Showing posts with label Lidding Road. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lidding Road. Show all posts

Tuesday 5 July 2022

LETTER: Cllr Butt challenged over building on green space

 Dear Editor,

I am accusing the Leader of Brent Council, Cllr.Muhammed Butt (Lab Tokyington), of telling an untruth yesterday when he said that Brent Council was not building on green spaces at the end of Lidding Road HA30YF here in Kenton and the green land space next to it known as the Legion Hall site both of which are right next to a SINC (a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation) and the Wealdstone Brook. The approved Planning Application 21/3248 Lidding Road Garages, Lidding Road, Harrow, IS on green spaces and I challenge the leader of Brent Council, Cllr.Muhammed Butt to join me in inspecting the site and let us agree the facts.

 

 John Poole,

Kenton, Harrow, HA 0UT (L.B.of Brent)

[Full address supplied]

Friday 15 April 2022

Do not view before eating: Photographic evidence of Wealdstone Brook sewage pollution

With the planning application for the Lidding Road Garages, close to the Wealdstone Brook, coming up on Wednesday (See LINK ) a reader has helpfully sent me photographs taken today of the sewage pollution in the brook. Raw faeces flowing into the water. Surely councillors cannot ignore this?





Thursday 14 April 2022

The 'Battle of the Brook' returns on April 20th over flooding and sewage fears regarding the Lidding Road Garages planning application

 

One of several teenagers seen crossing the Wealdstone Brook recently - if they fell in the water they could swallow something very nasty

A comprehensive objection has been submitted on the Brent Planning Portal to the Lidding Road Garages Planning Application. The Planning Committee will consider the application next week (Wednesday April 20th) after its deferral to consider a report from Thames Water.

Planning Officers are recommending approval LINK .

Comments can still be made on the Planning Application HERE

 

LIDDING ROAD GARAGES PLANNING APPLICATION number 21/3248  APRIL 2022

 

The Wealdstone Brook is a river that starts from a spring on Stanmore Common in Harrow and runs through Harrow, into Brent near Woodcock Park in Kenton and then onto the river Brent beyond Wembley. By the time water enters the London Borough of Brent at the cross roads of Kenton Road and Kenton Lane it is already seriously polluted and reading counts taken of the E.coli bacteria in the water at the end of Lidding Road in Kenton, were one of the highest recorded from waterways in the London area. E.coli is a naturally occurring bacterium that is found in the human gut and is therefore an indicator of foul raw sewage in a water course.

 

This serious level of water pollution is due in part to known and unknown misconnections of the foul surface water and foul raw sewage water connections throughout its course through Harrow and the additional misconnections in this part of Kenton, Brent. Under severe rainfall events the Wealdstone Brook quickly fills to its maximum capacity before it reaches Woodcock Park and, due in part to poor maintenance, blocked and damaged foul surface water and foul sewage drains, the areas around the Brook quickly get flooded and badly polluted. The most recent recorded foul raw sewage overspill was from the manhole on the grass area at the end of Lidding Road on the 5th October 2021. This raw foul sewage over spilled onto the grass area, onto the area next to it known as the Legion Hall site and then into the Wealdstone Brook.

 

The Wealdstone Brook was an earth bank water course and there are numerous recorded flooding events between 1927 and 1981. In 1977 on the 16th and 17th August the Brook burst its banks and the whole surrounding area of Kenton was flooded including numerous residential properties. Following this 1977 event, works were undertaken along the length of the Brook up to and including the junction of the Kenton Road/Kenton Lane interchange – in other words mainly on the Brent side. These works included the widening, deepening and brick-walling sections of the Brook from Woodcock Park down to Wembley. The aim of these improvement works was to increase the capacity of the Brook and to speed up the flow of the water. An engineer’s report at that time indicated that these improvements would alleviate problems of flooding for 50 years – and that was 43 years ago.

 

The Wealdstone Brook is simply incapable of coping with the expected water run-off during storm events because it is, according to a recent Thames Water engineer, attempting to operate at over 130% capacity during severe weather events. There is an important difference between the Wealdstone Brook over-spilling its banks and the flooding which occurs around the Wealdstone Brook during severe weather events. This distinction is important in the light of the recorded history of the Brook. As stated earlier, the Brook starts its life from a spring on Stanmore Common in Harrow and continues to receive surface water from several sources as it runs towards the river Brent:

 

1.    Surface road drains taking rain water from roads and into the Brook. Most of the outlets of these drains can be seen on the sides of the Brook and most are at a low level where their outlet enters the Brook. Many are blocked with debris due to poor maintenance and soon become unable to discharge when the flowing water level in the Brook rises.

