From the official video LINK
The following item is published with the permission of Eric Leach who publishes an occasional Newsletter researched, written and edited by a group of concerned residents in Ealing, West London who want to preserve our NHS.
This is his account account of the recent Brent 'engagement' event on theSTP (Sustainability and Transformation Plan) LINK LINK
Appalling STP Public Meeting in Brent on 26 September 2016
I attended this STP public
meeting which was organised by Brent Council and Brent Clinical Commissioning
Group (CCG). Two of the five North West London ‘Footprint’ bosses spoke at the
meeting. They were Carolyn Downs, Chief Executive of Brent Council and Local
Authority STP lead in NW London, and ex-advertising executive Rob Larkman who
is Chief Officer for Brent, Harrow and Hillingdon CCGs.
The STP aspirations were
summarized as closing the ‘gaps’ in health and wellbeing, care and quality, and
finance and efficiency. Ways to close these gaps will be prevention, self-help,
more home care and less hospital care. Also care for those with long term
conditions, and for old and mentally ill people would be improved.
What was sadly missing in the
presentations was detail on:
+ The Brent STP
+ How the Brent STP relates to
the NW London STP
+ Five years of cost cutting
+ Loss of 500+ beds
+ Changes to access to GPs
+ How integrating healthcare and
social care will be implemented
+ Seven day working
+ Care staffing levels
+ Any mention of Accountable Care
Partnerships (ACPs) – the future delivery vehicle for all care services and
cost cutting
+ Evidence to support the STP.
No-one will ever argue with
efforts to improve healthcare and social care. However it’s quite clear that
many who spoke in the audience had serious doubts as to whether the money,
staff and facilities would be available to make improvements.
Carolyn Downs seemed surprisingly
ignorant about the national STP dimension. She stated that just two STPs out of
44 nationally had been published. In fact seven regional STPs have been
published. It was news to me that when the initial STP submission was made by
NW London each of the eight CCGs/Local Authorities submitted their own STPs.
Given that Ealing and Hammersmith & Fulham Councils failed to sign up to
the NWL STP, one could only wonder at the time what these local STPs actually
contained.
In the Q&A the issue of ACPs
was raised twice. Rob Larkman gave hopeless answers to the questions. In his
answers he failed to explain the nature of ACPs and refused to identify their
supreme importance for care service delivery in the future.When asked about
capitated budgets for ACPs he just waffled. One wonders whether he was
genuinely ignorant about the ACP details or he was being deliberately
economical with the truth.
Doctor Kong, a GP from Harlesden,
was on the panel. She is Chair of Brent CCG. She repeatedly gave her spirited
opinion that healthcare and social care would become integrated because
everyone was so committed to make it happen. An ex-Brent Councillor in the audience
said that in the 1980s we were all committed to make healthcare and social care
work together. But commitment was not enough to bring about improvements then
and she doubted it would be in the future. She also said that getting people to
do what they were supposed to do has always been a problem. She asked how the
performance of the new services would be monitored. This question was bizarrely
(not) answered by a diatribe on the STP community engagement strategy!
Questions were asked about social
care costings, delivering out of hospital services and improved provisions for
respite for carers - but no clear answers emerged. This meeting was described
as ‘community engagement’. How such a label could be attached to this event is
baffling – given that the draft Brent STP was delivered to NHSE on or before 30
June 2016.
This occasional
newsletter is researched, written and edited by a group of concerned residents
in Ealing, West London who want to preserve our NHS. We view the wholesale
engagement of private, for-profit healthcare service suppliers as unnecessary,
profligate and dangerous. Process improvement is what is needed in our NHS –
not revolution.
