Friday, 9 May 2025

Labour Leadership incompetence in the management of the Barham Park Trust could have lost residents up to £100,000 in income, claims Paul Lorber

Another potential  failure in the effective and responsible management of the Barham Park Trust has been revealed by Brent Liberal Democrat Leader, Paul Lorber. Readers will know that the Trustees are all members of the Brent Labour Cabinet with no representation from the community that is supposed to benefit from the Barham bequest.

In an email to Brent CEO, Kim Wright, Lorber alleges that the Trust failed to arrange a lease and collect rent from a Barham Park building occupied by the Young Brent Foundation, thus depriving the Trust of income.

Cllr Lorber asks for an Internal Audit based on the following:

  1.  The Council has had a Lease of the former Children Centre space in Barham Park Complex for many years.
  2. When that use ceased the space was made available to Brent Young Foundation who were allowed to take occupation before a Lease was prepared and signed.
  3. Officers were instructed to prepare and finalise a Lease some 4 years ago but never did. (I expect there were exchanges documenting the terms and basis on which YBF could use the building in advance of the Lease - an unusual situation not available to others). They were due to pay a rent equal to the rent paid by the Council to Barham Park Trust - originally £11,300pa but at some point subject to a review. 
  4. Young Brent Foundation were in occupation until now - it is not clear if proper legal process for termination was followed and the space is still being cleared as I write. (Termination was referred to at a recent Barham Park Trust Meeting). 
  5. The answers received to date (but not complete and slow in coming) suggest that Young Brent Foundation did not pay any rent, any business rates, any service charges and possibly no utility costs for electricity, gas or water or contribution to insurance.
  6. It is also not clear who paid for any of the above.
  7. I estimate that the loss mainly to Brent Council but also partly to the Barham Park Trust may be in the region of £100,000.
  8. An independent investigation is required as Property and Finance are implicated and YBF clearly has other debts owing to the Council and others including possibly HMRC and the Pensions Authority.  Letters from all these are coming through Barham Community Library and have been passed by me to the Property Unit.
  9. The investigation needs to ask a number of questions including why was occupation by YBF allowed without a lease being in place, why was no rent collected, who paid the costs of the business rates and utilities and others. What action is being taken to recover all the debts and losses sustained by Brent Council and Barham Park Trust.
  10. I consider this a major failing by various Units of Brent Council. It seems that if you are well connected as people in YBF were you get anything and you get away with anything without effective scrutiny or action. 
  11.  It is particularly galling because well established organisations in my Sudbury Ward or in Barham Park which have provided services to local people for years - East Lane Theatre Club, LNER Sports Club and Barham Veterans Club are under threat of closures because of unfair and unrealistic rent demands from the Brent Property Unit. All of these should have had lease renewals a long time ago well before the new Brent Council Property Strategy was out in place which fails to take into account the contribution these organisations provide for local people.  

 Cllr Lorber adds:

In view of the above I trust that you will instruct Internal Audit to investigate and for Property and Finance respond fully to my outstanding enquiries.


I am making my request public as part of my Scrutiny duty as the Scrutiny arrangements in Brent Council are ineffective and frankly a waste of time as recent Call Ins clearly show. Labour Councillors are cleared whipped and will never agree to refer an item back to Cabinet however flawed the original decision.

 

Thursday, 8 May 2025

UPDATE: Brent Council refers itself to Housing Regulator as result of finding weaknesses in its actions to ensure compliance

 Brent Council is writing to its tenants and leaseholders after it referred itself to the Housing Regulator in relation to its previous building risk assessment actions.

The Council will tell them what actions they are taking following identification of weaknesses in their management of follow-up actions following the completion of the required checks across its estates. The concerns were identified as part of Brent Council's new Housing Management Plan.