2.   Water run-off from saturated ground – such as the parks, school grounds as well as gardens which abut the sides of the Brook.

3.   Damaged, broken and leaking clean water drains.

4.   Misconnected foul sewage water and surface water pipes which connect to the surface water drains as in 1).

5.    Springs

Even in the driest of summers and the coldest of winters, water continues to flow in the Brook.

 

It is when there are torrential downpours and storm like conditions that we see the full force of the Brook. Within 30minutes of a storm event in the NW London area, the Brook can be full of water moving along it at a rate of 20 tons per second. In these situations the Brook is at full capacity when it hits the culvert that runs under the Kenton Road/Kenton Lane interchange and the roads around here become flooded. The poorly maintained road drains cannot cope and cannot discharge into the Brook. By the time the water reaches the Falcon Way culvert it is also full to capacity. Again, road flooding around this area and around Lindsay Drive roundabout occurs for the same reasons. These are all HA3 0 areas of Kenton. If any problems occur further down the Brook such as blockages of the road and railway culverts or the opening of the sluice gates on the Welsh Harp, then the flow of water in the Brook is slowed resulting in areas around the Brook higher up flooding even more severely.

 

Flooding from the Wealdstone Brook is therefore a more complex issue than simply saying that the Brook is overflowing its banks. It is a combination of hydrology issues which vary from event to event and include such factors as the direction of the weather storm event, the intensity of the downpours, the length of the downpours and, crucially to begin with, the state of the drains. Once a storm event has started both surface foul water and domestic foul water sewer drains quickly become full, house drains overflow and the mixture of these waters pollutes the surrounding land and intensifies the pollution of the Brook.

 

The main Wealdstone Trunk Sewer, which follows a similar path to the Wealdstone Brook through Woodcock Park and onto the northern section of the grounds of Uxendon Manor School, has been known to discharge its contents from 6m underground to well over 3m above ground during severe storm conditions. All this foul and surface water attempts to flow into the Brook.

 

To put it bluntly, the drainage infrastructure in the area simply cannot cope and is not fit for purpose. For the Environment Agency and Thames Water to say that housing developments close to the Brook can tap into the present infrastructure is to ignore the numerous occasions that Thames Water and Lanes for Drains have had to clean, repair and replace various pieces of drainage pipework in the area in the past few years. And to attempt to build on and next to the present drainage infrastructure as suggested in the Lidding Road garages development proposal (Planning Application 21/3248) would land Brent Council with a substantial structural and economic ongoing problem which would be both a disaster for the residents of these new builds, the residents in the surrounding area as well as an ongoing and increasing economic burden for the Council tax payers of Brent Council. Hash Patel, a past Principal Engineer, Transportation Service with Brent Council, following flooding around the Brook on Wednesday 26th August 2015 and Wednesday 16th September 2015 stated the following:

 

“Regarding the River Brent and Wealdstone Brook, I am not aware that surface water has topped the banks (of the Brook). I am aware of flooding in your catchment and majority is related to inadequate capacity in the public sewer network” (my emphasis)

 

Thames Water knows it has to divert the damaged, broken and dysfunctional Victorian sewer pipe that runs from Woodgrange Close, through Woodcock Park, across the green field sites at the end of Lidding Road, through the back gardens of numbers 9 to 14 Brookfield Crescent and onto the manhole junction in Brookfield Crescent, before any works can take place on the site of the old Legion Hall and the grass area at the end of Lidding Road. This would be a very expensive piece of restructuring work. Best not to let them pass the buck to Brent Council.

 

It is wrong to consider housing developments in a flood plain zone 3 area and it is wrong to build over foul water sewers and surface water sewers. The Environment Agency and Thames Water are wrong to approve to the proposed housing development at the end of Lidding Road (Planning Application 21/3248). They are, in my opinion, acting irresponsibly.

 

Brent Council declared a Climate Emergency in 2019 (www.brent.gov.uk/climateemergency) and their pamphlet ‘Nature, green space and the climate and ecological emergency’ should surely be the foundation and driving force in the local Planning agenda. ‘Protect the remaining green spaces, support biodiversity, stop flooding or reduce their severity by preventing surface run off’ – all good intentions which need to be put into practice.

