Tuesday, 9 October 2012

A&E closure will affect schools' capacity to deal with child illness and accidents

The UCC can deal with broken arms but not broken legs

My submission to the Shaping A Healthier Future had a particular focus on the impact of the Central Middlesex A&E closure on children and schools, as well as the role schools could play in preventative medicine.

This is an extract:
   
PROCESS

  1. Dr Mark Spencer, leading on the Shaping a Healthier Future consultation, told a TV news programme before the consultation had begun that A&Es would close. This suggests that the consultation is a sham as decisions had been prior to the public having a say.
  2. Despite claiming that ‘nothing had been decided’ the continuation of Central Middlesex A&E was not included as an option in the proposals. The statement is thus untrue and misleads the public.
  3. No risk assessment was carried out on the proposals prior to the consultation so the public have had insufficient evidence on which to base their responses.
  4. Throughout the consultation meetings it has been claimed that the proposals are not ‘cuts’. However flat funding at a time of population increase and increased demand does amount to a cut in real terms even before we take into account the financial plight of the Trust and the subsequent need to make ‘savings’. This again amounts to misleading the public.
  5. Headteachers and school governing bodies, responsible for the health, safety and well-being of children in their care, were not consulted about Sustaining a Healthier Future.. Key stakeholders have thus had no say about the impact of the closures on a particularly vulnerable section of the community.

CENTRAL MIDDLESEX A&E

  1. The department has been run down over several years, including overnight closure, pre-empting the closure proposals.
  2. The department serves two of the most deprived wards in the capital (Stonebridge and Harlesden) with low life expectancy and high incidence of illness including a specialism in sickle cell anaemia affecting the African Caribbean population.
  3. Car ownership at only 22% is low and public transport links poor making the journey to Northwick Park A&E difficult with potential dangers to patients of long and delayed journeys in emergencies.
  4. The area has a significant number of sites where major incidents could occur which necessitate an easily accessible fully functioning A&E in the vicinity:
    1. Railway lines including Euston-Birmingham mainline, Chiltern line, London Overground, Bakerloo, Jubilee, Metropolitan and in the future possibly HS2
    2. The North Circular Road, Harrow Road, Edgware Road.
    3. The industrial area around Wembley Stadium and Neasden, and the Park Royal Industrial estate (one of the largest in Europe)
    4. Major venues including Wembley Stadium, Wembley Arena and Fountain Studios
  5. The area has a rapidly growing child population so has increasing demand for A&E services associated with  childhood illnesses such as meningitis, asthma, allergic reactions and the increasing incidence of TB; as well as the usual head injuries and fractures associated with childhood accidents.
  6. Many recent immigrants in the area are not registered with GPs which leads to increased use of A&E by their parents for childhood illnesses.
  7. The assumption is that Urgent Care Centres and A&Es are complementary provision, operating on the same site. This will not be the case if Central Middlesex A&E is closed and instead cases that cannot be treated by the UGC will have to be transferred to Northwick Park A&E. This will necessitate an additional journey by ambulance, private transport, cab or public transport increasing the risk to the patient.
  8. Concerns about first aiders in schools and work places having to make decisions about whether to send patients to the UGC or Northwick Park A&E were not answered convincingly during the consultation. We were told that they would soon get to know which was appropriate or could ring a new telephone service for advice. I remain concerned that this could put patients in danger and puts far too much responsibility on the first aiders concerned.
  9. School first-aiders and support staff taking children to Northwick Park A&E act in locus parentis until parents get to the hospital. The distance and transport issues mean that parents will take longer to get to Northwick Park hospital with resultant distress for children, and school staff will have to stay at the hospital for longer periods.
  10. Similar arguments can be made for other A&E facilities threatened with closure in the NW London NHS area.

URGENT CARE CENTRE

  1. The demarcation lines between UCCs and A&E are unclear and without an A&E at Central Middlesex could cause dangerous delays to treatment.
  2. The UGC is privatised and therefore less accountable to the local community and susceptible to market pressures.
  3. The Central Middlesex UCC, run by Care UK.  having lost 6,000 x-rays does not have the confidence of the local community.

