A Wembley Matters reader in Wembley Park writes:
Quintain's 'pro-active' 'consultation' with the Wembley Park (and wider Wembley) community still seems limited to the couple of A5 posters they've put-up at random points around the development (they're really "blink and you'd miss them", it's almost like they're hoping no-one notices them!). No attempts what-so-ever at truly engaging directly with the community they profess to care so much about.
Now a petition has been launched against the hotel development on what is currently a lively open space - a break from the surrounding high rise where people can meet and childen play.
Yoga in the threatened Samovar Open Space (Picture from wembleypark.com)
The Petition (SIGN HERE)
We grew up surrounded by the vibrant energy of Wembley Park Market Square, a place where families gather, children play, communities connect, and traditions flourish. This is not merely a physical space, it is the heartbeat of our local culture. People from all walks of life come together here, united by a rich tapestry of diverse stalls, warm interactions, and a deep sense of belonging. Sadly, this cherished community space is now under threat.
A proposal has been put forward and discussed with the council to construct a hotel on Olympic Way, directly opposite the Civic Centre, on the site of Wembley Park Market Square and Samovar Space without any meaningful consultation with local residents or their elected representatives. Residents should have been informed by email and a proper consultation should have been held for all neighbouring residents, rather than limiting consultation to only those living at Landsby East.
If approved, this development would have far reaching consequences for both residents and the environment, while permanently eliminating a valued open space that is central to our community life.
The construction of a hotel in this location would not only overshadow and diminish this much loved public space, but would also likely result in increased traffic congestion, noise pollution, environmental damage, and additional strain on already pressured local infrastructure. The character and charm of the neighbourhood could be irreversibly altered, depriving future generations of the cultural, social, and communal experiences that have long defined Wembley Park.
Beyond the environmental and infrastructural concerns, such a large scale development would significantly impact residents’ quality of life. Increased footfall from hotel guests could lead to overcrowding, parking difficulties, and the erosion of the peaceful atmosphere that the community currently enjoys.
We firmly believe that alternative locations exist which are far more suitable for a development of this nature, locations that do not require the sacrifice of an invaluable community space. We therefore urge Brent Council, Quintain, and all relevant stakeholders to reconsider this proposal and take meaningful action to ensure that Wembley Park retains its unique cultural identity and heritage.
Please stand with us in preserving the vibrancy and spirit of Wembley by opposing the proposed hotel development at Wembley Park Market Square and Samovar Space. Sign this petition to protect the heart of our community and help secure a future in which local culture and shared spaces are safeguarded for the benefit of all.
Comments on the Petition site:
Note: I understand that the well-used Children's Playground opposite the entrance to the London Designer Outlet from the Boulevard is also subject to development in the future.To Brent Council and Quintain, Wembley Park is being shaped by decisions that prioritise profit over people. Both Brent Council and Quintain should seriously consider the principles outlined in Thomas Heatherwick’s Humanise, which argues that buildings and neighbourhoods must be designed around human health and wellbeing — not maximum financial return. More buildings may generate revenue for developers, but the long-term impact on residents will be far greater. Increased strain on the NHS, social services, and housing support is inevitable when overcrowding and poor living conditions are normalised. These costs will be paid by the public, not by the developers who benefit today. What drives this approach is simple: greed. And it is telling that no one making these decisions would realistically choose to live at Wembley Park under the conditions being created for others. Development should serve the people who live there — not just the financial interests of a few. The right thing to do is to stop, reassess, and place human lives, health, and dignity ahead of profit.This square is one of the few genuinely shared community spaces we have - it’s where local markets run, kids play, and people actually spend time together. Building a hotel here would permanently take that away. On a practical level, the area already struggles with infrastructure: the local Sainsbury’s regularly has long queues and stock shortages, and transport and foot traffic are already stretched, especially when concerts or events finish. Adding a hotel would significantly increase congestion, confusion for visitors, delivery traffic, waste, noise, and pressure on services that clearly aren’t equipped to handle it. With limited open space, crowd flow would become a real safety concern during busy periods. This development doesn’t improve the area - it removes a vital community space and creates ongoing problems for residents, families, and local businesses. The construction period alone would last years, bringing constant noise, dust, visual blight, and disruption that would make events difficult or impossible to run and harm local traders. Environmentally, losing open space will worsen air quality, increase noise and light pollution, and contribute to urban overheating and drainage issues. The area already lacks the infrastructure to support additional pressure, and increased traffic, deliveries, and visitor congestion would create ongoing safety and accessibility problems. This proposal prioritises developer profit over long-term community wellbeing and the character of the area.I previously challenged the relationship between the construction and hotel industries whilst working in the Far East. Now, back in my own country, I see the same murky processes taking place. The apparent lack of consultation in this case with the local community is truly disturbing and it is essential that we challenge this at an early stage in the proceedings by demanding the necessary and promised levels of transparency before any decision is made. Please sign the petition at your earliest convenience



23 comments:
Unfortunately this Labour Controlled Borough only care about Towerblocks, she might be in the Lords, but her shadow remains a blot on the landscape of Brent. From memory, wasn't the £18m for the Wembley steps supposed to stop Quintain building on this site. Just think how many new pavements that would have paid for? Isn't great to have friendly developers who are into lift shafts (punn).
