Monday, 17 April 2023

Phone Mast application in St Andrew's Conservation Area refused by Brent Council

The proposal was to erect the mast on this green opposite St. Andrew's Church

 

The picture of the location supplied by the applicant H3G

An application by Edinburgh based Dot Surveying n behalf of the operator H3G for the erection of a 15 metre high mast and associated cabinets on the green at the junction of Tudor Gardens and Old Church Lane was refused earlier this year by Brent Council.   There were 22 objections to the mast from residents in the area.

This objection sums up the issues:

1.     The proposed site is within a conservation area. The application should therefore be refused.

2.     The Mast will not be in keeping with the street scene. Conservation areas are areas of special architectural and historic character with a particular quality worth preserving. One of the main features of the St Andrews conservation area is the way the individual buildings and gardens complement each other. This mast will not compliment anything whatsoever. It will be an eyesore.

3.     The proposed mast will have a negative impact on the skyline and views of St Andrews Church. For example, the view looking down Tudor Gardens towards the church. The views of the Church are specifically mentioned in Brent Council's St. Andrew's Conservation Area Character Appraisal. Such views would be ruined.

4.     The most significant views of the conservation area are those which look towards St Andrews Church. The church plays the most important part in creating the special identity of the conservation area because of its presence within most of the local views. The views are suitably bordered by the houses that flank the roads, and the presence of large amounts of greenery helps in promoting a rural village quality within the area. This will be ruined by the mast.

5.     Brent Council are obliged to maintain the character of the conservation area and are responsible for designating Conservation Areas. The law set down in the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 enables the Council to influence the type of physical changes that would otherwise be detrimental to the area. Thus, a local authority should preserve and enhance a conservation area. It would be a dereliction of duty on the part of Brent Council if this application was to be approved.

 

6.     Brent Council are obliged by the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, to ensure that Conservation Areas retain the character that brought about their designation. If conservation areas retain their designation but do not retain their essential character, they undermine the credibility of a Conservation Area status.

 

7.     St Andrews conservation area is defined by our church. The Church is the symbol and centre of the conservation area. The current proposal is to erect a large, unmissable and unsightly mast right opposite the Church itself. The site selected for this mast, is quite possibly the worst possible location - right opposite St Andrews Church.

 

8.     We really would have succumbed to consumerism - if a historic church is overtaken and despoiled by a radio mast which nobody wants and nobody supports.

 

 

Brent Council set out their reasons for refusal:

 

The proposed monopole and associated cabinets, by reason their size, siting and appearance within the St Andrews Conservation Area (a designated heritage asset), would result in a harmful impact on the visual amenities of the streetscene and result in harm to the significance of the St Andrews Conservation Area. The proposal is therefore considered unacceptable in terms of siting and appearance. Prior Approval is therefore required and refused having regard to Part 16 of the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, as amended.

UPDATED with comment by George Irvin. Developer George Irvin offers Brent councillors all the fun of the fair

 

 

An email from Irvin Leisure to Brent councillors has been seen by Wembley Matters.It is not possible to tell if the email went to ALL councillors but it does suggest that many will be at the Funfair it invites councillors to attend.  It asks councillors to reply personally to George Irvin in response to an invitation to enjoy free admission to the upcoming Funfair at Roe Green for friends and family:

 

Hello Dear Councillor,

 

As I’m sure you realise, we have worked with your Borough for many generations staging the Annual Funfairs where we support many local charities including the Mayor’s charity which we are raising funds for at this year’s event.

 

The local community have an important day coming up soon at the local Fair, this being Eid al-Fitr on the 21st and 22nd April 2023 and regardless of your personal religion we would like to invite you along with family and friends to our Funfair free of charge as I will arrange tickets for you all.

 

Do confirm to George direct if you wish to attend as many other Councillors will be attending.

 

George Irvin's controversial application to redevelop a site in Barham Park LINK to build 4 houses is with the council and expires on Thursday April 20th. 

 

After publication I received the following emailed comment about the Barham Park development: 

 

Brent Council treated the Barham bequest as their own asset for a long time. They used buildings in Barham Park as offices for Parks Department and build the two cottages for parks staff in early 1970s without permission.

 

The park buildings and pathways have been neglected for years and rather than treating it just like any other Park, paid from the Council Tax the Council is insisting that Barham Park needs to generate its own income to fund improvements.

 

When the cottages became empty and needed substantial upgrading a decision was made some 14 years ago to sell them to generate money for repairs to the park.

