Monday, 21 March 2022

Densification along with misleading figures on community space and green space provide ammunition for South Kilburn residents to fight for a better deal

 

As tables were being cleared after the usual community meal at the Granville Centre in South Kilburn, Leslie Barson  of Granville Kitcheh stepped forward to introduce the evening's rather special speaker.

 She said, 'I have been thinking - you can't have a project without a place to do it. And you need a project for the place.'

The Granville and Carlton Centres have done so much, so many projects, over the Coviud crisis and proved its essential role in the community along with Rumi's Cave (now relocated in Harlesden) and had kept people together: 'We now understand its relevance.'

The planning application approved at the beginning of 2020 is to be actioned over the next few months.

Dr Pablo Sendra from UCL who had led the research project 'Co-designing social infrastructure for resilient communities in post-Covid cities' addressed the crowded room full of local residents. A rare collaborative effort between community and academics.

In his talk Pablo made a number of key points:

Researchers estimated that the Granville Centre over 65 weeks had provided £344,760 worth of volunteer labour,

Quoting the Mayor of London that organisations, projects and buildings need to be more connected and relevant he asked, 'How can the community be more involved in how the building and its spaces work?'

As a result of regeneration South Kilburn had increased in density and needed more community spaces. The 'Community Hubs' hailed by the Council were places to ask the Council for support, rather than for organising activity. Bland spaces were being provided that people did not feel comfortable in. [Later I mentioned the 1970s 510 community centre in the Harrow Road with its old settees and arm chairs, kettle in the corner, that people treated as home from home and housing many organisations involved in anti-racism, immigration, education and campaigns against SuS.]

The former hall in the Granville where people used to meet has been converted into an 'enterprise space' . Overall the research showed that the Council estimate of a overall loss of  community space of 5% had not included the Granville, Carlton and Rumi's and in fact the loss was 60%.

The workspaces were rigid, enclosed office spaces but the UCL survey showed that people wanted much more creative spaces for activities such as pottery and music.  At a time when people were used to working from home the space offered had to be more than a desk and internet - otherwise people would continue to work from home.

Green spaces were also important. Brent has a very low ratio of green space per person and regeneration will decrease the amount of green space.  And of course densification is going to increase the population significantly. During the pandemic green space became an important outdoor safe space for mental and physical health as well as a place to catch up with neighbours.  It also lent itself to food production and community gardening.

Summarising the recommendations (full details below) Dr Pablo Sendra listed:

1. No loss of community space

2. Creative and well-equipped workspaces

3. Address potential conflict between users (quiet activities versus noisy or messy)

4. Welcoming space to socialise

5. Diverse types of community spaces

6. Spaces for emotional support

7. Activities for young people

8. Flexible and well-equipped green space

9. Local food production and gardening

10. Inclusive process for decision making

11. Involvement of the community in the running of the buildings

12. Work on a resilient funding model.

In discussion questions were asked about the possibility of legal action against Brent Council over its decisions in the light of the research findings. whether the council had carried out a lawful consultation and how the council's action stood regarding the Equality Act.

Asked what next Pablo said that it was now a matter for the community to mobilise itself using the research findings to ensure that they maintained, managed and improved the good space that they had.

After the meeting Leslie Barson said:

Granville Community Kitchen is  very pleased to have this research that identifies and clarifies what needs to be done and why to safeguard The Granville and The Carlton as multi purpose community spaces. We hope the Council will find it useful too and help the South Kilburn community achieve the report's recommendations.

Pete Firmin, a local resident, queried:

When Brent says there has been little loss of green space with regeneration in South Kilburn, I wonder whether they take account of the fact that much of the green space previously was open to all, yet now much of such space is reserved for residents of certain blocks. And green space now is more more patchwork - many smaller spaces, rather than larger ones which allow for ball games etc.

 

The report implies that the Granville/Carlton Centres, whatever else is going on there, are under community control. They never have been and are not now. They are under the control of Council-appointed bodies, with South Kilburn residents having very limited say in their use.


4 comments:

John Healy said...

20 years ago I tried to get some facilities for people with mental health issues in South Kilburn. I suggested that the NDC could let one of the empty buildings in Peel Precinct to serve as a base for people to meet and join in social activities. Everyone in the NDC agreed it was a good idea but it would be better if it was based within either The Cranville, or Carlton Centre. That's where it started to go wrong as instead of allowing SK resident's to run the project, they brought in Brent Mind to manage it and all I can say is, it was never set up.

Every community led initiative during that time (2000-2010) was stopped either by the NDC board, or Brent Council, as they both felt these projects needed to be run by outside professionals rather than South Kilburn resident's.

But at least we still have The Granville Centre and the wonderful volunteers still operating there and I hope they manage to stay around in the coming months, as we are facing a cost of living crisis' never experienced before by most of us and we will still need them to continue providing support to many SK residents who will struggle to survive without them.

Anonymous said...

Let's face it, Brent Counil care most about their Developer friends and the Gentification of parts of Brent than they do about their current residents and their well being. The time is right for current residents to tell Butt and Labour exactly what they think of their performance over the last 12 years, they should do this at the ballot box before it is too late.

Anonymous said...

Densification. What a great word, it could be used when talking about Butt and Co

David Walton said...

Open space fenced and walled private enclosures (for future development extra two storeys no planning permission required new roof site future market opportunities) is not public open space. These Growth Area pocket none public open spaces are locked away and I never see anyone ever using them. This new design was highly problematic during lockdowns 'stay local' as Growth Area is less and less public open space for mega population density living, no gardens, anti-resilience design for massed poor life outcomes.

The new 16 storey tower by Countryside at Peel Precinct cynically uses promotional visuals of the South Kilburn Public Open Space (Brent Kilburn's only park sized open 24/7 park), yet this park is for Brent Master Developer just surplus public land to dispose of to market (see new Brent Local Plan ambiguities).

Growth Area political consensus ideology is anti-resilience and poor life outcomes contained in red lined zones and seems to be a fixed policy able to survive Grenfell, ongoing pandemic, economic crash and even war with the Russian autocracy. So a pretty rigid government zoning of life chances agenda seeing sanctions and infrastructure destruction as 'working' in South Kilburn, yet as 'not working' as regards Russian oligarchs?

The giant hole for a staircase cut bang in the centre of its floor (GLA funded) to destroy the function of the main South Kilburn community central hall at Granville Centre should be reversed. The little enterprise cubicles occupying this key giant hall space now could easily be relocated into empty shops in Brent or Westminster, especially as many of these users are colonists anyway with zero stake in South Kilburn life and ready to move out any day as re-development requires. Building housing on and in Carlton Granville is stupid, stupid, stupid given the masses of housing towering up all around it.

Granville hall pre its being disabled and colonised used to host giant wedding parties every weekend, people since its loss have even tried to organise these parties in the South Kilburn Public Open Space Park. We really are a community running out of shared space. Low car use, mega population density points to Granville hall being re-enabled in 2022. Housing on this site would obviously terminate South Kilburn having any hope at all of an affordable community hall use.