Although tenants and leaseholders do not have to take any action themselves if they have further questions about building, fire safety, asbestos, or gas, electrical and general compliance they should email the teams below:

For building safety issues: BHMBuildingSafety@brent.gov.uk
For asbestos related issues: housingasbestos@brent.gov.uk
For fire safety related issues: housingfiresafety@brent.gov.uk
For gas, electrical & general compliance issues: complianceteam@brent.gov.uk

Swindown Borough Council has previously referred itself to the Housing Regulator and you can read about the proces son its web page HERE.

The regulatory standards for social housing landlords are set out HERE

 

UPDATE:

Cllr Lorber has received this response regarding the self-referral  after requesting further information:

 

As it stands I can confirm that fire risk assessments (FRAs) have been carried out on our blocks of flats whether that’s our high-rise blocks or converted street properties.

 

What we have some concerns with, is actions that are registered as a consequence of an FRA and how they have been closed down on our system, True Compliance, that has been in use for around 2 years.

 

At present we are carrying out an audit of this process and have appointed an external Health and Safety Consultant to assist with this.  Until that audit has been completed I’m not able to say what the situation is on individual blocks but rest assured that we will be working hard to rectify these issues over the coming months and prioritising actions according to risk.

 

The Social Housing Regulation Act 2023 is a UK law designed to improve the quality, safety, and accountability of social housing, especially in council-owned homes and this act came into forces around this time last year.

 

In simple terms, the Act gives the Regulator of Social Housing more power to make sure landlords (like us) are doing their jobs properly, keeping homes safe, in good condition, and treating tenants fairly.

 

Councils are now subject to inspections by the Regulator, much like Ofsted inspections, to check that we meet safety and quality standards in the way that we are delivering our homes. We have not been inspected yet, but we could be at any time, and therefore after finding an issue such as this it is far more advantageous to be proactive, transparent, and accountable hence our self-referral.

 


Tuesday, 6 May 2025

The formal consultation on the amalgamation of Malorees Infant and Malorees Junion School has opened. Have Your Say. Closing date 10th June 2025

 The headteacher of the Malorees Schools has written to parents announcing that the formal consultation on the amalgamation of the Infant and Junior schools has opened:

 I am writing to inform you that the formal consultation on the proposed amalgamation of Malorees Infant and Junior Schools has now been launched.

A statutory notice has been placed on the school gates, and all relevant information can be found in the formal proposal which can be found at https://haveyoursay.brent.gov.uk.


It is really important that all parents take the opportunity to share their views on the proposed amalgamation. If you are in favour of the proposal, or not we encourage you to make that viewpoint known as all feedback, will be taken into consideration.

 

As the consultation is now in its final and formal stage, all comments must be submitted directly on the website, or by post to Brent Council. Please don’t send any comments to the school as they will not count as a formal consultation response.

 

Thank you for your support.

 

The Have Your Say webpage has the following introduction:

 

Malorees Infant and Junior Schools - Formal Consultation

 

Brent Council has launched a formal consultation regarding the amalgamation of Malorees Infant School and Malorees Junior School.

 

This would result in the schools joining together to become one primary school, known as Malorees Primary School.

 

Brent Council, working with the governing body of the two schools, is seeking your views on the proposal to amalgamate Malorees Infant and Junior Schools. This is a unique opportunity to bring two good schools, which are already federated under one governing body, together as a single educational institution. The combined school would build on the existing strengths and good practice within both schools, and over time there would be opportunities to further enhance whole school approaches to improve teaching and learning across all key stages.

 

Further information is contained in the full proposal document, linked below. Any person may object to or make comments on the proposal by clicking the 'Leave a comment' button on this page.

 

If you have any questions about the consultation, please contact Michael Rollin at MaloreesConsultation@brent.gov.uk

The closing date for the consultation is Tuesday 10th June 2025.

 

THE PROPOSAL DOCUMENT (hover your mouse over foot of page 6 and press + to enlarge)

 

 

 

 

Monday, 5 May 2025

The five runners in the race to be Brent's Deputy Mayor 2025-26

 

The Brent Labour Group's AGM tomorrow will be over-shadowed by last Thursday's election results. Brent goes to the polls on May 7th next year and given the volatile state of politics it is hard to predict what will happen. Those who think Reform has no chance in London should bear in mind that there may be some support in Outer London due to a collapse in the Conservative and Labour vote. A lot will depend on whether Greens and Liberal Democrats can take on Reform.

This leaves the Labour Group's choice of Deputy Mayor for 2025-26 more difficult. They would be due to be Mayor after the 2026 borough election but will they still be a councillor and able to take up the role?

So members of the Labour Group,  as well as looking at the five candidates' election statements, will likely take into account the security of the ward the candidates currently represent (although that could change through some nifty selection manoeuvres ).

Cllr Ryan Hack will become this years' Mayor at the Annual Council Meeting, the youngest ever, but who will be the Deputy?

Those in the know give Cllr  Ishma Moeen (Wembley Hill ward) the edge in the first past the post secret ballot. She has no current Committee position on the council so is relatively inexperienced but does have business experience according to her Register of Interests:

At the 2022 local election she was just 91votes ahead (1390) of the leading Conservative (1299).

I understand that Cllr  Narinder Singh Bajwa (Northwick Park) is running again after his defeat last year. His only Committee role is on the Alcohol and Licensing Sub-Committee.  His energetic and insistent campaigning has annoyed some of his colleagues, and out in the community he has been accused of over-claiming his involvment in the K-Pop Festival issue.

His business interests are based on a number of entities that share the name Skyspace, only one is recorded on the Register of Interests.  The main company gives its interests as development of building projects,  building completion and finishing and other letting and operating of own or leased real estates.  Total net assets seem to be around £5.5m.

At the local election in 2022 Cllr Bajwa was well ahead of the nearest Conservative, 1638 votes to 984.

Another name that has cropped up is  Cllr Rita Begum (Kilburn).  She is Chair of Brent Connects (Kilburn) and a member of the Planning Committee.

Her entry on the Register of Interests is extensive and includes 'Ambassador for Gem Environment Building Services Lrd and Paytap' and Advisor to SD Care Agency.

Gem is based in Central London and a leading building maintenance contractor since 1999, serving London and the Southeast across sectors like local authorities, social landlords, schools, and commercial buildings.

Paytap is one of the many companies offering firms a gadget to take card payments.  

Cllr Begum was top in the Kilburn 2022 local election with 2,115 votes. The nearest political rival was the Green Party at 679.

Cllr Kathleen Fraser (Chalkhill), is also a candidate. She is a veteran Labour Party member, first elected as a councillor in the 1980s and is deeply embedded in Chalkhill and its Community Centre, Community Trust and Residents' Association. 

Cllr Fraser is Vice Chair of the Community and Wellbeing Scrutiny  Committee. She topped the Barnhill election with 1,410 votes.

Lastly, but these candidates are listed in no particular order, is Cllr Orleen Hylton. (Preston). Cllr Hylton has been Mayor before but she was affected by illness duing the latter half of her term. She is on the Licensing Committee, the Alcohol and Entertainment Licensing Sub-Committee, the Employers Joint Consultative Committee and vice chair of Wembley Connects.

Cllr Hylton's Register of Interest includes Diversity Office for Brent Friends of the Earth, governor of Donnington Primary Schools and  Company Secretary of the Black African Caribbean Alliance.

Cllr Hylton was second  in the 2022 Council election with 1417 against 941 for her Conservative rival.

As far as I can ascertain there are no committee changes likely at the AGM that will be held at 6pm tomorrow at the Civic Centre. 

 

 

Note an earlier edition of this article also contained a paragraph on Cllr Robert Johnson (Chalkhill) who I have now been told has withdrawn his Mayoral submission.

'Neither shared nor ownership' - SHAC's factual information blitz counters SO mis-selling at the London Home Show

 


Despite a partial recognition by Brent Council that Shared Ownership is not an affordable housing route for most Brent resident and broader issues with the product, the Planning Committee continues to approve developments that include a shared ownership component.

