I will be moving a motion revising the Green Party's Education Policy at our forthcoming Spring Conference. The revisions take account of recent developments in what has been termed GERM (the Global Education Reform Movement) and the various campaigns that have sprung up as a result of privatisation, forced academisation, test led curriculum and pedagogy and the attack on teachers; conditions of service.
The full briefing paper on the motion can be read
HERE. This extract sets out the background:
Since the current Education Policy was written there has
been much change in the direction of education both nationally and globally.
What has become known as GERM (the Global Education Reform Movement) emphasises
competition between schools and between countries, education’s contribution to
global economic growth and competition, the provision of a ‘market’ in
education with increasing involvement of private companies, a narrowing of the
curriculum through a concentration on basic subjects that can be measured
through standardised testing, and a convergence between the world of work and
education.
In England the three main parties, to varying degrees,
support this movement, which has resulted in the promotion of free schools and
academies, the increasing role of private companies not just in sponsoring such
schools but also in the provision of curriculum and learning materials.
Companies such as Pearson and Murdoch are poised to exploit this situation.
Testing at the age of four is now being mooted as well as the existing Phonics
Screening Test at six, Key Stage 1 SATs at 7 and Key Stage 2 SATS at 11. In the
secondary sector there is a huge emphasis on examination results. Test results
are used by Ofsted as the first measure for judging school performance and
schools spend an enormous amount of time analysing and ‘interrogating’ the
data. A blip in these results can lead to a local authority school
being forced to convert to academy status.
The paradox is that increased centralisation and the
granting of unprecedented powers to the Secretary of State for Education, in
this government and any successor, have accompanied the rhetoric about setting
schools free from local authority ‘control’ through academies and free schools.
Currently the micro-management of schools by Michael Gove has extended to
advocating particular policies on behaviour management. Peter Wilby has
described the situation thus:
Michael Gove is on course to
complete what Kenneth Baker began… the creation of a fully centralised school
system in which the secretary of state for education has the powers of an
elected dictator.
The agreement between the three main parties on this gives
the Green Party the space to offer a completely different approach based on our
underlying principles:
- Our
rejection of the economic growth agenda and the accompanying international
economic competition enables us to have a broader interpretation of the
aims and content of education.
- This
in turn enables us to reject the narrow curriculum, testing regimes and
league tables associated with the GERM model and to put forward a
child-centred approach taking account of child development, especially in
the early years.
- Our belief
that decisions are best made at local level rather than by centralised
diktat means that decisions about curriculum (apart from a broad
entitlement) and pedagogy are made by teachers and the school community
rather than the Secretary of State.
- This
enables diversity and creativity to take place within the state
funded local authority school system, which will have the effect of
empowering teachers and developing their professionalism rather than
deskilling them.
- Our
belief in cooperation rather than competition means that we put forward
collaborative models of school improvement including school to school
support and a partnership role for an independent inspection service
informed by educational research/
- Our support for increased democratic
accountability at a local level involves improving the representation of
parents and pupils within schools and democratic accountability through
local authorities and removing the excessive powers of the Secretary of
State.
- Our
commitment to social justice means that we put forward policies that
support fair admissions and fair funding of schools and inclusion of
children with special needs.
