If you care about our health services Sunday's meeting at Unity Centre is a must!

 

Nothing in the London Road development for Brent people says Cllr Saqib Butt - then votes for it

 

Slide shown at Planning Committee showing the site of the 8 shops on London Road in the foreground and Wembley Central flats behind them.

The two new blocks

Wednesday's Planning Committee was a curious affair with at one time, despite the developer and officers explaining several times why the two proposed mid-rise blocks (6 and 7-storey) on London Road should not be higher (overbearing, over-shadowing, reduced daylight and sunlight,) Cllr Liz Dixon  insisting that they should be higher.  Her idea was that if they were higher the developer would be able to provide some affordable housing (there is none in the development) - an argument she has used before without quoting evidence in terms of financial viability.

The case of Cllr Saqib Butt, vice chair of the Planning Commitete and brother of Cllr Muhammed Butt, leader of Brent Council was interesting. He had obviously read the documentation thoroughly and as you can see from the footage below found much wrong with the planning application:

 

 He finishes by saying:

There is nothing here for our Brent residents that is a positive I can find, apart from market rents which our residents will not be able to afford.

As on other occasions his contribution contains a careful assessment that would lead you to think he would vote against a proposal. However, as has also happened before, he voted in SUPPORT of the application.

It may be a good idea for those supporting an application to have to give their reasons. At present the default rule is that this only has to be done by those abstaining or voting against.

There was an interesting intervention by Cllr Ajmal Akram who had also done his homework. He asked who was the true land-owner behind the development. The papers said Freshwater but his search of the Land Registry found that it was Daejan Investments (/Holdings) a company that there were concerns about.

He was told that this was not an issue for the Planning Committee and anyway the ultimate developer may be another company.  The Freshwater family own Daejan Investments. There has been controversy because they have no women on their board as this would offend their Orthdox Jewish Charedi values. LINK

The company also launched a very expensive battle with mansion block leaseholders as the freeholder that went to the Supreme Court. Daejan won.  LINK

Maybe that made Cllr Butt pause for thought.

The Committee voted 4-3 in favour of the application. Councillors Akram, Dixon and Maurice all voted against on the ground of non-compliance with various planning guidelines including the loss of commercial space on London Road.

Cllr Rita Begum, as far as I could see took no part in the proceedings. I understand that she has thrown her hat in the ring to become Deputy Leader of the Labour Group at the upcoming AGM,  a post currently held by Milli Patel. Apparently in her pitch for the job she emphasised effective communication with stakeholders including Labour Party branches.  As a Kilburn councillor she is not known for regular attendance at the Kilburn branch.

There will be a later viability review when the site has been developed and tru costs are known but as it stand there is not affordable housing on the site and no contribution towards affordable housing elsewhere in the borough.

 

Police use of facial recognition technology is coming to Brent. Undermining human rights or helpful in fighting crime?

 

Cllr Tariq Dar, the next Mayor of Brent, has hailed the news that facial recognition is coming to Brent on Twitter saying, 'Great news, this will help reduce the crime rate in Brent.'

The zoom meeting on May 21st (email Brentiag.community@gmail.com to attend) will be an important opportunity to debate the drawbacks and merits of the technology and its uses.

Note that the meeting is not asking Brent citizens if they want facial recognition used in the borough, that is stated as a fact: 'Facial recognition technology is coming to Brent!'

It is particularly important in Brent as police are said to favour its use for the scanning of large crowds such as those at Wembley Stadium and the Arena. Another Brent factor is the doubts raised over its accuracy when surveying people of colour and discriminatory use by the police. An additional concern is its use on private developments and private 'public spaces' such as Olympic Way where safeguards may not be strong..

The civil rights organisation Liberty devotes several pages to the issue on its website LINK. Extract below:

What is facial recognition?

Put simply, facial recognition is a form of technology that attempts to match a person’s face from a picture, video footage or live camera feed to a database of facial images.

Do the police use facial recognition?

Yes. Several UK police forces have used facial recognition technology since Leicestershire Police scanned thousands of people’s faces with it at Download Festival in 2015.

Police use has been spearheaded by the Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police. The forces have used the surveillance tech to scan hundreds of thousands of faces at protests, sporting events, concerts, Notting Hill Carnival, Remembrance Sunday, train stations, busy shopping streets, and even the seaside.

In 2022, it’s clear that the Met Police is ramping up its use of the tech.

How does police facial recognition work?

