Guest post by Philip Grant in a personal capacity
The Brent Council election results in seats.
There have been many comments under Martin’s recent posts about the local election results, with people giving their views on how the new four Party / no overall control Council should be run. The formal decisions on this will be made at the Full Council’s Annual Meeting next Wednesday, 20 May, beginning at 6pm.
If you feel strongly about something, why not let the decision makers know your views? It is something which I have often done, and it is something you have every right to do, by emailing the recently elected councillors for your Ward. You can check who they are, and get their Council email addresses on Brent’s “Find Your Local Councillor” web page. Even if you did not vote for them, they are your elected representatives for the next four years, and should be interested in what the residents in their Ward think on matters affecting the Council.
The choice of ways to find your local councillor on Brent’s website.
I happen to live in Queensbury Ward, which now has three Conservative councillors, so as I was concerned to see rumours that Cllr. Muhammed Butt might be trying to court that Group, I sent this email to them, with a copy to their fellow Conservative councillors, on 13 May:
‘Dear Queensbury Ward councillors,
Kanta and Jayanti have already come across me as a politically independent resident of your Ward, and I am writing to you, with a copy to your fellow Conservative members of the newly-elected Brent Council, to share my views on an important matter ahead of next week's Annual Meeting.
It may not be correct, but it has been rumoured online that Cllr. Muhammed Butt has been in contact with your Conservative Group, with a view to retaining the position of Council Leader for the next four years. If that is the case, I hope that no agreement has been reached with him.
I have observed, and interacted with, Cllr. Butt on a number of local issues for the past twelve of his fourteen years as Leader of Brent Council. I have watched, investigated and experienced a number of his abuses of power, to the detriment of Brent residents and the Council's reputation, and can provide detailed examples if you would like the evidence (although some of you will have witnessed this for yourselves).
I can imagine that Cllr. Butt will have offered inducements, such as the Leader of the Opposition role, nominations for Mayor, Chairs or Deputy Chairs of Committees. Please do not succumb to his temptations. Another four years of Muhammed Butt as Council Leader would do further damage to our borough, and facilitating it would be seen by many as unforgivable.
I am also writing to the Leaders of the LibDem and Green Party Groups. If the Conservative Group stays strong, and votes with these two other Parties against any Labour proposal that Cllr. Butt should continue as Council Leader, he cannot be elected to that position of power.
As Labour has the largest number of seats, but no overall majority, it is entitled to seek to have one of its councillors as Council Leader; but as Labour candidates only received 30% of the total votes cast in the 7 May Brent Council elections, the other three Parties can rightly ask the Labour Group to propose a candidate for the role who will work cooperatively with all three of them. That candidate is NOT Muhammed Butt!
In my view, as a long-term resident who prefers to take an independent view on any particular issue, a fair way forward for Brent Council over the next four years would be for positions of responsibility to be shared. That would be a condition which a prospective Labour Council Leader would need to agree, although they would be free to appoint their own Cabinet.
If the three "opposition" Groups cannot agree on who is best suited for the role of Leader of the Opposition, I would suggest that the Leaders of each of the Conservatives and LibDem Groups should each have the role for two of the four years. The Green Party's candidates received more votes across the borough than either of those two, so the Green Group Leader should have the choice of Chairing one of the main Council Committees, such as Planning or the two Scrutiny Committees, with the other two opposition Groups nominating the Chair of the remaining two.
As there are now four Parties with at least nine seats on the Council, it would not seem unreasonable that each should nominate one of their councillors to serve as Mayor during the four years to 2030. I would suggest: for this coming municipal year, a Labour Mayor with a Conservative Deputy; for 2027/28, a Conservative Mayor with a LibDem Deputy; for 2028/29, a LibDem Mayor with a Green Deputy; for 2029/30, a Green Mayor with a Labour Deputy.
I hope that you, and your Conservative colleagues, will seriously consider my views and suggestions, along with your fellow councillors from other parties, particularly my strongly held belief that Cllr. Muhammed Butt should not be allowed to continue as Council Leader, Thank you. Best wishes,
Philip Grant.’
