Friday, 5 December 2025
Stop Air Pollution. Community picture Sunday - Jubilee Clock Harlesden 11am
Wednesday, 1 September 2021
Parent activists Mums for Lungs call for a ‘diesel-free city’ to protect children’s lungs and highlight 'illegal' air pollution on North Circular
At the North Circular Road (IKEA) monitoring site (Photo Amandine Alexandre-Hughes)
A group of concerned parents have launched a pavement art campaign in areas of London with harmful levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Mums for Lungs campaigners used eye-catching stencils stating, ‘illegal air pollution recorded here’ and demanding action to ‘protect children’s lungs.’ The stencils point to 15 air quality monitors that recorded illegal levels of NO2 in 2020 – a pollutant that can cause reduced lung function in children, as well as trigger asthma attacks and hospital admissions for children living with lung conditions.
Location of stencils at air quality monitoring stations
London has
never met its requirement to reduce pollution below legal limits(1) and the health impacts of pollution are
not equal. Previous research shows that NO2 pollution is on average
24-31% higher in areas where people from Black, Asian or minority ethnic
backgrounds are most likely to live. (2)
Environmental
Defense Fund Europe (EDF Europe) compiled readings from the city’s reference
air pollution monitors and used modelled data, produced by Cambridge
Environmental Research Consultants (CERC) for the Breathe London pilot project,
to estimate that approximately two-thirds (67%) of the NO2 pollution
at these locations came from diesel vehicles, such as cars, taxis, vans and
heavy goods vehicles. (3)
Most of the illegal sites are located outside of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), London’s measure to lower diesel pollution by charging more polluting vehicles to enter the city centre. The zone dramatically reduced air pollution in central London (4) and will be expanded to a much larger area on 25 October 2021. Some of the illegally polluted sites are beyond the ULEZ expansion, including in Kingston and Merton.
Nine of the
15 locations are on or adjacent to the city’s Red Routes – a network of major
roads managed by Transport for London. A recent health assessment has shown how
these roads create an unequal health burden in the city (5), leading to calls for action to make them significantly healthier and safer.
Around 47,500 primary school children study close to these major roads. (6) The Mayor of London has committed to
identifying ‘bespoke solutions’ for Red Route locations that are unlikely to
meet legal NO2 limits after the ULEZ expansion, but plans are yet to
be seen. (7)
Amandine Alexandre-Hughes, Mums for Lungs activist and Clean Air Ambassador for Harlesden Neighborhood Forum, (Brent Ikea site) told Wembley Matters:
The expansion of the ULEZ cannot happen soon enough in Harlesden. Our high street has the highest NO2 rating in the UK, so cleaning up the air in our area requires urgent action.
However, the ULEZ expansion won’t be sufficient for Harlesden children to breathe clean air and, also, it won’t cover Brent North. IKEA Wembley, for example, is on the ‘wrong side’ of the North circular. So, NO2 levels will remain extremely high there and that's a real worry for me, as I live close to IKEA Wembley with my husband and 4 year old son.
All children deserve clean air, whether they live in Brent North or Brent South. It’s the bare minimum we owe them as adults. Diesel vehicles need banning in London as soon as possible. The boom in diesel delivery vans in the capital is completely unsustainable. It has to be reversed at speed.
[1] Annual average pollution targets for NO2 were set in 2000 with an objective date to meet the target in 2005. In 2007, the target was updated to be in line with EU obligations to be achieved by 2010.
[2] EDF Europe analysis using Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants (CERC) high-resolution modelled NO2 2019 annual averages produced as part of the Breathe London pilot project and census 2011 data from the Office for National Statistics.
[4] Greater London Authority: Central London ULEZ - Ten Month Report
[5] EDF Europe and Centric Lab: Rethinking London’s Red Routes
[6] EDF Europe: Parent and teen campaigners demand action after study reveals nearly 50,000 London school children exposed to dangerous pollution from Red Route roads
[7] Mayor of London: Improving London’s Red Routes
Wednesday, 10 June 2020
Brent Council says air quality is not a problem for new school in Neasden Lane
In a previous posting LINK I raised concerns about the siting of a new school in Neasden Lane because of its history of poor air quality which in the past have been raised in Parliamemt by then MP Sarah Teather and with the GLA through Mayor's Question Time. At one stage pollution levels were in clear breach of EU regulations. The monitoring site was one of those which Boris Johnson, when London Mayor, was accused of 'fixing' by the installation of dust suppressants at the monitoring station.
