The Metropolitan Police have sent this message following the events in Paris. The Football Association has advised fans attending tomorrow's England France friendly at Wembley Stadium to arrive early to allow time to get through additional security checks. They are also asked to be in their seats by 7.55am to take part in post-Paris preliminaries.
Monday 16 November 2015
Wanted: Chair of Brent Scrutiny Committee
Following the sad and premature death of Cllr Dan Filson, who had made a good start at making Brent Scrutiny Committee more effective, a new Committee chair is needed from amongst the Labour group:
The new Chair will thus need to be someone who has not got an eye on future preferment by the Council leadership, including the position of Mayor, and with the strength and tenacity to follow issues through without caving in to pressure.
The new Chair should have a proven public record of contributions to Full Council Meetings which are more than planted questions to Lead Members to showcase the Council's achievements. They should have raised pertinent questions on policy decisions and detail at Full Council or committee meetings.
Some in the Labour group are of the opinion that the position requires such a high workload that it should not be undertaken by someone who has a full time job in addition to being a councillor. That obviously raises significant issues about equality of opportunity. Those putting forward the argument suggest that a 'part time' Scrutiny Chair will become over-dependent on Council officers who themselves should be subject to scrutiny.
Lastly the new Chair should not be compromised by close friendships and relationships with Cabinet members that might affect their independence. This could extend to representing the same ward as the leadership.
The Scrutiny Committee's role can be found HERE
Just a reminder of what Barry Gardiner MP said reacting to Labour's election result last May:
Any nominations?
Speaking to some of the Labour group it is clear that there are some impediments to the challenging scrutiny of a Council with such a large majority and where the leader is controlling and intolerant of criticism.WANTED: INDEPENDENT MINDED, SCRUPULOUS COUNCILLOR GOOD ON DETAIL BUT AWARE OF THE BIGGER PICTURE
The new Chair will thus need to be someone who has not got an eye on future preferment by the Council leadership, including the position of Mayor, and with the strength and tenacity to follow issues through without caving in to pressure.
The new Chair should have a proven public record of contributions to Full Council Meetings which are more than planted questions to Lead Members to showcase the Council's achievements. They should have raised pertinent questions on policy decisions and detail at Full Council or committee meetings.
Some in the Labour group are of the opinion that the position requires such a high workload that it should not be undertaken by someone who has a full time job in addition to being a councillor. That obviously raises significant issues about equality of opportunity. Those putting forward the argument suggest that a 'part time' Scrutiny Chair will become over-dependent on Council officers who themselves should be subject to scrutiny.
Lastly the new Chair should not be compromised by close friendships and relationships with Cabinet members that might affect their independence. This could extend to representing the same ward as the leadership.
The Scrutiny Committee's role can be found HERE
Just a reminder of what Barry Gardiner MP said reacting to Labour's election result last May:
I’m thrilled, of course I’m thrilled but we need to be very careful.It is a huge responsibility because a majority this big for any party means that we have to look within ourselves for the sort of scrutiny that we need of the policies that we ourselves are proposing.
Who will be that independent critical voice for Brent residents?All of these people got elected because they managed to persuade voters they wanted to represent them in the civic centre on the council. They must remember their job is to represent the people to the bureaucratic (sic) of the council and not to represent the council bureaucrats to the people.We are here to be a critical voice to say where things are wrong and to set policy to change Brent for the better.
Any nominations?
Labels:
Barry Gardiner,
Brent Council,
Dan Filson,
Scrutiny Committee
Local government cuts and offering alternatives to those attracted by ISIS
Guest blog by Scott Bartle
Friday 13th was
an eventful day as it was in the morning that David Cameron explained how he’d
worked ‘hand in glove’ with the USA to execute Mohammed Emwazi in Syria, where
we are not ‘at war’. This was a man that walked the same streets as us in
Brent, perhaps buying food from the same checkouts and was described by those
that knew him as a ‘nice guy’ before adopting the moniker ‘Jihadi-John’.
Meanwhile, in the afternoon over at Woolwich Crown Court 19 year old Yahya
Rashid from Willesden who had left the country to join ISIS was found guilty of
terrorism charges. As the guilty verdict was given to Yahya, in France final
preparations were being made by ISIS to attack Paris. After the mass-murders
French Gendarme conveniently found a passport upon a perpetrator matching one
shown by someone who identified as a refugee in Greece. However, other reports
from the media indicate that the majority of others involved in the Paris
attacks were more like Yahya Rashid, considered ‘home-grown’.
It’s
beyond most of our capacity to do anything about a foreign policy so reliant
upon fossil fuels we’ve contributed towards conflict over its supply since WW1.
From the Baghdad Railway, to the overthrow of democratically elected Prime
Minister Mohammad Mossaddegh of Iran in 1953 to the wars in Iraq and the funding
of ISIS to topple President Assad in Syria, it can feel pretty stuck. However,
within our grasp we do have the power to offer alternatives to people from
our communities who may be leaving our communities to get involved with ISIS.
