Wednesday, 21 August 2024

Brent launches its campaign to encourage homeless families to move out of the borough: 'little prospect that temporary accommodation will lead to social housing'

 

Brent - Housing Crisis

 

On the 1st July Wembley Matters ran a story LINK  revealing that Brent Council were to run a campaign to urge people on the Council housing waiting list to 'up sticks and move somewhere else where private rents are lower'. 

That campaign was launched today with a video and website. At one level it can be seen as admitting that Brent housing policy has failed, along with government housing policy. Not enough council or social rent homes are being built to match the demand.

At another level it may be claimed that this is a form of social cleansing: poorer people with local connections are being forced to move out of London to find somewhere decent to live, but will also have to find jobs and school places. Brent Council has offered to help them with the move but will only make a ' one time' offer in the private sector to end homelessness.

A worry for some, perhaps underlined by the recent 'race' riots, is that families from ethnic minority backgrounds, will not feel welcome, or worse, in the towns that they move.

If the offer is taken up by the hundreds of families on the housing waiting list it will have implications for school rolls and therefore school finances. A school places review is already in progress with forms of entry reduced in some schools.

The 'child yield' of new developments (the number of children expected to move in or be born into the new developments) is expected to be low.

Another long term repercussion will be on the number of potential workers available to work in the borough, including those in the NHS and school, due to the unavailability of low cost housing.

Moving people out of Brent is not new. Back in 2017 research found that Brent was one of the worst councils for forcing people out of London. LINK

This is the Brent Council press release on the scheme:

Homeless people trapped in temporary accommodation for months on end are being urged to ‘find a place you can afford’ by Brent Council.

 

Brent has experienced a 23 percent increase in the number of homelessness applications – up from 6,000 to more than 7,300 – over the past three years. Each week, an average of 140 households are becoming homeless in Brent. Of all homeless households, around half are trapped in very basic and costly ‘temporary’ accommodation.

 

Government data shows that London accounts for 57% of England’s total number of homeless households living in temporary accommodation. Around 175,000 Londoners – equivalent to one in 50 residents of the capital – are currently homeless and living in temporary accommodation arranged by their local borough. This figure includes one in 23 children, meaning on average there is at least one homeless child in every London classroom. The homeless emergency is being driven by a perfect storm of rising rents, which have soared by nearly 34% in Brent over the past year, a backlog of people being evicted since the pandemic, reduced supply of private rented housing and cost of living pressures.

 

“The number of homeless families we have in so called ‘temporary’ accommodation has now reached critical levels,” says Cllr Muhammed Butt, Leader of Brent Council. “Sadly the reality is children are growing up in temporary accommodation, coming home from school to do their homework on the floor of a shared bathroom of a hostel and eating dinner perched on the side of their bed. This is a human tragedy but it’s not a situation of Brent’s making.

 

“Despite building more new homes than almost any other borough in the capital over the past decade, Brent is one of the places worst affected by London’s homelessness emergency. We just can’t build quickly enough to meet the tsunami of demand.”

 

Unfortunately, the vast majority of residents in temporary accommodation will eventually end up in the private rented sector outside of London due to the sky-high rents in London and lack of affordable housing in the capital. However, some homeless people believe that staying in temporary accommodation increases their chances of securing a council home.

 

“Some people think that becoming homeless increases their chance of a council home, it does not,” continues Cllr Butt. “Right now, there are more than 34,000 families or individuals on our social housing waiting list. Some have been waiting since the last century and they are still waiting. An average of just 650 council homes become available each year, with 40% of them being 1 bed properties, so this queue is moving very slowly and waiting times are getting longer. It is important that the council is honest with people and that homeless households don’t have unrealistic expectations.”

 

Brent overspent it’s budget by over £13m last year and is forecast to overspend by more than £10m this year mainly due to the cost of temporary accommodation such as hostels and bed and breakfasts. Meanwhile London’s councils are spending more than £90million a month on temporary accommodation.