Police facial recognition works by measuring and ‘mapping’ a person’s unique facial features. These ‘maps’ are then converted into a numerical code to be matched against the codes of faces on secretive watch lists.

Up until now, the police have used what is known as ‘live’ facial recognition. This means that the act of scanning a person’s face and comparing to the watch list happens in real time.

It usually involves facial recognition cameras mounted on top of police vehicles stationed in crowded areas. The cameras scan the faces of everyone in range, and the software instantly compares them to the database.

Recently, South Wales Police announced that it was testing facial recognition on officers’ phones, so they could more easily scan people’s faces in the street.

As well as ‘live’ facial recognition, the Met has purchased software that allows it to carry out what is called ‘retroactive’ facial recognition. This is when faces in still images or previously captured video footage are scanned and compared to the watch list.

Who is on the watch list?

The police say the watch lists are made up of dangerous criminals and people wanted by the courts. There are usually thousands of people on a watch list each time a force uses facial recognition.

In 2020, we represented Ed Bridges against South Wales Police (SWP) in the world’s first legal challenge to the use of live facial recognition – more on this below (spoiler, we won).

During the case, we were able to see SWP documents that revealed that anyone could be on the watch list, whether they were wanted in connection with a crime or not. It also became clear that the images on the watch list could come from anywhere. The police could even take them from our social media accounts.

What’s the problem with police facial recognition?

The ‘maps’ that facial recognition makes of your face is unique to you. Much like a fingerprint, it is identifiable biometric data.

With ‘live’ police facial recognition, cameras scan everyone in sight, so this data is likely being snatched from you without your knowledge or consent. And this is certainly the case with ‘retroactive’ police use.

This is gross violation of your human rights.

Police officers have previously admitted to us that they just deploy live facial recognition in crowded areas to scan as many people as possible.

Retroactive facial recognition also turns every photo or video available to the police – including any you upload to social media – into a possible surveillance tool.

Does it work?

Lots has been said about the inaccuracies of the tech and how incorrect matches with the watch list have led to harmful police interactions.

Studies show that it particularly struggles to tell Black people apart, and has difficulty with women of any ethnicity.

But the idea that more accurate tech would lessen the problems with facial recognition is false. History shows that surveillance technology will always be used to monitor and harass people of colour. More accurate tech would only make this easier and discriminatory policing worse.

Is it lawful?

No.

When Liberty and campaigner Ed Bridges took South Wales Police to court for its use of live facial recognition, the Court said the force’s use of the tech was unlawful because it violated everyone’s human rights.

The Court also said that SWP hadn’t adequately taken account of the discriminatory impact of the tech – failing to meet its obligations under equality laws.

And by processing people’s unique biometric data, SWP also breached data protection laws.

You can read more about our legal victory here.

The Met Police has pushed ahead and continues to use live facial recognition after our win against SWP, but the Met’s use must also violate human rights, equality and data protection laws – and is therefore unlawful.

We also believe that retroactive facial recognition is similarly unlawful.

What should happen?

Especially after our court victory, there have been calls for Parliament to create laws governing police use of facial recognition.

However, there is no way of creating a law that solves the human rights or data protection issues, let alone discriminatory policing.

The safest thing to do is ban police from using dangerous facial recognition surveillance technology. More than 80,000 people have signed our petition. Add your name today.

 

1 Morland Gardens – now a TV drama location!

 Guest post by Philip Grant in a personal capacity

 

Wreaths on the front door – but not for Altamira’s funeral!

 

Back in March I asked ‘Is Brent Council busy doing nothing?’ over “Altamira”, Brent’s heritage Victorian villa at 1 Morland Gardens. It appears that, six months after the Council accepted that its planning consent to demolish the building and had expired, it has still not completed the review of what to do with it next.

 

But when I was passing the site on Tuesday 7 May, I saw that it was a hive of activity. What is more, there were two new signs on either side of the entrance. The building had now become the Bakedwell Nursing Home!

 

One of the Bakedwell Nursing Home signs at 1 Morland Gardens, 7 May 2024.

 

The former college, which the Council specially restored and converted the building to be for Brent Adult and Community Education Service (now Brent Start) in the 1990s, might make a good nursing home, but this was not a real one. The beautiful Victorian building, which has been unoccupied since January 2023, had been chosen as a location for scenes in a TV drama!

