Blue marker GMH site: proposed hotel and housing Yellow marker: current Leisure Centre, proposed new centre will be further south with Adult Learning Centre behind it
The twin unisys buildings
Artists' impression of the new leisure centre
Brent Cabinet will be asked at the next cabinet meeting to rubber stamp the closure of Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre. This comes shortly after their eviction of a nursery from the site at short notice, as they clear the site for redevelopment.
The Leisure Centre could have stayed open for longer before the builders moved in, but officers reject that option because it is running at a loss and the state of the building would incur maintenance expenses.
The closure date comes a month ahead of when the decision of the Secretary of State on the community bid to give the building listed status is expected/
Officers explain:
A plaque on the current
Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre marks the achievements of the late Leonard
Johnson, community activist and Chair of Harlesden Peoples Community Council,
in creating this space. This will be retained and included in the new facility.
The council will work with the community to ensure that this history is
commemorated in the new development.
Harlesden People’s Community
Council have commenced a Save Bridge Park Campaign and submitted listing
applications to Historic England to place Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre
and Technology House on the National Heritage List for England. The developer,
Stonebridge Redevelopment Estate Development (SRED has also submitted Certificate of Immunity (CoI) from listed status for
the same buildings and their Unisys site.
Historic England will
consider the applications and compile a report for the consideration of the
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. It is anticipated that a
decision on the CoI and listing applications will be made in the summer 2025.
The main purpose of listing
Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre and Technology House is to protect the
buildings and their surroundings from changes which materially alter the
buildings or their setting. Once a building is listed, listed building consent
may be needed, in addition to any potential need for planning permission, for
works and alterations to the buildings, and breaches of the listed building
regime are subject to criminal penalties and enforcement action.
So, depending on the decisions of Historic England and the Secretary of State, it may not all be plain sailing.
Another issue is the viability of the project with General Mediterranean Holding, the international parent company, controlled by the Auchi family, expecting a return on their investment. 'Viability' raises its head, especially as the land sale to GMH is expected to fund the new leisure centre that Brent Council will build.The Cabinet Report notes a proposal to double the number of homes on the site from 500 to 1,000. The GMH website says it will include affordable homes but stand by for a revision of that:
Conditional Land Sale
Agreement
In June 2017, the Cabinet approved a
Conditional Land Sale Agreement (CLSA) with GMH and to complete the CLSA, the
following conditions need to be achieved:
- Planning: For the
developer to achieve outline Planning Consent for the Bridge Park Masterplan
- Financial Viability: For
the developer to achieve a profit and for Brent to fund the capital
construction of a new leisure centre from the land sale proceeds.
- Vacant Possession: For
Brent to acquire the Car Breakers Yard, either via private treaty purchase or
CPO proceedings. It should be noted that the Council purchased the Car Breakers
Yard in February 2019 via private treaty purchase.
At the signing of the
CLSA, the Council and GMH envisaged the delivery of a Bridge Park Masterplan,
which comprised a new hotel, a modern leisure centre and approximately 500 new
homes.
In February 2019, and following public
consultation, Cabinet approved proposals to optimise the development potential
of the site by enhancing the leisure provision, incorporating additional
community facilities, enterprise space and supported living accommodation.
Given that the new leisure
provision is to be funded from the sale proceeds, GMH sought to optimise the
quantum of housing that can be delivered on their part of the development site.
The change to the CLSA would have provided “at least 500
apartments/townhouses.” Since the agreed change, the council and GMH have been
working to maximise the site even further and the current proposals is to
include:
· Approximately
1,000 homes to meet the needs of Brent’s growing population
·
Modern flexible
community facilities
·
A better
environment and public realm
·
A new permanent
home for Brent Start, the council’s adult education service
·
Enhanced leisure
provision
·
A hotel with a
restaurant.
An Equality Assessment demonstrates the impact of closure on current users and the local community:
Sport England’s Active Lives
survey identifies a number of target groups which are underrepresented in terms
of participation in sport and physical activity. The nationally identified
under-represented groups are young people, women and girls, people with
disabilities, over 45s and black and minority ethnic groups.