 

Cllr Butt concludes: “As well as the terrible human cost, this homelessness emergency is completely unaffordable for taxpayers. This is why we are launching our ‘Find a place you can afford’ campaign. If you find yourself homelessness, for most people your housing options will be in the private rented sector. Rather than being stuck in temporary accommodation for months on end and still end up in the private rented sector somewhere outside of London, we are advising homeless families to take control of their housing situation and find a place they can afford.

 

“We will be able to help families secure a home financially, ensuring that the rental property is safe and checking that it is affordable in the long-term. We are here to help.”#

Brent launched its Find a place you can afford campaign with a video (above), booklet and webpage with more housing advice.

This is a transcript of the video:

 Did you know Brent is one of the worst affected places in the UK by the housing crisis? One part of the problem is we've got private landlords selling up and leaving the rental market because of rising mortgage costs.

There's been a 41% decline in private rental listings since 2017, combined with a 50% decline in 4 bed properties.

At the same time, there has been a rapid rise in the number of people experiencing homelessness.

In the last three years, we've had a 23% increase in the number of applications from homeless households. And today, it's more than 7,300. That's 140 households becoming homeless, every single week.

This has resulted in over 2,000 households living in temporary accommodation, more than 900 of whom are in emergency B&B accommodation.

This can mean families living in a single room, in cramped accommodation, sharing kitchens and bathrooms with other families for months on end. And because the housing emergency leaves many families competing for the same pool of homes, it often means that we're forced to use accommodation that's outside the capital.

Cramped conditions in temporary accommodation can create, and worsen, health problems and affect the health and well-being of children in particular.

That's how we know that living in temporary accommodation isn't a good long term solution.

Sadly, there's also no guarantee that you'll receive permanent housing in Brent. There are currently 34,000 households on our social housing waiting list. That's nearly 1 in 10 of all Brent residents.

Some families have been on the list since the last century, and only an average of 650 social homes become available each year with 40% of them being one 1 properties.

Even though Brent has been leading the way in building new homes with the second highest number of new builds completed out of all the London boroughs over the past ten years, put simply, supply cannot cope with this surge in demand.

The average wait time for a 2 bed home is more than a decade. For 4 bed properties, the wait is over twenty years.

If you're homeless, your best option is to find a place you can afford in the private rental sector as quickly as possible. Regrettably, most private rental properties in London are becoming unaffordable.

Rather than wait for years in temporary accommodation, we can work with you to find a more cost effective property outside of London where rents remain more affordable. We can help you to secure a rental property in a place that's affordable to you.

If needed, we can financially help you to secure a rental home.

We can talk to your landlord for you and we can support you to move into your new neighborhood.

We know that relocating to a new area may seem daunting. There are school and work moves to think about as well as changes to your commute, but we'll help you to find a place you can afford to end your homelessness.

We'll support you and your family with the option to change location and help to make your move into your new home as easy as possible. We can only make you a one time offer of a home in the private rental sector to end your homelessness.

Sadly, there is a high probability that it will be outside of London due to the lack of affordable housing. With only a small supply of council homes, most routes lead to the private rental sector. So, take control of your housing situation today and work with us to find a home you can afford. 

Tuesday, 20 August 2024

Another Harlesden Off-Licence Application to be heard. Opposed by Licensing Inspector and Police.

An application for another off-licence  premises in Harlesden comes before the Licensing Committee on Thursday August 22nd.

The premises is in Harlesden Cumulative Impact Zone (CIZ) which takes into account the number of similar premises in the area.

The Licensing Inspector report states:

The Statement of Licensing Policy states that any licence application in a CIZ area will need to demonstrate with evidence that its operation will not add to any cumulative impacts that the CIZ is seeking to address.

Further, new applicants and those applying for variations would be required to demonstrate how their premises will not contribute to street drinking in those areas.

The effect of adopting a CIZ is to “create a rebuttable presumption” that applications for licences which are likely to add to the existing cumulative impact will normally be refused (or subject to certain limitations) unless the applicant can demonstrate that there will be no negative cumulative impact on the licensing objectives.