Whilst i dont agree with the hotel development they already have permission for the building so the decision about building here has already been made years ago and thats when we should have objected. they now want to agree with Brent what the building looks like.
More extremely poor management by Labour run Brent Council - they gift £17.8million of our NCIL/CIL money to multi-billion pound developer Quintain for their vanity project steps outside Wembley Stadium as 'a sweetener' to stop them building on this site next to the Civic Centre (that money should have been spent on vital local projects for us residents of Brent) but then they give Wembley Stadium permission to hold 9 more major events per year so Quintain are more determined than ever to bulld a hotel here to cash in.
No proper forward thinking, no proper planning and and no consideration of the impact things like this might have on residents or visitors to the staduim. This is a valued open space for residents amongst all the tower blocks. Visitors to the stadium are already kettled into a small area before and after events.
Seems that the new Wembley Stadium has just turned onto a total cash cow for wealthy developers, hugely rich music artists and events promoters rather than being the prized showpiece National Sports Stadium we were promised.
Look at the scale first image and then tower fill in. Box park to right is another tall site pending- Civic Space Invaders of this Tower City Market Rent Brent Estate.
In South Kilburn the 2017 local Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document for mid-rise blocks Brent adopted, then has a 2019 (2022) adopted Local Plan layer on top of all its sites as a 51m tall building zone. Upwards, but the same permanent development game. In South Kilburn all green spaces are deemed brown land for adding to Kilburn Towers Wall design-by-greed zoned.
Reform policy is already Brent deeply entrenched.
Should all be green roofs and grey water collection, but that wouldn't amuse water or building insurance companies.
The new park at Wembley City doesn't have much quality or soul to its 'design', so watch that space brown land infill too.
“ We grew up surrounded by the vibrant energy of Wembley Park Market Square, a place where families gather, children play, communities connect, and traditions flourish.”
- yeah its not that for a long time bro. At least a hotel will bring in some people to the shops, which is why its being recommended. As the businesses are struggling because the flats are empty
Labour abolition of leasehold on all new build flats, so ownership for families paying £300,000 plus should raise tower build and neighbourhood design quality in Brent growths.
Flats are too expensove and too many events at Wembley Stadium!
Wembley Park private developer why these so-called meanwhile use? People dont want it shut it down.
Shops full of designer gear for young thin people, restaurants and bars too expensive and cineworld rarely shows any decent films!
What is the box park tower to look like? What are the park towers to look like?
Tower flats being by families owned rather than long rental, should better support more neighbourhood assisted living infrastructure for locals being allowed space. And stabilise conflicting masterplans into a single agreed neighbourhood masterplan for what the future will look like for tower homes owners. National Labour in power needs to move fast on ending feudal towers and tower lord culture.
30 January 2026 at 21:02 you do realise that the designer Outlet is basically seconds and can't sells? It's like markets used to be, a way to get rid of the unsaleable
Not a 'property ladder' with no flat ownership first rung.
It was precarious leasehold rental trapping of young families and new arrivals.
The original planning permission was put-in when the whole area was an industrial estate and coach park, so there were no residents to be able to object.
Now, years later there's a vibrant community all around and a status-quo has been established. They do still have to clear final planning permission with the final designs, so there is still an opportunity, thankfully, for residents to lodge objections to the design they are putting forward. That could result in a drastic scaling-down of the building, given the various concerns I've been hearing from residents and councillors.
I bet Quintain will put pressure on its residents to enter favourable responses to the final planning permission...
The design they've put forward is cheap, lazy and uninspired. A big ugly grey box, well done Quintain. You'd think an experienced property developer, knowing they were going to be bulldozing a loved community space, would take the time and have the basic level of respect to actually put forward an inspiring design that fitted-in with the buildings around it and gave us an acceptable replacement community space, not the pitiful piece of paving they've proposing. Come on, at least try to attempt to seem like you care at all.
The proposals are going to create dangerous bottlenecks for stadium events, whereas now people flow all around the big open area. I hate to think what it'll be like on those days there is a stadium and an arena event on at the same time.
There is already planning permission for a major hotel in the area, along Olympic Way, on the old Olympic House site. That also includes an expansion of the existing Novotel and construction of residential properties.
That development won't cause the destruction of valuable community spaces and will provide lots of hotel capacity, so we DON'T NEED Quintain sticking an ugly brick of a building on top of our market square. You can view the other hotel here on Brent Council's website with references 21/2130 and PP-09478070:
https://pa.brent.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=DCAPR_155496
The market square and samovar spaces are used all the time... The market is there every weekend. Quintain themselves had won awards because of all the community events that Wembley Park holds in those spaces. Plus all the live music in the sound shell bandstand. Mainly in the summer when the weather is better.
Just for the built scale of WP, this outdoor living room needs Brent kindness, care and public realm investment, rather than mean-whiling abandonment. The outdoor civic centre of Brent Civic Centre, which surely has a major say as to what happens on its doorstep?
As said, at new Kings Cross Growth Area locals managed to protect their canal side square from being towered over and it wasn't sited directly outside Camden Town Hall!
We don't need overpriced tower block housing either (we need houses with garden for families) but that's never stopped Quintain from building them so that investors can make money.
All Quintain see is profit profit profit in a hotel right next to the stadium :(
How widely do Brent Planning notifications consult on such overdevelopment of Wembley Park? South Kilburn, its very restricted notification, making single staircase new tower a reality.
Post a Comment