A recurring theme of this blog has been the lack of democracy and poor consultation in matters involvng Brent Council: the views of library users over the transformation project, Willesden Green residents over the redevelopment of the library site, human rights campaigners over Veolia's multi-million public realm contract and more recently the denial of residents' requests to speak at Council meetings on matters that affect them.
Here a South Kilburn tenant outlines the latest case of 'democracy denied'.
 
 
 
 
 
Here a South Kilburn tenant outlines the latest case of 'democracy denied'.
Last year Brent Council changed the rules so that residents can no longer 
address full Council meetings about issues of concern, however much support they 
have. The claim is that this is unnecessary, since petitioners can address the 
committee meetings or Executive where the issues are discussed, and there are 
all sorts of consultations where there views can be heard. 
Even when such opportunity exists – committees and consultation forums – 
this is inadequate, since it is only when an issue comes to full Council that 
all Councillors are present to hear the issues.
But what happens when an issue comes to full Council without going to any 
committee or consultation beforehand? Isn’t it obvious that in such a situation 
those affected should be heard? It would be a simple matter of suspending 
Council standing orders for this to happen
Far from it. A report is going to Full Council on Monday (March 3rd) about 
the affect of the HS2 Bill on Brent. This report notes that the HS2 Bill allows 
for the acquisition of 2 blocks of (Council) flats and St Mary’s school in South 
Kilburn, and also calls on HS2 to move the planned ventilation shaft, currently 
proposed to be next to Queens Park station to a site next to St Mary’s school 
and those flats.
That report has not gone to any committee or the Executive. Affected 
residents were not informed of its existence by any Councillor or Council 
Officer, despite their Tenants and Residents Association asking for over 2 years 
now how they would be affected by HS2 and Brent Council being unable or 
unwilling to provide them with answers. Residents received recorded letters from 
HS2 last year saying it might want to acquire their property, and still Brent 
Council was unable to provide advice on what this might mean. And, of course, 
residents have not been consulted on their attitude to having the shaft moved 
next door. This in a situation where residents have made numerous complaints 
about the effect of living on a building site – being in the middle of 
regeneration with all the dirt and disruption involved.
Yet despite all this, Councillors are denying residents the right to put 
their views to the Council meeting. There have been attempts to fob them off by 
saying that their Councillors are able to speak and represent their views. Some 
of those saying this have no idea whether the Councillors and TRA have the same 
view on the issues concerned! But the very idea is patronising – who better to 
put their views forward than residents themselves, especially when so directly 
affected.