 

George Irwin bought them at auction for £630,000.

 

The sale was subject to a covenant preventing further building. While this has nothing to do with planning - and any permission could be given or refused - the ‘restrictive’ covenant cannot be ignored.

 

As the Council sold the two cottages with the Covenant on basis that it was the two houses and not more. The value received was reasonable. If the houses and land were sold unrestricted than the value would have been much higher.

 

The Council Trustees have a fiduciary duty to maximise any income to the Trust. As the land from Titus Barham is a charitable endowment, they also have a duty to protect it. They could simply say 2 houses is enough and no more - irrespective of any decisions made by planning.

 

If the Trustees, following proper advice and probably clearance from the Charity Commission allowed the proposed 4 houses to be built - despite public opposition - they would have to extract a fair and substantial value for disposing of the protection given by the restrictive covenant.

 

George Irwin paid £630,000 for two cottages some years ago. He also incurred legal and other costs. Each of the 4 town houses, once built could be worth £700,000 each that is a total of £2,800,000. If demolition, rebuilding and other costs come to say £1,170,000 that would still leave a gain of £1 million.

 

The Brent property or Finance team can do this calculation for the Barham Trustees as a value needs to be placed on the covenant. An independent valuation officer from the Inland Revenue will probably need to be involved.

 

What is quite obvious is that George Irwin will not be allowed to go ahead without paying a very large price - even if the planning Committee caves in and allows more building inside an important Brent Park. Once Brent officers finally advise him of the price, he needs to pay he may simply give up on his plans and realise that he is wasting his time.

 

GEORGE IRVIN HAS SENT THIS COMMENT (00.15 APRIL 20TH)

 

I need to make everyone aware we have been asked to support Eid al-Fitr by many Mosque’s all over London that we do events with and because of this we have sent £10 of tokens to all the councillors that can be given to anyone including charities in Tower Hamlets, Lambeth, Brent and Southwark where funfairs are taking place over Eid as this has nothing to do with planning issues.

 
We support many non-political charities, like the mayors charities with our annual funfairs as we have donated more £500,000 over previous years.

 
So this is completely wrong to say this is connected to any planning, applications.

 

We must defend the right to boycott as a peaceful means to bring about change - Public Meeting Monday April 24th Chalkhill Community Centre

 RIGHT TO BOYCOTT PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 24TH

WEMBLEY PARK

 

Monday April 24th  at 7.30 to 9pm.   Chalkhill Community Centre,  Welford Centre, 113 Chalkhill Road, Wembley Park, HA9 9FX 2 minutes walk from Wembley Park tube station and served by many buses from all parts of Brent and Harrow.

 

SPEAKERS: Andrew Feinstein, Former ANC MP in South Africa and Ryvka Barnard, Deputy Director, Palestine Solidarity Campaign. 

 

Entry is free  but PLEASE register with Eventbrite https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/595697135167

 

A public meeting at Chalkhill Community Centre on Monday April 24th will focus on Government plans to limit the right of public bodies to boycott. A Coalition has been formed to challenge the  proposed Bill  that could affect many campaigning organisations and its declaration has been signed by 60  human rights and environment campaigns, religious organisations and trade unions. Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) have long been an effective and peaceful means of bringing about change.

THE DECLARATION

As a group of civil society organisations made up of trade unions, charities, NGOs, faith, climate justice, human rights, cultural, campaigning, and solidarity organisations, we advocate for the right of public bodies to decide not to purchase or procure from, or invest in companies involved in human rights abuse, abuse of workers’ rights, destruction of our planet, or any other harmful or illegal acts. We therefore oppose the government’s proposed law to stop public bodies from taking such actions.

The government has indicated that a main intention of any legislation is to ensure that public bodies follow UK foreign policy in their purchasing, procurement, and investment decisions, particularly relating to Israel and Palestine. We are concerned that this would prevent public bodies from deciding not to invest in or procure from companies complicit in the violation of the rights of the Palestinian people. We affirm that it is the right of public bodies to do so, and in fact a responsibility to break ties with companies contributing to abuses of rights and violations of international law in occupied Palestine and anywhere else where such acts occur.

