Lilburne Walk, St Raphael's Estate
An applicant who applied to run a childcare
and tuition centre in a Brent Council shop front property on St Raphael’s
Estate was told that her application
“very strong” and “came a close second”, to another proposal. That proposal was chosen
because it “aligned more closely” with Brent’s strategies and objectives.
That application was for an off-licence.
The unsuccessful applicant
said she was struggling to see how this was a better strategic fit than a family
run childcare and education service business.
The Metropolitan Police had initially raised concerns about the
succesful application, highlighting risks to all four licensing objectives.
Her application outlined a
safe, community-focused offer including childcare, tuition, school pick-ups and
holiday activities. Residents are now raising serious concerns about the impact
of an off-licence between two playgrounds, beside a mosque and opposite a
community centre.
She asked:
What strategic criteria were
used to assess the bid?
How an off-licence was
deemed more aligned with those priorities than a childcare/education use?
Whether Social Value scoring
or likely licensing impacts were considered?
Her concerns and call for transparency have now been taken up by the community group st Raphael's Voice who have issued a formal complaint to the Brent Council:
FORMAL COMPLAINT AND STRONG
OBJECTION TO THE COMMERCIAL TENANCY DECISION FOR 67 LILBURNE WALK, ST RAPHS
ESTATE,NW10 0TW
I am writing to register a
formal complaint and express my profound disappointment and strong objection to
the decision regarding the tenancy at the commercial premises at 67 Lilburne
Walk, St Raphs Estate.
This letter serves as notice
that the community demands a comprehensive, independent review of the
commercial tender process itself, entirely separate from the alcohol licensing
application process.
The community asserts it was
fundamentally failed by the council's initial process due to a distinct and
unacceptable lack of meaningful engagement with residents during the critical
decision-making phase of the tenancy agreement.
The formal licensing
application process, while a necessary stage, was a retrospective measure to
address concerns, not a proactive consultation on the type of business that
would best serve our estate. This approach is a clear failure in due process
and community engagement, as a community we have battled with years of ASB,
drink and drug fuelled violence. This could potentially undo much of the
hardwork we have done to ensure we create thriving communities, give our
children the best start in life, and live healthier lives.
Our objections are rooted in
specific, tangible risks to public safety, public health, and the failure to secure
community social value, all of which are material considerations that appear to
have been inadequately weighted against pure commercial viability.
1.Public Safety and Crime
& Disorder Hotspot:
St Raph's Estate is a
historically identified "crime and disorder hotspot," an area that
has been contending with significant alcohol and drug-fuelled antisocial
behaviour, including (VWAG) violence towards women and girls. The introduction
of an off-licence, one of four in the immediate vicinity, directly undermines
the council's own stated priority of community safety and has the potential to
exacerbate these existing issues, particularly given the premises' proximity to
two playgrounds, a place of worship and community centre. These material
concerns were raised by multiple "responsible authorities" including
local residents, the Metropolitan Police, residents association, local
foodbank, St Patricks church, local mosques, and youth club. The council
appears to have disregarded the professional and local expertise on this
critical issue.
2. Failure to Prioritize
Social Value and Council Objectives:
The alternative proposal for
a childcare and tuition centre would have directly and demonstrably supported
the council's social objectives outlined in the Brent Borough Plan: Prosperity
and Stability in Brent, A Cleaner, Greener Future, Thriving Communities, The
Best Start in Life, and A Healthier Brent. By prioritising an off-licence, the
council has bypassed a vital community asset that aligns with these strategic goals,
failing to give social value, public health, and public safety equal weight to
commercial considerations.
3. Demand for a Separate,
Independent Tender Review:
The community formally
requests that the decision-making process for the commercial tenancy at 67
Lilburne Walk be subjected to a separate, independent review. This review must
scrutinise:
- The criteria used in the
tender selection.
-
How community and
stakeholder input was gathered and, critically, utilised before the tenancy
decision was made.
-
The weighting given to
social value and public safety over commercial viability.
This must be a distinct
process from the ongoing or completed alcohol licensing application, as the
tenancy decision and licensing decision are separate legal matters, each requiring
independent scrutiny.
We urge the Council to act
transparently and responsibly by reviewing this flawed decision-making process
to ensure that robust community engagement is a fundamental, early, and
decisive step in all future commercial tenancy agreements. We expect a formal
response outlining the steps the council will take to initiate this independent
review
Yours Sincerely,
Asif Zamir