It has been no secret that in the past there has been resistance by the neighbouring South Kilburn schools, Carlton Vale Infant School and Kilburn Park Foundation School (a junior school), to amalgamation. However, they have recently been operating as a Federation with some joint management and leadership.
Now Brent Council has come forward with plans to build a new combined school building on the existing Carlton Vale Infant site (KVI) and Kilburn Park School Foundation (KPFS). The demolished KPFS site would be incorporated into an improved South Kilburn Open Space.
The proposal before Cabinet on Monday December 9th is:
Approves the use of £12.9m of SCIL funding, for the construction of a 1 Form Entry primary school with a nursery and the infrastructure to expand to a 2FE school (including decanting of Carlton Vale Infant school to Kilburn Park Junior school and the associated building works), as part of South Kilburn Regeneration Programme.
Approves the use of £4.4 m of SCIL funding, for the enhancement of the South Kilburn Open Space, as part of the South Kilburn Regeneration Programme.
Given the difficulties facing the delivery (and viability) of the remaining housing schemes on South Kilburn the proposal, by using £17.3m of Strategic CIL, removes any funding through the regeneration.
As a Foundation school Kilburn Park has possession of its land and will have to agree a land transfer to Brent Council. Brent Council once in possession will have to request permission from the Department for Education to use the land for non-educational purpose, namely the improvement of the open space.
There is a potential fly in the ointment here because Islamia Primary is still looking for a site following an eviction order from the Islam Yusuf Foundation. The Strathcona site as an alternative was overwhelmingly rejected by parents. A potential school building will be standing empty and available before demolition. Islamia could appeal to the DfE not to release the land for non-educational purposes.
Both CVI and KPSF are operating well below capacity. The latest figures I have managed to find are CVI 56 pupils out of a capacity of 230, and KPFS 66 out of a capacity of 240. As a result the LA is proposing a one form entry school (30 per year group) and a 26 place nursery. In addition however, the build will include infrastructure for expansion to 2 forms of entry if required when demand increases as a result of the regeneration, but importantly the officers' report (rather puzzlingly) states:
-
It should be noted that should the need arise for the new school to expand to a 2FE school in the future, there is no provision in this proposal to cover these costs.
The regeneration so far does not appear to have resulted in much of an increase in the rolls of the two schools despite Good Ofsted report. If future housing tenure is aimed at young professionals rather than families the anticipated demand may not materialise.
This brings us to another issue. Brent Council has a School Places Strategy that deals with falling numbers in primary schools in some areas of the borough, with amalgamations and federations, and potential closures as part of the solution. Because school funding is based on the number of pupils, falling numbers impact on the school budget. As argued in some recent discussions this impacts in turn on the capacity of the school to employ the full range of staff to offer a broad and balanced curriculum and SEND support.
The officers' report sees a glowing role and future for the new school:
-
The school will not only support the educational needs of the growing population but will also act as a catalyst for community cohesion, social mobility, and local economic growth, linking directly to the wider regeneration goal.
The new school will not only replace outdated facilities but will create a modern, efficient educational environment that meets the needs of South Kilburn’s children now and in the future. It aims to provide top-tier educational facilities at the heart of the community, fostering community cohesion and improving life chances for residents.
The officers' report does not see an early increased demand for places and discounts the Islamia interest:
The modelling exercise [ ] identified that there would be sufficient capacity over the next five years (the 2027/2028 academic year) to meet projected need if a one form of entry primary school replaced CVI and KPJ schools, taking into account the likely relocation of Islamia Primary School away from the area.
Development of a two-form entry school would likely lead to spare places in the area which would not be an efficient use of resources. However, in the longer term given the level of planned regeneration, it was felt prudent to design options that would allow the new primary school to be relatively easily expanded to a 2 FE school should the need arise.
However the new school will not be occupied until 2029, after that period, according to the timeline. Will a 2 form need be apparent by then and additional work needed?:
There are no design details of the new school as yet but it may well be a similar to the pre-assembled Wembley Manor SEND school in London Road. LINK
Proposals for the improvement of the South Kilburn Open Space are promising at this stage:
-
The proposed landscape strategy of the South Kilburn open space includes ecological enhancements and activation of the open space through a network of safe routes, creating opportunities to bring together new and existing residents of South Kilburn. The proposed improvements include new cycle and pedestrian connections, a new multi-activity area, youth space, gym trail, woodland play area and earthworks, enhanced biodiversity, community orchard, and growing space, and a proposed community pavilion that can accommodate community space and café. Officers within the Parks Service have commented on the design proposals, to ensure ease of maintenance and community benefit.
