Brent Clinical Commissioning Group (Brent CCG) at its meeting on December 5th is likely to go ahead with a proposal to move from Wembley Centre for Health and Care in Chaplin Road, to Brent Civic Centre. Brent Council already lets out two floors in the Civic Centre to external organisations and is due to cut their staff further in the next budget. The report going before the CCG states:
The CCG
has expressed an interest to be co-located with Brent Council in its Civic
Centre (subject to affordability and commercial terms). Equally Brent Council
is extremely keen and supportive of this move and fully recognises the
opportunities for greater collaboration that co-locating would bring.
The
current HQ premises are spread across the Wembley Centre for Health and Care
site with staff working in silos largely within cellular offices. This is not
an efficient use of space nor does it foster cohesive working arrangements.
Releasing
space at the Wembley Centre for Health and Care, under the NHS Property
Services vacant space policy, potentially creates an opportunity to reduce CCG
running costs. Strategically this also supports the future aspirations for the
site to become an out of hospital hub, appropriately sized and fit for purpose.
There are
76 staff working at Brent CCG, the accommodation on offer at Brent Civic Centre
is 48 dedicated desks together with shared offices and breakout areas. This
move would require the CCG to adopt the NWL Agile Working Policy which
recommends a staff to desk ratio of between 6:10 and 7:10. The proposal
complies with the policy with a ratio of 6.3:10. The CCG is required to reduce
its office accommodation and desk allocation across its estate; as such this
proposal is in line with the overall strategic direction being adopted across
NWL.
Current
estimated project costs are £85,500 to be covered from existing revenue
funding.
There is
an annual saving to Brent CCG of £446,000 generated by moving to Brent Civic
Centre.
The walk-out of schoolchildren in Australia, protesting against government inaction on climate change (video below), reminded me of various school children's protests in this country over the years. Back in 1911 there were school children's strikes at a time of widepsread militancy and their demands included ending corporal punishment LINK.
The walkout above, in 1988, was by Neasden High School pupils who marched to protest at Brent Town Hall. Neasden High School was in Quainton Street and according to local historians was partly created to absorb Asian refugees families. The school was closed and demolished in 1989. More recently there were walk-outs by secondary school students over the Iraq war.
30 years after this protest the NEU is balloting for possible strike action over the government's failure to fully fund the recent pay increase and teachers, parents, headteachers and schoolchildren are protesting over the cuts in education funding. Some of the children in the news report may well now have their own children who are affected by the current round of cuts.
A legal battle is on between Brent Council and the Afro-Caribbean community of Stonebridge, Harlesden and Monks Park over the future of Bridge Park. The centre is part of a Council redevelopment project that includes the long-empty Unisys building. It is much more than a legal battle - it is a battle for the beating heart of the local community.
Wembley Matters has covered the dodgy nature of some of Brent Council's partners in their development scheme and this was reinforced by trenchant criticism of the Council by the late Dan Filson. LINKLINK
Young visionaries in what was then a bus depot
Bridge Park was set up by young black people in the 80s at a time of the uprisings. It is part of black heritage in the borough that came from the grassroots, just as the Stonebridge Adventure Playground, closed by the council, also had its roots in the community and amongst the young.
A community group, Bridge Park Community Council, set up to save the centre from the council plans have put forward their own alternative which is rooted in the community and continues the original ethos of Bridge Park when the Harlesden People's Community Council organised to purchase the old bus depot:
BPCC successfully appealed to the Land Registry over the sale of the land and it was blocked but now the council is fighting back through legal action.
A fundraising campaign is now underway to take the council on: LINK and there is a petition of to stop the sale and return control and development of the Bridge Park site to the community HERE
BPCC's short-term plan is:
(a) To show the “London Borough of Brent” that we have an interest in
the land, and to therefore suspend the sale of the Land and
property referred to as “Bridge Park Community Leisure Centre”.
(b) To secure the Community interest in the Land and property by means of legal, public and political action.
(c) To develop a self-sustaining Centre of Excellence providing
educational, Technology, social, well-being and commercial facilities.
(d) To encourage Brent Council and all parties to engage with BPCC in
peaceful timely negotiation (ADR), Mediation or Arbitration as opposed
to costly litigation with a view of coming to an agreement in relation
to the Community’s control and interest in the said Land and Property.
EMPOWERING OUR COMMUNITY
WE NEED YOU...!!!!
THANK YOU FOR CONTINUED SUPPORT TO SAVE BRIDGE PARK LAND & COMPLEX
*FIRSTLY - BRIDGE PARK IS NOT SOLD.
Bridge
Park Community Council as successor to HPCC established Bridge Park
Complex Steering Group, to protect the interest, control and development
of the Bridge Park Land and Properties for the community.