 

An Independent London Flood Review has been announced (Wednesday 22nd December 2021) into the flooding events of July 2021. The review seeks ‘to better understand the extent and causes of these floods, to assess how the drainage systems performed, and to recommend how the increasing risks of future flooding events can be managed.’

 

‘The review, which has been commissioned by Thames Water, will play an integral part in ensuring that the company future proofs its infrastructure to protect its customers, their communities and the environment as such severe weather events look set to become the norm across the UK.’

 

‘The review will also play an important role in improving the collaborative working between all parties responsible for managing future flooding risks. As part of its focus, the review will provide insights on London’s wider drainage infrastructure and broader recommendations that could be adopted by all organisations with surface water responsibilities. It is anticipated that the review will take no more than 6 months with interim reports published as it progresses.’

 

It would be prudent of Brent Council Planning Committee to await the findings of this review in areas where flooding has occurred and is occurring not just in severe weather events but under normal rainfall conditions. This should be particularly applied to areas designated as Flood Zones 3a and 3b by the Environment Agency such as in the Lidding Road garages Planning Application 21/3248.

 

‘This Independent Review will also assist with Thames Water’s role (as a Risk Management Authority) in supporting Local Authorities in undertaking their flooding investigations as required by Section 19 of the Flood and Water Management Act (2010).’

 

‘As part of its Independent Review this inquiry will examine the flooding mechanisms and consider the performance of drainage systems against design standards.’

 

This will hopefully set a standard whereby Brent Council Planning Officers and Brent Council Planning Committee members can assess whether a housing development such as that proposed at the end of Lidding Road meets the necessary flood risk assessment standards or is too risky to consider until major changes have been undertaken to the surface water and foul sewage water drainage infrastructure in the area of the proposed development.

 

Finally, I would like to conclude on the assumed role of the Environment Agency (EA) with regards to the Wealdstone Brook and its maintenance including its banks. The EA claim in an email letter to John Poole dated 28th April 2021 that they do not own the Brook and are not responsible for its maintenance including the banks of the Brook. The EA claim the maintenance is the responsibility of the riparian owner where the banks are owned by the landowner which in the case of my garden would be me. There is just one problem with this approach to the responsibility for maintenance and repair and that is that the EA does not allow me to enter the Brook to carry out any necessary maintenance or repair. The other issue to do with this denial of responsibility from the EA and delegation of responsibility to riparian owners is that Brent Council would have to take over stretches of the Wealdstone Brook and its banks where Brent Council owned land joins the Brook or where the Council owned properties with gardens end at the Brook since they would be designated the riparian owner. This is particularly relevant in the case of the Planning Application 21/3248 since Brent Council would be deemed to be responsible for the maintenance and repair of the Brook and its banks from the footbridge near the Woodcock Park Mural, through Woodcock Park, past the end of Lidding Road, past the site of the ex-Legion Hall grounds and down to the Falcon Way bridge at least on the Uxendon Manor School side of the Brook. Needless to say, if this was proven to be correct this would have very serious financial implications for Brent Council.

 

References:

 

BRENT COUNCIL – Flood Risk Management Strategy – Managing the Floods Risk in Brent - 2015

GREATER LONDON COUNCIL – Public Services and Safety Committee Report (30.09.77) – from the Director of Public Health Engineering  - Flooding on 17th August 1977.

MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD – Departmental Investigation into Flood Warning Arrangements in North West London – Report – (25th April 1978)

GREATER LONDON COUNCIL – RIVER BRENT FLOOD ALEVIATION SCHEME – ENGINEERS REPORT – MAY 1982 –WEALDSTONE BROOK.

HALCROW REPORT – The Environment Agency Thames Region – Wealdstone Brook Investigations – Scheme No 3721 – February 1999

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR RIVER BRENT FLOOD ALLEVIATION SCHEME – WEALDSTONE BROOK VOLUME 3 (Contract no.BD3) LEDWAY DRIVE TO KENTON ROAD – January 2002.

WATER FLOW RATE (m3/s) READINGS OF THE WEALDSTONE BROOK FROM THE UNIT AT THE JUNCTION OF KENTON LANE AND KENTON ROAD – from 30TH November 1976 to 14th November 2020 DURING SEVERE WEATHER EVENTS.

SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS: WRITTEN STATEMENT-HCWS161 made by Eric Pickles (Secretary of State of Communities and Local Government) – 18th December 2014.

