Brent's Cabinet which meets tomorrow afternoon, will be considering its response to the proposed Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC) that would take control of the regeneration of Old Oak Common and Park Royal. It would cover parts of Brent, Hammersmith and Fulham and Ealing.
Stephen Cowan, leader of Hammersmith and Fulham Council, came out strongly against it in July, calling it a 'land grab'.
This council
objects to an MDC at Old Oak and Park Royal. We are concerned about the
Mayor of London’s record on delivering truly affordable homes for
Londoners and do not believe he should be entrusted with sole
responsibility on a scheme of this importance.
We are committed to changing housing policies so that we build homes
for residents rather than investment properties for overseas
speculators and look forward to working with Ealing and Brent councils
to do that. There is no good business case for the Mayor to step in.
In fact, the move in government over the years has been to devolve
more powers to local communities not take them away. The Mayor’s
proposed organisation is a throwback to decades long gone, it would be
undemocratic and unnecessarily takes away powers from local residents
and local businesses and essentially hands them over to developers and unelected bureaucrats.
There is little information on Ealing Council's response but Brent Council
LINK does not follow Hammersmith and Fulham in opposing the MDC in principle:
To support delivery
on the scale required there is no doubt a delivery body with a strong regeneration focus is required.
Without such a body there is a real risk that the opportunity HS2 and the Old
Oak interchange presents
for Brent will be missed. Arguably an MDC gives Brent greater influence over
the proposals that will come forward at Old Oak as the Council will have representation
on the decision making bodies.
The report goes on to seek some changes in the MDC brief..
In fact, when the Ealing Officer's report
LINK sets out their demands if the MDC goes ahead despite their opposition, there is little difference between the two Councils. Both seek changes in the borders of the MDC zone. Both seek greater representation on the MDC and quote the Localism Act in their support. Both also seek assurances on the availability of genuinely affordable housing. Brent is also concerned about the CIL (Community Infrastructure Levy).
Countering the MDC proposal Hammermsith and Fulham call for a Joint Area Action Plan:
The Council has also discussed the potential for a joint
Area Action Plan that would include land from LBs of Ealing and Brent as well as
LBHF. Officers from the three Boroughs have been working well together on
this project for a considerable period of time meeting weekly with the GLA and
TfL as a JointProject Team and reporting up to a Project Strategy Board.
LBHF has resourced the project with key staff who have led on and significantly
progressed the project. This process could continue (subject to discussion and
agreement with LBs of Ealing and Brent) and a cross borough Area Action Plan
could be progressed by the three boroughs without the considerable expense and
administration involved insetting up an MDC.
This is not mentioned as far as I can see in the Brent report - Brent offers no alternative, just a modification of the MDC. It is surprising that in dealing with a Tory mayor that three Labour boroughs have not cooperated more on their response.
Brent Officers call for the following local benefits: