More information on deployment of extra resources in Veolia contract variation

 

The problem of overflowing bins...

 ...and dumping

 

Brent Council officers have supplied Cllr Suzanne Gallagher (Green Party Kilburn Councillor)  with further information on how the extra resources in the 12 month variation of the Veolia contract will be deployed:

  

Distribution of Resources

Could officers please advise:

      1. How the additional litter pickers will be allocated across the borough.

The deployment of the additional litter pickers will be flexible to account for emerging pressures on a day to day basis. Each Brent Connects area will receive 1x extra dedicated litter picker.

     2. How many of the additional litter-picking resources are expected to be deployed within Kilburn Ward.

As above. There will be 1 litter picker for your Brent Connects are, and any deployment specifically within Kilburn ward will be determined on a day to day basis depending on need and other priorities.

    3. Whether there is a ward-by-ward or area-by-area breakdown of the anticipated allocation of resources.

The additional litter picking resource is being applied on a Brent Connects area basis. The mechanical sweeping and the two additional fly-tip clearance teams are being deployed on a north of Brent and south of Brent basis.

    4. What criteria have been used to determine where the additional resources will be deployed.

Neighbourhood Mangers will determine the day to day deployment through discussion with their counterparts at Veolia. The decision-making will reflect monitoring outcomes and FMS data.

   5. Whether historic complaint data, Fix My Street reports, fly-tipping reports or cleanliness indicators were used in determining allocations.

Yes, this will be helpful in determining day to day deployment.

Housing Estates Trial

The decision refers to a trial of an additional vehicle and two-person crew for Brent Housing Estates. Could officers please advise:

   6. Which estates will be included within the trial.

A select range of the most challenging estate locations across Brent.

   7. Whether any estates within Kilburn Ward or the wider South Kilburn area will benefit from the additional resource.

Blocks at Stafford Road, Malvern Road, Cambridge Road, 

William Dunbar House, William Saville House

Gorefield House, Canterbury Court

   8. How estates were selected for inclusion in the trial.

A review of historic issues and ongoing difficulties.

   9. What specific services the additional crew will provide.

Rubbish clearance form grounds and bin stores

  10. How the success of the trial will be measured.

A basic assessment only of any improvement in visual amenity.

11. What performance indicators will be used to determine whether the trial should become a permanent service.

Basic improved visual amenity, and value for money.

Service Improvements and Outcomes

12. What baseline cleanliness standards or performance measures are currently being used against which the success of the investment will be assessed.

We measure cleanliness based on national guidelines relating to levels of litter that are visibly present.

13. What specific improvements the Council expects residents to see as a result of the £1.54m investment.

We seek only reduced levels of litter and dumped waste and better visual amenity and cleansing standards.

14. How councillors and residents will be able to monitor whether the additional expenditure is delivering value for money.

Through a general appreciation of improved cleansing standards at problem locations.

15. Whether there will be any public reporting of outcomes associated with these additional services.

This is yet to be determined with the Lead Member, but may be similar to reporting against NCIL funding for similar activity last year.

Contract Performance

Residents frequently raise concerns with councillors regarding street cleansing standards despite the existence of significant contracts with both Veolia and Krinkels. I would therefore be grateful if officers could advise:

16. To what extent the decision to provide additional funding reflects increased demand pressures as opposed to shortcomings in existing service provision.

The funding is necessary to improve standards beyond what the current contract is resourced to achieve. The current contract meets its current KPIs in relation to cleansing, so this will create an enhancement.

17. Whether any lessons from resident complaints, Members' Enquiries, Fix My Street reports or service performance monitoring informed the decision to increase investment.

Yes, this information establishes the correct locations and the overall demand for greater intervention.

18. Whether the Council considers that existing contractual service levels have been sufficient to meet resident expectations.

Current KPIs are being met. Demand is increasing most definitely, however, and the current contract scope was much reduced in order to remain affordable at the time of award. 

19. Whether any performance concerns have been raised with contractors in relation to litter, cleansing, weed control, fly-tipping or estate cleanliness.

The contract is currently meeting its KPI commitments in relation to cleansing.

Kilburn and South Kilburn

Given the persistent concerns raised by residents regarding locations including the South Kilburn estates, could officers specifically advise:

20. What proportion of the additional investment is expected to benefit Kilburn Ward.

Not established, and will be determined on a day to day basis.

