Guest blog by Will Shaw
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the case, the bizarre
events surrounding the Birmingham ‘Trojan Horse’ schools should have finally
made clear that Ofsted exists to give the government the inspection reports it
requires to support whatever its schools
strategy happens to be at any particular time. If the inspectors don’t come up
with the right report they can be sent back into schools until they do. This is
not usually necessary as the inspectors know what is expected of them and they
dutifully supply it. Their lack of integrity or principled independence of
thought can be measured by their deafening silence in objecting to this role
over the years and the extreme rarity of
any individual resignations.
Ofsted inspections are a key weapon in the government’s
overriding aim of ultimately turning all
(state) schools into centrally-run academies and taking them out of local democratic accountability. Once Ofsted supplies the government with the ‘appropriate’
inspection report on a school, the next stage is special measures, the
imposition from outside of a non-accountable IEB and forced academisation. This is the stage
Copland has been at since last September.
Obviously, this stage in the process has to appear to be both necessary and beneficial and it’s Ofsted
again which is used to show how much schools like Copland improve as a result of the government’s wise
policies. At Copland, if the inspectors are to be believed, the beneficial
results of government policy were almost instantaneous. Their report after last
November’s visit spoke of the school
having ‘turned a corner’ and ‘students making better progress’. It continued ‘
teaching …..attendance and punctuality are improving’, ‘students are keen to
learn’, ‘ there has been a sea-change in the pace of improvement’, ‘the interim
headteacher and associate headteacher and very strong governance of the IEB are
driving this change well’ and so on; and all this after only 6 weeks! The
nature of the narrative had been set.
March 2014’s Copland report took the hagiography to the next
level: ‘… the headteacher of St Paul’s Way is an astute
Chair of the Interim Executive Board….. IEB members are asking the right
questions about the school’s performance.. balanced in the rigour of challenge
and in the quality of their support. Senior leaders are ‘stepping up to the
plate’ more …. having greater impact on the work of the school ……... responding
well to the high level of challenge being laid down by school leaders and the
IEB... ……more accurate understanding of students’ needs ……..higher expectations for students…… behaviour is much improved and the school is
a more respectful place…… zero tolerance to poor behaviour … ….. an attitude of
respect between and among students and staff……more confident and articulate
learners. …….a richer quality of teaching…..teaching is better… lessons are
more structured’. Clearly carried away with the spirit of the thing, the
reporting inspector at one point came over all Mills and Boon and,
revealing a bureaucrat’s tin ear for the
speech patterns of 21st century London youth, wrote this:
‘One student, capturing the views of many, said, ‘We can see hope now.’
This new-found optimism is palpable’.
(I like to imagine the inspector considering whether to attribute the final 6 words to this ‘student’ as well, but wisely deciding that this might be pushing it a bit).
(I like to imagine the inspector considering whether to attribute the final 6 words to this ‘student’ as well, but wisely deciding that this might be pushing it a bit).
It’s difficult not to laugh (if only at the writers’ belief
that they could get away with this tosh) but many teachers and pupils have
worked very hard at Copland this year and it’s a pity that any truth which
these Ofsted reports might contain is tarnished by the relentless gung-ho bollocks of the rest of it. But then,
establishing the truth is not at all
what these inspections are about. How could they be when 2 inspectors come in
for a day and a half and watch 10 or 15 minutes of a few lessons? No, as in Birmingham their function is to
provide bogus supporting evidence for actions already decided on. In the case
of Copland, we are being provided with the
narrative of the ‘saving’ of a school by Gove, forced academisation, ‘tough’
but necessary action, (60 staff and half the curriculum axed), and finally the
salvation that is The Ark Rescue.
It’s a satisfying narrative
so far and it will be interesting to see how far the Ofsted inspectors
think they can push it when the report on their imminent final visit comes out
in a few weeks time. As the purpose of
the report is pre-determined and as the inspectors know what is expected of
them (and also know that their
continuing employment depends on their coming up with the goods), the
report might as well have been written last
September. If it was, I hope they don’t change anything if they , by chance,
should come across this blog. And if they’re looking for further fictional
inspiration, what better place than in the sort of book that, if he’d ever read
it, Michael Gove would surely have banned, if only for the fact that it isn’t
even really a decent, proper, stout English novel but rather some thin, poncey,
foreign-sounding thing called a ‘novella’: Animal Farm.
The next Copland Ofsted visit is ‘imminent’ and the inspector’s report will be published in a few week’s time. But please remember, and thanks to Martin, you read it here first.“It has become usual in Wembley to give Mr Gove, Michael Pavey, the IEB, the Interim Headteacher and the Associate Headteacher the credit for every successful achievement and every stroke of good fortune at the school. You will often hear one pupil remark to another, “Under the guidance of our Senior Leadership Team I have progressed five levels in six months” or two teachers, enjoying a drink at the staffroom water-cooler, will exclaim, “thanks to the leadership of Headteacher Marshall and Associate Headteacher John, how excellent this water tastes!”...” (With apologies to George Orwell).