Cllr. Muhammed Butt refusing to respond to a Point of Order I raised, as a petitioner at the May 2024 Cabinet meeting, when he declared his preferred option agreed, despite no Cabinet members raising their hands or speaking, and without even seeking a vote on the second option in the Officers’ Report. (Screenshot from the Brent webcast recording)
You may not agree with what I wrote, and will probably not wish to go into as much detail, but if you have a view on who should (or should not) be Leader of Brent Council for the next four years, or how the new Council should be organised so that the views of the 70% of residents who did not vote for Labour candidates are properly represented, you have just as much right as I have to let your councillors know what you think. I hope that at least some of you will.
As I said in my email above, I have also written to the Leaders of the Lib Dem and Green Groups on the new Council, and have heard back from both of them (although I have had no response yet from my Conservative councillors, or any of their colleagues). Cllr. Anton Georgiou let me know what his Group’s position is, and said I could share it publicly:
‘To be absolutely clear, the Lib Dem Group that I lead will never make any deals or arrangements with Cllr Butt’s Labour Group. The time has come for Cllr Butt to vacate the position of Leader of the Council and allow fresh, new leadership in Brent. That is what residents voted for last week.’
Cllr. Mary Mitchell asked me not to share the details of the Green Group’s position publicly, but in general terms they believe that the Brent’s voters have demanded change. They want to see that change brought about in the way decisions are made, including genuine collaboration, scrutiny and accountability.
The Lib Dem Leader has already shared his views publicly with our local newspaper, as you may have seen on the front page of this week’s “Brent and Kilburn Times”:
The front page story in Thursday’s local newspaper.
Will Cllr. Butt still be smiling after next Wednesday evening’s meeting at the Civic Centre? We may not have a vote at that Annual Meeting, but we have the chance to influence the outcome, if we share our views with our councillors!
Philip Grant.




37 comments:
Well done Mr Grant, really important perspective shared here 👏
Going, Going, GONE......
this is an opportunity for the parties to work together for the good of the Borough, and to end the overly-long dictatorship of Mohammed Butt, Councillors need to realise he has been in power for far too long and make sure they follow the electorate's lead by initiating a much change.
What Brent needs is a confidence and supply agreement between Greens, Lib Dems and Tories. The Lib Dems can mediate the Greens and Tories to make them play nice as they have a foot in each camp
Page 14 here https://www.mylondon.news/news/north-london-news/brent-councils-labour-leader-promises-33944462?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1778845609 - Ketan Sheth blame everyone but him for be voted out as Councillor - in 4 years he as a Wembley Central Councillor he no respond residents and was no seen at local community meetings, even though too much ASB in ours area.
Yes all parties should work together setting an example to others - hard working council tax payers deserve better than Butt’s family backed dictatorship!
Everyone share this, it's important residents know what they can do to make a difference. As Phillip writes, (a) email your councillors about it, and (b) attend the AGM on Wed 20th May at 6pm (https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=180&MId=8374)
Couldn't agree more. We need Labour out of control in brent.
Lib/ Dems / Tories / Greens should join forces and run Brent Council . Every time the general public is asked about Westminster especially on programmes like Question time or even Googlebox they have repeated over and over please stop spending time slagging each other off and form a coalition to work together. Oh and Butt must go as it is against democracy to have the same leader for so many consecutive years. Just look what a mess he has made of Brent !!!!!
Thanks for your comment, my Anonymous (16 May at 08;35). But don't just comment, please, commenters - send an email!
Agree, it is time for Butt to go. He has damaged the landscape of Brent. He does not listen to the residents. We need a change NOW
Are the remaining Labour Councillors bonkers? Councillor Butt has overseen a collapse in the Labour share of the vote from 55% to under 30% and reduction in number of Labour Councillors from 49 to just 26. How can they possibly allow him to remain as Leader?
This is a staggering failure of Leadership and should NOT be rewarded by keeping Councillor M Butt in post.
If not even one Labour Councillor comes forward to stand against him it will highlight that there is now NOT a single Labour Councillor in Brent who deserves any respect.
The only people who still want Cllr Butt to remain as Leader of Brent Council are the Conservatives. Seems a bit odd for the Conservatives to support a man who once claimed to be a member of Corbyn supporting Momentum faction.