In
the 1980s, HPCC, founded by a group of young 16-20 year olds, who
followed their vision and desire to serve the community, and to ensure
that the young men and women growing up in Stonebridge, N.W London had
facilities and opportunities to empower them to succeed. They bought
the land supported by sourced grant funding of £1.8m.
They
raised a further £3m+ along backing to design and build the current
Bridge Park Complex seen today. The original vision was for the creation
of educational, commercial business units, sports and multi-purpose
facilities. The land is estimated to be worth over £50 million on the
open market.
In order for HPCC to obtain the funds, Brent Council
acted as custodians ONLY: with no right to sell, transfer or dispose of
the land, acquired by the community for the community. The Bridge Park
site had a protective covenant on the land. Brent Council officers
removed the covenant prior to February 2014. The community were not
informed. [Wembley Matters here is the LINK to the report to the Brent Executive in June 2013 which states: The Bridge Park site had a covenant on it that sports and
community uses should be protected and around half of any value of any
development would have to paid to the LB Bromley (as successor body to the
GLC). However officers have successfully re moved this covenant.]
-->
Experienced Lawyers, (DWFM Beckman, London) have been
engaged, and advice has been taken from a Senior Counsel, specialising
in this area of Law and Chancery.
*Brent Council entered into the
Conditional Land Sale Agreement with General Mediterranean Holding
(GMH) as guarantor, for the sale of the Bridge Park Complex in June
2017. A strict condition of the sale is that the land must be free of
all interests. Brent Council plan to allow development worth over £800
million on the land, but aim to sell off the Land and 42x Business
Units, 2x restaurants, Bar, 2x Gyms, full size In-door Basketball and
Badmintons Courts, plus Multi-faith centre and Nursery buildings all
this for less than £13 million Brent will not fully disclose the lower
price. THIS DID NOT GO TO TENDER !!!
HPCC in association with successor's BPCC Steering Group and S.C. Trust (HPCC) Ltd the land.
An
application to the Land Registry to restrict Brent Council, to stop the
Sale of Bridge Park was made in August 2017, through our lawyers.
Brent Council have been given an extension of 30 days to file their documents to challenge this restriction.
***** WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT *****
Our community needs a lot more than a Gym & Swimming Pool.
We
will build an iconic Centre of Excellence for The Community by The
Community. Addressing our Educational, Social and Commercial needs. And
most of all it will be self funded and sustained.
A land mark building upon which we can take pride in.
Come and get involved - Sign the petition against Brent Council's plans
WE NEED our community building to be kept in the hands of the COMMUNITY in PERPETUITY!!
Help us to raise the much needed funds for the legal challenge to halt the sale of Bridge Park.
WE NEED TO FIRST RAISE THE INITIAL £10,000 OF THE £25,000 FOR OUR LEGAL DEPOSIT, TO FIGHT OUR CASE IN THE HIGH COURT, LONDON.
The officers' report to the Brent Executive in June 2013 stated:
Our officers have carried out a new Equality Analysis.
There are a number of important conclusions. The first is that Bridge Park has
been important in serving an important part of Brent’s Afro-Caribbean community.
Removing the sports centre would strongly negatively impact on this group. The
area has one of the strongest increase in under 5’s in the whole of Brent. Over
88,000 of the 447,000 people within a three mile catchment of the centre are
under 16 years of age (20% compared with a borough average of 16%). The starter
business units that would not be replaced do have a high proportion of people from
Afro-caribbean background.
Wembley Matters has approached Brent Council for a comment on how the possible extension of Tottenham Hotspur's use of Wembley Stadium up to May 2019 would affect the timetble for removal of the stadium pedway and its replacement by steps. The request was made more than a week ago and despite reminders no answer has been received. The works already had a tight schedule and would not take place on event days, so an increase in the number of event days will obviously make an impact. The Minutes of the Planning Commitee meeting of September, where the steps application was unanimously approved states:
Members heard that the
steps were intended to be in place for 2020 when Brent would become
the Borough of Culture and Wembley National Stadium would host
European Nations League finals.
Wembley is scheduled to host seven Euro 2020 games including the final LINK
The works schedule is formidable:
The
delivery of the project can be split into three main construction phases:
•Phase
1 – Site Preparation and Substructure Works;
•Phase
2 – Pedway Demolition and Construction of Steps;
•Phase
3 – Landscaping and Fit Out.
.6.62
Phase 1 - The initial work activity will focus on clearing the site below
and around the Pedway of those utilities and other items that will obstruct the
Pedway demolition and subsequent staircase construction. As areas become clear,
works to the foundations and substructure of the steps will commence.
•6.63
The foundations to the steps will be constructed in and around the
existing Pedway structure in advance of its demolition. Therefore, there will
be a need to utilise small/specialist plant, such as restricted access piling
rigs that will be able to access the low headroom areas beneath the existing
Pedway to construct the piles.