21. Whether any hotspot locations within Kilburn have been identified for enhanced cleansing activity.

The focus will be on those estates mentioned, and areas of high footfall, and those locations that are subject to repeated incidences of fly-tipping. Raakesh will be able to advise in terms of the specifics, and will gladly receive your recommendations, etc.

22. Whether officers anticipate a measurable improvement in cleanliness standards within Kilburn as a result of this investment and, if so, how that improvement will be assessed.

Yes, the intention is to provide an enhanced service to make areas cleaner. Improvement will be assessed through joint inspections with Veolia.

 

Robotaxis rollout delay welcomed by Brent Green Party

Brent Green Party Councillor Suzanne Gallagher and Councillor Amandine Alexandre organised a protest against Waymo in Harlesden on May 22nd. They are asking the Mayor of London to hit pause on the robotaxis trial. Photo: Suzanne Gallagher 

 

  

Earlier this year, Londoners were led to believe by Keir Starmer’s government, Brent Labour leadership and big tech companies that the introduction of robotaxis in the capital was essential, inevitable and imminent. 

 

However, since April, when a serious Waymo incident happened in Harlesden, a coalition formed by Brent Green Party, trade unions and campaigning group Pull the Plug has been challenging this narrative and asking Sadiq Khan to hit pause on the robotaxis trial. 

 

Now, just over three weeks after Brent Green Party members, trade unionists, local transport workers and residents protested outside Waymo’s depot in Park Royal, the FT has revealed that driverless vehicles are unlikely to be introduced in London this year. 

 

TFL is not in a rush to publish regulatory guidance for driverless companies, and the Transport Committee of the London Assembly is yet to publish the result of its investigation on Autonomous Passenger Vehicles.

 

Councillor Amandine Alexandre, Green Party councillor for Harlesden and Kensal Green said:

This delay is a win for all the people who have been lifting up the veil on the negative impact robotaxis would have on jobs, road safety, privacy, but also safeguarding of our children, and our environment. This spanner in the wheel of extractive tech companies will be welcomed by the majority of Londoners. According to a YouGov poll published in July, 42% of us are opposed to the roll-out of so-called Autonomous Vehicles. 

 

Londoners have a lot of issues to battle with day-to-day - a suffocating rising cost of living, unaffordable housing and extreme heat. Improving their quality of life and protecting their jobs, and their health, should be the priority of the Labour Mayor of London Sadiq Khan. 

 

AI-powered vehicles that generate tons of data stored in water and energy-hungry data centres are not the future of London. Londoners are the future of London.

NOTES 

•   Harlesden Says No to Waymo is a Brent Green Party campaign that was launched at the end of April 2026 after a WAYMO vehicle drove through a live police cordon on Harlesden High Street on April 22nd while officers were investigating a double stabbing.
•  A petition was launched at the same time and has gathered so far almost 450 signatures. 

Brent Green Party welcomes PM's gambling reform announcement but warns of 'long road ahead' as another Wembley gambling licence is granted

Brent Greens campaigning against against gambling centres

 

From Brent Green Party

    

BRENT, LONDON Brent Green Party has cautiously welcomed the Prime Minister’s recent briefing announcing the intended scrapping of the controversial "aim to permit" rule under Section 153 of the Gambling Act 2005, over 20 years after its introduction by a Labour government.

Like many campaigners, affected families, and individuals who suffer from gambling harm, the Brent Green Party strongly supports ending the legal presumption that leads local authorities to believe they have no option but to approve new betting shops, casinos and 24-hour Adult Gaming Centres (AGCs).

However, the Brent Green Party warns that without a published White Paper, statutory document, or formal government policy roadmap, the announcement remains little more than a press statement. With legislation unlikely to be introduced until early next year, and heavy corporate industry lobbying expected during consultations, the "aim to permit" mandate will continue to hamstring local councils for the foreseeable future. The announcement also has no impact on the 80+ betting shops and casinos already in operation across Brent.