Analysis of the available
data in relation to the impact on the different protected characteristic groups
shows that closing the Centre may have a negative impact on Black, Asian, and
Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups as a greater proportion of users are from the
broad black group – Black Somali, Black Caribbean and Black African. Closing
the centre may also have a negative impact on people with disabilities, as there
is a targeted session for young people on a Saturday.
There may be a negative
impact on the older population as they may find it more difficult to travel to
alternative provision.
Closing the centre could have a negative
impact on the five faith groups who hire the Centre on a regular basis for a
total of 12 hours per week. Attendance across the 5 groups varies between 217
and 339 per week.

I estimate that if the development goes ahead, based on the timetable above the new leisure centre is unlike to open before 2028/29 at the earliest. That means unavailability for possibly 4 years or more.
Have no fear, Brent Council suggests alternatives, albeit likely to be more expensive than Bridge Park:
Whilst closure of the Centre
will result in the temporary loss of this leisure service and of spaces that
can be hired, alternative spaces exist nearby. These include Willesden Sports
Centre, Vale Farm Sports Centre, Wembley Leisure Centre, Moberly Sports Centre,
various community facilities, schools, faith facilities and private gyms. These
alternative facilities are well served by public transport from the Stonebridge
area.
And if you have little money:
Brent Council Public Health
have a wide range of opportunities for residents to be physically active with
over 70 free sessions running each week. These include Walking for Health
sessions at six of our parks, instructor led sessions at 20 outdoor gyms, six
weekly sessions with Sport in Mind to support mental wellbeing, Our Parks
sessions in Brent parks and libraries, Steady and Stable falls prevention class
for those over 50 years, Couch to 5k, parkrun, community based sessions such as
Zumba and Bollywood dancing and sessions for vulnerable residents.
The Cabinet report offers recognition of the contribution of the Black community in the new building:
The council also
acknowledges that Bridge Park has played an important role in the Stonebridge
community for many years. Bridge Park is an important chapter in Black British
history and the community’s achievements in creating this space in the 1980’s
to empower local black residents. The council recognises the importance of
working with the community to ensure this history is commemorated within the
new facilities. We will work closely with the Libraries, Arts and Heritage Team
to explore how best to recognise the legacy and contribution that Bridge Park
had in Black British History. For example, working with local groups,
organisations and individuals, this might be a photo exhibition showing the development
of the community centre from a bus garage through to today and a mural on the
hoardings of the development site to reflect the history.
The closure will mean loss of jobs for some at least of the Bridge Park employees.
The Cabinet report notes:
There are 11 permanent
employees (seven full time and four part time) and six group exercise
instructors. These staff are at risk of redundancy. There will be some
redundancy costs depending on the number of staff that are not redeployed. The
maximum cost for redundancies will be £90k based on calculations provided by
Human Resources colleagues in May 2025. There will also be Pension Strain costs
of £88k for two members of staff for early release of pension.
Just a word about the companies involved. As mentioned above, General Mediterranean Holdings is an international company controlled by the Auchi family.
Stonebridge Real Estate Development is a UK subsidiary. Mohammad Al-Miqdadi listed on January 1st 2025 as 'a person with significant control' of SRED: These are the latest accounts (2023) I can find:
Mohammed Al-Miqdadi is also a board member of the Egyptian-British Chamber of Commerce and director of Tucan Investments and Kenton Holdings Ltd.
Brent Council provides a comparison of the offer at the current lesiure centre and the proposed new facilities:
With new adult provision at the site, the issue of 1 Morland Gardens (Altamira) and its preservation, is an issue that has been much discussed on this blog.
The Altamira Villa, Stonebridge (Picture: Willesden Local History Society)
Officers note:
For Morland Gardens, there was
also a petition requesting that the locally listed Altamira Building should not
be demolished as part of development plans for the site. 251 people had signed
the petition. A decision on the demolition or retention of this building will
be subject to a future Cabinet report after the necessary design, site
investigation works and viability assessments are undertaken.
Proposals would
also be subject to a planning application which would also consider the
appropriate planning and heritage considerations.