|
Outside Hendon Towen Hall |
Barnet Planning Committee tonight passed the planning application for
the West Hendon Development on the banks of the Welsh Harp by 5 votes
to 4 after a sometimes rancorous debate.
The
presentation by a planning officer of his report on the development provoked protests from Andrew
Dismore AM for Barnet and Camden who said that he had never heard such a
biased officers' report in 30 years involvement in politics. He said
the officer was acting as a advocate for the developers rather than as
someone presenting a balanced view on which the Planning Committee could
make a decision.
Dismore asked why there had not been a
ballot of residents of the West Hendon Estate and presented his own
findings (see posting below). He said the luxury tower blocks would be
for Russian oligarchs rather than local people.
Cllr
Roxanne Mashari (Labour -Welsh Harp) told the chair of the Committee
that she would be writing to Barnet Council to record her concerns about
the officer's presentation which amounted to a 'hard sell'. The length
and veracity of the presentation had not been used for any other
application.
Cllr Mashari said that when she visited
the developers they had not even be aware of Brent Council's objections.
She spoke about growing up near the Welsh Harp and what a much loved
and valued resource it was. The 29 storey buildings would be an
imposing and inappropriate presence looming over the reservoir.
Navin
Shah AM for Brent and Harrow told the committee that the Welsh Harp was
an exceptional site of tremendous value. The enormous scale of the
development and its density was unsustainable. The amount of affordable
housing should have been at the target of 40% rather than the 25% in
the application.
Cllr Javaid Ashraf (Liberal Democrat -
Dollis Hill) told the committee that he was a former chair of the Welsh
Harp JCC), He had three main concerns: density, damage to the SSSI and
traffic congestion. He said he was not against redevelopment. He was
supportive of 'a' scheme but not 'this' scheme.
The public loudly supported this last point. The officer's
presentation had implied that the scheme should be supported because it
was better than a previous scheme that had been agreed by the Planning
Committee and that no other scheme was viable as it would not provide
enough of a return to the developer to enable the social housing to be
redeveloped.
Objectors will continue their campaign at the London Mayoral level.