Last week the Brent Cabinet approved the annual Infrastructure Funding Statement with little discussion. Millions of pounds is involved so it is worth looking at it in some detail. To help readers I have extracted some of the tables. The full Statement with detailed commentary can be read HERE,
Brent Council introduces the Statement (extracts):
The
Council has been collecting the borough’s Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) since July 2013.
CIL is a levy applied to most developments granted planning permission that
commence, and is to help deliver the infrastructure needed to support the
development of the area. CIL is also important in demonstrating to communities the benefits
that new development can bring, including through key infrastructure projects,
place-making and local improvements.
The
borough CIL receipts can be broken down into three portions – the Strategic CIL, the
Neighbourhood CIL and the Administration CIL. A Mayoral CIL of £60 per sqm is
collected as well and passed on to TfL on a quarterly basis. The borough keeps
4% of this levy for administrative purposes. All London Boroughs are subject to this levy,
with the money used to fund the Elizabeth Line and Crossrail 2
The
Council also enters into Section 106 agreements with developers – a mechanism which makes a
development proposal acceptable in planning terms. S106 agreements are focused on
site-specific mitigation of the impact of development such as securing affordable
housing or requiring improvements to an access road. CIL, on the other hand, is
designed to raise funds for infrastructure needed generally as a result of an
increase in development in an area, and is spent on community infrastructure
projects across the borough.
Although
the Council has had high CIL receipts compared to the majority of other London Boroughs,
it is important to note that future years CIL receipts may not be as strong
given the current financial and economic conditions in the UK which may affect the
commencement of developments and subsequently, CIL receipts.
The receipts from CIl and Section 106 and their use are one of the justifications that councillors use when challenged on the anount of development in the borough that is rapidly changing its face. Provision of housing during a housing crisis and the subsequent rise in Council Tax receipts are also quoted.
One of the controversial aspects is the amount of both Strategic CIL and Neighbourhood CIL that remains unspent or unallocated at the end of the financial year and is carried forward.
The actual amount spent in 2021-22 (rounded) was SCIL £7,058,222. NCIL £4,575,043 - TOTAL £11,635,265 of which CIL Admin was £681,441.The amount collected in 2021-22 and the amount carried forward from previous years that has not been allocated (£60m) :
STRATEGIC CILSo what has the SCIL been spent on?:
South Kilburn
Wembley Park
There is a full description of the Olympic Way 'improvements' which follow the large expenditure on the replacement steps in previous years. The expenditure is justified in the Statement:
The improvements are a
recognition that Wembley Park is an area of national and
international importance. The high quality
public realm supports the ongoing transformation of the area into a thriving, attractive environment where people want to live
with access to shops and entertainment.
The North End Road/Bridge Road reconnection has yet to be signalised and buses are not yet using it avoid the stadium on event days to avoid delays and curtailment of services.
NEIGHBOURHOOD CIL
For the distribution of Neighbourhood CIL the borough is divided into NCIL areas including the two Neighbourhood Forums. Wembley continues to get a higher allocation on the basis that it is most impacted by new developments:
There is a description of many of the projects allocated funds in the Statement and a full list can be found HERE. I understand that not all projects progress to actually receiving the funds as there are various legal and financial hoops to get through.
SECTION 106 FUNDING
Section 106 is site specific and is funding that makes a development acceptable to Planning. It is sometimes a financial contribution but may also be an allocation of the housing approved as so-called 'affordable housing'. This returns to an argument familiar to readers about the precise meaning of affordable. As the Brent Poverty Commission said that only social housing was truly affordable to Brent residents, bear that in mind when looking at the figures for the housing contribution:
So just under 14% of the 'affordable' units (column 2) are social rent and under 4% of the total units (column 3) in the developments.
Section 106 Financial Contributions
What immediately struck me on looking at these figures was the amount, £3.5m, spent on transportation compared with the other areas.
Transportion includes: cycle parking, electric vehicle charging points, signage around Wembley Stadium, Roe Green/Kingsbury Road junction, hostile vehicle measures in Wembley Park around the stadium and 'Wembley Two Way Working' including North End Road mentioned earlier under SCIL.
Full details of the projects funded can be found in the Statement.