We must recognise that ISIS is merely a gang for those in a multi-cultural
world who are better connected.
The myth
of the ‘five star jihad’ is pervasive as recruits like those from Birmingham
leave clutching their copies of ‘Islam for Dummies’ from Amazon. On social
media images are posted of a hiphop lifestyle of five-star hotels, hanging with
their friends, driving smart cars offering a perception that there will be more
opportunities with the ladies. This is the allure of stuff, people looking for
material things, love or a sense of community and belonging. These are
life-goals shared by many that people have become disaffected in their ability
to reach, and see joining ISIS as a more achievable way to meet their needs.
What to do about these things hasn’t changed since 1936 when Winifred Holtby
highlighted Local Government as the ‘first-line of defence thrown up by
the community against our common enemies – poverty, sickness, ignorance,
isolation, mental derangement and social maladjusment’.
What’s changed
is the ability of our elected representatives to recognise this and that cuts
in the short term equate to costs – both financially and socially in the long
term.
More
often than not adults who make choices to get involved with crime have had behaviour
considered ‘anti-social’ or ‘challenging’ since childhood. Research aggregated
by Professor Martin Knapp of the London School of Economics estimated that the
cost of conduct related crime in England to range from £22.5bn to £60bn a year,
and £1.1-1.9m over the lifetime of a single offender.
These costs on the public
sector are distributed across many agencies and are around 10 times high than
children with no behaviour problems. Yet research has found that gross savings
over 25 years from an intervention provided from services can exceed the
average cost of the intervention by a factor of around 8 – 1. We need to
recognise that despite this money being spread across many agencies it is still
our tax money that is being lost. Local Government needs to recognise it’s
likely to be around for ever and start operating on long term plans. As last
month’s decision by the Labour run council to engage in ‘savage’
short-sighted cuts to youth services See LINK or destroying
places like Stonebridge Adventure Playground could cost us all dearly.
Scott Bartle stood as The Green Party
Parliamentary Candidate for Brent North in 2015 and is a behaviour psychologist
who works in forensic services.
Labels:
cuts,
David Cameron,
Isis,
local government,
Mohammed Emwazi
Children to take over Brent streets? (occasionally)
They could be updated photographs from the 50s LINK but these are from an experimental 'Play Street' in Kempe Road, Queens Park.
The Brent Cabinet will this afternoon at their meeting at Crest Academy (2pm) be considering a paper adopting a procedure for occasional closure of local streets along similar lines. LINK
This comment from one of the organisers sums up what is to be gained for the community:
The report outlines the wider advantages:Apologies for the belated thank you! I wanted to extend our heartfelt gratitude and thanks for the first ever play street in Brent. As you can see from the photos it was a whopping success - old and young mingled and laughed and got to know each other. As one of my elder neighbours said, she’d lived on the street for 30 years and hadn’t met several neighbours until that day. The children played for hours, and invented their own games and enjoyed the freedom of not stressing about cars. I knew they would love it, but I hadn’t quite realised how much the adults would love it too. I’ve received many emails of thanks, and have acquired a long email list of neighbours who want to be included in the next one.
Although Play Streets do no replace the need for Green Spaces they have the advantage of:
- Allowing children to play near home while remaining the responsibility of their parents
- Reducing obesity
- Giving children the space to play energetically
- Increasing the sense of community by bringing neighbours together both in setting up and managing the play street but also in taking part when the street is in operation
Labels:
Brent Council,
cabinet,
Kempe Road,
Play Street,
Queens Park
Join the Hunt protest on Thursday
Labels:
Jeremy Hunt,
Save our NHS,
Southall Town Hall,
Thursday
Sunday 15 November 2015
Sympathy and Solidarity with Lycee Winston Churchill, Wembley
Some of the school's students |
Principal Mireille Rabate will face a daunting task tomorrow morning when she brings the school community together after the Paris attacks.
Wembley Matters sends sympathy and solidarity to staff, pupils and their families.
Wembley Stadium Today |
Labels:
attacks,
Lycee,
Paris,
solidarity,
wembley,
Winston Churchill
John Roan shows the way in challenging 'exam factory' schools
The current action by teachers at John Roan School in Greenwich has significance well beyond that borough. There is increasing recognition of the impact of a high stakes testing system both on teachers and pupils. As teachers' workload increases their stress levels rise and the fixation on grades and fear of failure produces stress in their students.
John Roan staff are taking the initiative in challenging what the NUT have called factory schooling. (Exam Factories? The impact of accountability measures on children and young people NUT June 2015).Yesterday a number of organisations, working under the banner Reclaiming Education, came together at Hamilton House, the NUT HQ, to discuss some common aims in that campaign. Green Party teachers were among those who took part.