The operating schedule fails to demonstrate that a grant will not lead to a negative cumulative impact on one or more of the licensing objectives and to the contrary add to the issues of an existing saturated area.

It is on this basis, that the Licensing Authority ask that the application for a new premises licence is refused by the Licensing Sub-Committee. Adding conditions to a premises licence, in the Licensing Authority’s opinion is not adequate when the application does not demonstrate what is being put in place in order to avoid further cumulative impact. Adding an additional off licence to the eight that already exist in the immediate area, will no doubt be detrimental to the local area.

The report includes a very interesting Q & A with the applicant LINK.

The Police Representation also recommends rejection and focuses on crime in the area of Craven Park.

The Police objection states:

These crimes are based around violence, sexual offences and public order issues quite often generated by excessive alcohol consumption.

Below is a list of venues in Craven Park Road with off sales as their main licensable activity. As you can see Craven Park Road is already saturated with Off Licenses. The list below does not include restaurants and nights clubs all of which sell alcohol.

Corner Shop 98, Craven Park Parade Off License

Craven Park Off License 102, Craven Park Road Off License

Housewife Cash & Carry 14, Craven Park Road Wholesalers

Kotoko Mini Market 126, Craven Park Road Convenience Store / Off License

Metro Supermarket 72, Craven Park Road Convenience Store / Off License

Save Food and Wine 46, Craven Park Road Convenience Store / Off License

Tamirez Deli 24, Craven Park Road Convenience Store / Off License

The Liquor Store 43, Craven Park Road Off License

Who’s Next Food & Wine 6, Library Parade Off License

New Atlas Café 69-71 Craven Park Road Café / Off License

Supersave 68, Craven Park road Convenience Store / Off License

 

Adding another bog standard Off License to this area is not required. Doing this will just add to the ASB, street crime and public nuisance. Police are of the opinion that allowing this application to go ahead will be detrimental to all four of the licensing objectives Prevention of crime and disorder, public nuisance, public safety and the protection of children. Therefore police oppose this application in full.




Wembley disruption ahead: Taylor Swift and Wrestling - Today and Sunday

From Brent Council



Wembley Stadium will be hosting Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour tonight (Tuesday 20th August).


Wembley Stadium will also be hosting AEW: All Elite Wrestling this Sunday 25thAugust.


Please read below to see how this might affect you.


Timings


- Tuesday 20th August: Doors open at 4pm and road closures will be in place from 12pm

- Sunday 25th August: Doors open at 3.30pm and road closures will be in place from 1pm


We expect the area around Wembley Stadium to be very busy before and after these events so please avoid the area if you can unless you have a ticket.


Event day parking


Event day parking restrictions will be in place from 8am to midnight on main roads and from 10am to midnight on residential roads on 20th and 25th August.


If you have a paper permit, please make sure you clearly display it in your vehicle. If you have an electronic permit, you do not need to display this.



UPDATE: MEETING POSTPONED Another Harlesden gambling licence application goes to Brent Council Licensing Committee next week

 TODAY A NOTICE WENT UP ON THE BRENT COUNCIL CALENDAR TO SAY THAT THIS MEETING HAS BEEN POSTPONED. NO REASON WAS GIVEN.

 

 The Brent Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee, unlike other Brent committees, is busy meeting this month with two alcohol licence applications and another for a gambling licence. LINK

The latter, on Tuesday August 27th,  is interesting because the applicant, Merkul Slots, applying for a licence for 67 High Street, NW10 4NS, has been able to persuade the Brent Licensing Inspector and Brent Police to withdraw their initial opposition to the application. This has been done by their acceptance of a number of conditions. The conditions are listed here: Licensing Inspector LINK and Police LINK.

However, the Committee will also be considering objections from local councillors led by the Deputy Leader of the Council, Cllr Mili Patel, and residents:

Councillors' Objections

On behalf of the Harlesden and Kensal Green ward councillors, and also the Roundwood ward councillors, I am writing to lodge a joint objection to the application by Merkur Slots for a Bingo Club Premises Licence.

