Brent
Council resorting to dirty tricks as embarrassment looms?
Guest blog by E.Tribunal
The prospect of seeing
Rosemarie Clarke being presented with the Brent Staff Achievement Award
2014 by her colleagues Cara Davani and Christine Gilbert is one which has moved a large number of
people to register their knowledge and appreciation of this strong and resolute
lady by nominating her here LINK
It’s crucial that this momentum is kept up in the last 2
days before nominations close, however. So could I ask everyone who hasn’t
already done so to nominate Rosemarie and for as many people as possible to
urge others to nominate her before the deadline of October 16th?
We need the maximum nomination for Rosemarie as we can
expect some dirty tricks from Butt/Gilbert/Davani/Ledden as they attempt to wriggle out of the
inevitable popular result. Following the example of Jed Bush ( Bush’s brother in Florida who fiddled the vote to
make him president), they may claim that only either ‘Rosemarie’ with an ‘ie’
or with a ‘y’ should count.
Nonsense. We know and they know
who we’re nominating.
They may claim that she resigned from Brent Council and is
no longer eligible. Nonsense. As the Tribunal judge established, their
bullying, victimisation and racial discrimination amounted to constructive
dismissal, so their illegal treatment of Rosemarie forced her resignation. ( A
point they inadvertently acknowledged by insisting on continuing their
disciplinary even after forcing her resignation).
There are rumours that they have organised a
counter-campaign by selecting their own nominee and getting people to vote for
him/her in order to outvote Rosemarie.
This is always possible. It’s also possible, I suppose, that the nominee
they’ve chosen to select is Ms Davani herself. Could it be (see Martin’s post
today) that this is why it’s been announced that she is now actually on the
Brent payroll, in order to make her eligible?
Will they be able to find enough people to support their
plan? Or is Brent Council about to
receive hundreds of nomination forms for Ms Davani with only a paw-mark where
the nominator’s name should be?
Will it be noticed that the majority of these votes come
from the same addresses, addresses which do not tally with the official
register of the names of dogs residing at that address and where the actual
resident mutt has no knowledge that
their identity has been fraudulently used?
Will the police again
show no interest in getting involved in a blatant case of identity theft
?
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
MEANWHILE, PLEASE
NOMINATE ROSEMARIE AND DO ALL YOU CAN TO CONVINCE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME
