Guest post by Philip Grant in a personal capacity. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Philip for his many valuable contributions over the past year,
I don’t make New Year resolutions. If I did, one of them would probably
be not to get into any new entanglements with Brent Council in 2026. And I
would have broken it already, after seeing this Legal Notice in the 18 December
edition of our local newspaper.
The Notice said that the Council would be applying for a Stopping-up
Order for an area of highway, including pedestrian areas near the Olympic Steps.
That seemed an odd thing to do, as such an order would extinguish all rights of
way over that land. I’m interested in the history of Wembley Park, and actually
wrote an illustrated article, The Olympic Way Story, for Brent Council in 2017! I wanted to see what area of land the
application affected, but to do that I would have to go to the Civic Centre
‘during normal office hours on Mondays to Fridays.’
A copy of the Notice, on a lamp post at Engineers Way, 22 December 2025.
So on Monday 22 December I went to the Civic Centre to inspect the Plan
and Draft Order, and did see one notice about the proposed stopping-up on a
lamp post. But when I asked to inspect the documents, staff in the Library did
not know anything about them, and after a half-hour wait to be seen at the
Civic Centre’s “Welcome Desk” (reception), staff there did not know about them
either, and could not find them in the cupboards behind the desk.
I sent an email to the address of the Council Officer listed in the
Notice as soon as I got home, and that Officer in Brent’s Development Services department
sent me pdf copies of the documents the following day, also saying that they ‘were
given to both Civic Centre reception and Wembley Library on the 12 December
2025 for public viewing.’ As I believe it is important that local residents
have easy access to the Plan and Draft Order, I will ask Martin to attach
copies at the end of this article.
When I saw what was involved in the Order Brent would be seeking from
Magistrates on 22 January, I could not understand the reason for it. Why would
they want to stop people walking over that land, or vehicles from going between
Engineers Way and Olympic Way East or West? I felt it had to be questioned, and
if necessary challenged! My 22 December email had been copied to Brent’s Public
Realm Director (who had signed the Notice), and as his “out of office” message
said that he was away until 29 December, this is the main section of the email
I sent him first thing that morning:
‘[Your colleague] kindly sent me the documents for
this Stopping-up application on 23 December, but that does not detract from the
fact that those documents were not freely available for me to inspect, during
normal office hours at Brent Civic Centre on Monday 22 December, as they should
have been under your Notice of 11 December 2025.
Please let me know whether you still intend to make
the Council's application at the hearing on 22 January 2026, or whether you
will be issuing a fresh Notice, with a new hearing date, ensuring that the
necessary documents are available to inspect, at a designated location within
the Civic Centre (as suggested in my email to you of 22 December).
I note that the Plan showing the hatched areas
which the proposed Order plans to stop-up was prepared for Quintain Limited in
June 2025. Can you confirm, please, that the London Borough of Brent is making
the application on behalf of Quintain Limited, and if so, on what basis is the
Council doing that (and at whose expense)?
This is the relevant extract from the Plan (with
the words "Olympic Steps" added for clarity):
The draft Court Order states that the application
is being made because the area(s) 'shown hatched black on the plan attached
drawing number TPHS-434-DR-00 should be stopped up on the ground that it is
unnecessary.'
Please let me know the reasons why you consider
those hatched areas to be unnecessary for pedestrians and/or vehicles to use in
future. I have to ask that, because I cannot understand why that should be the
case, as stopping-up would extinguish 'all traffic and all public rights of way
... over the said area of highway.'
From my knowledge of the area, including walking
over some of the "hatched" areas myself on my visits to Wembley Park,
I can't understand why it should be unnecessary for:
· vehicles to pass, at least on some occasions, to or from Engineers Way
and Olympic Way East and Olympic Way West, including to access the undercroft
area for community and other events;
· for pedestrians using the Engineers Way crossing from Olympic Way to
have unimpeded access to the Olympic Steps, in both directions, especially when
large events are taking place at the Stadium;
· for pedestrians using the Engineers Way crossing from Market Square,
beside the Civic Centre, to have unimpeded access to Wembley Park Boulevard
(and back, on their way from Wembley Arena, the LDO and beyond towards Wembley
Park Station);
· for pedestrians coming west along Engineers Way from Canada Gardens, the
University of Football Business and other developments, to have free use of the
existing wide pedestrian area at the foot of the Olympic Steps, and the
existing but narrower pedestrian area as they approach Wembley Park Boulevard
and Arena Square.
