Sunday, 22 February 2026

Brent Council Budget and Council Setting meeeting is at 3.30pm tomorrow. Links to full alternative proposals from Tory, Green and Lib Dem Groups

The Council's Budget and Council Setting meeting tomorrow (Monday February 23rd) is the last Full Council Meeting of the Municipal Year. The next meeting will be after the May 7th Council Election and will see the fromation of a new adminstration.

The budget meeting will be at 3.30pm rather than the usual 6pm to allow for Ramadan observation. WATCH LIVE HERE

There is some history attached to the meeting as it will be the first time a Green Group of councillors will present alternative proposals to Labour's budget.

All three opposition groups have submitted alternative proposals and the full details can be found on the links below:

  

·  6.2 Brent Conservative Group Alternative Budget Proposdals 2026 -27, item 6. pdf iconPDF 604 KB

 

·  6.3 Green Group Alternative Budget Proposals 2026-27, item 6. pdf iconPDF 462 KB

 

·  6.4 Liberal Democrat Group Alternative Budget Proposals 2026-27, item 6. pdf iconPDF 284 · 

  

In their introduction to their proposals the Greens say:

 

This Green Group set of budget amendments is not a fully comprehensive view of investment opportunities, cost saving measures or income generation opportunities.
 

Rather, it intends to set core principles for financial prioritisation and a direction of travel based on Green Party values of social and environmental justice.


Our priorities for investment fall within three areas:


1. Aligning with the energy transition away from fossil fuels and ensuring long- term energy resilience


2. Ensuring housing equity for all Brent’s residents including enhanced scrutiny of housing policies and operations and landlord licensing arrangements


3. Protecting and investing in Brent’s Green Spaces, including parks, protected areas of natural interest and pocket parks and other green spaces


Brent Council, as with all local authorities, remains in a local government funding crisis, despite the new Labour government’s funding settlement. There are therefore only hard decisions to be made in terms of cost savings, and it is not within the scope of our budget amendments to scrutinise the spending within service delivery. The Green Party is calling for a radical overhaul of the funding of local government as the present system, including council tax, is regressive and unsustainable.


However, we have proposed cost savings as they relate to internal processes such as removing costs associated with the Mayor and Deputy Mayor role, reducing the number of cabinet members, and a reduction in costly engagement initiatives with a low ROI (Return on Investment).


It is also our position that there are a number of under-utilised avenues for income generation and maximising the council’s assets, some, but not all of which have been costed up as part of these budget amendments. These include expanding CPZs and increasing parking revenue through a mix of increasing the base rate and introducing a variable parking rate which takes into account vehicle size, weight and emissions type, further investment in debt collection initiatives, and ensuring maximum ROI of Brent-owned properties, whilst recognising the social value they add to Brent as well as financial value. Where further exploration is required, we have budgeted for feasibility studies for these initiatives.


These budget amendments propose a modest use of SCIL funding at £2.4m, which will part-fund travel initiatives to enhance active travel and traffic calming measures. 
  
 
As noted by the Budget Scrutiny Task Group, there is an opportunity to deploy CIL funding more widely to support infrastructure and to offset financial pressures on services, while ensuring the residents that benefit are those most impacted by development across the borough.

 

The Full Paper sets out proposals in detail HERE. Below is a summary. Note that in the first item the sum of £15,000 is for a feasibility study - not a programme of work.




 

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good to see given Brent car-free housing towers population grow, grow, grow the new policy priority of - "Protecting and investing in Brent’s Green Spaces, including parks, protected areas of natural interest and pocket parks and other green spaces."

Let's hope Brent officer and politician decisions can finally see beyond the conservation areas green space major invests. Hope for Granville Road Pocket Parks private hijack being ended and the three South Kilburn children's playgrounds harshly removed recently being replaced.

Brent needs to lobby also for high quality active travel infrastructure funds, why repeat East London's car-free housing towers disconnects in the Great West Tower Hundreds City?

Anonymous said...

Local Green Space Designation for South Kilburn Public Open Space in the Local Plan Review. Just good governance this, to protect for future generations this 60 year old park from its being developer towered on, ditto public rights of way definitive map and statement for former Borough of Willesden spatial area. Only former Borough of Wembley has such strong legal public rights of way protection in 2026.

Lets have good growth foundations, protections and civil rights in all of Brent.

Anonymous said...

Why are Labour planning to spend £47 million on a Sports Centre in Bridge Park from money raised from the massive Tower Blocks built in Wembley and Alperton? Should not the money be spent on these areas first?

Anonymous said...

The Great West Tower Hundreds City needs a national plan 2026. How does this massive population growth of Brent safeguard and sustain all its lives with equitable welfare state support infrastructure grown to be baked-in?

Tower Lord developers not interested. Labour should be.

Anonymous said...

It's a sweetner to keep Stonebridge Residents Happy re the loss of their historic community centre.

Anonymous said...

This article makes you wonder about how Brent's finances are being managed...

"I thought gathering basic financial information from our councils would be relatively quick and straightforward. It wasn’t. It opened my eyes to how badly many of them are run."

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/london-borough-councils-spending-bankrupt-tax-b1272565.html

Anonymous said...

Ignore the data. Brent's planning policy is generic (so conservation area de-growth zones), rather than focused on where neighbourhood destruction population growths are being zoned-in.