This is the message that John Roan staff have sent to supporters today:
Dear Supporters,
We thought we would update you on our campaign to defend our working conditions and the traditions of our comprehensive school.
Our strike day on Tuesday 10 November 2015, received phenomenal support from NUT Associations, other trade unions, parents, students and teachers from as far as New York Miami and Nigeria! We think this is because we are speaking up for teachers who are defending education and the conditions in which it can flourish. We want our students to do well in their qualifications but not at any cost; not at the cost of those who find exams difficult and feel they are failures, or the ones who want to do so well they work into the night, bent over books with the stress of heightened expectations and future failure.
Teaching should be something that brings fulfilment and reward, not exhaustion and demoralisation. They are destroying our vocation and turning it into alienating toil. We must stop this and our campaign is the start for us. We hope we have encouraged teachers everywhere to do the same.
We understand that a negotiating meeting has been called this week and we hope that The John Roan Management come to their senses and adopt policies that recognise the valuable contribution we make to our students' learning. All we ask is that they respect that our workload should be reasonable and that we should be trusted to teach without excessive scrutiny and monitoring.
If we do not get agreement, we will have no choice to but to continue our strike on Thursday 19 November 2015. Our pickets are from 7.30am until 8.45am and we welcome everyone in joining us to support our strike.
Please continue to spread the word and if you would like us to speak at a meeting then reply us with details of when/where you would like us to come. We are all working teachers so we will do our best, but we have part-time and retired teachers who could speak too.
Thanks again and solidarity forever.
The John Roan NUT
www.thejohnroannut.org johnroannut@gmail.com Twitter @thejohnroannut
Labels:
Exam factories,
John Road,
NUT,
strike,
work load
Saturday 14 November 2015
Staff and parents press for secret ballot on Furness academisation
The audience at the academies meeting |
Parents and staff from Furness Primary School, Harlesden, London gathered[1]
to voice their deep concerns as to why their school was proposed to be turned
into an academy. The Governors of Furness and Oakington Manor, federated
schools, have made an application to turn the two schools into a sponsored
academy trust without having first consulted parents and staff.
The question asked by everyone at the meeting was why? Furness school
received a good rating by Ofsted in June this year. Oakington is currently
rated as outstanding. The two schools federated three years ago to prevent
Furness (which was then in special measures) closing or being taken over by an
academy chain such as ARK.
The audience listened to Bridget Chapman, Chair of the Anti Academies
Alliance, explain what academisation was all about – privatisation of state
education and ultimately schools to be run for profit. She spoke about the evidence
from research that showed that 13% of sponsored academies were classed as
failing yet on 3% of state schools were in this Ofsted category. Further, the
data shows a higher rate of exclusion among black and minority ethnic children in
academies and there are fewer children with special educational needs. 99
academies had received warnings from the DfE about their financial dealing and
11 academy chains had received multiple warnings. The percentage of primary
schools that have become academies is still very small and many of those have
been forced to by the DfE despite there being no evidence that academies
improve education for children, in fact the opposite. Analysis of primary school results indicates
that academy conversion actually slows progress” (Local Schools Network
research).
Jean Roberts spoke on behalf of the education unions and told the
audience how the unions had been stopped from making any presentation to staff at
the so called consultation meetings held at both schools the previous week, as
to why the education unions are united against the proposal. Staff who wanted
to hear them, were shushed and told to be quiet by Mr Jhally, Chair of
Governors of the Federation, when they protested. A motion of support for a
campaign against the academy which had been passed by the Kensal Green Labour Party
group was read out to much applause.
Mrs Libson who is the Executive headteacher of the federated schools
had told the staff consultation meetings it was because Brent had done “nothing
for the schools”. Brent LA dispute this most strongly. Jean Roberts had been
sent a copy of the Brent Audit Report for Oakington Manor in June 2015. Auditors
were unable to say that its accounts and accounting procedures were fully in
order[2].
The report stated, “The key areas of weaknesses related to high value
expenditure, income administration, stock management and pension administration”.
One of the criteria Ofsted inspects in
schools is the Governors oversight of school finances.
Janice Long a local councillor, who sent a message of support for the
campaign against an academy, asked if the imminent Ofsted may be a reason for
this rushed application.
Euton Stewart from GMB explained that in his experience the support
staff were the first to be made redundant in academies. Academies can employ
unqualified teachers, another concern of the teaching staff there. Parents
spoke about the good teachers and the education they provided for their
children at Furness and how all this change was unnecessary now the school had
been given a good by Ofsted.
There was a clear commitment to continue to
seek a secret ballot for parents and staff so that the Governors would fully know
their views. Parents will continue to collect signatures on the petition. Staff
are looking to hold meetings to discuss what they will do in response.
Labels:
Anti-Academies Alliance,
ARK,
ballot,
Bridget Chapman,
Democracy,
Furness Primary School,
governors,
Janice Long,
Oakington Manor Primary School,
Ofsted
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)