 

We object to this application because we believe it contravenes the Council’s four licencing objections:

 

1) Preventing crime and disorder

 

Harlesden is a location that is already saturated with betting shops, bingo halls and adult gaming centres. On a six-hundred-metre stretch from Craven Park Road to Harlesden High Street there is currently a total of six gambling premises, with potential for more to come. An additional adult gaming centre is not needed and would further cluster the high street.

 

Evidence has demonstrated that the public health and community safety impacts of gambling are often exacerbated in areas in which clusters of betting shops are located. This means that vulnerable residents are often targeted, anti-social behaviour is increased, and the high street is further impacted.

 

Increasing the density of Harlesden’s gambling cluster will only divert further resources from stretched policing budgets. This is why our dedicated Harlesden Police Force have objected to further gambling premises being opened whenever applications have come up.

 

2) Public Health

 

A stones-throw away from 67 High Street is a homeless shelter. The homeless charity, Crisis, have submitted objections against these types of applications. The negative social, economic, and public health impacts of gambling are well documented.

 

In the Council’s Statement of Principles for Gambling, section 4.5 outlines the importance of protecting vulnerable adults. Within the guidance a persons ‘situation’ is highlighted as needing to be considered, this includes if the individual ‘is experiencing financial difficulties, is homeless, is suffering from domestic or financial abuse, has caring responsibilities, experiences a life change or sudden change in circumstances.’

 

An additional adult gaming centre would, in our view as local representatives, put already vulnerable people at further risk. Moreover, in addition to the homeless shelter, Harlesden is an area with high levels of poverty and deprivation as identified by the Brent Poverty Commission. Granting this application would therefore undermine the Council’s efforts to safeguard vulnerable adults.

 

3) Public Safety

 

The saturation of betting shops and gambling premises also increases the likelihood of crime within the area. Harlesden High Street already has high levels of anti-social behaviour, and an additional adult gaming centre could increase this level and attract further illicit and anti-social activities.

 

A study from nearby Ealing Council explored crime and disorder in relation to gambling premises and found that: ‘as well as reported crime in betting premises being much higher than the controls, there was a clear and statistically significant increase in crime in the vicinity of betting shops, with the greatest correlations at the closest distances from the premises.’

 

We are clear that public safety in our two wards would be undermined if this application were to go through.

 

4) Protecting Children from Harm

 

Harlesden High Steet is a known area for young people to congregate, particularly after school. Whilst Merkur Slots outline that they operate a strict over-18 policy, the proliferation of gambling premises and the consistent visible exposure to them on the high street is likely to increase interest in them and potentially encourage young people to explore gambling opportunities either illegally or when they are of age.

 

We have a duty to ensure that young people are aware of the impacts of gambling. We should follow the principles of Brent’s groundbreaking policy which prevents new fast food outlets opening in close proximity to schools and also prevent gambling sites clustering in these areas.

 

We believe that, for all these reasons the application is in contravention of Brent’s licencing objectives and should be rejected by the committee.

 

Cllr Mili Patel

Deputy Leader of Brent Council

Labour Councillor for Harlesden and Kensal Green Ward

 

Residents' Objections  (There are 21 objections that can be read HERE. This is just one)

 

To whom it may concern,


I am writing to formally object to the application for a gambling licence for the premises located at 67 High Street, Harlesden on the grounds of public safety, health, and wellbeing concerns.

 

As a local resident, I have observed that our area already hosts several gambling

establishments. The saturation of such venues can contribute to several significant issues within our community. An increase in gambling establishments is often correlated with higher incidences of crime and anti-social behaviour. The concentration of such venues can attract criminal activities, including theft, fraud, and other related offenses. This increase in crime not only affects the immediate vicinity of the gambling establishments but can also extend to surrounding residential areas.

