Readers may wonder why so much fuss is being made about the Broadview Garages infill application. My answer in this case would be that it is essential that Brent Planning Committee members should be making decisions based on correct factual information provided by officers and that Brent Council should be doing all in its power to protect our green spaces and the borough's trees - particularly when our tree cover is lower than some comparable London boroughs. Furthermore the Council has a duty to protect our designated Local Nature Reserve and Grade 1 Site of Importance to Nature Conservation in Fryent Country Park. If accepted this application would set a precedent for nibbling away at the edges of the Country Park.
In an email to the Chair of the Planning Committee and the relevant officers, Philip Grant has provided factual photographic information that MUST be taken into account. Tonight's 6pm Planning Committee meeting can be viewed on a Live Feed HERE:
Item 5 - Broadview Garages - application 22/2531
I
would not normally write to you so close to a meeting, but there is an
important point on the Broadview Garages application which you need to be aware
of, so that the Planning Committee decision this evening is based on fact, and
the correct interpretation of planning law in relation to the facts.
It
was my objection comments on 9 December which led to the Supplementary Report,
but that report still does not reflect the true position over a key point, the
location of an environmentally significant ash tree, referred to in the
application as tree T1. You can see this, as the closest tall tree to the
garages, in photograph BV4, which was submitted as part of my comments and
should be available for the Committee to view this evening:
The
application's Arboricultural Impact Assessment ("AIA") said that tree
T1 'is growing on the site boundary’, but several Broadview residents in
their objection comments pointed out that it is growing within the adjacent
Fryent Country Park.
Despite
this the Officer Report states incorrectly that tree T1 is ‘located
within the application site’. I provided photographic evidence that tree T1 is
growing within the Country Park, and is NOT located within the application
site. Yet the Supplementary Report published yesterday still tries to justify
the Officers' false claim that this tree is within the application site!
I
responded with a further objection comment yesterday afternoon, sending a copy
of it (see below*) to the Development Management Manager and Head of
Planning, and Mr Glover has replied to confirm that he has received my
email.
To
prove my point about the location of tree T1, this is the photograph BV7 which
I sent to Brent's Planners on 9 December. It was taken from within Fryent
Country Park, and shows the base of the trunk of tree T1, the concrete fence
post which marks the boundary on the far side of the trunk, and the garages
beyond them:
The
main legal point, which the Brent lawyer attending the Planning Committee
meeting this evening needs to be asked to advise members on, in the light of
the fact that tree T1 is NOT within the application site, but is actually
within the Country Park, which is a Local Nature Reserve and a Grade 1 Site of
Importance to Nature Conservation, is the effect of Section 197, TCPA 1990.
The
Officer Report recommends: ‘That the Committee confirms that adequate provision
has been made, by the imposition of conditions, for the preservation or
planting of trees as required by Section 197 of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990.’
That
recommendation was made on the incorrect assumption that tree T1 was within the
application site. Your Committee needs to know whether tree T1 can legally be
removed, under Section 197, as proposed in the application. If it cannot, then
the application must fail.
Thank
you for taking the time to consider this email. Best wishes,
Philip
Grant.
(a
resident of Queensbury Ward, within a short walk of Broadview)