Tuesday, 12 March 2019
Carlton-Granville debate continues on Twitter
Labels:
Brent Council,
Carlton,
Deirde Woods,
Granville,
Shama Tatler,
South Kilburn
Monday, 11 March 2019
Bellowing Butt loses his cool and sees red over South Kilburn
David Kaye of Kilburn Labour Party clearly hit raw nerve when he began his speech at tonight's Cabinet Meeting. He had begun to say that a problem with the Brent Cabinet (all Labour Party members) was that they didn't, on the South Kilburn issue and others follow Labour Party policy.
Hardly were the words out of his mouth then Muhammed Butt bellowed across the room, 'THIS IS NOT A PARTY POLITICAL MEETING!' When Kaye tried to elaborate a furious Butt continued to shout him down. Eventually Kaye made his contribution moving on to the details of the South Kilburn Carlton/Granville scheme and the feeling of the local community that their views hadn't been taken into account ,and the role of the South Kilburn Trust (Watch video below)
However, in apparent contradiction of his earlier claim, at the end of the contributions from the public Cllr Butt did allow Cllr Miller to make a speech about Labour Party policy in reply to what David Kaye was not allowed to say!
In a nutshell the community wanted the Cabinet to approve Option 4 for the Carlton-Granville site which would contain community space and no housing. The Cabinet were recommending Option 3 which would build 23 social housing homes on the site. Leslie Barson thought that the combination wasn't practical and that complaints about noise from the community centre by the new neighbours would curtail its activities and make in unviable. There was less community space in the proposals then there had been before and the new developments on the estate already did not provide enough community space.
Not for the first time the issue of the South Kilburn Trust came up. Pete Firmin for the local tenants' association put it succinctly: 'The problem with the South Kilburn Trust is that South Kilburn residents don't trust it.' It had no elected representatives on its board and was not truly independent of the Council. Contrary to the views of residents it had supported the installation of an HS2 vent in Canterbury Road.
A speaker from South Kilburn Trust claimed that of the 8 trustees three were local residents and one was the former tenant of South Kilburn Studios. After the Cabinet had, inevitably, approved Option 3 there was an altercation in the public gallery when residents challenged the Trust on this claim - they were appointed, not elected, and not representative. This conflict has arisen elsewhere in the borough when such organisation appear to be a non-elected buffer between residents and councillors.
Lesley Benson, head of Granville Nursery Plus, said that the school had eventually accepted demolition of its prize winning extension as part of the development plans. She said that she was no cheer leader for the Council but they had been involved with other stake holders in an innovative way of working where 'robust' conversations had taken place.
As with the Kings Drive 'residents garages replaced by home's controversy there was a tension between the need to build new homes for those on Brent's massive waiting list and the impact of the new homes on existing residents and their facilities. Such conflicts are likely to increase as Brent Council continues its policy of in-filling on estates.
Cabinet members said they had taken notice of residents' concerns by discarding a proposal for a denser build of 63 homes on the site. Residents asked why they had not ensured that the hundreds of other homes being built on South Kilburn were not let at social rent.
As we left the Civic Centre we were surrounded by the huge blocks and towers of Quintain's unaffordable Tipi 'built for private rent' development advertised by pseudo Russian Revolution style posters...
Hardly were the words out of his mouth then Muhammed Butt bellowed across the room, 'THIS IS NOT A PARTY POLITICAL MEETING!' When Kaye tried to elaborate a furious Butt continued to shout him down. Eventually Kaye made his contribution moving on to the details of the South Kilburn Carlton/Granville scheme and the feeling of the local community that their views hadn't been taken into account ,and the role of the South Kilburn Trust (Watch video below)
However, in apparent contradiction of his earlier claim, at the end of the contributions from the public Cllr Butt did allow Cllr Miller to make a speech about Labour Party policy in reply to what David Kaye was not allowed to say!
In a nutshell the community wanted the Cabinet to approve Option 4 for the Carlton-Granville site which would contain community space and no housing. The Cabinet were recommending Option 3 which would build 23 social housing homes on the site. Leslie Barson thought that the combination wasn't practical and that complaints about noise from the community centre by the new neighbours would curtail its activities and make in unviable. There was less community space in the proposals then there had been before and the new developments on the estate already did not provide enough community space.