Brent Council has taken action to 'clean up' the pollution LINK but has admitted that more needs to be done.
I should make it clear that I am not against a new secondary school in the Harlesden area, there has long been a campaign for a community secondary school there, but I am raising questions about the specific site chosen. This is particularly important when Brent Council through Brent Breathes is setting out to improve air quality near existing schools and cites particular issues when existing schools are on busy roads. Full Brent Breathes Report HERE see section on schools.
Planners have reacted to the Wembley Matters article with the following statement in a supplementary report presented to tonight's Planning Committee. There are also supplementary reports for the Sudbury Town and Ujima House planning appplications.
Air Quality
The site falls within an AQMA a recent publication by Wembley Matters raised concern with allowing a new school in an area with poor air quality, particularly an open roof MUGA. As discussed in the main body of the report, the application site has been identified as being one of the ones in the borough suitable to accommodate a school.
The London Plan places great emphasis on the importance of tackling air pollution and improving air quality. It therefore states that development proposals should minimise exposure to existing poor air quality and make provision to address local problems of air quality such as by design solutions, buffer zones or steps to promote greater use of sustainable transport modes.
The development makes a particular contribution through promoting greater use of sustainable transport modes. The existing Chancel House site currently benefits from a large car parking area with 189 car parking spaces. Under the proposed scheme only 11 spaces are to be retained. To further discourage car use to the site a travel plan is to be secured via the s106 agreement to promote walking and cycling to the site. Sustainable transport modes are also promoted through on site cycle parking provision and the contribution to TfL for local bus services.
As required by the London Plan, the application has been accompanied by an Air Quality Assessment and an Air Quality Neutral Assessment. The submitted Air Quality Assessment concludes that air quality levels would not exceed air quality objectives when the site is operational, with the Air Quality Neutral Assessment confirming that the development is better than air quality neutral in terms of both transport and building emissions.
The submission therefore demonstrates that air quality in the area will not have an adverse impact on the proposed school, and that the proposed development will not worsen air quality.
Wednesday, 3 June 2020
North Brent School (Neasden Lane) planning application at Planning Committee next Wednesday
![]() | |
| The proposed building on Neasden Lane |
![]() |
| Chancel House |
![]() |
| The school plan |
The school will be part of the Wembley High School Academy Trust and some children are expected to travel down from the north of Brent and from Wembley High itself, as well as from Harlesden and neighbouring areas. There has been some parental demand for a secular secondary school in the area in the past and Brent Council's pupil projections indicate the need for two more secondary schools - although that may change post-Brexit and post-Covid.
The building design looks like many of the period and there is more outdoor space than schools such as Michaela. However, one of these spaces is a Muga (multi-use games area) on the school roof overlooking Neasden Lane.
Those familiar with the area know that Neasden Lane is one of the most polluted roads in Brent and also has heavy vehicles, including skip trucks, accessing the industrial area between the proposed school and the station.
![]() |
| Industrial area off Neasden Lane |
Wembley Matters has already expressed concern about the proposed Ark Somerville, with a roof top playground overlooking a busy road, and this application follows a similar pattern. The question arises is why, when the Council is attempting to mitigate the impact of air pollution on existing schools, is it permitting the building of new schools on polluted roads?
The answer is partly the lack of other suitable sites and also the desire to build near transport links. There is little in the officers' report about air pollution but the Velocity Active Transport report looks at the routes to the school:
Route 1
This route connects the site to the residential areas located north of the Dudden Hill Lane / Neasden Lane roundabout. This route also connects the site to Neasden Underground Station north of the proposed development.
Clean air – According to the London Air Quality Network, this section of the carriageway fails the annual mean objective for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) air pollution indicating unacceptable air quality. This is likely due to the high volume of vehicles that travel along this main road. An investigation could be done into how the timing controls at the junction along Neasden Lane could be improved to reduce exposure to air pollution from motor vehicles.
Route 2
This route connects the site to the residential areas located east and west of Church Road, southwest of the proposed development.
