Thursday, 23 January 2025

Kensal Green residents oppose the demolition and redevelopment of Victorian community centre building in Hazel Road

 

The present Victorian era community centre

The proposed new building
 
 

 The current  building in the setting of Hazel Road, Harrow Road and Kensal Green Cemetery

 

Kensal Green Residents' Association are opposing the demolition of the Hazel Road Community Centre (Harriet Tubman House) in Hazel Road that was built between 1890 and 1896 as a Mission but severed several different uses over the years. It is a well known and well loved building in the local area and creates a unique ambience.

The current owners, the 'Making The Leap' charity, have applied to demolish the Centre and erect a new, higher building, on the site.

 This is what the Kilburn Green Residents have to say about the proposal:


DEMOLITION OF HAZEL ROAD COMMUNITY CENTRE

 

We are concerned by the proposal by ‘Making The Leap’ to demolish Kensal Green Community Centre at 28 Hazel Road and replace it with an office block. ‘Making the Leap’ wish to start the work in spring this year and have submitted their planning application to Brent. The link is below. Any comments on their plans must be made by Thursday 13th February 2025 LINK:

 

Here are a few bullet points raised by residents in regard to ‘Making The Leap’s proposal:

 

  • The office block, as described, would consist of over four floors, but with each of the upper three floors being one-and-a-half times higher than the base floor. Furthermore, there is a fifth-floor structure, a black box on the roof, which appears in the plans to be as high as the base floor, so effectively it will be a six-storey office block. The proposed development would tower over the surrounding terraced streets dominating Hazel Road and our park, Hazel Road Open Space, and staff and clients of ‘Making The Leap’ would be able to look down into neighbouring houses, and down into the children’s play area in the park. 'Making The Leap' even acknowlege in their planning application that feedback from residents shows that: "Some are worried over the building’s height affecting nearby homes or that the building is too imposing." Their own survey indicates there will be reduction of between 23.9% and 36.5% sunlight to the homes opposite the new building which means a daylight distribution below the recommended level of 80%. The light surveyors also say they couldn't access the properties for their tests so the situation could be even worst for those poor residents. 

 

 

  • One of the planning illustrations shows a paved walk-way from Harrow Road to the new building which will divide the park. It doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the text. 
     

 

  • In the architectural representation on Making The Leap’s website, the height of the terraced houses opposite the proposed development and the trees in the open space appeared to be artificially exaggerated to downplay the office block’s scale. However, the reality is clear: this is a case of over-development in an already highly developed area. We assumed that Brent planning regulations restrict construction that exceeds the roofline of existing housing. Additionally, the proposed office block’s lightweight permeable façade, which will resemble painted cardboard, is completely out of character with the neighbourhood’s predominantly red brick construction. 'Making The Leap's own extension to the Community Centre is even described in their own planning application as "an unsympathetic feature". The new build will have the same texture.
     

 

  • Making The Leap have allowed the current building’s façade to fall into disrepair, claiming they lack the funds for maintenance. This raises questions about their ability to finance a large-scale office block. There is a genuine fear that, should Hazel Road Community Centre be demolished, that the site might be left undeveloped for years, becoming a blight on the community, or sold off to developers, as has happened in other parts of Brent.

 

  • Hazel Road Community Centre holds historical and architectural value. Originally built as a Victorian Mission Room between 1890 and 1896, it has a unique facade with alternating brick patterns, gothic style window openings and gables that are integral to its unique façade. The Heritage Statement in the planning application states that 'the Site was nominated for addition to the Brent Local List and as such may be considered a non-designated heritage asset. However, since nomination the Site does not appear to have been added to the Local List.' An investigation should be undertaken to find out why the building wasn't listed, especially as The Victorian Society is now considering listing it among its top ten endangered Victorian buildings of 2025. The horse trough across the road outside The Mason's Arms is Grade II listed. The demolition of the Community Centre would represent a significant loss to the architectural heritage of Kensal Green.
     
Placing an office block in the middle of a residential area will put pressure on residents’ parking spaces. Parking bays are already earmarked for closure during the demolition and building work. 



Please email us at kensalgreenres@gmail.com  if you would be happy to help us to leaflet the neighbourhood and/or be part of an Action Committee. Any feedback will be welcome. We hope to shortly organise a public meeting. 
 

 Editor's note:  The Heritage statement is by a consultancy and is not an assessment by the Brent Council Heritage Officer. I cannot find a response from the Heritage Officer on the Brent Planning Portal.

7 comments:

Philip Grant said...

The Editor's Note at the end of the article above mentions Brent Council's Heritage Officer.

I discovered at the end of December that Mark Price, who had been that Principal (and only!) Heritage Officer, has now left Brent Council.

He has not yet been replaced, but Brent Council is currently advertising that post, with a salary of just over £50k a year, and applications required by 2 February 2025. When I "clicked" on the job advert on the Council's website, a "window" invited me to 'be the first to apply' (but my days of full-time employment are over).

The Job Description says this about The Post:

'The historic environment makes a substantial contribution to the character and distinctiveness of Brent as a place. We are recruiting an experienced heritage professional to support the protection, conservation and enhancement of the borough’s designated and non-designated assets. As a key member of the Placemaking team, you will principally act as a statutory consultee to provide expert heritage and conservation advice as part of the planning process. You will also work across a number of other teams and departments to provide heritage and conservation input on masterplans, site allocations and planning briefs.

Brent has a varied built heritage. From the iconic Wembley Stadium to the Shri Swaminarayan Mandir in Neasden, and a wealth of historic buildings, sites and monuments in between, there is a lot to be celebrated in the borough. A range of architectural styles can be found across Brent, but it is best known for the vast swathes of ‘Metroland’ style suburbs laid out along the Metropolitan Railway in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

You will be responsible for ensuring that the growth, management and regeneration of the borough is character-led through a range of heritage-related workstreams and projects, as well as seeking new ventures through grant funding or revenue generating opportunities.'

I don't know why Mark Price left his post, but I don't believe he found the attitude of Brent's planners and decision makers lived up to the fine words about 'the protection, conservation and enhancement of the borough’s designated and non-designated assets'!

Anonymous said...

London Borough of B~ent

Anonymous said...

Making The Leap Charity are reprehensible wanting to destroy a local heritage building and put a block of flats on top. If this isnt a lister building there is still time to register it as such

Anonymous said...

Direct south (east- west) is Europe's biggest regeneration area OPDC 650 ha/ Kendal Canalside/ and the much wider Great Western City Tower Hundreds. Good to see the existing local community is wide awake. Maybe a look at Carlton Granville Centre in regen year 24, where beautiful main Edwardian community hall had a giant staircase cut in the centre of it to disable it and was then partitioned up into tiny enterprise units using GLA funds. Units could have been located many other places rather than destroy the main community hall heritage.

Anonymous said...

As a resident of a road leading off it, if this development were to improve the wider Hazel Road area - currently a "Hamsterdam" of drug use and intimidating/antisocial behaviour - I'd be all for it.

I feel unsafe walking along Hazel Road after dark, and reluctant to take children to the play area in the day. The pedestrianised section of Hazel Road, partially in front of the building it's being proposed to replace, is always full of drug users and intimidating drinkers (who sometimes cause a nuisance to children in the play area). It's also dark and largely concealed by bushes which makes it more intimidating. The road either side of it us often full of people revving cars and playing loud music. The park that surrounds the building, and the play area, is no better; ditto the benches around the football/basketball court.

Anonymous said...

The charity has done this on purpose, neglected it to encourage people to agree to let them develop the site

Anonymous said...

Who are “making the leap” what do we know about them, their directors and activities? Will the editor interview them