryan, and Cllr Stephen Malonga (Kilburn ward Brent).

 

GB News presenter Patrick Christys recently targeted an independent pomegranate juice shop on Kilburn High Road. In a video clip circulated online, Christys used dog-whistle rhetoric to baselessly imply that this small business was "dodgy" or operating as an illicit front.

This is a complete fabrication. We have been on the ground, met the operators, and tasted the juice (which is excellent, rich in vitamins, and highly anti-inflammatory!). They are pleasant, hard-working people who have invested heavily in a beautiful storefront. They deserve our community's support, not xenophobic tropes masquerading as current affairs journalism.

We have written a formal letter of complaint (please see below) directly to Ofcom and the editorial board of GB News. While it remains unclear whether this segment was broadcast on traditional linear TV or exclusively via podcasts and YouTube shorts, we wish to call out this behaviour. Although this may fall outside Ofcom’s linear broadcasting code, we have placed this on record to highlight the severe, real-world economic harm that irresponsible media commentary inflicts on independent traders.

The Real Threat: Corporate Greed, Not Independent Shops

The right-wing media wants to manufacture a culture war out of thin air because they want to blind people to the structural economic pressures destroying our high streets. If these journalists actually cared about Kilburn, they would look at the real damage being done by landlord greed and corporate extraction.

Across Kilburn, we are losing much-loved, family-run independent food businesses. These heartbreaking closures are not caused by right-wing conspiracy theories; they are caused by the brutal, unchecked realities of the modern economy:

Commercial Rent Squeezes: Landlords are placing an impossible burden on small traders by demanding aggressive, two-yearly rent reviews. These frequent and steep hikes offer local businesses zero long-term security, forcing viable shops to the brink or driving them out of our community entirely when the financial damage becomes too much to bear.

Silicon Valley Wealth Extraction: Independent food businesses are being squeezed to breaking point by tech intermediaries like Uber Eats, which extracts an extortionate 35% commission on local deliveries. This model bleeds wealth directly out of Kilburn and sends it straight to California. Local business owners have told us they often feel like they are working primarily to line the pockets of Uber Eats, rather than building their own livelihoods.

Hyper-Inflation: Skyrocketing utility bills, particularly punitive commercial electricity rates, have made running independent commercial kitchens completely unsustainable for small operators.

While independent shops face these immense struggles, corporate entities, including predatory gambling shops owned by offshore billionaires with zero connection to our community, are thriving. They extract profit from our neighbourhoods while contributing nothing to our social fabric.

It is the peak of hypocrisy that these factless attacks on Kilburn’s diverse traders are broadcast by a network owned by a tax-exiled, Reform UK-donating billionaire living in Dubai. Wealthy media moguls have no right to dictate what is "viable" or "legitimate" on a working-class London high street.

Building a Fairer, Circular Economy

In the Green Party, we passionately support independent businesses. Unlike multi-national corporations, independent traders keep wealth circulating within our local economy. They buy from local suppliers, employ local people, and build genuine community wealth rather than extracting it to offshore tax havens.

We support collaborative initiatives like One Kilburn, where our community is working incredibly hard to bring residents, independent businesses, and local partners together to build a resilient, supportive, and sustainable high street economy.

We will not sit idly by while so-called journalists working for billionaire-backed media outlets attempt to trash the reputation of small traders to feed a divisive political agenda. We stand with our high street, we stand with our independent businesses, and we will keep fighting for an economy that puts people and planet ahead of corporate profit.

Great turnout at consultation event for new Welsh Harp SEND 16-25 provision and continuation of the primary school environmental study centre

There was a significantly larger turnout than might have been expected at the Consultation Meeting about the proposed SEND 16-25 Facility at the Welsh Harp Environmental Education Centre (WHEEC) on Wednesday. Attendance was higher than many of the consultations held for multi-million regeneration projects, showing how important the Centre and the SEND provision is to local people.

People crowded into one of the WHEEC classrooms to see the 7 panels outlining the plans.  I was gratified to see the primary classrooms and separate toilet facilities for primary school pupils in the draft floor plan for the new building. The continuation of an environmental studies facility for primary school pupils was something that Brent Green Party members, Brent Friends of the Earth, Brent Parks Forum  and many individuals had campaigned for. It is so important for a new generation that will be faced with climate breakdown and  the biodiversity crisis. PETITION HERE

Conversation was animated and questions detailed over issues such as the horticultural features, potential loss of mature trees, parking, security and more.

Aside  from building design is the devising of a strategy for a sustainable future for the WHEEC and plans for community use and shared building management.

Brent Council has kindly provided a copy of the Display Boards below so that those unable to attend can study them and submit their views:

Depending on your broadband speed the boards may take a while to download:

 

Comments have to be in by June 17th 2026 FILL IN THE FORM HERE

Contact: jas.yembra@brent.gov.uk