Previous articles on Wembley Matters have covered the topic. 

https://wembleymatters.blogspot.com/2022/11/shared-ownership-lets-have-debate.html

 

https://wembleymatters.blogspot.com/2022/11/brents-affordable-council-housing.html

 

I thought that a recent article by SHAC (Social Housing Action Campaign) would be of interest to readers and local politicians.

 

I thank SHAC for their permission to reproduce the article below that can also be found on their website HERE

 

 


 

By Alison, SHAC Campaigner

 

Twice a year, the estate agent subsidiaries of the big London housing associations assemble at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster for the London Home Show. 

 

Mortgage providers, conveyancing solicitors, and related service providers also take stalls. It’s a one stop shop for Shared Ownership (SO) flats.

 

The problem is, SO in neither shared nor ownership. The tenant is responsible for 100% of the costs of the maintenance of their properties, and also, through service charges, the cost of maintaining the building and the area around it. 

 

Service charging is entirely unregulated and escalates quickly. There is no tenure in law that is called ‘shared ownership’ – that is actually a marketing term. Legally, all you have is an assured tenancy, which means that if you get into just eight weeks arrears with rent and / or service charge, the landlord can repossess the entire property and, crucially, not give you back the money you paid for your share (1)

 

It is sold as an affordable way to get a foot on the property ladder, and with an option for ‘staircasing’, ie. increasing the share of the property that you theoretically own until it reaches 100%. But when rent rises above inflation, service charges increase exponentially, and wages do not keep pace with property prices, it’s no wonder that less than 3% of tenants ever ‘staircase’ to 100% (2).

 

So, a few concerned housing activists from SHAC went along to the London Home Show on Saturday 26 April 2025, armed with information leaflets for people attending the show. We knew from experience that the marketing people inside – with their bright smiles and their glossy brochures – give information on SO that is so riddled with inaccuracies, omissions, and outright lies, that their conduct constitutes deliberate mis-selling. 

 

By contrast, we had more details and sources for future research, so that anyone thinking about buying SO would know where get accurate, independent, impartial information. We didn’t have banners or placards or megaphones. But what we did have, in abundance, were facts. 

 


 

It was a lovely, sunny day, and the show was not quite as well-attended as it was the last time there was a demo outside it, in 2022. What we did find, though, was that everyone we spoke to already knew about the problems with SO. Awareness of the problematic nature of the tenure is high, although not everyone knew the details. 

 

Many people were going along to the show out of curiosity, where previously they were going along with the express intention of finding a home. A lot of people were interested in SO only because they viewed it as better than private renting – a low bar if ever there was one – but still were not convinced that it was right for them.

 

It’s astonishing that the Mayor of London chooses to promote SO as a part of his affordable housing plan, when the Housing Select Committee has found that the scheme is failing to deliver on any of its promises (3)

 

It is astonishing that Labour spent fourteen years in opposition, becoming increasingly aware through their constituents’ complaints that SO is a problem and the landlords running the schemes are out of control, and yet still have no plan to reform it. But as people are gradually turning away from the tenure, and more and more SO homes go unsold (4), sooner or later something will have to give.

 

Sources:

(1) Shared Ownership Resources – Shared Ownership – Is It Really Ownership?

(2) SORESEI Blog – Shared Ownership Market Review 2020

(3) Parliament – Shared Ownership is Failing to Deliver an Affordable Route to Homeownership Say MPs

(4) Inside Housing Third Quarter Turnover at L&Q – But Hundreds of Shared Ownership Homes Remain Unsold


Fundraising Concert at St Andrew's Church, Kingsbury, May 24th - arias, songs and musicals

 

 CLICK HERE TO BOOK TICKETS


 

Door open at 6.30pm

Interval refreshements available

Parking in Church car park

83 and 302  bus

Sunday, 4 May 2025

Updated: Bush Farm Collective calls for support for application for shipping containers on site for up to 5 years for barn restoration

 

The barn and orchard are remnants of the former Bush Farm in a corner of Fryent Country Park. The barn is in a pretty dilapidated state and restoration is a long term aim.