The areas which your application proposes to
stop-up were designed to be the way they are, as part of Quintain's Masterplan
for Wembley Park. I can't see why the need for them should have changed,
particularly given the growing number of people living in the area, and the
increased number of large events at the Stadium, since that Masterplan was
drawn up, and approved by Brent Council.
Unless you can provide a very strong justification
as to why those hatched areas on the Plan are now unnecessary, I think that
this application should be withdrawn. Best wishes,
Philip Grant.’
In case you have difficulty in visualising the areas the Council
proposes to stop-up from the plan, I have marked them in red on this Google
Maps satellite view extract:
The Public Realm Director quickly sent a holding reply, to say that he
would consult colleagues on their return before sending a full response, and this
is what he wrote when he sent that:
‘Dear Mr Grant,
The land proposed to be stopped up was the former
bell mouth into Green Car Park and a sliver of land along the southern footway
of Engineers Way located east of Wembley Park Boulevard.
The stopping-up was requested by Quintain as the
area shown in hatch was deemed to be in the line of their Hostile Vehicles
Mitigation bollards (an important counter-terrorism installation). These
bollards are installed by Quintain, and the future maintenance will also be
with them. The staggered nature of the former highway land would not serve any
purpose as highway maintainable at public expense and so there is value in
eliminating an ongoing burden on public finances.
I confirm Quintain has met all expenses in this
stopping-up process. The original application was made around five years ago
and the legal process, the statutory undertakers utility clearance and the
obtaining of a court date have taken a considerable amount of time.
The stopping-up does not in any way impede public access
to Olympic Steps nor to the access roads Olympic Way East and West. The
stopping-up process will not in any way change the layout of the public realm
that is currently in place. All existing pedestrian and vehicular access will
remain unchanged, and we have had written assurance from Quintain to this
effect. The purpose is simply to allow Quintain to maintain their land in
future years to the same standard as the rest of the Wembley Park estate.
We have now been given a court date for the hearing
on the 22 January 2026 at 2 pm. Therefore, the notice of intent and the draft
order was publicised by our lawyers on the 15 December allowing sufficient time
for the statutory notice period.
As part of the notice process, notices and a draft
order were published in the local press; the same was posted on-site and a copy
of the notice of intent, draft order and the stopping-up plan were left with
Brent Civic Centre welcome desk and at the Wembley Library on the 12 December.
Following your email, my colleague contacted the
Civic Centre welcome desk and requested that the documents must be available
for public viewing until the end of the statutory notice period, i.e. 19
January 2026.
I regret you couldn’t view these documents when you
visited. However, they were left with the front of house staff on Friday, 12
December 2025.
The stopping up process is a lengthy process and
the court date is harder to obtain. Therefore, asking for an alternate date is
not a viable option and would require substantial officer time.
I can advise, however, that if you are not
satisfied with our process, then you can, of course, make representation at the
court.
I hope this is helpful background. Kind regards,
Director of Public Realm.’
The Olympic Steps and Stadium, from Engineers Way
(with people walking across a strip of land that could be stopped-up!)
If you have managed to read this guest post all the way through to here,
thank you. What do you think of this proposed Stopping-up Order, and the
Council’s explanation of why they are applying for it? If you have any views,
please feel free to share them in the comments below.
I think it is important that local residents are aware of this
application, by Brent Council on behalf of Quintain Limited. Having considered
it myself, I believe that the proposed Order is unnecessary, and a misuse of
Section 116, Highways Act 1980. I will try to persuade the Council Officer to
withdraw the application, and will include my reasoning for that (as the text
of an email I will send to him) for information in the comments section.
For now, though, I will wish all “Wembley Matters” readers a Happy New
Year! There will be lots of interesting and important things happening in Brent
in 2026, and this blog website is a very good source for information about them,
so please keep following it.
Philip Grant