•6.64
Phase 2 - This phase will commence within an agreed window of time to
minimise the impact to WNSL. The first stage of demolition will focus on
removing the Pedway structure from the area of the new staircase construction.
Once this is removed, the demolition will focus on removing the remainder of
the Pedway (as it runs across Engineers Way towards Olympic Way and Wembley
Park station north of the Stadium). A road closure of Engineers Way will be
required whilst the Pedway is removed across the carriageway area (details as
to the number and timeframes required for the road closures are not yet
available but will be agreed, at the proper time, with the Council).
•6.65
The construction of the staircase is anticipated to be a combination of
pre-cast and cast in- situ concrete. It is anticipated that the bridge podium
section that will connect to the Stadium will be cast in-situ and the staircase
will be formed from precast structural elements. The staircase is of a modular
construction and will follow a step by step process that will be prescribed by
the designer and supplier. Throughout this phase of heavy lifting it may be
necessary to have lane closure on Engineers Way to facilitate easy delivery and
unloading of the precast elements. Pedestrian management will be a key feature
of this phase to maintain safety exclusion zones around the works.
•6.66
Phase 3 - The fit out of the staircase undercroft will commence as soon
as all overhead working is complete and it is safe to do so. The final
landscaping will be constructed during the WNSL events season. Ahead of this
phase there will be agreed processes and access routes to limit the level of
non-working and disrupted time (as has been managed through the delivery of the
Olympic Way Zone A works).
•6.67
The construction of the landscaping and public realm works will be
undertaken in two sections that will run concurrently: Olympic Way (from the
boundary of the Zone A works) to Engineers Way and the Olympic Steps area
comprising land south of Engineers Way to the Stadium.
More than a week ago I reported on the collapse of Allied Healthcare, providers of adult social care in Brent and across the country. LINK
I contacted Brent Council Press Office to ask what contingency plans had been put in place for Brent recipients of their care. I had no response, despite several phone calls and email reminders, the latest yesterday.
However, yesterday evening at Brent Council, Cllr Farah, lead member for adult social care, announced that Allied was responsible for 94 residents and, with the situation regarding the company still unclear, Brent Council would today be implementing their contigency plan - although he gave no details of what that plan was. Presumably the clients will be transferred to other providers but it would be important to know what steps are being taken to ensure continuity of care, including if possible retention of carers with whom people would have built a trusting relationship.
The exchange between Andrew Marr and Shami Chakrabarti hit the headlines a few weeks ago on account of Marr's sudden and aggressive 'Don't patronise me' comment as he waved his notes towards her. I was moved to put an official complaint into the BBC and have now had a response. The BBC reveal that after the interview, and presumably after the social media reaction, Marr contacted Chakrabarti to say it was only 'robust' questioning.
My complaint summary: unprofessional
behaviour amounting to bullying
Full Complaint: The moment when Andrew Marr interviewing Shami Chakrabarti
exclaimed 'Don't patronise me' and left her visibly shaken. In my view losing
his temper in this way and adopting an intimidating tone amounted to bullying
and sexism; revealing bias against intelligent, young women who stand up for
themselves. Such behaviour was not evident in his interviews on the same
programme with male politicians.
BBC Response
Andrew used his interview with Shami
Chakrabarti, Shadow Attorney General, to explore Labour’s position on the draft
Brexit withdrawal agreement negotiated by the Prime Minister. The Labour
leadership have said they don’t support this deal. Andrew sought to clarify
what areas of this deal Labour had issue with, what they would seek from an
alternative agreement and the logistics of how they would achieve this.
When interviewing any politician from any party, Andrew’s intention is to
scrutinise their position on any given issue. Andrew didn’t intend anything
other than to robustly question Baroness Chakrabarti on the proposed Brexit
deal. He contacted her to make this clear afterwards.
Hi Martin, I received the Winter edition of ‘Your
Voice’ the magazine for Brent Council’s tenants and leaseholders this morning
and noticed that 5 out of 6 key performance targets had gone down, as they are
highlighted in red.
The council told me and other residents that we would see a remarkable
transformation in the delivery of services following the transfer from BHP 14
months ago. I assumed they were going to get better but as their own
statistics show, they are nosediving. e.g. The target for Estate Inspections in
2018/19 is 100% but their performance is rated at 48%.
Maybe you might like to ask the council, why are they performing so badly?
The next Housing Scrutiny committee meets this week and you could ask the
chair Cllr. Long what has gone so badly wrong? Could it be that the council
misled us at the consultation meetings to get us to vote to take the services
in-house. I attended the session at the Willesden Library and ‘my table’
was hosted by Cllr. Butt and I remember him saying, “BHP were useless at
managing repairs” but it seems the council are even worse