SCHOOLS

  1. Schools and Children’s Centres have not been included in the section about care outside hospitals and preventative care in these settings could be of vital importance.
  2. As mentioned above newly arrived families are often not registered with GPs and schools could play a role in campaigns over registration, immunisation and be a site for health checks on new arrivals.
  3. The health service could also deliver support to groups of  parents in school on health, sexual health and other related issues in an environment in which they already feel at ease.
  4. As well as health screening for new arrivals dental, eyesight, allergy and weight checks for all pupils could be reintroduced as a form of preventative care.




 



Monday, 8 October 2012

Don't let the ConDems make a casualty of our NHS


Hospital campaigners from Brent, Hammersmith and Fulham and Ealing converged on the NW London NHS headquarters in central London today to hand in petitions containing thousands of names opposing the closure of A&Es across West London. Some campaigners wore bandages to dramatise the threat to local people.

The consultation on Shaping a Healthier Future ends at midnight tonight. www.healthiernorthwestlondon.nhs.uk  for the online consultation form  or e-mail to consultation@nw.london.nhs.uk


Brent to join with other boroughs to out-source 'Public Realm' including waste and parks maintenance

In a report to go before the Executive on October 15th LINK officers are recommending that the Council join with Barnet, Hounslow and Richmond in a 'super contract' see my previous blog HERE that will cover:

• Household waste collections and recycling
• Street Cleansing operations
• Graffiti clearance
• Winter maintenance
• Cleansing of public conveniences
• Grounds maintenance to parks and open spaces (including Brent Housing Partnership HP estates)
• Grounds maintenance to cemeteries and grave digging
• Highway verges and shrub beds
• Playground inspection and maintenance
• Warden service
• Commercial waste

Brent's contract with Veolia ends on March 31st 2014. The contract, across the 4 boroughs and BHP which may not all buy into all the services, would be worth £700m over the 16 year contract period..

In a controversial move the report recommends:
The Executive to give approval to an exemption from Contract Standing Order 88 to allow an advert to be placed and a pre-qualification process to be run without the approval of evaluation criteria and certain other pre-tender considerations, subject to approval of such matters at a future Executive
And further recommends, as a consequence of the problem of the lack of a Brent Council depot when the last contract was awarded to Veolia, that the Council acquire a depot. Andy Donald Director of Regeneration and Major Projects, appears to be leading on this:
That the Executive agree to an amendment of £6.2m to the Council’s capital budget for 2012/13 to procure a new depot as set out in section 3.6 of the report. If a suitable site is identified, due to the reasons set out in paragraph 3.6.6, that the final terms of any acquisition including the purchase price be delegated to the Director of Regeneration and Major Projects and the Director of Finance and Corporate Services in consultation with their respective Lead Members. Such purchase price to be contained within the amendment to the Council’s capital budget as set out within this report
As a lay person it seems to me that this is not a particularly transparent or accountable  process when the Executive is not fully involved in an exceptionally large contract.

The proposal has come as a surprise to people in Barnet where a large number of staff are involved. In Brent waste management and recycling are already out-sourced to Veolia and it is the Parks and Sports staff who are most affected. The report states:
For Brent, whilst the majority of staffing implications are for staff currently employed by the current contractor, there are implications for existing Brent staff in Sports and Parks and Highway Operations. The proposal is that in excess of 50 council staff providing grounds maintenance and a number of staff in other services are transferred to the successful provider. In addition, if the decision is to create a single client arrangement a small number of staff in waste and recycling would be affected,

TUPE will apply and presumably this will also be the case for the cleaning and grounds maintenance contractors currently employed by Brent Housing Partnership, which also comes under Andy Donald's umbrella.

Boris Johnson ditches driverless trains plans according to reports today

It has been reported that Boris Johnson has withdrawn his plans for driverless underground trains which were due to be tested on the Jubilee Line.  See previous  blog from the RMT HERE

REPORT HERE