The Bush Farm Collective has appealed on Facebook for people to support its planning application for the siting of two shipping containers on the site to contain materials for the restoration The area where they would be installed is outlined in red on the site map below. The barn is next to the site labelled Riding School:


 


 

This is Bush Farm Collective's Appeal:

 

BUSH FARM URGENTLY NEEDS YOUR HELP!

As you are aware we will be renovating our barn we've put in a planning application to have storage containers on site for a maximum of 5 years which is essential to do the works and before our full renovations planning application. 

 Brent wants people's views on this so please go to https://www.brent.gov.uk/.../viewing-or-commenting-on... (you will have to register if you haven't already) the only thing you need to enter is 25/0734 you will then add a wonderful comment about how beneficial everything is etc and click SUPPORT.

 I can not explain how vital this is, please please please share with your contacts for those that don't know bush farm collective is a grassroots community project with a dilapidated 400 year old barn the BFC team have worked endlessly to raise money to save it and bring it back to life to provide much needed education and well-being to all. feel free to view our instagram @bushfarmcollective or email bushfarmcollective@gmail.com with any enquiries.

 

The planning statement gives the cost of renovation as up to £2m.

At present there are 19 support submissions on the Brent Planning Portal and 11 objections. Only 7 local addresses were sent notice of the application. Some of the support submissions are from outside of Brent.

The Comments include this statement of support from the Brent Head of Property

Brent Letter of Support
To whom it may concern

Re: Community Ownership Fund Application. The Barn & Paddocks, Fryent Country Park, Salmon Street, NW9 8YA.

I write on behalf of the Dove Watson-Yorke in support of her proposal to the Communities and Local Government for a grant to fund the transformation of the Barn and Paddocks, a building and enclosed fenced fields that are in need of significant repair to create a modern shelter for horses and livestock. This proposal assists the Council's objective of improving access to fields and open spaces by young people in the local area.

The Barn is a unique one of a kind horse shelter facility in Brent and was previously occupied by another tenant that left the building and paddocks in a poor state of repair. Dove Watson-Yorke took over the Barn and the paddocks as her horses had been sheltered at the location with the consent of the previous tenant. The Council is seeking to enter into a Farm Tenancy Agreement with Dove Watson-Yorke for a 25 year term, subject to detailed heads of terms and the Barn and Paddocks repairs being carried out under an agreement to lease.

The Barn and Paddocks are in need of works and the Council has not been able to bring the property back into a reasonable state of repair due to the level of capital investment required. Repairs include those to the timber structure, replacement of asbestos roof, timber cladding to the outer walls, the addition of modern toilet and and kitchen facities updated services and subsantial field fence repairs. The improved conditions would allow a long term agreement to be entered into and would strongly aligned to the objectives of the Borough Plan. The Brent Borough Plan is charged with a renewed focus and actions to tackle cross-cutting issues such as health inequalities. The Council therefore considered Dove Watson-Yorke to be best placed to bring the Barn and Paddocks into good use and deliver outcomes for local young people. As part of evaluation we have considered Dove Watson-Yorks to have a business model and a plan for meeting these objectives.

We believe that Dove Watson-Yorke, will be able to gain access to and secure other sources of additional investment, and thus secure the future of the asset in the longer term for community benefit. Without intervention, the building will continue to deteriorate and may eventually be lost for community use. The Council recognises that the letting has the potential to achieve a range of key objectives from promoting civic renewal, community cohesion, active citizenship and improving local public services to tackling poverty and promoting economic regeneration. If the proposed letting does not proceed, the Council may need to consider other options, such as demolition of the structure.

Dove Watson-Yorke would be better placed than the Council to manage this asset in the local community, with her local knowledge, and hands-on management likely to lower overheads and achieve better and more intensive and sustainable use from the asset than might be the case under traditional models of service delivery. The letting would also support the delivery of service outcomes which would otherwise be unnaffordable by the Council. There is a lack of high quality assets available for community use in Brent. The proposed letting is therefore a rare opportunity to make use of a potentially high quality asset for community benefit.

The works to be carried out at the Barn and Paddocks, as a condition of the agreement to lease, will include Dove Watson Yorke funding and returning the Barn and Paddocks to a safe, compliant and lettable state of repair. 


The proposal meets the general objectives of providing targeted investment to strengthen capacity and capability in communities to support them to shape their place and develop sustainable community businesses. We strongly support this application and the focus on increasing the use of open spaces for local young people.

I look forward to working with you in improving opportunities for young people in our communities and achieving health equity.
Yours sincerely,


Head of Property
London Borough of Brent

 

There is a submission from a Trustee of the Barn Hill Conservation Group that looks after Fryent Country Park, writing in a personal capacity:

 

I am a long time resident in Kingsbury, a regular volunteer with Barn Hill Conservation Group BHCG and a trustee of BHCG charity. However, I write in a personal capacity.


The proposed redevelopment of the stables barn is a difficult, complex task. The stables with horses are a much loved feature of Fryent Country Park. The applicant has a very difficult task with limited resources. The proposal is an essential step along the way and has my full support.

 

An opposing view is put by a near neighbour:

 

Firstly, I believe granting permission for two storage containers would exacerbate the derelict site the area has become over the past few years, along with the large horse transporter that is used as a mobile home. Moreover, I question the necessity of such large containers for such a long period, especially considering that the barn's reconstruction is due to commence later this year. While I strongly support the barn's refurbishment, the requirement for these containers raises concerns about the timeline for its completion.


In reference to the letter of support submitted by the 'Head of Property' at Brent Council, it's evident that the council is merely pleased that someone else is taking on the responsibility of rebuilding the derelict barn, rather than have to address the issue themselves. They base their trust on a business plan filled with whimsical ideologies, disregarding the potential impact on local residents. The site is not a riding school, there has been no involvement with local schools, and community engagement is minimal at best. My back garden backs onto one of the paddocks, and I have three young children. This portal is the first time I've heard of the educational workshops purported in the business model. Perhaps we don't fit within the definition of 'local community'?


We have attended two events hosted by Bush Farm Collective, one of which we left due to the explicitly inappropriate music being played. Has anyone at Brent Council investigated the authenticity of the claims made in Bush Farm Collective's business proposal?


The 'Brent Council Head of Property' also stated, "Without intervention, the building will continue to deteriorate and may eventually be lost for community use." However, to my knowledge, the barn and 'riding school' have not been available for community use in the nine years we have lived here.


Currently, the area appears to be used as a personal party hub for BFC, with loud gatherings, music, dogs barking, and general noise disrupting the normally peaceful surroundings. Granting planning permission would only allow this free run of the land to continue, making it an impossible environment for us who live within it.

 

A supporting statement from outside the area gives a different view of the Bush Farm Collective's activities;

I am writing in support of the planning application for temporary storage at the paddocks and barn at Fryent Country Park. I have taken part in conservation activities with the Bush Farm Collective (BFC), planting hedges, and improving the land for wildlife. I have also attended and volunteered at the community events organised by the BFC in collaboration with the local community. I have witnessed the hard work and dedication the BFC put into these events. I see how much they benefit the local community members who engage with the group, attend events and get involved with activities. I am also aware of the important work the collective do to support volunteers and children with outdoor activities, that are so important for mental health and general well-being.

 

A further objection contains some points not covered above;

 

 As a daily user of Fryent Country Park and a local resident I was deeply concerned to hear, only two days ago, that this planning application had been submitted several weeks ago. There are no notices on the barn itself, the two noticeboards, the gate or nearby lamp-posts to alert the community around the park. Nor has anyone from the 'Bush Farm Collective' made any attempt to speak to park users or neighbours about their plans. As word of mouth has spread over the past few days, it is apparent that nobody was aware of these plans.

The 'business plan', for which this is supposedly the first step, would not stand up to scrutiny on any level. Quite apart from the substantial change of purpose for what is, and always has been, a community recreational facility with a small area of grazing land and pasture which is leased for private use, the information provided is riddled with inaccuracy throughout - not least that there is no existing Riding School, (which would surely require a license, insurance and a qualified instructor, in any case).