Not for the first time the issue of the South Kilburn Trust came up. Pete Firmin for the local tenants' association put it succinctly: 'The problem with the South Kilburn Trust is that South Kilburn residents don't trust it.' It had no elected representatives on its board and was not truly independent of the Council. Contrary to the views of residents it had supported the installation of an HS2 vent in Canterbury Road.
A speaker from South Kilburn Trust claimed that of the 8 trustees three were local residents and one was the former tenant of South Kilburn Studios. After the Cabinet had, inevitably, approved Option 3 there was an altercation in the public gallery when residents challenged the Trust on this claim - they were appointed, not elected, and not representative. This conflict has arisen elsewhere in the borough when such organisation appear to be a non-elected buffer between residents and councillors.
Lesley Benson, head of Granville Nursery Plus, said that the school had eventually accepted demolition of its prize winning extension as part of the development plans. She said that she was no cheer leader for the Council but they had been involved with other stake holders in an innovative way of working where 'robust' conversations had taken place.
As with the Kings Drive 'residents garages replaced by home's controversy there was a tension between the need to build new homes for those on Brent's massive waiting list and the impact of the new homes on existing residents and their facilities. Such conflicts are likely to increase as Brent Council continues its policy of in-filling on estates.
Cabinet members said they had taken notice of residents' concerns by discarding a proposal for a denser build of 63 homes on the site. Residents asked why they had not ensured that the hundreds of other homes being built on South Kilburn were not let at social rent.
As we left the Civic Centre we were surrounded by the huge blocks and towers of Quintain's unaffordable Tipi 'built for private rent' development advertised by pseudo Russian Revolution style posters...
Labels:
David Kaye,
Lesley Benson,
Muhammed Butt,
South Kilburn,
Tom Miller
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING - free screening of Naomi Klein's documentary Tuesday March 12th 7pm
Time: March 12, 2019 from 7pm to 10pm
Location: Kingsgate community centre, NW6 2JH
Street: 107 Kingsgate Road
City/Town: London
Website or Map: https://www.facebook.com/even…
From Transition Kensal to Kilburn
Join us for a free screening of Naomi
Klein's documentary, This Changes Everything.
Filmed over 211 shoot days in nine countries and five continents over four years, This Changes Everything is an epic attempt to re-imagine the vast challenge of climate change.
Directed by Avi Lewis, and inspired by Naomi Klein’s international non-fiction bestseller This Changes Everything, the film presents seven powerful portraits of communities on the front lines, from Montana’s Powder River Basin to the Alberta Tar Sands, from the coast of South India to Beijing and beyond.
Interwoven with these stories of struggle is Klein’s narration, connecting the carbon in the air with the economic system that put it there. Throughout the film, Klein builds to her most controversial and exciting idea: that we can seize the existential crisis of climate change to transform our failed economic system into something radically better.
After the screening we will be discussing how the struggles of our local community relate to those depicted in the film. We will reflect on the ties between us, the kind of lives we really want and why the climate crisis is at the centre of it all.
Filmed over 211 shoot days in nine countries and five continents over four years, This Changes Everything is an epic attempt to re-imagine the vast challenge of climate change.
Directed by Avi Lewis, and inspired by Naomi Klein’s international non-fiction bestseller This Changes Everything, the film presents seven powerful portraits of communities on the front lines, from Montana’s Powder River Basin to the Alberta Tar Sands, from the coast of South India to Beijing and beyond.
Interwoven with these stories of struggle is Klein’s narration, connecting the carbon in the air with the economic system that put it there. Throughout the film, Klein builds to her most controversial and exciting idea: that we can seize the existential crisis of climate change to transform our failed economic system into something radically better.
After the screening we will be discussing how the struggles of our local community relate to those depicted in the film. We will reflect on the ties between us, the kind of lives we really want and why the climate crisis is at the centre of it all.
