This is the deputation Philip Grant would have given at tonight's Full Brent Council Meeting if he had he not been forbidden to do so by Fiona Alderman,Brent Chief Legal Officer. Challenged to give her reasons for the ban she repeated the contents of an email she sent to Philip Grant last Wednesday. He had replied to that response setting out the reasons his deputation should be allowed. He sent her a copy of the deputation so that she could see for herself that it was not a campaign and not a personal attack on individuals. She did not refer to this in her account to Full Council..
When Cllr Warren moved suspension of standing orders to hear Philip Grant's deputation only Brondesburty Park Conservatives voted for it. Most Labour councillors voted against with Cllr Duffy and Crane and the Kenton Conservatives abstaining.
The importance of high standards of conduct in carrying out
the functions of
Brent Council.
I
am here as an individual, but I hope that the many Brent residents and staff
who have raised similar concerns will feel that I am speaking for them as well.
I
would like to welcome Carolyn Downs to Brent. She has a very important job as
Brent’s new Chief Executive, and a key part of that role is in setting an
example of the highest standards of conduct to the staff she leads. Those
standards are summed-up by the principles of integrity, selflessness,
objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership.
I
know that I am not the only Brent resident who feels that these high standards
of conduct have been allowed to slip by some senior figures at Brent in recent
years. I can illustrate what I mean through a recent example, where proper
accountability and openness does not appear to have been shown by Ms Downs’
predecessor.
In
June 2015 it was announced that Brent’s Director of HR was leaving the Council,
to take a career break. Many were surprised that she had been allowed to stay
in post, following findings of fact made against her a year ago by an
Employment Tribunal. It found that she had victimised, and facilitated the
constructive dismissal of, a fellow officer who had complained of being bullied
by her.
Rumours
quickly emerged from the Civic Centre that the departing Director of HR was
receiving a “pay off” from Brent. Serious concerns about this were raised, by
me and others, from 12 June onwards. The original questions to the interim
Chief Executive were dismissed on 8 July with the statement:
‘I am advised that the Council cannot
legally disclose any details of the arrangements relating to
Ms Davani’s departure.’
On
9 July I asked the interim Chief Executive two simple questions which did not
require the disclosure of any details of the arrangements. Those questions are
still unanswered, despite reminders from me, and requests from a number of
individual Labour councillors, and the leaders of both Conservative
groups.
I
would ask the Council and its Officers for the honest answers to them now:
1. Can Brent Council
confirm that there has not been, and that there will not be, any financial
payment by the Council to Cara Davani in connection with her leaving the
Council’s employment as Director of HR and Administration, other than her
normal salary payment up to 30 June 2015? YES or NO.
2. Can Brent
Council confirm that it has not agreed, and will not agree, to pay any award of
compensation, damages or costs made against Cara Davani personally, as a
separately named respondent from Brent Council, in any Employment Tribunal or
other legal proceedings in which she and the Council are named parties?
YES or NO.
It is important that these questions should be answered. If you don’t,
people will rightly ask: “what are they hiding, and WHY?” If either or both of
the answers is “no”, councillors, staff and residents should be told who made
the decisions over the “pay off”, and why it was considered to be justified.
All
of you, as Brent’s councillors, have a duty to satisfy yourselves that any such
“pay off” is not a mis-use of Council funds.
·
Ask yourselves, why shouldn’t Brent respect the judgement of an
independent Tribunal, if it decides that an award should be made against Ms
Davani personally?
·
Why shouldn’t your Scrutiny Committee, meeting this Wednesday, use its
power to scrutinise the decisions in this matter?
·
What will you say to your constituents, when you have to make further
cuts to their services, and they ask why you turned a blind eye to the “pay
off” to Ms Davani?
In
a farewell message to the Council’s staff in September 2012, after he had ‘agreed
with the political leadership to move on’, Gareth Daniel said:
‘I believe that personal integrity is the foundation for good
governance, and without it everything else is lost.’
The
‘few months’ we were promised it would take to recruit a new Chief Executive
has turned into three years, and the high standards he set have been allowed to
slip. I would urge both councillors and Council Officers to make answering my
two questions the first step in putting high standards of conduct at the
heart of how our borough is run, under Carolyn Downs’ stewardship.
Thank
you.
Philip Grant
7 September 2015
