Cllr Jayesh Mistry Resigns - By-election soon in Wembley Central

Cllr Jayesh Mistry

 The personable young Labour councillor, Jayesh Mistry, resigned from Brent Council this morning. Jayesh is a trade unionist and bus driver with strong roots in the local community. When I stood against him in a by-election in 2009 I found him a principled and friendly opponent.

No reason has yet been given for his resignation but the by-election will come at a time when the Labour administration is unpopular as a result of the cuts they have made in local libraries, street cleansing, adult day care and other provision. Their latest proposals are the closure of two nurseries.

Cllr Mistry represented Wembley Central Ward.

The resignation comes on the eve of the Brent People's Assembly where Labour councillors are due to join Brent Fightback supporters and answer questions from the public.

Borough Election Result May 6th 2010

Jayesh Mistry	Labour	2649	16%	Elected
Emad Al-Ebadi	Labour	2352	14%	Elected
Wilhelmina Mitchell Murry	Labour	2277	13%	Elected
Valerie Brown	Liberal Democrats	2122	12%	Not elected
Daniel Bessong	Liberal Democrats	1977	12%	Not elected
Afifa Pervez	Liberal Democrats	1917	11%	Not elected
Shaheen Butt	Conservative	1119	7%	Not elected
Ratna Kamdar	Conservative	1092	6%	Not elected
Miranda Colwill	Conservative	963	6%	Not elected
Rodney Freed	Green Party	210	1%	Not elected
Solomon Agbonifo-Ezomo	Green Party	174	1%	Not elected
Maya Sendall	Green Party	144	1%	Not elected

IT'S TIME FOR BRENT PEOPLE TO MAKE THEIR VOICES HEARD

This week I have been giving out publicity for the Brent People's Assembly along with other activists.  Shoppers in Harlesden High Street and  parents at school gates expressed their concern about the cuts and how they are impacting directly, and indirectly, on children.

With both the Coalition Government and Brent Council appearing to ignore the views of local people,  the People's Assembly has been organised as a forum where people can make their voices heard and talk about what the cuts are doing to them and their families.

We will hear about these experience and about the campaigns that are going on locally. This is a chance for the Brent community to get together and organise to make sure their children have a future.

BRENT PEOPLE'S ASSEMBLY

GIVE OUR KIDS A CHANCE 

Saturday November 12th 12.30 - 4.30 pm

Harlesden Methodist Church, 25 High St, NW10 4NE

(Just around the corner from Jubilee Clock)

 

The timetable for the day is:

 

12.45-1.30 Opening speeches:

 

Lee Jasper (Black Activists Rising Against Cuts),

Jeremy Taylor (National Union of teachers)

Kishan Parshotam (Chair, Brent Youth Parliament),

Speaker from Brent SOS Libraries Campaign

1.30-2.30 Workshops (all same subject):

Experience of cuts, successful campaign strategies, next steps

2.30-3.00 Refreshments plus video One Million Climate Jobs

3.00-4.00 Any Questions? 

Two Brent Labour Councillors and Sarah Cox and Pete Firmin from Brent Fightback answer questions from the audience

4.00-4.30 Reports from workshops and the way ahead

Kids are welcome and there will be some provision for them

Financial transparency bill will help tackle the tax dodgers

Blog by Caroline Lucas on FALSE ECONOMY LINK

The public services we all benefit from are funded by the taxes we all pay. It’s pretty straightforward. But that means people and companies who fail to pay the full amount of tax that is expected of them are starving our public services of funds. If we want to fight spending cuts, we must tackle that failure to pay the right amount of tax.

Taken together, more than £100 billion is currently being lost because of abuse of loopholes in the tax system, tax bills remaining unpaid and from illegal non-payment of tax. That’s why, earlier this year, I tabled the Tax and Financial Transparency Bill in Parliament, which is due to have its second reading in the Commons on 25 November.

A report published earlier this year by Tax Research UK estimated that regulatory failures by HM Revenue & Customs and Companies House mean that around 500,000 companies a year fail to pay their tax or file their accounts.

My Bill would ensure that banks have to provide details on all accounts they maintain for companies operating in the UK, so that HM Revenue & Customs and Companies House can chase those companies who do not file the returns they're obliged to make for the missing information – and the tax they owe.

The Bill would also require banks, companies and trusts that operate in the UK to publish details of how much tax they pay in all the jurisdictions where they operate. That means requiring them to reveal what use they make of offshore tax havens. Full transparency will enable the tax authorities (and the public) to make sure that these companies are paying the right amount of tax, and make it easier to close loopholes and crack down on tax avoidance. Who could argue with that?

Well, just because it’s fair and it makes sense, doesn’t mean it won’t need a huge amount of campaigning momentum – and political will – to challenge the vested interests which do so well out of tax dodging. To help channel that momentum, I’ve set up an e-petition on the Government’s website, which echoes the demands in the Bill. Everyone who is opposed to cuts in public services, and who thinks the same rules should apply to everyone when it comes to paying tax, should sign it. If we can gather more than 100,000 signatures, it will be considered for debate in Parliament.

A successful e-petition can achieve a lot by helping to build pressure for change, so please do sign the petition and keep circulating the link. With a coordinated effort, we can reduce tax avoidance and reduce the terrible harm it does to our crucial public services.