Sunday, 10 March 2019
CIPFA shows how important Brent libraries are to residents
The CIPFA report into public libraries compares the London boroughs with each other. In these tables Brent is 'h' with a black graph block. Brent controversially closed half its libraries creating two major hub libraries at Wembley and Willesden Green and four smaller libraries. Kensal Green, Barham and Preston are run by volunteers while Cricklewood is getting increasingly impatient with developer Octavia Housing as volunteers wait to start running a volunteer library there. (Note: CIPFA do not make judgements so all comments are my own.)
As can be seen from the diagram above Brent has far fewer libraries than the average borough but a slightly higher than average population.
I have long argued that Wembley Library has vastly inflated visitor figures because the electronic counters count Civic Centre staff who use the library entrance off Olympic Way as a short cut to their offices. Apart from entering and leaving at the start and end of the day, some also enter and leave for their lunch break.
As a result although Wembley has the highest number of visitors Willesden green has the highest number of borrowers. Watch our for media claims that Wembley Library has a record number of visitors:
Due to the closures Brent has a low number of what CIPFA call service points:
Overall Brent children borrow more books than average with 5 times more fiction than non-fiction borrowed. Primary class visits to the libraries will account for some of this. Adult fiction book issues is below the average but non-fiction higher which may reflect the large number of students who use the libraries.
One area of concern is the low number of housebound readers. Some boroughs provide a delivery service, often run by volunteers, and this is something the Scrutiny Committee could investigate.
Book stocks are another measure of the quality of the service and here Brent lags. Children do better than adults which may explain the discrepancy in figures. Residents borrow more books than average even though book stocks are lower than 13 other London boroughs:
When the 'Libraries Transformation Project' was launched much was made of access to computers and other digital resources such as e-books. The figures show Brent is below the average for the number of devices available but that they are well used.
The Brent libraries website is particularly successful and ease of on-line renewal may account for the low level of overdue fines in Brent:
A proposal to reduce the opening hours for Brent libraries, and the possible complete closure of one, was ruled out after the budget consultation. CIPFA reports a very positive picture on opening hours with Brent out-performing the average for London boroughs.
The figures indicate that Brent is already spending lower than average on its libraries but it is also collecting less revenue, in terms of borrowing charges, fines and reservation fees. Given the low median income of Brent residents I would oppose an increase in charges but it may be an area that will be vulnerable in the future:
To access the full report follow this LINK
As can be seen from the diagram above Brent has far fewer libraries than the average borough but a slightly higher than average population.
I have long argued that Wembley Library has vastly inflated visitor figures because the electronic counters count Civic Centre staff who use the library entrance off Olympic Way as a short cut to their offices. Apart from entering and leaving at the start and end of the day, some also enter and leave for their lunch break.
As a result although Wembley has the highest number of visitors Willesden green has the highest number of borrowers. Watch our for media claims that Wembley Library has a record number of visitors:
Due to the closures Brent has a low number of what CIPFA call service points:
Overall Brent children borrow more books than average with 5 times more fiction than non-fiction borrowed. Primary class visits to the libraries will account for some of this. Adult fiction book issues is below the average but non-fiction higher which may reflect the large number of students who use the libraries.
One area of concern is the low number of housebound readers. Some boroughs provide a delivery service, often run by volunteers, and this is something the Scrutiny Committee could investigate.
Book stocks are another measure of the quality of the service and here Brent lags. Children do better than adults which may explain the discrepancy in figures. Residents borrow more books than average even though book stocks are lower than 13 other London boroughs:
When the 'Libraries Transformation Project' was launched much was made of access to computers and other digital resources such as e-books. The figures show Brent is below the average for the number of devices available but that they are well used.
The Brent libraries website is particularly successful and ease of on-line renewal may account for the low level of overdue fines in Brent:
A proposal to reduce the opening hours for Brent libraries, and the possible complete closure of one, was ruled out after the budget consultation. CIPFA reports a very positive picture on opening hours with Brent out-performing the average for London boroughs.
