After a marathon session today. the Licensing Committee finally decided to refuse the application for an Adult Gaming Centre licence for 1 Walm Lane, Willesden Green - the former Lloyds Bank premises.
It was a cross-party resident led campaign that said. 'Enough is enough' over the deterioration of Walm Lane and High Road Willesden and threats to public safety with special concern over young people and children who are growing up in the neighbourhood.
There was a powerful presentation by Brent's Public Health Team on the social and health impact of gambling. Cllr George Burn (Labour, Willesden Green) had done some telling research into the business's background and suggested that it was a 'paper company' that filed its accounts late. There was no substance behind its application and its claims: the community deserved better.
Cllr Mary Mitchell demonstrated the value of a 'Green in the room' with a passionate but well-researched presentation:
Cllr Suzanne Gallagher, spoke as a Willesden Green resident and parent, about having to explain to her 5 year old son, attracted by the lights flashing from gambling machines glimpsed through open doors, what exactly they were. She talked about the impact on gambler's own families of their habit as well as other key aspects of the application:
The applicant's legal representative challenged what she claimed was a lack of proper evidence of the link between gambling and Anti Social Behaviour and crime, while admitting there was such evidence in terms of alcohol and drugs.
The lack of any police representation to the Committee. post its April 16th email saying they were satisfied with the 24 undertakings by the applicant, and therefore would not be making any representations, had clearly disappointed local councillors and residents - since so much had happened, including the murder of a 15 year old, since that date.
'The job of the police is to protect our community - they are negligent and have let us down' one resident said to me as the Committee went off to make their decision in private.
The applicant said that he was a business man making a living, 'I work every day. I am not some kind of multi-national business from outside the community making huge profits,' he argued vehemently.
This was a small committee and of the three members, a word should be said about the diligence and forensic questioning of Liberal Democrat councillor, Fiona Mulaisho. She is clearly taking her job seriously.

13 comments:
We were told that the Police Licensing Team had been disbanded by the 'Powers That Be' losing vital experience and expertise in these issues so perhaps direct your criticism of the Police in this to those higher up who took that poor decision.
Success, this result has made my day. At last they see sense.
It is wonderful to have Council Committees that are no longer full Butt's nodding donkeys. The new non-Labour Councillors obviously care about the community and Brent. Perhaps the Brent Tory submission to Butt's power, for a few Special Responsibility Allowances, isn't total surrender to Butt's Dystopia after all. Well done the Greens and LibDems.
Great result, the campaigners who opposed this application should feel proud and be congratulated for their work: An inspiring precedent.
A great result and an inspiring precedent to use against the spread of gambling dens on high streets. How many such places are located in Mayfair and Belgravia etc ? (Answers on a postage stamp please...)
All those who campaigned to oppose this application should feel proud of their work and deserve our thanks.
Can this decision be overturned??
Yes, there can be an appeal. it has to be made with 21 says of the written decision
Thank you for your comment. We will keep up the hard work 💪
Thank you Myles. Next stop is the old Santander building in Kilburn. Please join us in our work to challenge this.
Counting down the clock
Made my year!! Thank you!
I hear Labour Councillors are claiming credit for this fantastic result! I wonder why other such gambling dens were previously approved, you know, when Butt's Labour Councillors were in almost complete control of the Council?
That’s an interesting observation!
Post a Comment