 

There were marshals to keep onlookers at bay while a large cast and crew prepared for and filmed a crowd scene in the courtyard of the building. It was hot in the bright sunshine, but some of the cast members were wearing winter coats and woolly hats. Why? They were filming a Christmas episode, complete with Christmas trees (and holly wreaths on the front door).

 

Cast and crew, in between filming scenes for a TV drama.

 

I’m glad that 1 Morland Gardens is being put to some use, and presumably bringing in a fee to Brent Council for its use as a location for filming. I hope that they will use that income to repair the edges of the roof, before any more damage is done to the fabric of the Victorian villa by the Council’s neglect of this locally listed heritage building.

 

What TV drama were they filming? I don’t know, but if anyone has an idea which TV show might include a “Bakedwell Nursing Home” in its Christmas programme, please add a comment below!

Philip Grant.

Brent Council pays £3.25m for Falcon Pub ('Gateway'to South Kilburn) site

After a long delay Brent Council has agreed the acquisition of the Falcon Pub in South Kilburn. opposite the Queens Park station car park. The site was designated as the 'Gateway' to regenerated South Kilburn but acquisition was beset by difficulties. The decision notice below gives the final purchase price as £3,250,000.

A local resident observes:

It looks like the Falcon has finally been purchased after such a long time, as the Queen's Park/Cullen House site including The Falcon, received planning approval back in 2012 but is out of date and will now have to be redesigned and sent back to planning.

The original plan included 37 affordable homes for rent, with both 3 bed and 4 bed homes but will this change to make it viable?

The council have described this site as being 'the gateway to the new SK' with most of the new homes being private, together with several 'upmarket retail outlets e.g. a Waitrose superstore'.

BRENT COUNCIL DECISION NOTICE  7.5.24

 

This decision confirms approval of the final terms for the Council to acquire the freehold of the Falcon Public House site situated on Kilburn Lane from Londonewcastle (QP2) LLP in order to assist with the ongoing regeneration of the South Kilburn Housing estate to deliver much needed affordable housing. 

 

A Key Officer Decision Report was approved on 15 April 2024 for a maximum purchase price for the Falcon Public House.  Brent Council and Londonewcastle (QP2) LLP have reached agreement on the value of the Falcon Public House within the maximum sum and authority is therefore sought to proceed with the acquisition.

Decision:

To approve acquisition of the freehold of the Falcon Public House site, located on Kilburn Lane from Londonewcastle (QP2) LLP on the terms agreed in the sum of £3,250,000 ex VAT.

Reasons for the decision:

At its meeting on 14 October 2019, Cabinet resolved to terminate the South Kilburn Queens Park LLP Project Agreement and Members Agreement (“SKQP Agreement”) by 30 October 2019, if an agreement on outstanding conditions precedent could not be reached between the Council and LN.

 

Additionally, Cabinet resolved that, contingent upon the termination of the SKQP Agreement, the Council should enter into an option agreement for the acquisition of the Falcon Public House site situated on Kilburn Lane (the “Site”) from Londonewcastle (QP2) LLP (“LN”).  The authority to exercise this option and negotiate terms for the acquisition of the Site was delegated to the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment (now Corporate Director of Neighbourhoods and Regeneration), in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Regeneration, Property, and Planning (now the Cabinet Member for Regeneration, Planning and Growth).

 

The Council and LN have reached a mutual agreement on the valuation of the Falcon Pub on 19 April 2024.

Alternative options considered:

Given Cabinet’s requirements to terminate the SKQP Agreement and enter into an option agreement for the purchase of the Falcon Public House officers are required to pursue the purchase of the Falcon Public House.

 

Officers have attempted on a number of occasions to agree a purchase price for the Falcon Public House with LN.  Only when it was not possible at the time to agree the purchase price, did officers refer the matter to arbitration as stipulated in the Option Agreement. During the arbitration, Officers continued to make attempts to agree a purchase price.

Interests and Nature of Interests Declared:

None

Wards Affected: Kilburn; Queens Park;

Cabinet/Committee Decision or Scheme of Delegation: Cabinet delegation - 14 October 2019 and Officer Scheme of Delegation (Part 3 - Constitution)

Parties Consulted: Consultation with the Cabinet members for Finance, Resources and Reform and also Regeneration, Planning & Growth has been carried out in relation to this matter. Ward Members have been engaged in terms of the proposed course of action.

Contact: Archika Kumar, Head of Estate Regeneration Email: archika.kumar@brent.gov.uk.

