Wednesday 11 September 2024

UPDATE, WEMBLEY EXTRA EVENTS APPLICATION APPROVED Quintain's comments on extra major stadium events application and officers' conclusion on the application to be decided tonight


UPDATE

BRENT PLANNING COMMITTEE APPROVED THE EXTRA EVENTS APPLICATION WITH JUST ONE VOTE AGAINST. MINUTES WILL GO TO PLANNING COMMITTEE BECAUSE OF WIDER ISSUES RAISED.

The application by Wembley National Stadium Ltd (WNSL) for additional major events at the stadium will be heard at 6pm tonight. The officer's report to the Planning Committee can be read HERE. The public can attend the meeting in person at the Civic Centre or watch online HERE.

While the full report can be read on the link above I print below two significant extracts. Quintain Ltd is the owner of  some land within the planning application area and their developments around the stadium now has a large number of residents, many of whom have become restive over the impact of Wembley events on their lives:

 

QUINTAIN COMMENTS 

 

The proposal is supported subject to the following conditions:

 

From reviewing the representations submitted by local residents, it is clear that event day management, and in particular stewarding and post-event cleaning, are areas of significant concern. Therefore, WNSL should commit to paying all the operational and management costs associated with the additional events and/or any event that exceeds the existing caps of 22 sporting events and 24 non -sporting events in a calendar year.

 

WNSL have highlighted the success of the triparty ‘Best in Class’ initiative between WNSL, Quintain and Brent, which currently manages the impacts of event days upon the local area and state this will be implemented for the additional events. Whilst we agree that the ‘Best in Class’ principles covering stewarding, parking enforcement, traffic management, toilets and street cleaning should apply to the additional events, the increased costs associated with delivering these should be borne wholly by WNSL.

 

To ensure residents’ amenity is adequately protected, WNSL should commit to the following restrictions on events: a cap on the maximum number of consecutive non -sporting events; a cap on the maximum number of non-sporting events per week; and a cap on the maximum number of weeks in any calendar year where the maximum number of consecutive non -sporting events or maximum number of non-sporting events in a week can be held.

 

The above conditions should be included in the s.106 Agreement (Deed of Variation).

 

Should they not be secured, Quintain reserve the right to make further representations. As a participant in the Best in Class initiative, and owner of land within the planning application boundary where many of these measures will take place, Quintain would expect to be consulted on the Deed of Variation before it is completed

 

We would also request that WNSL, TfL and Brent work closely on mitigating the impact Stadium events have upon existing bus routes and services to ensure residents are able to carry on their daily lives and move around the area on event days with the minimum of disruption.

 

 

THE OFFICER REPORT CONCLUSIONS (original report paragraph numbers)

 

 

144. The objections received indicate that there is a level of impact currently experienced by local residents as a result of events at the Stadium, with concerns predominantly focussed on anti-social behaviour, transport issues, air quality and noise. Some impacts are to be expected, given the size of the Stadium and its siting in a location surrounded by residential properties and businesses, within a dense urban area, although it must be remembered that a Stadium has been in situ for over 100 years.

 

145. The original cap on events was imposed to manage the impacts until such time as specific transport improvements had been made. Whilst most of these have taken place, not all of them have been realised. Circumstances have changed since the original planning permission in 2002, which suggest that the final piece of transport infrastructure (i.e., the Stadium Access Corridor) will not be provided in its originally envisaged form, but other changes to the road network have now taken place. Therefore, the Council considers that the cap remains relevant.

 

146. Clearly, to increase the number of higher capacity events to accommodate up to 8 additional major non-sporting events per calendar year would imply an increase in the impact. However, a wide range of mitigation measures have previously been secured and would continue to do so to help mitigate these impacts. There are ongoing efforts to reduce the number of vehicles on an event day, including additional parking enforcement capacity and an updated Spectator Travel Plan to promote sustainable travel patterns. WNSL and public transport operators work closely to promote sustainable transport solutions and maximise the efficiency of the network. This in turn contributes to reducing noise and air quality issues.

 

147. Infrastructure works including two-way working in the area to the east of the Stadium and the opening of a link between the western end of North End Road and Bridge Road to provide an east-west route past the Stadium that is capable of being kept open at all times before and after Stadium events has improved traffic flow in the area and assist residents’ movements on event days.

 

148. The Trusted Parking Scheme aims to ensure authorised car parks are responsibly run in a way that would limit their impact on neighbouring residents and reduce local congestion, whilst the Private Hire Management Scheme would reduce the number of vehicles in the area around the Stadium after events have finished.

 

149. Employment and Training benefits for Brent residents would also be secured by the proposed scheme.

 

150. With regard to antisocial behaviour, a financial contribution would be paid by the Stadium to Brent Council per additional major non-sporting event. This would go towards mitigation measures as agreed between WNSL and the Council which may cover measures to address anti-social behaviour.

