Thursday, 5 June 2014
Alperton downgraded after first post-academisation Ofsted inspection
Alperton Community School which received an Outstanding grade in its previous Ofsted Inspection has been downgraded to Requiring Improvement in the latest inspection, which is the first since it converted to academy status in September 2012. The full report is available HERE
The Report states the school requires improvement because:
The Report states the school requires improvement because:
·
Students’
achievement is below expectations in a number of subjects, including English.
·
Not enough
teaching is good or outstanding, especially in English.
·
Teachers
do not set challenging work in all subjects, particularly for the most able
students.
·
Students
do not do enough extended writing in all subjects.
·
Teachers’
marking does not always help students to do better. Students sometimes do not
respond to teachers’ feedback and this restricts how well their work improves.
·
Teachers
sometimes fail to check if students understand the work taught during lessons,
which hinders their progres
·
The school’s leaders do not
compare what they know about students’ progress between Years 7 to 11 with
national expectations in all subjects.
·
Some subject leaders do not
have the skills to improve the quality of teaching and students’ achievement
quickly enough in their subjects.
·
Senior leaders do not evaluate
aspects of the school’s performance, such as the impact of teaching on
students’ achievement, precisely enough.
·
The sixth form requires
improvement because students’ results vary too much between subjects.
However Ofsted did identify the following strengths:
·
Weaknesses in teaching and
staff under- performance are being effectively attended to by the newly
appointed headteacher.
·
Students’ behaviour is good in
and out of lessons. Students are safe.
·
Attendance levels are higher
than average.
·
The governing body challenges
the school’s leaders and holds them to account for students’ achievement.
·
Students achieve well in
mathematics and science.
·
Lower
ability students, and those who speak English as an additional language,
achieve well.
Brent Labour backbenchers vote to reduce their own powers and Tories split
It was a sad day for democracy at the Brent Council AGM yesterday when not one of the 56 Labour councillors questioned the constitutional changes that will see the level of scrutiny in the Council reduced and limitations on questioning of Cabinet members by backbenchers and the opposition.
At the same time the opposition was weakened by a split in the Conservatives which saw them form an Official Group of three councillors and the 'Brondesbury Park Group' of three.
Cllr John Warren (Brondesbury Park Conservative) opposed the constitutional changes urging Labour backbenchers to 'look at your rights and how they are being lost' pointing to reduced scrutiny, restrictions on questions, removal of 'Key issues' debates, removal of rights to requisition meetings and the guillotine on Council meetings reducing them by 30 minutes.
Dr Helen Carr, (Liberal Democrat, Mapesbury) in her first intervention as a lone Liberal Democrat, said that she did not doubt Muhammed Butt's integrity, but had concerns about the constitutional changes and potential corruption. She appeared to nod in agreement when he reassured her that all was well and all councillors adhered to the highest of standards.
Butt's defence of the changes appeared to be based on their election mandate: 'The people of Brent have spoken'. He argued that the changes would increase participation pointing to the new right of individuals and community organisations to address meetings of the Council. He said that headteachers and doctors would be involved in the new Scrutiny Committee but failed to make a case for the reduction in the overall number of scrutiny committees and restrictions on questions.
All the Labour councillors voted for the changes, Brondesbury Park Conservatives voted against, and the Official Conservatives abstained.
Fryent Way Traveller encampment highlights need for Traveller sites
Rumours circulated yesterday about Travellers moving on to Fryent Country Park. When this picture was taken yesterday there were only a handful of caravans there in the meadow adjacent to the Fryent Way car park. This meadow is the one used for fun fairs and was the venue for Brent Countryside Day.
There is an official Travellers' site in Brent at Lynton Close in Neasden with space for about 30 caravans but I am unsure whether there are any vacant lots. Normally a Council officer would visit the unauthorised site and offer accommodation on the official site if it is available.
The Lynton Close site was the scene of demonstrations against evictions in 2008. LINK
The case highlights the change in the law which removed national targets and guidelines for the provision of sites and instead, under the Localism Act, left it up to local authorities to decide their provision.
More information from Shelter LINK
Labels:
Brent Council,
Fryent Way,
Kingsbury,
Localism,
Neasden,
Travellers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