NOTES FROM THE KENTON DRAINAGE MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY 12TH OCTOBER 2016

Water Industry Act 1991 – Chapter 56 – Sewerage Services – as amended.

Wealdstone Brook Water Quality meeting Thursday 22nd August 2019 which includes a map of all the misconnections of foul sewage water pipes and surfaces water pipes known at that point in time in the Harrow area.

THAMES WATER – Building over or close to a public sewer – undated but updated on a regular basis on the Thames Water website.

PINNACLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS – PROBABILITY OF FLOODING – A flood risk assessment revision 1 as part of the Planning Application for temporary classrooms on the Uxendon Manor School site – undated but probably around 2015 and includes a detailed Thames Water Drainage and Water Enquiry of the area around the school.

Flood Risk Assessment – Uxendon Manor Temporary Classrooms – April 2015 – Price and Myers – contains important information with regards to flood risk assessment in the area of the proposed Lidding Road development.

Email correspondence with Hash Patel, Principal Engineer, Transportation Services, Brent Council September 16th 2015.

London Flood Review (https://londonfloodreview.co.uk/) December 2021

Environment Agency email from Catherine MacDougall – Asset Performance Team Leader (Colne, Brent and Crane) dated 28th April 2021 (ref: HNL 12715 HH) – to John Poole. 

 

 

Tuesday 12 April 2022

Lidding Road planning application near Wealdstone Brook, returns to Planning Committee after Thames Water commentary

 The planning application for the development of garages at Lidding Road in the north of Brent was deferred last December after councillors heard representations from the Friends of Woodcock Park on sewer capacity and flooding in the area of the development which is close to the Wealdstone Brook. LINK

 The application was for demolition of the existing garages and redevelopment to provide 3 self-contained
flats and 5 dwelling houses; with associated car parking, cycle storage, refuse
storage, amenity space and landscaping

The application is back at Planning Committee on April 20th with a detailed response from Thames Water. Officers continue to recoemmend approval of the application.

Officers' Report extracts:

Members will be aware that the application was first reported to Committee at the meeting on 15 December 2021 where the committee agreed to defer a decision on the application in order to:

1. seek further details and assurance from Thames Water in relation to the impact of the proposed development on drainage and the maintenance of the sewerage infrastructure and how these would be mitigated;
 
2. seek further details on the location of the flooding incidents identified within the Flood Risk Assessment; 
 
3. seek further details on the proposals to alleviate concerns regarding the access of construction traffic to the site via Gooseacre Lane as part of the Construction Method Statement and Logistics Plan to be secured via condition.


Impact of the proposed development on drainage and the maintenance of the sewerage infrastructure and how these would be mitigated

 

In the Committee members raised concerns regarding flood risk impacts on the site. Specific concerns were raised regarding the potential for the voids under the houses to be blocked by residents; the ability for Thames Water to access and service the pipes where necessary. Additionally members raised concerns over the potential impact of the development on pollution in the Wealdstone Brook and further details were requested regarding any projects to clean the Brook.


Since the application was deferred, further comments were received from Thames Water regarding impacts of the development. It should be noted that these comments relate only to flooding that may rise from foul or surface water flooding. Flooding from other sources (such as the Brook) fall outside the statutory responsibility of Thames Water.


They consider that there is sufficient capacity and that the flow expected from the development would be exceptionally small. They have specified that they have no concerns over the risk of foul water flooding as part of the development. Additionally, they consider that the development would not result in an increase to the pollution of the Wealdstone Brook.


With regard to the concerns raised by residents about the sewers, Thames Water have specified the following:


We acknowledge concerns raised by residents about the performance of the foul sewers in this area. These have not been caused by the capacity of the sewers but by sewer blockages. Sewers are only designed to take water from toilets, sinks, baths and showers along with human waste and toilet tissue. Everything else should be put in the bin.


Sewer blockages in this area are predominantly due to fats, oils and grease being inappropriately put down the sewer. This then clogs the pipes, which causes the foul water to back up and eventually flood out of the sewer.


Sewer capacity is when the pipe is too small to accommodate flow and it can eventually back up and eventually cause flooding. Increased flow to the foul sewer from new developments has the potential to increase the risk of flooding due to sewer capacity. From our knowledge of the current flow in the sewer in question and the expected increase due to this development we are confident that the receiving sewer has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed flows. If we had concerns that capacity did not exist to serve this development, it would initiate Thames Water funded modelling investigations. Our initial assessment of this site shows this is not necessary.