Council failed to investigate whether library closures indirectly discriminated against Brent Asians, QC claims

Outside the High Court today

The public gallery  of Court 63 was crowded with Brent library campaigners today as the first day of the Appeal was being heard.  The Appellant's QC made it clear that the library campaigners' case was based on the process that Brent Council followed in its consultation and decision to close the libraries, rather than whether it was right to close libraries as such.

She focused particularly on the Council's failure to recognise that its own data signalled the possibility that the closure of the six libraries would indirectly discriminate against the Asian population of Brent. The figures showed that whilst Asians constituted 28% of the Brent population, they accounted for 46% of library users while the white population of 45% accounted for only 29% of users. As 3 of the six libraries that were closed served areas with higher than average  Asian population,  they were left with only Ealing Road library in the ward with the most dense Asian population. (Before the closure of the other libraries more than 60% of Ealing Road users were Asian)  So not only were people deprived of their own libraries but the remaining library at Ealing Road, as later evidence testified, had become over-crowded as a result of the closures.

Cllr Ann John appears outside the High Court

The QC also drew attention to the fact that despite their high usage of libraries only 21% of responses to the consultation came from Asians. She argued that this should have alerted the Council to ask why Asians used libraries more than other groups and  why they had not been effective at getting the views of the Asian population. A double whammy. There had been no attempt by the Council to investigate if Asians would be more affected than other user groups.

A further argument was that the Equalities Impact Assessment, as required by legislation, had been done at the last minute, and after the decisions about closure had already been made for all practical purposes. Although the EIA was very long it was premised on the Council's belief that there was 'no risk' of indirect discrimination and therefore did not analyse the data. It was a question of 'never mind the quality, feel the width'. The Appellant's submission was that the Council had an erroneous approach to the EIA and had claimed that 'only' the elderly, those with a disability and the very young,(those who could not travel or migrate to other libraries), would be affected.

Council confusion over library 1.5 mile claim

Following Brent Council's correction of the oft-repeated claim that no resident is further than 1.5 miles from a library which left the impression that the original quote was based on all libraries, including those that have now closed, a Brent Council spokeswoman seems to muddy the waters again. It appears they were including libraries in other boroughs.

She is quoted HERE on London24, the Archant Group's website:

The Brent Council spokeswoman said it was “nonsense” that the council has been misleading anyone.

She said: “It is true that everyone living in the borough is no more than a mile and a half from a library, either in Brent or a neighbouring borough, and many residents choose to use a library in another borough. This was clearly explained in the proposals.’’

It looks like we'll have to all get out our measuring sticks. Could it be that Brent is measuring it 'as the crow flies' rather than actual walking distance?

Brent Nursery Closures Will Force Us To Pay Double

From Today's Evening Standard

Parents today told of their fears for affordable childcare if plans to close two council-run nurseries go ahead.

They claim that hundreds of children could be left without nursery places. 

Parents at Treetops Children's Centre in Willesden said they were given eight weeks to come up with a business plan to run the nursery from March - or face paying more than twice as much for private childcare.

Treetops has about 50 children on its books and 100 on a waiting list. Also set to shut is Harmony Centre in Neasden. 

Brent council said it was consulting on closing the centres because of "huge" government funding cuts. It claimed the nurseries are predicted to make a total loss of more than £250,000 for 2011/12. 

The council is also consulting on a further nursery, Willow, which could be restructured, taking children with disabilities and some children with special needs.

Parents in the borough say that many of them, especially single mothers, will be forced to give up jobs and go on to benefits because of a shortage of affordable nursery places. While Treetops costs £33 a day, other local nurseries are said to cost up to £70.

Charlotte Sones, whose one-year-old daughter Margot attends Treetops, is leading a campaign to save the centre. Mrs Sones, a 39-year-old writer and telesales worker from Harlesden, said: "I feel sick to my stomach about it, it's keeping me awake at night. 

"One, because the council have forced a group of parents into the position of having to save a nursery, and two, having the trauma of potentially having to move a child who has been there since she was seven months old." Charlotte Schilcher, an event manager from Harlesden, has two children, Alfie, six, and Betsy, one, who have both attended Treetops. 

She said: "Parents are really worried and nervous about the future and their children. These are the things that are directly affecting families in this area." Parents have until December 14 to submit plans to run Treetops, which is set to close on March 23rd. 

Brent council's head of early years and integrated services, Sue Gates, said: "We can't afford to carry on as we are now. There's lots of alternative childcare provision locally so families shouldn't face any problem finding a suitable place for their child and, if these proposals are agreed, we will help them to make alternative arrangements."

Crucial Libraries Appeal hearing Thursday - Try and Get Along

The Brent Libraries appeal hearing will begin tomorrow in the Court of Appeal at 10.30 am in Court 63, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London. Please try and come along for the hearing: the physical presence of those who case about cases like this makes a real difference.

The hearing will last 1 ½ days, possibly extending a little into Friday afternoon. The Appellants’  new QC, Dinah Rose, will open and close the case with the Council’s QC making her own submissions half way through. Dinah will argue the Council:

• did not appreciate the likely impact of its plans to close libraries on particular groups in the community, such as Asian people, and without understanding this impact properly could not make a lawful decision compatible with its Equality Act 2010 duties to eliminate discrimination;

•  did not assess need for local library services, especially that of children; and

• was unfair to community groups who put forward proposals to save the threatened libraries.

The legal team cannot be sure when the judgement will be forthcoming but it is likely to be speedy as the Court appreciates the importance of the case.

Evening Standard covers library distance row

Follow this LINK for the story