The figures indicate that Brent is already spending lower than average on its libraries but it is also collecting less revenue, in terms of borrowing charges, fines and reservation fees. Given the low median income of Brent residents I would oppose an increase in charges but it may be an area that will be vulnerable in the future:
To access the full report follow this LINK
Labels:
Brent libraries,
closures,
Cricklewood. Barham,
Kensal Rise,
Preston,
Wem bley,
Willesden Green
No Coup or War in Venezuela! Meeting on Monday March 11th Brent Trades Hall
Video: Jeff Webber speaking about the situation in Venezuela at a recent meeting with Hugo Blanco
Topical as always Brent Stop the War will be discussing what is happening in Venezuela at their meeting on Monday:
The next meeting
of BRENT STOP the WAR will take place on Monday, March
11th at 7.30pm at Brent Trades Hall
(London Apollo Club) 375 High Rd, Willesden, NW10 2JR [It’s very close to Willesden Bus Garage, buses
6,52,98,226,260,266,302,460, and just five minutes’ walk from Dollis Hill
Jubilee Line station]
Speaker: Calvin Tucker [Morning Star campaigns
manager and international election observer to the May 2018 Venezuelan
presidential elections] will be talking about the situation in
Venezuela.
Labels:
Brent Stop the War,
Calvin Tucker,
meeting,
Morning Star,
Venezuela
Friday, 8 March 2019
Granville - the South Kilburn community strikes back - Brent Cabinet urged to reject housing plans
![]() |
Author Zadie Smith (Left) spoke up for the Granville in November 2016 LINK |
These are interesting times in Brent as 'People Power' is exercised in Stonebridge/Bridge Park, St Raphael's Estate and South Kilburn. This is the letter about the Granville Centre plans as featured in this week's Brent and Kilburn Times. LINK
To
Brent Council Cabinet:
Please keep the Granville/Carlton
site for use by the community and run by the community
The Granville Carlton buildings
were built for the purpose of serving the South Kilburn community. The Carlton
as a school in 1910, which later became an adult education centre and closed in
Spring 2017.
The Granville was built in
1888 as a community centre and place of refuge, respite and learning for
the poor of the area. The Granville had a strong arts direction from
the 1980s. It was well used as part of Brent Youth and Community Service
hosting over 800 children and young people a year in arts activities. This
service was closed in March 2016.
The building was left to The
Otherwise Club and The Granville Community Kitchen to steward. It was filled
with community and educational activities, exercise classes, award winning food
related activities and fun. In August 2017 the South Kilburn Trust took over
responsibility for running the Granville. After renovations, the
building re- opened in May 2018 as an enterprise hub and community
centre.
South Kilburn itself is
in the throes of major changes with huge building works with Gloucester site
being built, the Peel site about to be started, the Winterlees site in
consultation and work on the HS2 vent started. The new buildings do not have
community meeting spaces in them as the buildings being demolished
did. This leaves Granville/Carlton as the only non-denominational
community buildings in the area.
There are 2400 plus new homes
planned to be built in South Kilburn. Where are these people going to do an
exercise class? Where will they hold their parents 50th wedding
anniversary party? Where can children and young people outside of school
go to socialise and learn in a space that’s safe? Where will marginalised
groups of people go to a place where they feel welcomed and not judged because
they have been in prison, or mentally ill or because they are poor or hungry
? You can see the need for the community space.
The building already functions as
a community hub offering social and welfare services which will be greatly
affected or lost.
In this new plan you are being
asked to agree to there is a slight increase in square footage but that is a
nod to new community space being built, with the 3 community spaces separated
by some distance. Nor does it take into account the community hall lost in
2018. The housing aspect of this plan is said by the Regeneration team to be
minimal (25-30 homes)and cannot be guaranteed to be social or even affordable housing
as there are so few planned now. The cost of building may necessitate that they
all be sold on the open market.
How will these two necessary but
incompatible uses of these spaces play out into the future? Already South
Kilburn Trust, who manage The Granville, have had numerous complaints from
residents of Granville New Homes on Granville Road about the noise from the
community centre. The community activities had to quieten down as the residents
have priority now. Do you believe the needs of community groups using
community spaces on the site will be prioritised above the needs of home
owners?