With regard to this application specifically, though, objections are as follows;

- Shipping containers are completely out of keeping with the natural character of the park and would constitute an eye sore.

- The 'Collective' has already parked a dilapidated horse box next to the barn, which could have been used as 'storage' but is frequently occupied overnight, despite there being no sanitation facilities.

- The 'Collective' was granted a substantial amount of money over two years ago but there has been no improvement to the barn or the surrounding paddocks since then. Whilst we understand that the barn itself is now beyond repair (partly as a result of the tenant's actions), there is no reason why the paddocks could not have been cleared of the accumulated junk, the fencing repaired properly and some form of shelter for the horses with an adequate water supply provided.

- Using whatever grant remains to pay for shipping containers, which could not be used to house animals, would be a mis-use of charitable funds.

- Contrary to what is submitted in the application, there is no hard-standing for these containers to be placed on, either in the area indicated on the plan or elsewhere within the leased paddocks.

- To get two 20 foot containers into the place indicated on the plan, a long established and healthy tree would have to be removed / destroyed.

- The plan alleges that installing two containers on the land for a period of 5 years will allow time for planning and work to replace the barn to be completed. Surely there should be planning permission in place first - then they can look at the best way to achieve the work?

- 5 years is not temporary. The 'business plan' talks about further fund raising and income from activities which require the use of the barn and the other 'developments' which means that there is no viable exit strategy should that income not be forthcoming. The containers could be there forever.

- There is a well established, long standing and active community group in Kingsbury which provides volunteers with the opportunity to take part in and learn about conservation and wildlife in the park. It has a garden which offers regular community events, it has direct links with Brent Parks Department and, importantly, a properly formed constitution and committee structure. The 'Collective' has none of these.

- Photographs to show the actual condition of the area around the barn, and the inadequate fencing will be emailed separately. It is an eyesore with an accumulation of dangerous materials left where the horses, dogs and children can easily be injured. For example, broken fence posts with nails sticking out and sheets of discarded rusty metal. This does not seem to correlate with the 'Collective's rhetoric.

A further support statement with some new points:

 I am writing in support of the planning application for temporary installation of 2 shipping containers on the land at Fryent Country Park. The Bush Farm Collective have developed over the past three years a community supported plan to transform the barn for community benefit, providing facilities for local partner charities to conduct their learning and development activities. This requires renovation of the barn to be fit for purpose and use. The shipping containers are required for storage of the barn contents during construction.

The barn restoration plan has been achieved with the support of funding from Brent's You Decide grant, determined by community support. This has been matched with funding by Government's COF Grants, which has achieved the funds required to renovate the barn. The restoration will reinstate the barn for community use, with construction planned to happen in the latter part of 2025.

The Collective is made up of local volunteers, who have worked hard to make the land and barn fit for community purpose, with facilities that will enable the site to contribute to increased community benefit once the barn is reinstated. This has all been achieved with the support and knowledge of Brent Council throughout.

Without the initiative and activities of the Collective over the years, the barn, which has fallen into dereliction, would not be restored, and remain the eyesore, and unused asset that it is presently is. As a borough that is in great need of community facilities, we know that this is seen positively by the Council and many local people. Our community events have always been well attended and supported, and have been used to communicate the plans for the barn, along with extensive consultation, community surveys and letterboxing.

We understand that for some residents, who have the great fortune to live adjacent to Fryent Park, have objections to any change to the public land. We encourage them to look at the architect's plans for the barn once they are live on the planning portal, which demonstrates the transformation possible to this neglected building. We also understand that change is sometimes difficult, however advocate that the benefit to the wider community that Bush Farm Collective are proposing is a change that is worth considering with positive spirit.

LINK TO PLANNING PORTAL TO COMMENT

 In response to request from a reader on the first publication of this story here is more about the Bush Farm Collective's plans.