Priyesh Patel (Credit: Brent Council)
A Freedom of Information
request has been submitted to Brent Council by Asif Zamir, Independent
Community Advocate on St Raphael’s Estate. It concerns the process involved in
the appointment of the Independent Chair of the £20m St Raphael’s Pride in
Place Project:
I
am writing to make a formal request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000. My request relates specifically to the recruitment,
shortlisting, and final selection process for the newly appointed Independent
Chair of the St Raphael’s Neighbourhood Board under the 'Pride in Place'
programme.
Please
provide the following information:
1.
Resident and Stakeholder Involvement:
* Documentation confirming whether a
localised resident stakeholder panel or community interview forum was formed to
participate in the evaluation, interviewing, or selection of candidates for
this specific Chair position.
* If a resident or community panel was
utilised, please provide the terms of reference or the criteria by which panel
members were chosen. If no resident stakeholder panel was involved, please
provide any recorded policy justification or decision log detailing why
community panel interviews were omitted from this recruitment process.
2.
Shortlisting and Interview Metrics:
* The total number of applicants who
submitted an application for the role of Independent Chair for the St Raphael's
Neighbourhood Board.
* The total number of applicants who were
successfully shortlisted and advanced to a formal interview stage.
* The anonymised scoring matrices,
evaluation criteria, or procedural rubrics used by the council selection panel
to determine which applicants were granted an interview and which were excluded
from the shortlisting stage.
3.
Independence, Vetting, and Conflict of Interest:
* Given that the successful candidate's
public employment record indicates they were an employee of Brent Council until
August 2025 before transitioning to a political think tank, please provide any
recorded assessments, internal panel minutes, or governance reviews that
evaluated how an individual leaving council employment approximately 12 months
prior satisfies the strict criteria for an "Independent Chair."
* Copies of the conflict of interest
declarations, political activity disclosure forms, or dual-interest registers
completed by the successful candidate during or immediately following the
application process regarding their political campaign activity alongside ward
councillors.
* Any internal correspondence or minutes
detailing how the candidate’s concurrent political campaigning activities were
assessed against the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity,
ensuring that public funds allocated to the Neighbourhood Board are protected
from perceived political bias.
Procedural
Instruction (Section 12 & Section 16):
If
you determine that any part of this request exceeds the statutory cost limit
under Section 12 of the FOI Act, please invoke your statutory duty to provide
advice and assistance under Section 16. In that event, please fulfil all other
sections of this request that fall within the limit, prioritising the
production of the anonymised scoring matrices and conflict of interest
declarations.
Priyesh Patel campaigning with Stonebridge
councillors
Asif Zamir speaking to
Wembley Matters said:
The
council advertised for an 'Independent Chair' to lead a board tasked with
shaping the future of a £20 million investment on St Raphael's Estate. Yet it
is alleged the recruitment process completely bypassed a localised resident
stakeholder interview panel that was advertised on their website.
Instead,
the appointment went to an ex-Brent Council employee who was on the council
payroll just 12 months ago, and it has been alleged that he has been actively
documented on the local political campaign trail with Stonebridge Labour
Councillors who are also involved in the Pride in Place appointment. Residents
deserve complete transparency over how this selection was scored and verified.
Residents
aren't a checkbox exercise. We don't need a board that is set up to manage our
expectations from the top down—we need a board that actually represents us.
This FOI forces the council to put their scoring and vetting records on display
so the community can see exactly how this decision was made.
The appointee, Priyesh
Patel’s Linkedin Profile says that he
worked out of the Brent Council Leader, Muhammed Butt’s, office from January
2024-August 2025 providing ‘high-level policy,
communications, and stakeholder support to Brent's Cabinet Members, ensuring
the delivery of strategic objectives across portfolios including housing,
regeneration, health, education, and community safety.’
Previously
he had been a case worker at the House of Commons and is currently at British
Future.
Sandra White, appointed to the equivalent post in
Harlesden, had lived in the area for more than 20 years an active in the
community including Chair of the Harlesden Neighbourhood Forum. Priyesh Patel has been on Next Door (St
Raph’s) since 2024 but has not made any posts. Brent Council’s press statement
on Priyesh’s appointment says:
A
proud St Raph’s resident, Priyesh has been involved in civic and community life
in Brent from a young age – including through Brent Youth Parliament and later
training and presenting with Brent Youth Radio. Priyesh has a strong interest
in interfaith work across the borough and has supported charitable and
community initiatives within local faith spaces in Stonebridge, alongside his
involvement with Brent Multi Faith Forum.
Asif Zamir remarked:
I
want to make it absolutely clear that this is not a personal attack on Priyesh
Patel. I do not know him, and despite years of working on the ground here, he
is not someone I or other active resident groups have ever come across within
our estate's community advocacy networks. This is entirely about protecting the
integrity of our community's voice.
When
an advertised resident interview panel is bypassed to install an ex-council
employee who worked directly inside the Council Leader's political office only
a year ago, it fundamentally undermines the word 'Independent'. Our community
is fighting to ensure that appointments are made fairly, transparently, and
with genuine local oversight. St Raphael's residents have waited too long for
this £20 million investment to have its governance handled through closed
doors. We deserve a board leader who answers strictly to the people living in
these blocks, not to the political networks at the Civic Centre.