I seem to be alone here in not wanting Lib Dems or Tories anywhere near control of Brent Council. Neither has the interests of most residents interests at heart. Indeed, since neither could be bothered to attend the South Kilburn hustings, why should I think they are interested in the concerns of residents. Mo Butt should stand down as leader, and Labour and Greens should have a supply and confidence agreement.
Any recommendation for a successor to Muhammed Butt (ruling out another Butt)?
Its medicine to help Labour think about what they want to do with power. Same medicine they will get with a reform parliament
Why are the Tories keeping the despised Labour administration in place?
Butt has bought the Tories off
If only, blame the Tories for another 4 years of Butt
Towerblock Tatler is the one blocking a Labour Green alliance. However, Butt needs to go first anyway. So it won't happen as the Labour Councillors are scared of Butt and don't want to lose their special responsibility allowances
I was of the opinion that people wishing to be local Councillors had a strong sense of Civic duty and did so purely to improve the lives of the local residents, communitites and environment and it should not matter whats their personal political persuasion.
Perhaps they should choose a Council leader by who's lived in the borough the longest, or who was born in Brent?
I wouldn't trust anyone from Labour to run a bath let alone the Council
Tell that to the Tories - who are only after money and petty status. Kansagra wants to be Mayor and this is his only chance. So selling off Tory principles and giving Butt the leadership again is easy and worth the price to pay. Interesting that Kansagra only got back because of Bob Blackman interference and the ditching of Sunita Hirani.
Pete Firmin is alone on everything. He is irrelevant as most people on the far left these days. The Tatler Labour Region have told Brent Labour that they are NOT allowed to deal with the Greens. So Pete Firmin suggesting it is as good as ****ing in the wind.
Comment received: Are the remaining Labour Councillors bonkers? Councillor Butt has overseen a collapse in the Labour share of the vote from 55% to under 30% and reduction in number of Labour Councillors from 49 to just 26. How can they possibly allow him to remain as Leader?
This is a staggering failure of Leadership and should NOT be rewarded by keeping Councillor M Butt in post.
If not even one Labour Councillor comes forward to stand against him it will highlight that there is now NOT a single Labour Councillor in Brent who deserves any respect.
Thank you Councillor Butt for all that you and the Labour Group have done for the Borough of Brent. Look around the Borough and pat yourselves on the shoulders. The Borough was shabby, dirty, residents were embarrassed to own Brent as their place of work or residence.
You cannot wave a magic wand to get everyone what they ask for. Public service is a thankless job but under Labour we had the best .Nobody wants to pay an extra ten pounds in Council Tax to make improvements but are quick to shout for their own selfish needs at the expense of tax payers.
To all the hypocrites ,back stabbers and selfish residents, I say stand for elections and let us see what you can achieve or offer to the the voters of Brent.
FOR INFORMATION:
Anonymous (16 May at 01:16) asks: 'Why are the Tories keeping the despised Labour administration in place?'
Several other commenters seem to have information that this is likely to happen, but nothing is settled until the votes take place at next Wednesday evening's Annual Meeting of the full Brent Council.
I sent this email to Cllr. Suresh Kansagra, Leader of the Conservative Group, this afternoon, and you can still send emails too, as suggested in my guest post above:-
Subject: Conservative Group position over the Leadership of Brent Council
'This is an open email
Dear Councillor Kansagra,
I have not received a response from my Queensbury Ward councillors, or from any other member of the Conservative Group, to the email I sent on 13 May headed "Leadership of the newly-elected Brent Council". I have now included the full text of that email in a guest post which was published yesterday on the "Wembley Matters" blog website, which has already received a number of supporting comments:
https://wembleymatters.blogspot.com/2026/05/contact-your-councillors-over-who.html
I hope the lack of a response does not mean that your Group has "done a deal" to keep Cllr. Muhammed Butt as Council Leader. That would be bad for Brent and, I believe, bad for your Party.
The Conservatives have increased their support in the local elections, getting just over 20% of the votes cast and more than doubling the number of seats held, across a much wider range of Wards. But as one Anonymous commenter wrote under another blog article:
'Vote Tory get Labour! - will really 'piss off' many Tory voters.'