Furthermore, we have deep concerns about the Labour government’s true resolve to implement meaningful reform, given the government's close financial ties to the gambling industry; public records show the Labour Party and senior ministers accepted over £1 million in donations and gifts from betting executives and industry bodies in recent years, including a £25,000 leadership campaign donation to Keir Starmer from the head of Bet365 and VIP event hospitality for key Cabinet members. 

Gambling Harm Continue to Costs Brent £18 Million Annually

According to estimates from GambleAware, gambling-related harms cost the London Borough of Brent over £18 million every year. Despite these devastating economic and social impacts, local communities remain largely powerless under the current statutory framework. Where Green Party ward representatives are active, they have successfully mobilised residents against proliferation:

Willesden Green Ward: In June, a controversial Adult Gaming Centre application was formally rejected by the licensing committee following strong community opposition. This decision was unprecedented in the history of Brent.

Kilburn Ward: A major bingo hall/gaming application was forced into withdrawal ahead of its scheduled committee hearing in July due to organised local pressure.

This record contrasts with a recent decision of Brent Council’s Licensing Sub-Committee which granted a new premises licence to 312 Investments Limited to operate an Adult Gaming Centre at 574 High Road in Wembley Central, a ward represented by the Liberal Democrats at council level.

Speaking on behalf of Brent Green Party, Cllr Suzanne Gallagher said:

While we welcome the Prime Minister’s recognition that the 'aim to permit' rule is broken, a press briefing does not stop fixed-odds betting terminals or 24-hour slot machines from opening on our high streets today. Under Brent Labour, the industry has exploded in our borough with over 80 gambling venues, including ten within a ten minute walk of each other in Harlesden.

Furthermore, this announcement must be coupled with a comprehensive strategy to encourage local independent businesses to not only survive, but thrive. Small, independent enterprises present on our High Streets are currently suffering under punitive rent increases, extortionate commissions demanded by delivery platforms like Uber Eats, and a broader cost-of-living crisis impacting essential utility bills. The Green Party believes in actively promoting and protecting the local businesses that enrich our communities and drive our wider circular economy ambitions.

The recent approval of yet another gaming centre in Wembley Central where local representatives failed to even show up to the hearing to defend their residents proves exactly why we cannot wait months or years for legislative promises. The Brent Green Party will continue the good fight against gambling harms alongside our communities, pushing back against applications that threaten our town centres.

1 Walm Lane: 'A victory for our community' - Licensing Committee rejects Adult Gaming Centre application.

 

After a marathon session today. the Licensing Committee finally decided to refuse the application for an Adult Gaming Centre licence for 1 Walm Lane, Willesden Green - the former Lloyds Bank premises.

It was a cross-party resident led campaign that said. 'Enough is enough' over the deterioration of Walm Lane and High Road Willesden and threats to public safety with special concern over young people and children who are growing up in the neighbourhood.

There was a powerful presentation by Brent's Public Health Team on the social and health impact of gambling. Cllr George Burn (Labour, Willesden Green) had done some telling research into the business's background and suggested that it was a 'paper company' that filed its accounts late. There was no substance behind its application and its claims: the community deserved better.

Cllr Mary Mitchell demonstrated the value of a 'Green in the room' with a passionate but well-researched presentation:  

 

Cllr Suzanne Gallagher, spoke as a Willesden Green resident and parent, about having to explain to her 5 year old son, attracted by the lights flashing from gambling machines glimpsed through open doors, what exactly they were. She talked about the impact on gambler's own families of their habit as well as other key aspects of the application:

 

 

The applicant's legal representative challenged  what she claimed was a lack of proper evidence of the link between gambling and Anti Social Behaviour and crime, while admitting there was such evidence in terms of alcohol and drugs.

The lack of any police representation to the Committee. post its April 16th email saying they were satisfied with the 24 undertakings by the applicant, and therefore would not be making any representations, had clearly disappointed local councillors and residents - since so much had happened, including the murder of a 15 year old, since that date.

'The job of the police is to protect our community - they are negligent and have let us down' one resident said to me as the Committee went off to make their decision in private. 

The applicant said that he was a business man making a living, 'I work every day. I am not  some kind of multi-national business from outside the community making huge profits,' he argued vehemently.

This was a small committee and of the three members, a word should be said about the diligence and forensic questioning of Liberal Democrat councillor,  Fiona Mulaisho. She is clearly taking her job seriously.