From Brent Council today
Parents, schools and Brent Council are uniting to defend local school
children following Government plans to cut funding to local schools by
£2.2 million.
The proposed cuts - which would see local schools lose two per cent
of their budgets overall and equate to £105 per pupil - are a result of
the government's National Funding Formula. Overall, schools in London
are set to lose £19million.
As around 80 per cent of a school's budget is spent on staff
salaries, funding reductions are likely to result in fewer teachers and
support staff posts in schools, as well as increased class sizes. This
is significant because top quality teachers who are motivated and highly
skilled are the main reason that children make progress and achieve
good results in their education.
Cllr Mili Patel, Cabinet Member for Children and Young People, said:
In recent years, schools in Brent have made great strides. We have
gone from 78 per cent of schools in the Borough rated as 'Good' or
'Outstanding' by Ofsted, to 96 per cent currently. Our primary school,
GCSE and A Level results are all above the national averages and we are
in the middle of an ambitious school build programme to ensure that
every child in Brent has access to a good local school place.
All of these things are absolutely fantastic and a result of the
tireless hard work and dedication that our senior leaders, teachers,
support staff and governors in Brent put in every single day. But we
need the teachers and schools' staff in the first place and this is only
possible thanks to the sustained investment over many years.
Fewer teachers and bigger class sizes will do nothing to help our
school children thrive - especially in a hugely diverse borough like
Brent where pupils come from a huge range of different backgrounds. This
is why we, at Brent Council, will do everything we can to support our
schools.
If you are a parent of a school age child, the Government's current
plans will see nearly £105 a year taken away from your child's
education. I would urge all of our parents and carers in Brent to
respond to the Department for Education's consultation and let them know
what you think.
ENDS
What to do if you would like to know more or share your views
These are suggested responses to certain questons as set out below.
· Q1: In designing our national funding
formula, we have taken careful steps to balance the principles of fairness and
stability. Do you think we have struck the right balance?
·
The proposals do not provide enough financial
stability for schools. All Primary schools in Brent stand to lose significant
amounts of funding, and all schools are experiencing rising costs.
·
There is no evidence that schools can manage the
funding reductions whilst maintaining or improving performance levels.
·
Additional funding should be allocated to prevent
cash losses to individual schools.
·
Q2: Do you
support our proposal to set the primary to secondary ratio in line with the
current national average of 1:1.29, which means that pupils in the secondary
phase are funded overall 29% higher than pupils in the primary phase?
·
Locally in Brent the proposals mean moving away
from this national average resulting in primary schools losing funding.
·
The Department for Education should look again at
the impact of the national formula on London primary schools.
·
Q7. Do
you agree with the proposed lump sum amount of £110,000 for all schools?
·
Small school funding is not just a rural
issue. Smaller primary schools, including
faith schools, serve their community but can not always expand as physical
space is an issue in London. Smaller
primary schools should receive additional funding.
·
Q14. Are
there further considerations we should be taking into account about the
proposed schools national funding formula?
·
The school national funding formula should be
considered alongside the Pupil Premium funding.
We believe that an area cost adjustment should also be applied to the
Pupil Premium to reflect higher costs in London.
·
Many of the cost pressures facing
schools are the direct result of government policy, such as changes to national
insurance and pension contributions, and the introduction of the Apprenticehip
Levy. Any action the government can take to ease these cost pressures would
make the introduction of a fair funding formula less challenging.