They also note that with regards to surface water flooding there would be an overall reduction in flood risk due to the increased flow rates identified in the drainage strategy.


With regards to access to the sewers, Thames Water have confirmed that the applicants have engaged with them during the course of the development and a build-over agreement has been proposed. Thames Water raise no objections or concerns in regards to this and note that such matters are usually dealt with post-approval via Building Regulations.


The applicant has also advised that they already have details of the existing line, level and condition of the existing sewers within the development boundary prior to development, from undertaking drainage CCTV condition and utilities surveys in 2020. The flood risk consultant has therefore suggested that a post-construction drainage CCTV and conditions survey is undertaken of the Thames Water assets within the redline boundary to confirm that there has been no damage to the existing sewers during construction. Any damaged and/or blocked pipes could then be reported to Thames Water for repair. Such details could be conditioned to any forthcoming consent.


With regards to pollution in the Wealdstone Brook, colleagues in the Parks team have provided further information on the existing circumstances. They note that most of the pollutants in the water would have originated upstream and flowed down into Brent towards the River Brent.

Brent Parks Service are working on an early-stage scheme to improve the structural and wildlife diversity and amenity section of the Brook through woodcock Park. Additionally, the catchment area of the brook is mainly located in Harrow and Harrow Council has ongoing projects to improve the brook.


Thames Water have an on-going programme looking at addressing the issues with water quality in the Wealdstone Brook, and have specified the following:

We recognise that there is a significant issue with water quality in the Wealdstone Brook. We host a “Friends of the Wealdstone Brook” quarterly meeting where residents, the Environment Agency, Lead Local Flooding Authorities are other interested stakeholders can meet and engage on the issue. This allows us to share water quality data for the watercourse, our operational activity and longer-term investment plans with interested stakeholders. The group is attended by the NERC funded CAMELLIA project (Community Water Management for a Liveable London) consisting of many academic partners including Imperial College, British Geological Survey, and Oxford University. We completed an extensive Catchment Study on the Wealdstone Brook in 2016/17 that assessed the root cause of poor water quality and flood risk in the area. Following that study, we have a long-term list of improvements we propose to make to the sewer system. As water quality and flood risk are intrinsically linked, we have to start by creating capacity in the river system. We are in discussions with Harrow Council about a potential scheme to do that.

 

Once details are available, we will share them. We hope to promote a similar scheme with Brent Council in the future. Thames Water conclude their further advice by confirming that they have adequately assessed the impact  that the proposed development will have on the sewer system and that they are confident that the development will not cause a deterioration to the level of service residents receive at present.

Location of the flooding incidents identified within the Flood Risk Assessment


In the committee members noted that the flood risk assessment identified 66 flooding events at postcode ‘HA3 0’. It should be noted that this postcode zone encompasses a larger area stretching from Kingsbury to Northwick Park and including the area between Kenton Road and Preston Road.


In response to the above, the applicants have requested a Sewer Flooding History Enquiry from Thames Water. This has selected 1 Lidding Road as the centre point but encompasses a wider area around this address. The report notes that there have been no recorded flooding events in the area as a result of surcharging public sewers.


With regards to the potential for the voids to be blocked, the applicants have agreed that a planning condition can be attached requiring a verification report to confirm that the relevant measures have been implemented on site. This is intended to include a drainage maintenance schedule which can incorporate checks to the void structure.

Notwithstanding that, the voids are closed in by ‘hit-and-miss’ brickwork leaving several small gaps for water to escape. The gaps are considered small enough to avoid large objects from being inserted into the void space. Additionally, these voids would be located under all plots 1-6. As such, officers consider that the likelihood of the voids to be fully blocked and therefore resulting in undue flooding impacts is low and suitably addressed by the suggested condition

 

 


Wednesday 15 December 2021

BREAKING: DECISION DEFERRED: Friends of Woodcock Park voice flooding and ecological concerns over in-fill proposal on site of Lidding Road garages - Planning Committee 6pm tonight

BREAKING:  After a discussion which focused on  the  foul water surface water flooding danger - of the Lidding Road site and immense concern that Thames Water had not addressed the long-standing issue, the Planning Committee decided tonight to defer a decision on the planning application.