10 comments:
On the Open Space, a lack of detail in the map makes it difficult to assess what the `improvement' really means. Some of what is in the Council's document is already there (safe routes, activity area, playground) so it is unclear how different this would be. But if you add in the proposed pavilion with café, community orchard etc, it doesn't sound like there is much open space left in what is, after all, quite a small area. My South Kilburn scepticism tells me we have heard of such grand (or not so grand) schemes before and they seem to disappear between Council documents and reality. The new health centre, many years late, may open next year (we were promised 2) and no-one speaks of the promised youth centre or the Carlton Vale Boulevard nonsense which was supposed to be completed 18 months ago. The council document speaks of a consultation having taken place, but some South Kilburn residents never heard of that consultation. Plus ca change......
South Kilburn car-free housing tall building zone public land 45 ha in its regeneration year 23;
I think that this change of heart by Brent reflects the political change a national level, where the Tories wanted South Kilburn to be a "the worse the better" pet project, national Labour now wants to take back project control of this neighbourhoods Master plan to allow it community, cohesion, public health, flood resilience, assisted living support and real hope.
South, shown on the park map is Maida Hill which is Britain’s most overcrowded neighbourhood (census data)- 3 storey Victorian houses where lofts and small gardens are extended to become new flats, no public open space. Combine this urban fact with South Kilburn’s own massive population growth to 2040 and this central park investment is a national priority in terms of public health and UK park investment where UK park investment is most needed.
All areas surrounding South Kilburn neighbourhood are either de-populating conservation areas or neighbourhood plan areas and so are by government respected as being communities. That the Public Sector Equalities Duty had been collapsed in this tall building zone neighbourhood for developer market anarchy was a clear and obvious failure of Local government to govern in an equitable manner and to use its resources fairly.
Another important point to note here is that in 1999 a developer pitched building housing on both of South Kilburn’s two ‘green lungs’ (Granville Road Public Open Space and South Kilburn Public Open Space) and local people petitioned against this such that re-development was rejected by Brent as “not being in the public interest”. Fast forward the public interest to 2024 and Granville Road Public Open Space 1.4 ha is 2/3rds built on with 2024 planning permission for the other 1/3. This massive public open space loss is pledged to be replaced inside South Kilburn by Brent and this park extension proposed in 2024 is also pledged in the 2004 neighbourhood master plan by Brent.
Also to the west of this park, in the large panel system social estate there is also a sizable park and green spaces that are to be ‘lost’ to re-development builds- Another open space loss factor to justify this grand central park approach by Brent Master Developer as being the fair public health option.
The woodland area has veteran tree habitats, a bat colony, blue jays and foxes…..
'Kilburn wall' overdevelopment north side of this park has a major lack of sunlight. While protected areas south and west of this parks extension allow and make secure full sunlight even in winter, a remarkably good design for a London car-free housing tall building zones park.
During the pandemic, everyone was here in South Kilburn ‘stay local’ whereas St John’s Wood left the city. This park investment will build greater resilience for the next such ‘stay local’ event.
This park is a key natural flood defence for the South Kilburn tall building zone and also for the City of Westminster- the economic core of the entire UK economy.
Look at all the park user facilities surrounding this public open 24/7 park on the first map.
This high quality central park made reality will help sell South Kilburn as a liveable designed for humans place rather than a no plan slum zone.
It is vital to action this neighbourhood renewal key investment before national politics changes again. South Kilburn can set a real model and genuine tall building zone precedent for a fairer, more inclusive and equitable Brent.
Great work Martin
Interesting how the improved map doesn't show all of the existing park woodland area to the east side. Its been sliced off?
Local Green Space designation in Brent Local Plan would instantly attract in many new future investment streams and long term be able to total reduce council taxpayer burden.
A tall building zone 24/7 central park is valuable way beyond how developers brownfield designation 'value' it. The London Air Ambulance lands in there, one example.
Page 107 of the Cabinet Report has a map with the entire woodland retained in the park. This wider local map also shows the Granville Public Open Space and Dickens-Austen park 'losses' to re-development, which if mapped would show how these public open spaces lost being replaced into a grand central park by Brent Master Developer works.
Yes, I copied a small part of that map so names etc were legible. I will copy the larger map and place at the end of the article.
Thanks Martin. Amazingly the woodland area of Kilburn Park was brownfield land designated from 2010 to 2024, so its wonderful to see Brent have a policy change of heart. High quality expanded park and modern school will sell South Kilburn tall building zone as a neighbourhood/ community of place rather than a tenanted towers only nowhere zoned.
Context Map 3 shows more of Maida Hill (no public open space/ Britain's most overcrowded neighbourhood), while north side of this park, between park and electrified rail line (not shown) is 'Kilburn wall'/ Kilburn towers new population growth zoned. The small remaining fragment of Granville Road Public Open Space which has planning permission 2024 to build housing on is visible as a gap in development north right hand side.
A park investment where a park is most needed due to massive population growth, that is a real change from Tory Ministers tower all land approach to population growth zones.
This renewed park will look beautiful and be a jewel-like place for sunlight and nature access in this tall building car-free housing zone. Less a mono zone, more a community.
Signal here that political choice is changing. How many investments do depopulating flats to family houses zones need after 14 years of gorging?
Post a Comment