The temporary Wembley Library at Brent Civice Centre - look for better alternatives

 The ground floor Wembley Library at the Brent Civic Centre is closed at present as the redesign of the Civic Centre goes ahead. The library will eventually me on the mezzanine floor but will be temporarily housed on the first floor for several months.

I opened the door on to a huge hubbub when I visited today. The small room is shared with the Civic Centre Hub, also moved from downstairs. There were crowds of people waiting to be seen by Brent staff and use the computer terminals for advice and support. Not a room where anyone could study.

The are no terminals for returning or borrowing books, just one customer counter. There is a much diminished range of book available for borrowing.

Staff are doing their best but I would recommend library users go to Ealing Road Library or Willesden Green Library for Brent library books. Alternatively to borrow books, use IT or study in a peaceful environment Preston Community Library is available on Wednesday's (3.30pm-5.30pm) and Saturday (11am-3pm).

You have until Friday to take a few minutes to sign the petition to put Wembley's tile mural celebrating our sporting and entertainment heritage on permanent display

 

This is the wording of the petition that will be presented to Brent Council Cabinet later in May to keep a vital piece of Wembley's sporting and musical heritage on continuous display.

You have until this coming Friday, May 10th to sign. It only takes a few minutes. SIGN HERE

 

Allow the heritage tile murals in the Bobby Moore Bridge subway at Wembley Park to be put back on permanent public display, by only granting a new advertising lease for the parapets of the bridge.

 

We the undersigned call upon Brent Council, and its Cabinet making the decision on the Award of a Contract for the Bobby Moore Bridge Advertising Lease, to only award a lease from 31 August 2024 for advertising on the parapets of the bridge, and not on the walls of the subway, so that the heritage tile murals on those walls can be put back on public display.

 

The Bobby Moore Bridge and subway were created under a 1991 Brent Council scheme to pedestrianise Olympic Way, in advance of the 1996 Euros football tournament. With support from Wembley Stadium, the Council commissioned a large public artwork to decorate the walls of the subway from the station, and the Olympic Way walls as you emerge from the subway.

 

That public artwork was a ceramic tile mural, made up of individual scenes celebrating a variety of sports and entertainment events from the history of Wembley Stadium and Arena. These Bobby Moore Bridge tile murals were designed to welcome the millions of people passing through the subway each year, on their way to stadium and arena events, with a colourful reminder of Wembley Park’s heritage.
The subway was officially opened in September 1993 by the widow of the former World Cup-winning England football captain, who unveiled a plaque set into one of the mural scenes, showing England footballers playing at the “twin towers” Wembley Stadium, naming the bridge ‘in honour of a football legend’.

 

In 2013, Brent Council granted an advertising lease which allowed a Quintain subsidiary to cover the murals on the tile walls with vinyl advertising sheets, and to erect advertising signs on the walls above both entrances to the subway. A further advertising lease was agreed from August 2017 to August 2021.

 

In 2019, Quintain applied for, and were given (despite strong public opposition), permission to install LED light panels, to be used for advertising, on the walls of the subway, and larger advertising screens on the bridge parapets. The only concession they made, after campaigning by Wembley History Society, was to put the “footballers” mural scene on the east wall of the subway back on permanent public display. The existing lease was also subsequently extended by an additional three years to August 2024.

 

During the 2019 planning process, Brent acknowledged that the Bobby Moore Bridge tile murals were a heritage asset. At the start of Brent’s year as London Borough of Culture, in January 2020, three of the large tile mural scenes on the east wall of Olympic Way, just outside of the subway were put back on temporary display. The Council publicised the event, saying:

 

‘The tiles, which show scenes from famous sports and entertainment events at Wembley Stadium and the SSE Arena, Wembley, are part of Brent’s rich heritage.’

 

 The tile murals in Olympic Way are now back on permanent public display.

 

The end of the current advertising lease is an opportunity to allow Wembley Park’s residents and visitors to enjoy all of the tile murals in the subway again, for the first time since 2013. Potential advertisers have been asked to submit two bids in the tender process for the new advertising lease. One bid will be for adverting on the bridge parapets only, and the other will be for the bridge parapets and the subway walls.

 

Brent’s Forward Plan shows that the decision on the award of the new advertising lease is scheduled for the Cabinet meeting on 28 May 2024. This petition aims to show the level of support from people in the borough for the tile mural scenes in the subway to be put back on permanent public display.

 

Brent and Harrow GLA Election 2024 COMPREHENSIVE RESULTS

Source: London Elects