From bus boycotts against racial segregation to divestment from fossil fuel companies to arms embargoes against apartheid, boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaigns have been applied throughout history to put economic, cultural, or political pressure on a regime, institution, or company to force it to change abusive, discriminatory, or illegal policies. If passed, this law will stifle a wide range of campaigns concerned with the arms trade, climate justice, human rights, international law, and international solidarity with oppressed peoples struggling for justice. The proposed law presents a threat to freedom of expression, and the ability of public bodies and democratic institutions to spend, invest and trade ethically in line with international law and human rights.

We call on the UK government to immediately halt this bill, on opposition parties to oppose it and on civil society to mobilise in support of the right to boycott in the cause of justice.


 Badges from the 1980s

 

BRENT HISTORY

The presence on the platform of former ANC MP Andrew Feinstein is particularly appropriate as Brent has a proud record of opposing South African apartheid as I wrote in a previous article:

 South African fruit was a particular target and small groups were set up across the country and in universities with at its peak  140-150 groups.  The deaths of two students in 1976 in the Soweto Students Uprising generated further support for action against apartheid and in 1984 Brent Anti-Apartheid was working with the National Union of Students, women's groups and black organisations appealing to Trade Unions not to handle South African goods.

There were calls for boycotts that  have similarities with those promoted today by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign with a wider focus targeting sporting links, divest from companies profiting from apartheid, pension fund divestment, arms embargo and the release of political prisoners.  Barclays Bank, the biggest  high street  bank in South Africa,was targeted locally and Brent Labour Party moved its account to the Co-operative Bank.

The Labour Council at the time was part of a local authority delegation to Margaret Thatcher to present a petition if favour of the boycott and the Council stopped contracts with firms with South African links and councillors took part in pickets of supermarkets urging them not to stock South African goods.

Reflecting on that history it is to be hoped that the current Labour Council will also stand up for the right to boycott and divest.

 Monday's meeting is jointly organised by Brent Friends of Palestine who raise funds for the charity Brent Friends of Palestine, and the Brent and Harrow Palestine Solidarity Campaign.  With Amnesty International claiming that  Israel is operating a system of apartheid LINK it is telling that two of the 1980s badges above, on ending investment and boycotting Barclay's Bank, apply to current campaigns on human rights in Palestine, the arms trade and investment in fossil fuels.

Ryvka Barnard from Palestine Solidarity will make the links with current campaigns, the situtation in Israel-Palestine and the need to strongly resist the Government's propose new law.

In 2020 when PSC asked Brent Council for details of its Local Government Pension Fund Investments the following companies that they invested in were involved in arms sales etc:

Barclays £1,252,342
Barclays is a British multinational bank and financial services company. Barclays hold approximately £1,167.6 millions of investments in companies that are known to supply the Israeli military. This includes Babcock, BAE and Boeing, Cobham and Rolls Royce. More information available in War on Want’s 2017 ‘Deadly Investments’ report.

BAE Systems £970,233
According to CAAT, “BAE Systems is the world’s fourth largest arms producer. Its portfolio includes fighter aircraft, warships, tanks, armoured vehicles, artillery, missiles and small arms ammunition. It has military customers in over 100 countries. BAE has a workshare agreement with Lockheed Martin producing the US F-35 stealth combat aircraft. Israel, for example, took delivery of its first F-35 in 2016. According to Investigate, a project by the American Friends Service Committee, BAE has worked in cooperation with Lockheed Martin and Rafael to produce and market the naval Protector drone used to maintain the siege of Gaza along the Mediterranean coast.

Smiths Group £316,811
According to CAAT “Smiths Group is a global technology company with five divisions: John Crane, Smiths Medical, Smiths Detection, Smiths Interconnect and Flex-Tek. Smiths Connectors is part of Smiths Interconnect and comprises Hypertac, IDI and Sabritec brands. Products include connectors used in fighting vehicles, unmanned vehicles and avionics systems.” They have applied for a number of military export licences to Israel.

Rolls Royce £294,535
Rolls-Royce is a British manufacturer that produces military aircraft engines, naval engines and cores for nuclear submarines. Despite arms comprising only 26% of its total sales, it is still the world’s 17th largest Arms trade. In 2014, the year of Israel’s arial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza, which killed over 2,200 civilians, nearly a quarter of them children, Rolls-Royce was granted export licenses for engines for military aircrafts to Israel

When PSC requested updated information last year Brent Council said they were unable to supply details of individual companies as they were incorporated into various investment funds.


