The last Cabinet of these dying days of the current Brent Labour adminstration is set to approve the extremely far-reaching Neasden Stations Growth Area Masterplan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) following consultation.
Very little has been changed as the result of the consultation and the Council's responses make it clear that the designation of the area as a tall building zone will limit what tweaking may be done on individual planning applications within the scheme.
The Severn Way and Selbie Residents Association, who occupy the island of low rise housing between the two high-rise sites (see the middle of the image above) are clearly worried about their future, especially the mention of compulsory purchase orders. I am not sure that the Council's response will allay their fears:
It is
recognised that the inclusion of Severn Way and Selbie Avenue properties
within the site allocation may be of concern to
existing residents.
However, the borough's housing
needs and targets set in the London Plan are very high
compared to historic levels. This, together with national
policies and those within the London Plan, which promote the
most effective use of land near railway stations, has meant
that the Council has had to consider the potential of
sites with higher levels of public accessibility in the borough to
be used much more intensively.
The existing and potential public
transport improvements in this area, together with the
obvious availability of large areas of land around the stations
for redevelopment, has resulted in the identification of
the Neasden Stations
Growth Area. This is not unlike
numerous other parts of the borough where people
currently live, which from a planning policy perspective, are
acceptable for redevelopment for more intensive
residential development.
Currently, as set out in the SPD,
it is not considered likely in the short to medium term that
the Selbie Avenue/ Severn Way estate will come
forward for comprehensive redevelopment. Although many of
the homes are still owned by the Council, other sites
are more of a priority for delivering greater intensity of
use of land to accommodate much needed affordable homes. The
Council in regeneration schemes at South
Kilburn has engaged with occupiers and leaseholders
throughout the renewal process. It has offered better
quality homes for tenants and options for leaseholders
either on-site or through financial compensation that more
than adequately addresses needs. The Council will
always look to work with existing tenants/ property
owners to effectively address any issues through
co-operation and agreement, rather than the compulsory
purchase alternative, which is rarely used. The allocation in
the Local Plan and the development that comes forward on
adjacent sites is likely to increase property values
considerably above those that currently exist as the area's
potential is realised, to the benefit of existing property owners.
Section 7 on Delivery shows the
phasing plan from 0 to 20+ years within NSGA. However,
the phasing plan in section 7 will be updated to show
the timeline for the short/medium and long term.
Pinnacle Investment, the likely developers for the College of North West London, Dudden Hill site, seem keen to limit commitments:
[We] Support overriding vision for growth and principles set out
within the SPD. The SPD should clarify that the delivery of
high-density development within this identified Growth Area is
not linked or dependent on the delivery of this infrastructure
project. (Such as the West London Orbital) as it already benefits from
excellent transport links. Support the need for infrastructure
identified in the SPD and interested in engaging with
residents to establish infrastructure priorities. Supportive of
the principles set out within the SPD.
The SPD should clarify and explain that the indicative figures
stated for each site are not intended to guide or limit the
development amount and opportunity. The guidance should
not be overly prescriptive and refer to “two 0.2ha pocket
parks”. This requirement has not been informed by a detailed
feasibility study and there are other relevant planning policies
regarding the appropriate quantum of open space and
communal space.
Remove reference to the need to deliver health infrastructure removed unless there is a clear known need.
A District Heating Network is also queried. Although a medium-term sustainable option it is also affected by the current energy situation in that the energy cap does not apply to residents served by such systems.
Pam Laurance suggested:
Access to their own outdoor space. Range of different kind ofgreen space catering to different user groups, kids, youth,adults. Places for people to meet; pubs, bars, laundrettes, parents and toddler groups etc.
And did get a positive response:
We acknowledge the suggestions made regarding the kind of spaces and need for focused community activities. We will include these suggestions within the character area section that showcases future characteristics of the area.
Please note that all development proposals on individual sites are subject to statutory consultation as they come forward for planning determination. This will be an opportunity for you to provide further feedback on the detailed proposals.
Pam was less successful in her comment that the housing provided should be truly affordable with enough space:
The draft SPD Section 6.4 Development principles -DP4 New and affordable homes set out recommendations based on London Plan Policy H4 Delivering Affordable Housing and Brent Local Plan Policy BH5 Affordable Housing. Any development coming forward must adhere to the policy requirements set out in the London Plan and Brent Local Plan on affordability and mixed tenure developments
This restates the status quo that has been far from satisfactory.
The decision the Cabinet will take on Monday, without any meaningful public debate, will have far reaching consequences for the people of the borough over the next 20 years or so.
The full report on the consultation with the Council's responses can be found here:
https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/documents/s120905/09a.%20Appendix%201%20-%20NSGA%20Final%20Consultation%20Report.pdf
The full Masterplan is here:
https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/documents/s120914/09b.%20Appendix%202%20-%20NSGA%20Masterplan%20SPD.pdf
