View of the proposed buildings from Olympic Square ('Archer' statue and station steps on right)
The proposed blocks (Dark green, lower right) showing their suburban contextThe proposed blocks from Elmside Road (junction with Kingswood Road)
The proposed blocks (outlined in green) and other planned developments (pink) as they will appear from the junction of Forty Lane and Bridge road (The Torch pub on left and Ark Academy right)
The development of 5 blocks on Brook Avenue goes to Brent Planning Committee on Wednesday November 4th. This is a development of TfL land (formerly the station car park and tube drivers' depot). Two blocks are 13 storeys high, 1 is 14 storeys, 1 is 17 storeys and the highest, nearest the station is 21 storeys (reduced from the original proposed 30 storeys).
Th development represents the further 'leaking' of the highrise buildings around the stadium across Bridge Road into a partly two storey suburban street. It is likely that eventually the whole of Brook Avenue will become high rise.
Looking along Brook Avenue towards Bridge Road and Wembley Park station with existing flats in the foreground
The blocks outlined in green as they will be seen from Eversley Avenue/Barn Rise The tallest block, block E, will have commercial premises on the first 3 floors with retail facing on to Olympic Square,
Of the 454 housing units 73 will be London Affordable rent and 79 shared ownership ('affordable' 33.5 % of the total).
The officers' report states:
Whilst the London
Affordable Rented flats will be a self-contained element of the development,
the other affordable tenure will be intermixed with the private units of the
development and residents of all tenures within the scheme will have equal
access to the first floor landscaped podium. The development will therefore
facilitate social cohesion between the different tenures.
The buildings
proposed would serve as both a place-marker for the station but also
effectively transition away from the denser core of Wembley Park across Bridge
Road whilst also respecting the key viewing corridor of the stadium within
which it sits. The height of this apex point of the development is acknowledged
as significant and that it is taller than envisioned within the draft site
allocation in general design terms. Nonetheless, officers give weight to the
benefits of the scheme (including 40% affordable housing provision) and other
policy requirements such as the Mayor’s housing SPG seeking densification of
car free development around public transport hubs and consider that the
proposed height of the building strikes a good balance between the competing
requirements.
A significant reduction in height from 30 storeys at this
scheme’s initial pre-app stage is also acknowledged and has resulted in a
building which establishes a reasonable maximum height which balances the
townscape and visual impact considerations with the benefits of the housing
delivery. The applicant's submitted Townscape and Visual Impact Assessment
identifies a number of local views away from Brook Avenue from where the
development would be visible and demonstrates how these views would change. The
development will result in a substantial change to the backdrop visible from
some nearby roads (such as Elmside Road and Beechcroft Gardens), but this change
would very much be reflective of the status of the site as within a growth area
and a housing zone.
There are the usual comments in the officers' that may be challenged by some members of the Planning Committee. As well as the above they include:
- The development is a'suitable and attractively built addition to theWembley park growth area.
- Amenity space is below standard but of good quality through podium gardens.
- On-site child play space is only 'marginally' below policy objectives and shortfall will be offset by developer contributing £31,000 to the imporvment of existing parks
- Viability has been robustly tested and has demonstrated that the proposal offers more than the maximum reasonable amount [of affordable housing] that can be provided on site.
- Loss of light to some windows of surrounding properties is 'not unusual for developments of this scale.'
The developers will contribute £260,00 towards enhancing bus capacity in the area.
There are 15 objections recorded on Brent Planning Portal including this one:
I
am objecting to this application because it is a massive overdevelopment of a
small and narrow site.
The Wembley Park area has sites allocated within it, under
the Wembley Area Action Plan, as being appropriate to tall buildings.
At the same time, the WAAP identifies sites INAPPROPRIATE for
tall buildings, and this site in Brook Avenue is one of them. On those grounds
alone (and there are others) this application should be refused.
The applicants argue that as the site is only just across the
road from a site where tall buildings are considered appropriate, there would
be no harm in allowing their five proposed blocks of between 13 and 21 storeys
high. That is a false argument!
If this application is allowed, what is to stop another
applicant coming along and saying, 'Well, my site is just across the road from
one where tall buildings are allowed, so I should be allowed to build a tall
block too!'. To accept this application would set a dangerous precedent, which
other developers could exploit, and that must not be allowed to happen.
Brent's core policy CP17 is aimed at protecting and enhancing
the suburban character of Brent. This application would do the opposite of
that, by encroaching into the suburban character of Brook Avenue and its nearby
streets, and the view from the Barn Hill Conservation Area.
Only five years ago, Brent adopted the Wembley Area Action
Plan, and with it, a line on the map which showed "this far and no
further" for tall buildings. That line must be held, and this application
must be rejected, so as not to undermine it.
COMMITTEE AGENDA