 

The presence of multiple gambling venues can compromise public safety. Frequenting these establishments, individuals might become targets of crime, or engage in behaviour that threatens the safety of others. Ensuring the well-being and security of residents should be a priority, and additional gambling venues would undermine these efforts. Moreover, gambling establishments can contribute to noise pollution, littering, and other forms of public nuisance, disrupting the peace and order of the community.

 

Gambling addiction is a serious public health issue that can have devastating effects on individuals and families. The proliferation of gambling venues exacerbates this problem, contributing to mental health issues, financial distress, and family breakdowns. Our community needs more support services and healthier recreational options, not additional gambling facilities.

 

There are several schools in our district, and the presence of a new gambling establishment poses a significant risk to young people. Exposure to gambling at a young age can lead to harmful behaviors and addiction. Ensuring that children and young persons are protected from such influences is paramount for their healthy development. With multiple schools in the vicinity, the establishment of another gambling venue is inappropriate and harmful.

 

Children should not be exposed to gambling-related activities or environments on their way to and from school, as this normalises gambling behaviour and poses a risk to their well- being.

 

In light of these points, I urge Brent Council to reject the application for a gambling licence. The potential negative impact on crime rates, public safety, health, and the welfare of young people far outweighs any benefits that such an establishment might bring.

 

Thank you for considering my objections. I trust that the council will act in the best interest of the community and its residents.

 Brent Council is currently consulting on revised guidelines for Gambling Licensing. This will be covered in a future article.

Monday, 19 August 2024

Only one person has responded to Brent Council Survey on new Conservation Area Directions. Deadline August 30th

 A sharp-eyed reader has drawn my attention to several Brent Council consultations that are taking place during the August holiday period.  The first is on Conservation Area directions within some of Brent's Conservation Areas. These are important because they map the relevant area and set out regulations on windows, doors and front gardens. The consultation started on August 1st and ends on Friday August 30th. So far just one person has 'had their say'.

This is the blurb from the council website LINK:


Proposed Article 4 Directions for Conservation Areas

On the 28th May 2024 Brent’s Cabinet Committee gave its authorisation to proceed with proposals for immediate and non-immediate new Article 4 Directions to replace the existing Directions for its residential Conservation Areas. 

New immediate Article 4 Directions are needed because the Council has reduced the boundary of the Buck Lane Conservation Area, de-designated the Sudbury Cottages Conservation Area and agreed to relax the Article 4 Directions for windows, doors and front gardens in the Northwick Circle Conservation Area. 

Non-immediate Article 4 Directions are needed because the Council has extended the Brondesbury, Mapesbury, Queen’s Park and Willesden Green Conservation Areas. The proposed Article Directions, with the exception of Northwick Park outside Northwick Circle, will restrict the same suite of permitted development rights as those Article 4s that exist and as illustrated in the bullet points above. (Editor's note: As you can see there are no 'bullet points above!)

The Article 4 Directions are attached to this survey, or are alternatively available here where there are also accessible versions available: https://www.brent.gov.uk/planning-and-building-control/listed-buildings-and-conservation-areas#article4

We are inviting comments on the Article 4 Directions from 1st August to 30th August 2024 17:00.

Please complete this survey, providing your comments on the proposed changes to the Conservation Article 4 Directions.

Only the name of organisations represented but not any individual’s personal details will be made public in any material related to the representations received. The Council will only retain your personal details to inform you of the outcome of the decision on whether to proceed with the confirmation of the Directions. After this has occurred your personal details will be deleted. For more information see our privacy notice.

If you have any questions or would like any further information please email planningstrategy@brent.gov.uk

 Conservation area maps

 


 

Brondesbury

 


 Buck Lane

 

Kensal Rise

 

Mapesbury

 

 

 Northwick Park

 


 

Queens Park

 


 

Roe Green

 


 

 Sudbury Cottages

 



Willesden Green 

 

FULL DETAILS BELOW

Willesden Green Conservation Area Article 4 Direction.pdf
(349.0 KB)