 

151. Whilst it is appreciated that local residents face challenges on event days, the direct economic benefits for the local Brent economy of Stadium events are also recognised, including spending on accommodation, food, drink and other ancillary items within the Wembley area. The uplift in the event cap would also create additional event day steward and catering positions. Whilst some types of business would suffer on event days, many would benefit from the influx of people to the area.

 

152. In summary, it is recognised that there is a level of impact associated with major events now, and that this would increase with an increase in the number of high capacity major events. However, the measures proposed would ensure that this is moderated as much as is reasonably achievable. All are considered necessary to mitigate the increased number of major events which this application proposes.

 

153. A further consideration is that the Stadium can already be used for events up to 51,000 without restriction. Existing mitigation measures would be extended to cover this increase. Measures including the training and employment opportunities would apply more broadly to Stadium events, not just the additional major non-sporting events for which permission is sought under this application and would therefore provide wider benefits to local people and the local economy more generally.

 

154. The proposal is considered to accord with the development plan, having regard to material planning considerations. While there will inevitably be some additional impacts associated with an increase in the number of higher capacity non-sporting events, a range of mitigation measures are proposed and some benefits are also anticipated. The proposal is, on balance, recommended for approval.

 

Reading the report, although TfL mention the rail and tube routes they pay little attention to bus routes and their diversion and curtailment that impacts on residents.

Despite several protests over the curtailment of the 206 bus at Brent Park, affecting workers travelling to the industrial estates south of the stadium and school pupils when events are held on weekdays, no proposals are contained enabling the route to use the North End Road link.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Comment received by email:

bus diversions meaning many are cancelled or not worth using like 206

problems for Dial Ride especially in concert season

failure to enforce illegal parking need double the number of wardens

roads congested by taxis and limos and not enforced (need cameras )

too many events on consequent days resulting in residents being put under siege for days on end

road closures early in day please see Taylor Swift Road closed timings

Pirate parking vendors operate unchallenged

Looks like the Stadium Access Corridor will never be completed ( use NCIL )

Digital signage never worked

Still insufficient toilets

If the Stadium was operating well residents may be less inclined to object

We have one ice cream that parks on the pavement outside Bubble experience every day for the last 3 months and has not received one parking ticket.

The stadium area is still been heavily developed and often road closures mean residents can’t get home but these are miraculously removed for events and back again the following morning

Coldplay want 10 days with very few gaps if any at all

Anonymous said...

Even people who attend stadium events from afar complain about the poor transport links.

Anonymous said...

The stadium should be forced to employ Brent residents only.

Anonymous said...

How about 100 tickets for each and every stadium event going to the housing community that endures this disruption? Have a Wembley Park lottery and start some commercial goodwill and appreciation towards stadium locals lives.

Anonymous said...

Why is there no priority booking scheme for us Wembley residents for Wembley stadium events??? We should be offered some form of discount too!

Years ago you could just walk up to the Stadium box office to buy your tickets as soon as events were announced (and you'd also get box office returns too) but now we have to battle to get tickets online with everyone else from all over the world - except if you are Cllr Mo Butt of course with all his guaranteed freebie tickets!

Anonymous said...

It’s not just Wembley Park that’s affected, residents as far as Alperton and possibly beyond are significantly affected.

Philip Grant said...

The Planning Officers' Report says:
'Some impacts are to be expected, given the size of the Stadium and its siting in a location surrounded by residential properties and businesses, within a dense urban area, although it must be remembered that a Stadium has been in situ for over 100 years.'

The stadium wasn't always 'surrounded by residential properties and businesses, within a dense urban area.'

You only need to look at the aerial photograph view in the double-page spread "Regeneration - Building for the future" at pages 38-39 of the summer 2024 edition of the Council's "Your Brent" magazine, to see what it was like about 10 years ago.

(It's odd that while Shama Tatler, the Lead Member for Regeneration and Planning, is quoted there, talking about 'our commitment to making the borough an even better place to live', and the article refers to all the new Quintain developments, the Council publishes a photo which still shows the old pedway leading up to the stadium, rather than the Olympic Steps, which Brent so generously helped pay for!)

It has become 'a dense urban area' around the stadium since Brent ignored its own masterplan and planning policies for Wembley Park, and Brent's Planning Committee, on advice from its Planning Officers, approved Quintain's own masterplan in 2016.

They have helped to create the problems which the additional number of events will make worse.

Anonymous said...

I needed to nip into the LDO last night to collect an order - I thought I'll wait until the England match kicks off and then go but then of course remembered the road closures and the bus diversions. Why is our daily life so badly impacted by Wembley Stadium events??? It never used to be like this - buses should not be impacted on event days - it's a public transport system and needs to run on its advertised route everyday.

Anonymous said...

Yes, travelling home on dark evenings when it's an event day is a nightmare with the buses diverted away from where I live 😞