I am grateful to 'Reclaiming Education' for this. CfBT took over Gladstone Park Primary School following forced academisation, despite a strong parent campaign to keep it as a local authority school. E-Act runs the Crest academies.
Chris Dunne's letter, "We will come to regret not having defended our education system", in the Financial Times can be
seen here
Henry Stewart's piece looking at the progress of academies against maintained schools can be
read here.
And, in case you missed these pieces on where the money is being wasted and who benefits, there is
this piece in localgov.uk and this
piece in Schoolsweek
Ofsted condemns Academy Trusts: The Government
has announced that it plans to force all schools to become academies.
The major problem is going to be who will run these schools, given that
Ofsted has some major criticisms of at least 8
of the large academy trusts.
Ofsted Inspections of Academy Trusts
Ofsted has carried out focused inspections of academies within 9 multi
academy trusts. Significantly, only one, the last and smallest one, is
positive. The full reports can be found on the Government website
here. A map of where the academies are can be found
here.
CfBT: 11 primary/8 Secondary
“CfBT took on too many academies too quickly. The trust did not have a
clear rationale for the selection of schools, a strategy for creating
geographical clusters or a plan to meet academies’ different needs. As a
result, standards are too low. The trust relied heavily on external
consultants but did not ensure their accountability in securing rapid
and secure improvement. Headteachers were unable to provide each other
with the much needed mutual support or share available expertise.
Current CST leaders openly acknowledge these errors.”
Full report
Academies Enterprise Trust: 32 primary/30 secondary/5 special
"After operating for nearly eight years, the Trust is failing too many
pupils. Almost 40% of the pupils attend AET primary academies that do
not provide a good standard of education. It is even worse in secondary,
where 47% of pupils attend academies that are less than good......
"Children from poor backgrounds do particularly badly in this Trust. The
attainment and progress of disadvantaged pupils, in both the primary
and secondary academies, still lags behind that of other pupils, and
gaps in performance are not narrowing quickly enough......
"The outcomes of the focused inspections failed to demonstrate that the Trust is consistently improving its academies.
Full report
Collaborative Academies Trust: 9 schools
“Collaborative Academies Trust was set up in 2012 by EdisonLearning ......
.........Too many academies have not improved since joining the trust.
Of the five academies that have had a full inspection since joining the
trust, only one has improved its inspection grade compared with its
predecessor school. Two have remained the same and two have declined.
This means that, at the time of the focused inspection, there were not
yet any good or outstanding academies in the trust. “
Full report
E-Act (formerly Edutrust): 23 academies (was more)
“...Nevertheless, the quality of provision for too many pupils in E-ACT academies is not good enough.
......Standards in the secondary academies are too low. Previous
interventions by the Trust to raise attainment and accelerate progress
have not had enough impact and any improvements have been slow.
....Pupils from poor backgrounds do not do well enough. These pupils
make less progress than other pupils nationally. This is an area of
serious concern. “
Full report
Kemnal Academies Trust: 15 secondary/26 primary
“Less than half of your academies were good or better and there are no longer any outstanding academies in your chain. .........
.. an overwhelming proportion of pupils attending one of the academies inspected are not receiving a good education. “
Full report
Oasis Community Learning Trust: 50? Schools – DfE list and Oasis website appear to disagree.
The academy trust has grown rapidly, taking on 30 new academies in the last three years ...
Across the trust, some groups of pupils do not achieve well.
Disadvantaged pupils, particularly boys, make significantly less
progress than their peers nationally.......... there is no evidence of
an overall strategy or plan that focuses on these particular issues.
Full report
School Partnership Trust: 41 schools
“The impact of the Trust’s work in bringing about improvement where it
is most needed has been too slow. Where standards have been intractably
low for some time, the Trust is not driving significant, sustained
improvement. ...
......The standard of education provided by the Trust is not good enough in around 40% of its academies inspected so far. “
Full report
The Education Fellowship: 12 schools
“There is no clear record of improvement in the trust’s academies and
standards across the trust are unacceptably variable. In around three
quarters of the academies, standards are poor.
Standards declined in five of the eight primary academies in 2014. In
the majority of the trust’s 12 academies, the gap in attainment between
disadvantaged pupils and their better off peers, both within the
academies and compared with pupils nationally, remains unacceptably
wide.”
Full Report
Wakefield City Academies Trust – the only positive one!
“Two years into its development, WCAT is making a positive difference to
the quality of provision and outcomes for pupils within its academies. “
Full report