Committee members wanted assurances that the sewage pipes, descibed as 'broken, damaged and collapsing' by John Poole making representations on behalf of residents, would be repaired, replaced and upgraded, otherwise the new development would exacerbate the problem.

Thames Water had said that the system had capacity for the new development but councillors were sceptical and did not appear to be reassured by the statement. 

Some members also wanted a construction vehicle management plan give the nature of the local road,

 

 

The development site from planning report (outlined in red)

 

Satellite view

Wembley Matters has been been covering concerns over fluvial (river) flooding and surface water flooding in the borough in the wake of climate change. Local residents are usually better informed about the history of such events than planning officers, but this local knowledge is often dismissed and plans go ahead.

Tonight's Planning Committee will be discussing a Brent Council in-fill development at Lidding Road, Kenton,  which residents say will exacerbate flooding problems from the Wealdstone Brook and current sewage draining problems. Trees and some green space will also be lost according to objectors.

This is what Friends of Woodcock Park had to say:

 The site is totally unsuitable. It is in Flood risk 3 area. Flooding in this area is a problem as is water run off.

On the opposite side of the Brook the grounds of the Kenton Synagogue are constantly flooded by rainwater run off. This development will only increase the problem of rainwater run off.


Sewer pipes are shown running directly under the proposed development. Plot 5 has been designed with a manhole underneath it. This is contrary to Thames Water's policy of building over sewers. Thames sewers are constantly being blocked and require access to clear the problem.

Only yesterday  (September 28th) work was being carried out to clear a blockage in this sewer which runs from Woodgrange Close across the Park to Brookfield Crescent. These are old sewers which are prone to collapse, which has happened several times within the park itself and at the end of Lidding Road. The ground at Lidding Road is now sinking because of these problems.

The Wealdstone Brook is blighted by sewage, due largely to the infrastructure of dual manholes. We are in constant discussions with Thames Water, but this has been an ongoing problem for decades and will not be completely eradicated until the sewage system is rebuilt. This area is also plagued by rats which run along the Wealdstone Brook and there is often a foul smell of sewage. Who would want to live near an open sewer, liable to flood, where you are unable to open your windows.

To site properties so close to the Wealdstone Brook is contrary to NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE GUIDANCE, Chapter 11, making effective use of the land, sets out how the planning system should promote use of land in meeting the need for homes and other uses, while safeguarding and improving the environment and ensuring safe and healthy living conditions. Councillors would be failing in their duty to provide safe and healthy living conditions.


The land at the end of Lidding Road is a greenfield site. maintained by Brent Parks department, at the entrance to Woodcock Park. The loss of green space in Brent, which is already short of green spaces, should not be permitted.


The properties are situated too close to the SINC site, also known as the Wealdstone Brook Wildlife corridor.

Bats: A significant amount of foraging activity was recorded around the dense scrub and scattered trees in the southern portion of the site, and some commuting over this area. In accordance with best practice guidance relating to lighting and biodiversity (Miles et al, 2018; Gunnell et al, 2012), It is essential that any new lighting should be carefully designed to minimise potential disturbance and fragmentation impacts on sensitive receptors, such as bat species. Examples of good practice include:

- Avoiding the installation of new lighting in proximity to key ecological features, such as hedgerows and woodland edges.


The parking spaces allocated next to the Wealdstone Brook will create light disturbance from the headlights of the cars. In addition what guarantees are there that residents of these properties don't add their own external security lighting.


Security is a big issue in this area. Anti-social behaviour continues to be problem in and around Woodcock Park, we have drug dealing and have even had a stabbing in the Park. The footpath between Lidding Road and Shaftesbury Avenue across the Wealdstone Brook needs to have clear sight lines. The area should be kept open, with space either side of the footpath. The development should not go right up to the footpath.

 

Visualisation next to Wealdstone Brook

The officers report LINK  argues that the disbenefits are outweighed  by the benefit of supplying 8 housing units, 5 of which are family sized at London Affordable Rent and that the plans will actually improve drainage and mitigate the risk of flooding. Some failures to meet amenity space guidelines are said to be made up for by the proximity of Woodcock Park.

On the sewer over-load issue  the report airily hands over responsibility to Thames Water:

Concerns have been raised that the development would be impacted by on increase these issues. The local sewers are owned and maintained by Thames Water and as such Thames Water is responsible for the maintenance of this system.

 This is a common feature in many planning applications. 

 

LIVESTREAM 6pm HERE