We see this site as a place for
community activities only and exclusively. In fact we argue that given the
number of new people moving into the area and the loss of community rooms this
community space is even more vital.
This housing is likely to be
the beginning of the end of community use on the site. If you agree to this
plan you are going against a decision you took in December 2016 only two
years ago when you voted to save Granville/Carlton as spaces used for
the community.
The Granville/Carlton site must be
kept solely for the community in perpetuity. For this reason we would like to
present a different scenario for the Granville/Carlton site.
We would like to ask that the
Cabinet support the local community and community groups to establish a
Granville/ Carlton Alliance run by the community and stakeholders in South
Kilburn to oversee these buildings for the community in perpetuity. This would
be a self financing organisation which is viable, credible, transparent and
accountable to the South Kilburn community. There is precedent for this in
other communities.
We would not tear down the wing
of Granville built in 2005 that is still perfectly viable with happy tenants.
We would not build housing on 2/3 of the Granville building going against
cabinet promises made to safeguard Carlton and Granville in 2016. We would
return the Granville hall to its rightful place as the centre piece of both
these buildings. We would ensure the use of these buildings will support a
community to feel proud about itself and glad to be a part of.
We ask you to please reject this
plan and work with the communities of South Kilburn towards a long lasting
legacy, by preserving the Granville/Carlton site as the heart of the South
Kilburn Community.
Yours sincerely,
Leslie Barson
The Otherwise Club and Granville Community Kitchen
Deirdre
Woods The Otherwise Club and
Granville Community Kitchen
Cllr A
Abdi , Kilburn, Brent
Sara
Callaway, BAME officer, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP
Pete
Firmin, Alpha, Gorefield and Canterbury Tenant’s and Residents Association.
David
Kaye , Chair Kilburn (Brent) Branch Labour Party
Carlton
& Granville Centres Site – South Kilburn Development Options 1-4
1.0
Option 1
53 units
provided meeting a mixture of housing tenure to meet a section of the community
which may not be catered for in the existing South Kilburn programme this would
include:
9 Family Homes. Affordable Housing for medium to large
families
18 units
for the New Accommodation for Independent living initiative for those who have
extra care or support needs, arranged in 3 co-living clusters.
15 Move-On Homes for single people who are homeless or
on the housing waiting list
11
Down-size/accessible homes aimed at elderly residents already in South Kilburn
wishing to down-size.
2.0
Option 2
53 units
provided all of one tenure.
Having
met with the Operational Director for Adult Social Care to discuss the NAIL
programme in further detail this site could be ideally suited to accommodate
the biggest demand in this service from older people needing extra care.
This
NAIL programme is still to deliver 400 of the required homes in a bid to
provide a replacement for residential care. This is known to be the biggest
revenue savings programme at Brent Council, and something we could accommodate
on this site.
External
community activity is an excellent fit for these residents and there would be
an excellent blend of services in the activities already happening in The
Granville for older people and the day time services sought by this section of
the community. Benefits may also be found between this and the children’s
services on site.
The
minimum number of units this scheme would need to provide is 40 plus accommodation
for care staff to cover the night time care required.
3.0
Option 3 (Recommended)
Approximately
23 units delivered in response to some of the consultation responses. This
option endorses the principle of a less dense scheme whilst still achieving the
benefits housing provides on a site, specifically community safety with 24
hours passive surveillance of the outdoor spaces below.
A
reduction in housing presented on this option will responds to the community
concerns on scale of development and residential impact on this community site.
It also resolves technical issues regarding the build and management of the
space and should provide a more acceptable level of development as the taller
housing element is removed from this option
It
should be recognised that viability will have to be worked through and some
private housing may be required however the preference is for affordable units.
4.0
Option 4
No
housing delivered as part of the longer term plans this option would still
require refurbishment of the existing buildings for community and enterprise
use. Financial impacts would need to be further considered.
FULL REPORT TO CABINET HERE
-->
Labels:
Brent Council,
cabinet,
Carlton,
Granville,
The Otherwise Club
Thursday, 7 March 2019
No coup or war in Venezuela! Meeting Monday March 11th - Brent Trades Hall
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)