Guest post by Philip Grant in a personal capacity
The opening paragraph of Cllr. Tatler’s Foreword in the SCIL request Officer Report to 8 April Cabinet.
For “Wembley Matters” readers who have been following my correspondence with Brent’s top Council Officer for Governance (and now with the extended title: Corporate Director, Governance and Law), since my initial guest post on 5 April, here is the final instalment.
When writing about the previous exchange (published on 18 April), I said that I felt ‘the Senior Officer was trying to create a smokescreen’, over the central issue of party political content in a Cabinet Member Foreword (see an example in the extract above, but with a ‘content and style’ of a political manifesto as well). That is why, when replying to her on 17 April, I wrote:
‘So that we can finalise this point, please let me have your straightforward answers to these two questions:
a) Do you accept that the Cabinet Member Foreword, in the SCIL Request Officer Report to the Cabinet meeting on 8 April, contained some political material, including at least one piece of Labour Party political material?
b) Do you agree that it is wrong for Officer Reports to Cabinet meetings to include material which ‘in whole or in part, appears to be designed to affect public support for a political party’ (irrespective of whether or not its publication breaches Section 2 of the Local Government Act 1986)?’
You can judge for yourselves how well (or not) these specific questions were answered in this final exchange of emails on this matter, set out in full below.
Email from Brent Council’s Corporate Director of Governance at 9.12 am on 23
April:
Dear Mr Grant
Thank you for your email,
My role is to advise the council in relation to the law and governance. As a matter of governance, I do not consider there to be any good reason why reports to Cabinet should not contain a section for the relevant Cabinet Member to provide the council policy context of decisions to be made. As indicated previously, it is my view that the Cabinet Member Foreword about which you are concerned did not contain any material covered by the legislation to which you refer.
The new report template, including the section for a Cabinet Member Foreword, was introduced at the request of the Chief Executive.
The Chief Executive has considered your emails and does not consider there to be any need for the inclusion of the Cabinet Member Foreword in the template to be reviewed.
I recognise that you have a strong opinion in respect of this matter. As a result of your emails, I have reminded officers of the purpose of the Cabinet Member Foreword and how it should be presented in reports. However, our opinions differ as to the appropriateness of including the Cabinet Member Foreword in Cabinet reports.
Best wishes
Debra
Corporate Director, Law & Governance
My response to that email at 8.45am on 26 April:
This is an Open Email
Dear Ms Norman,
Thank you for your email of 23 April.
On point 2 of my email to you of 17 April (Are Cabinet Member Forewords appropriate in Officer Reports to Brent’s Cabinet?), our opinions do differ. You have my views on this, and the reasons for them, on record should the matter be raised again in future.
I am disappointed that you have failed to answer either of the two specific questions which I asked you at point 1 of my email of 17 April (Did Councillor Tatler’s Cabinet Member Foreword contain political material?). Instead of the straightforward answers I requested, you have repeated your earlier view that the Cabinet Member Foreword: ‘did not contain any material covered by the legislation to which’ I had previously referred.
I acknowledge and accept that your ‘role is to advise the council in relation to the law and governance.’ But, as Monitoring Officer, should you not also be showing leadership, by example, in answering questions objectively and honestly, rather than evading them?
I can only hope that, when you say you have: ‘reminded officers of the purpose of the Cabinet Member Foreword and how it should be presented in reports’, this means that you have advised them to ensure that there is no party political material included in them in future.
Best wishes,
Philip Grant.
4 comments:
"The Chief Executive has considered your emails and does not consider there to be any need for the inclusion of the Cabinet Member Foreword in the template to be reviewed"??? BUT isn't Ms Wright, the Chief Executive, also Brent Council's returning officer in any elections??? If so she should be keeping promotion of any political party out of all council reports. We pay our hard earned council tax for services provided by Brent Council NOT the Labour Party 😡
To be fair, I don't think that when Kim Wright (who is also Brent's Returning Officer) suggested introducing Cabinet Member Forewords she imagined that they would be abused for party political purposes, as happened in the case I complained about!
I still believe that there is no good reason for such input by Cabinet members into reports made by Council Officers, for the reasons I explained in my emails to Ms Norman.
She might not have expected this but she could correct the report and put a stop to this constant party political promotion.
Dear Anonymous (2 May at 11.39),
Although Brent's Corporate Director for Governance has publicly claimed, via her emails to me, that the Council has done nothing wrong, I would suspect, and hope, that in private she and the Chief Executive have spoken to the Cabinet member involved, and to the Senior Council Officers who sign off Reports, to ensure that there is no repeat of this abuse of Cabinet Member Forewords for political purposes.
[They would look very foolish, and partisan, if they did allow such abuse to happen again in future - and I don't think that they are stupid.]
Post a Comment