Clean air – According to the London Air Quality Network, this section of the carriageway fails the annual mean objective for NO2 air pollution indicating unacceptable air quality. This is likely due to the high volume of vehicles that travel along this main road. An investigation could be done into how the timing controls at the junction could be improved to reduce exposure to air pollution from motor vehicles. Adding some planter boxes with low level planting would also help mitigate the impact of air pollution.
Route 3
This route connects the site to bus stops (Willesden Magistrates Court) on High Road southeast of the proposed development.
Clean air – According to the London Air Quality Network, this section of the carriageway fails the annual mean objective for NO2 air pollution indicating unacceptable air quality. This is likely due to the four signalised junctions. An investigation could be done into how the timing controls at the junction could be improved to reduce exposure to air pollution from motor vehicles. Adding some planter boxes with low level planting would also help mitigate the impact of air pollution.
Route 4
This route connects the residential area beyond Dollis Hill underground station the east of the proposed development. This route also connects the site to the bus stop on Dudden Hill Lane (Chapter Road stop DK and DG).
Clean air – According to the London Air Quality Network, this section of carriageway fails the annual mean objective for NO2 air pollution indicating that the air quality is unacceptable. This is likely due to the high level of traffic present in this area. To further reduce air pollution, improved footway infrastructure could be introduced to encourage walking
I don't find the mitigation proposals very convincing but more worrying is not the walk to school but the exposure to pollution of both staff and pupils over a long period while in the school and its grounds. The school building is closer to the main road than Chancel House, but the report states that these will be the 'noisy areas', with classrooms towards the back.
A proposal in original plans that 4 coaches should transport children from the north of Brent to the school in the morning and back again in the afternoon has been reduced to one after opposition from TfL and £750,000 will be paid to them to improve existing bus routes. The 297 route is on Neasden Lane itself, 260 and 266 on Willesden High Road, and 226 and 302 on Dudden Hill Lane. Neasden Station on the Jubilee line is close by.
The proposal includes space for staff and pupil cycle parking (up to 172 for pupils)g but I challenge the planners to attempt to cycle from the Civic Centre to Chancel House and, if they survive, report back on the experience.
Apart from the obvious positive of a brand new secondary school for Brent children, is that in an area without many mature trees, the landmark willow on the bend of Neasden Lane will be retained.
Friday, 1 November 2019
The Impact of Air Pollution on Children's Health - Clean Air for Brent meeting November 12th
Thursday, 21 June 2018
Clean Air Day report calls for urgent action by Brent Council
From Clean Air for Brent (CAfB)
Monday, 4 June 2018
Clean Air for Brent call for thorough air quality assessment for new Empire Way primary school
![]() |
| A gross under-estimate of traffic? |
We know that children in schools on busy roads in Brent are being regularly exposed to illegal levels of air pollution. It’s imperative therefore that Brent Council put air quality at the top of their list of considerations for any new school being proposed in the borough. A child attending school will have 8 years’ worth of exposure, and it is during these years that children are said to be most vulnerable to the harms of pollution, including asthma, poor lung development etc.The decision on whether to grant planning permission for the school is due at the Planning Committee on Wednesday. LINK
In any case it is hard to see how this proposal aligns with Brent’s current Air Quality Action Plan which states that ‘ The council will review all new planning applications for potential air quality impacts and require all new development have no additional impact on local air pollution as a minimum requirement.’
Given that a superficial air quality assessment was done in 2015, Clean Air for Brent are calling for an up to date Environmental Impact Assessment to be done.
The Council must do this not just for the children but so that parents can use this information to decide whether they want to send their child to a school that is located on a busy main road, and therefore its air quality environment likely to be highly compromised by passing traffic.
Thursday, 31 May 2018
Brent set to approve new primary school next to busy road despite air pollution warnings
| The actual site yesterday |
![]() |
| Artist's impressions of the new school above and below |
However, the Officer's report for the Committee LINK does not go into any detail about air pollution, referring instead to a far more general reference back in 2015 when outline planning permission was given and focusing on the impact of demolition and construction rather than children's daily exposure to pollution.
They suggest that the playground will be protected from air pollution by the school building, although a rooftop multi use games area (MUGA) is planned as well as a rooftop learning area. The playground itself is very small for a 630 pupil school.
![]() |
| Ariel view over the school playground |
![]() |
| The present car park bounded by Empire Way, Stadium Way and the Royal Route |
Quite a test for the scrutiny powers of the new Planning Committee.