Many people who voted Conservative in Brent will feel that you have betrayed their trust if Cllr. Butt continues in power because of your votes, or abstentions. They may well turn to Reform UK next time, which is something you don't want, any more than I do!
Is a potential offer of job titles and additional allowances worth the damage accepting them would cause? If Cllr. Butt retains his position of power for another four years, he will exploit and abuse it as he has done for the previous fourteen years.
70% of those who took the trouble to vote wanted change. As one comment under my own guest post said:
'This is an opportunity for the parties to work together for the good of the Borough, and to end the overly-long dictatorship of Mohammed Butt. Councillors need to realise he has been in power for far too long and make sure they follow the electorate's lead by initiating a much needed change.'
Cllr. Butt's "divide and rule" can be stopped, if your Group together with the Lib Dem and Green Groups collectively let the Labour Group know that all 31 of your councillors will vote against his appointment at the Annual Meeting, if he is nominated for the position of Council Leader.
Please speak with the Cllr. Anton Georgiou and Cllr. Mary Mitchell in good time before next Wednesday's meeting, with a view to agreeing a way forward which more than two thirds of Brent's voters wanted at last week's local elections. I will forward a copy of this email to them, for their information.
Thank you, and your fellow councillors, for reading and considering this email. Best wishes,
Philip Grant.'
Walk along the junction of O.M.Dve and Neeld Parade. Still embarrassing ,shabby and dirty. After a long time of residents petitions and lobbying. And In Mr Butt's own ward. We need better.
Residents are more embarrassed by Brent than ever before after Butt's years of mis-management and poor decisions.
If the conservatives don’t push for changes with the council and cosy up to Labour, that will provide a great case for the Lib Dem’s and Greens at the next election. I hope the tories tread carefully.
Whoopee over rthe weekend someone has tried to clean up the bin and pigeon poo around Neeld Parade and Oakington Manor Dve. This only happens about every 4 or 5 years. Whenever there is a electoral issue. Residents are not blind to the everyday neglect of this area. We need better.
The cleaners were out yesterday to get rid of the pigeon poo and hose down the bin. First time in 4or 5years. Hopefully it won't take another 4 or 5 years to clean this up again. Krupa and Mr Butt looked after their own streets in Tokyngton.
Dear Dulcie Joseph, are you sure you mean Brent? It doesn't sound like it.
FOR INFORMATION 2:
One of my Conservative Ward councillors sent me this email early this afternoon (Sunday):
'Dear Philip,
Thank you for your various emails. We are having our Conservative Group AGP later today and you will appreciate that it will be a Group decision to take things forward.
We will get back to you thereafter.
Kind regards,
Kanta
Cllr Kanta Mistry
Conservative Councillor - Queensbury Ward'
I sent her this reply:
'Dear Kanta,
Thank you for your email.
I look forward to hearing from you after the Group meeting, and hope that Brent's Conservatives will make the right decision. Best wishes,
Philip Grant'
Admirable Mr. Grant. No party should succumb to inducements from Mr Butt. His vote share was much decreased in Tokyngton. We need a more democratic not autocratic council.
FOR INFORMATION 3:
I sent another email to my Queensbury Ward councillors this morning, copied to the other members of the Conservative Group, asking them to support the Lib Dem amendment over the allocation of Council committee seats at the Annual Meeting.
In acknowledging my email, Cllr. Kanta Mistry gave me her feedback from Sunday's Conservative Group meeting. She wrote:
'As promised, I can let you know that Cllr Suresh Kansagra was elected as The Conservative Group Leader unanimously and Cllr Jayanti Patel as The Conservative Group Deputy Leader.'
As for any other decisions they made, we will have to wait and see what they do at Wednesday evening's Council Annual Meeting!
Peter Firmin has to be amongst that hard left group that forgets nothing and understands nothing. Still repeating the same old shoulder-chipped nonsense after all these years. I suspect he’ll go his grave still whining about Nick Clegg.
You’re thinking sensibly.
Kansagra has long wanted to don the Mayoral robes and chain and he’s now waited for over a decade. His desperation is such that he’s prepared to ditch almost any principle in return for this. His group could have said “no!” but they’ve probably got their eyes on the role too.
I’ve never ceased to be amazed at just how cheaply Tories can be bought off.
Post a Comment