New Community Diagnostic Centres for Brent and NW London should be up and running soon

 The minimum offer

Community Diagnostic Centres are a national initiative that will offer checks, scans and tests at one site separate from urgent and emergency facilities. The aim is to tackle the backlog of  such tests, simplify and speed the process and have one  centre accessible to the public 45 minutes or less travel time from their home. Overall it is hoped that this will improve health outcomes in the targeted population:

The Community Diagnostic Centres programme aims to achieve a range of benefits as outlined above:

 Improve population health outcomes

Increase diagnostic capacity

 Improve productivity and efficiency

Contribute to reducing health inequalities

 Deliver better and more personalised experience

Support integration of care

The focus is on serving the most disadvantaged areas. There will be a centre at Ealing, Willesden Centre for Health and Care amd Wembley Centre for Health and Care.

The Committee Report states:

The Community Diagnostic Centres at Willesden Centre for Health and Care and Wembley Centre for Health and Care will work together to serve the deprived and disadvantaged communities of Neasden, Stonebridge, Harlesden, North Hammersmith and Fulham, North Kensington, Queen’s Park and Church Street.

Completing a journey to a Centre within 45 minutes by public transport may be a challenge from some of those areas.

The Process:


 Timeline

The timeline for the three new Community Diagnostic Centres to be established and
operational is based on the programme of works necessary at each of the three existing NHS sites, with anticipated opening dates as follows:

 
· Willesden June/July 2023
· Wembley November/December 2023 (subject to planning approval)
· Ealing December 2023/January 2024

 

 Details of the offer at the Centres

 

An officer clarified the roles of the various sites to Wembley Maters:

The plan is for the new Wembley Community Diagnostic Centre to provide imaging services and includes the provision of two MRI and two CT scanners.

 

We are developing three new Community Diagnostic Centres on existing NHS sites in north west London:

 

·         a larger facility – located at Ealing Hospital

·         and two facilities – one at The Wembley Centre for Heath and Care and another at The Willesden Centre for Health and Care – working together to provide the same suite of diagnostic tests as the Ealing Community Diagnostic Centre

 

The Community Diagnostic Centres at Willesden Centre for Health and Care and Wembley Centre for Health and Care will work together to serve the deprived and disadvantaged communities of Neasden, Stonebridge, Harlesden, North Hammersmith and Fulham, North Kensington, Queen’s Park and Church Street. The two sites also complement each other – the Wembley site provides the greatest catchment area to the overall population of north west London both by car and public transport – and the Willesden site serves the highest proportion (22 per cent) of deprived residents within its catchment area.

 

Also to note that there is a requirement for planning permission to build a new unit on the Wembley Centre site taking space on what is currently part of the car parking area to the rear of Barham House.

 

Saturday, 15 April 2023

£765,000 project to save and improve the deteriorating Kilburn Library



Photographs from collection submitted to Cabinet

Brent Cabinet will be considering major plans to rectify structural problems at Kilburn Library and improve the facility at its meeting on Monday. The project will cost £765,000 of which  £534,000 would come from Strategic Community Infrastructure Levy and £231,500 from an application to the Arts Council of England's Library Improvement Fund.

A dossier of photographs (see above) are submitted alongside the proposed works.

Offices explain:

This investment will:

 
· Upgrade the library facilities and building, including the substantial but
underused garden;

· Implement a flexible design to expand the use of the library and enable
hires outside of core opening hours;

· Improve the accessibility of the building through improved design and
signage;

· Extend the footprint of the building to create a dedicated event and
learning space which could also be used for community hire.

The last refurbishment undertaken at Kilburn Library took place in 2009/10.
Structurally, the building is in a poor state. There are large cracks forming in the
structure of the building and there is concern that debris may fall. Furnishings
are mostly fixed and offer limited flexibility to develop the library offer or adapt
the space for different audiences and uses. There is no dedicated event space
despite the strong demand for cultural programmes in the area. Local
consultation for the Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2022 also identified
community priorities of food growing and access to green space. Kilburn Library
has an underutilised garden and will meet this need, but it requires investment to
make it fully accessible and be used more extensively by the community.

 


The works would entail building an extension to the existing building and
reconfiguring the layout to create a larger more flexible space. The driver for this
is a need to increase engagement with residents in the South Kilburn area and
to meet an increased demand and need for services, with a particular focus on
digital, learning, culture and health, following the large amount of growth that is
currently taking place and expected to take place. The new spaces and design
would enable us to increase our programming in these areas and work more with
local partners to expand our reach and library usage in the area.

The increasing population of South Kilburn is cited as a further reason to improve the facility.

Costings:


The Project Plan